Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Drug firm threatened us, say MMR familie

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/sciences/story/0,12243,1214795,00.html

 

Drug firm threatened us, say MMR families

 

James Meikle, health correspondent

Wednesday May 12, 2004

The Guardian

 

Families who claim the MMR vaccine has caused illnesses in their children have

accused one of the three drug companies involved in the case of trying to

intimidate them into dropping legal action.

Lawyers for Merck & Co wanted to know whether the families were going to pursue

their cases now that public funding, already worth £15m, was likely to be

withdrawn. They said the costs of the action had been " considerable " and

children and their parents would be " at risk of facing a liability for any

further costs Merck continues to incur in defending the claim " .

About 500 families are thought to have received letters from the company's

lawyers, Lovells, saying Merck would not seek any order for costs as long as

they " give an undertaking to us ... not to issue any further proceedings arising

out of vaccination with MMR vaccine against Merck in this or any other

jurisdiction " .

Jackie Fletcher, of the campaign group Jabs, said she knew of two families who

had already given such under-takings. " It is very threatening and intimidating.

It has already put the fear of God into parents. They are just going to hear

alarm bells and think, 'the cost, the money, my house'. "

Lovells said it had informed the families' solicitors about what they were

doing. " We were not endeavouring to pressure people to act one way or another, "

said a spokeswoman.

The company had simply been stating " the potential cost liability if they cease

to be legally aided " .

 

 

 

 

 

Related articles

27.02.2004: Eight in 10 parents think MMR is safe

23.02.2004: Demand grows for full MMR inquiry

22.02.2004: Maverick view that sparked panic over the triple vaccine

22.02.2004: Ministers call for inquiry into 'flawed' MMR study

21.02.2004: Lancet regrets MMR report

31.10.2003: Q & A: measles and MMR

27.01.2004: Uptake of MMR vaccine rises

11.12.2003: Analysis: Never mind the facts

01.11.2003: Doctors turn on each other as MMR debate rages again

 

Big issue

Public health

 

 

 

 

 

SBC - Internet access at a great low price.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...