How Big Business Evades Taxes

[Guest guest]

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18474

 

 

How Big Business Evades Taxes

 

By Lucy Komisar, Pacific News Service

April 25, 2004

 

Were you stunned by the revelation, days before your taxes were due, that nearly

two-thirds of companies operating in America reported owing no taxes from 1996

through 2000? That over 90 percent of large corporations – with at least $250

million in assets or $50 million in gross receipts – reported owing taxes of

only 5 percent or less?

 

 

 

The law requires firms to pay 35 percent tax on U.S. profits. Had big business

complied, corporate income taxes in 2002 would have been $308 billion instead of

only an estimated $136 billion. Do you wish you knew the corporate secret?

 

 

 

Is your town or state suffering from service cutbacks because tax revenues are

down? Would you like to cut your tax bite from the current 15 to 35 percent to 5

percent or zero? How do corporations do it?

 

 

 

The General Accounting Office report, commissioned by Senators Carl Levin (D-MI)

and Byron Dorgan (D-ND) and released April 5, gave a clue to how. It's called

" transfer pricing, " or improperly shifting income to lower-tax countries.

 

 

 

Firms set up offshore " subsidiaries " which, on their books, perform functions

that let them cut onshore taxes. They may sell their own " logo " to the

subsidiary and then pay a high price to " rent " it back, deducting " rent " as

expense. They may move money to the subsidiary and " borrow " it back, deducting

interest payments. If several of their subsidiaries are involved in a deal, the

firms may grossly inflate profits assigned to those in offshore tax havens,

which levy no or minimal taxes on " profits " claimed there.

 

 

 

The U.S. firm may " trade " with an offshore " shell " it owns – a phony company set

up in a tax haven – pretending it's buying goods or services at a high price or

selling its product low, to create deductions. Because the tax haven keeps

owners' names secret, the IRS won't know the company is " trading " with itself.

 

 

 

Professors Simon J. Pak (Penn State University) and John S. Zdanowicz (Florida

International University) examined the impact of over-invoiced imports and

under-invoiced exports on 2001 U.S. tax revenues. Would you buy multiple

vitamins bought from China at $850 a pound, plastic buckets from the Czech

Republic for $973 each, tissues from China at $1,874 a pound, a cotton dishtowel

from Pakistan for $154, and tweezers from Japan at $4,896 each?

 

 

 

By contrast, U.S. companies, on paper, were getting very little for their

exports. If you were in business, would you sell multiple vitamins to Finland at

61 cents a pound, bus and truck tires to Britain for $11.74 each, color video

monitors to Pakistan for $21.90, missile and rocket launchers to Israel for

$52.03 and prefabricated buildings to Trinidad for $1.20 a unit?

 

 

 

Comparing claimed export and import prices to real world prices, the professors

figured the 2001 U.S. tax loss at $53.1 billion.

 

 

 

We all know that Enron cheated investors by using offshore firms to pretend that

money it borrowed was money it earned. We later found it also used shells to

hide income from the IRS. Enron had 881 offshore subsidiaries: 692 in the Cayman

Islands; 119 in the Turks and Caicos; 43 in Mauritius and 8 in Bermuda. Enron

had no office in the Cayman's, but Box 1350 there received mail for 500

affiliates. Enron's 1996 through 2000 pretax U.S. profits were $1.8 billion, but

it paid no tax in four of those five years. It even got a rebate! Because of

fancy paperwork that invented tax losses even while it was boasting of profits

to investors, Enron got back $381 million from the IRS.

 

 

 

Bob McIntyre, who heads the Washington-based Citizens for Tax Justice, says that

in 1996-2000, Goodyear's profits were $442 million, but it paid no taxes and got

a $23-million rebate. Colgate-Palmolive made $1.6 billion and got back $21

million. Other companies that got rebates in 1998 included Texaco, Chevron,

PepsiCo, Pfizer, J.P. Morgan, MCI WorldCom, General Motors, Phillips Petroleum

and Northrop Grumman. Microsoft, run by the world's richest man, reported $12.3

billion U.S income in 1999 and paid zero federal taxes. In the past two years,

Microsoft paid only 1.8 percent on $21.9 billion pretax U.S. profits.

 

 

 

There are some 55 " offshore " zones, including legendary Switzerland; the

Caribbean with money-laundries Grand Cayman, Antigua, Aruba and the British

Virgin Islands; European favorites Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Austria,

Cyprus; and British Channel Islands Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man. Many banks in

" offshore " centers are subsidiaries of major international banks, including

Citibank, Bank of New York and Credit Suisse.

 

 

 

Why does Washington tolerate the offshore tax evasion system? Because powerful

people benefit. With President Bush on its board, Harken Energy set up an

offshore network that cut its taxes. White House spokesman Dan Bartlett defended

Harken for seeking " tax competitiveness, " the preferred euphemism. When Vice

President Cheney ran Halliburton, it increased its offshore subsidiaries from 9

to at least 44.

 

 

 

Lucy Komisar is a freelance journalist who is writing a book about the offshore

bank and corporate secrecy system.

 

 

 

 

 

Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢