Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Aspartame: New Cancer Study Obligates FDA to Recall

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

New Cancer Study Obligates FDA To Recall AspartameMainPage

http://www.rense.com

 

 

New Cancer Study Obligates

FDA To Recall Aspartame

 

 

From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum

2-28-6

 

OPEN LETTER TO FDA - VIA CERTIFIED MAIL

DELANEY AMENDMENT: If a product causes cancer in animals it cannot be put in

food!

The late FDA Toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, testified to the Senate: " In

view of all these indications that the cancer-causing potential of aspartame

is a matter that had been established way beyond any reasonable doubt, one

can ask: What is the reason for the apparent refusal by the FDA to invoke

for this food additive the so-called Delaney Amendment to the Food, Drug and

Cosmetic Act? Is it not clear beyond any shadow of a doubt that aspartame

has caused brain tumors or brain cancer in animals?

" Given that this is so (and I cannot see any kind of tenable argument

opposing the view that aspartame causes cancer) how would the FDA justify

its position that it views a certain amount of aspartame (50mgm/kgm body

weight) as constituting an ADI (Allowable Daily Intake) or " safe " level of

it? Is that position not equivalent to setting a " tolerance " for this food

additive and thus a violation of that law? And if the FDA itself elects to

violate the law, who is left to protect the health of the public? "

Your toxicologist admitted you broke the law by approving aspartame. He also

said the significance of the studies is much greater if one considers that

brain tumors in rats is very rare: " the historical control rate for such

tumors amongst large populations of rats indicates that no more than 49

animals afflicted with them have been found amongst nearly 60,000 rats, an

incidence rate of less than 1/10th of 1% FDA never fails to consider this

aspect of the " historical control " incidence. ... One cannot help wondering

just why they failed to consider this particular aspect in reference to the

cancer-induction of aspartame. Had they addressed the historical incidence

of brain tumors amongst rats as presented by Dr. Olney, they could not have

failed to conclude what I have concluded: - tumors amongst the rats exposed

to aspartame increases many-fold " 8/1/85 Senate, S 10839 - 10840

FDA broke other laws, as shown in the National Soft Drink Association's long

protest against approval, found in the Senate Congressional Record of 5/7/85

Pages S5507-9: " Section 402 of the FDC Act 21 provides a food is adulterated

if it contains, in whole or in part 'a decomposed substance or if it is

otherwise unfit for food'. Searle has not demonstrated to a reasonable

certainty that aspartame and its degradation products are safe for use in

soft drinks. ... Aspartame is inherently markedly and uniquely unstable in

aqueous media. In a liquid such as a soft drink aspartame will degrade as a

function of temperature and pH. "

The hotter it gets the quicker aspartame decomposes. NSDA next reveals

Searle deliberately used the wrong test: " High pressure liquid

chromatography is a far superior analytical method relative to thin layer

chromatography and numerous HPLC methods exist for the detection and

quantification of amino acids. Searle's choice of TLC over HPLC adversely

affected the quality and type of analytical data generated on aspartame and

its decomposition products in soft drinks.. .. an important decomposition

product of aspartame, aspartic acid cannot be detected at all using TLC. The

inability to account for as much as 39% of aspartame's decomposition

products is significant. The marked and rapid decomposition of aspartame in

soft drinks under temperatures known to prevail is apparent from data in the

present record and discussed above in these objections. "

When responsible scientists, physicians and legislators try to protect us

from these criminals the industry with bottomless checkbooks annihilate our

rights and welfare. Arizona DHS studies showed aspartame in beverages breaks

down into free methanol, wood alcohol, formaldehyde, diketopiperazine,

formic acid (among other toxins), and a ban of aspartame was being

considered. In 1985 Dr. Woodrow Monte, Director of Food Science and

Nutrition Lab, Arizona State University, petitioned for a hearing to ban

aspartame, because high temperatures in that state accelerate methanol and

formaldehyde formation. By an unusual maneuver the legislature altered the

text in a Toxic Waste Bill so to ban regulation of FDA-approved food

additives. This scuttled the hearing Dr. Monte had been promised.

How are these abominations maneuvered? G. D. Searle lobbyists were Andrew

Herwitz, Governor Babbitt's former Chief of Staff, and other powerful hacks.

Then Searle officials contributed to the campaign of Arizona House Majority

Leader Burton Barr. The Committee to Reelect Barr gave campaign

contributions to state representatives Don Aldridge, Karen Mills, & Jan

Breuer. They all voted on the side of G. D. Searle. The legislators were

bought and paid for, and cared not for Arizona citizens. (Gordon 1987)

Another trampled law: Interstate Commerce regulations prohibit shipping

adulterated products, including drugs, across state lines. All aspartame

products are adulterated!

By law an additive must be inert. It's illegal to sell a drug as an

additive. In original studies aspartame triggered brain, mammary, uterine,

ovarian, testicular, thyroid and pancreatic tumors and is an

excitoneurotoxic carcinogenic drug. The 2005 3-year Ramazzini Study on 1,800

rats confirmed what FDA knew from the beginning: aspartame is a

multipotential carcinogen that caused leukemia, cancer of the kidneys,

lymphoma and cancer of the cranial peripheral nerves. Only the rats fed

aspartame developed malignant brain tumors. Producers complain researchers

let test animals finish their lives rather than killing them at 24 months

before most cancers develop. Standard practice is to kill the animals before

they get sick. The Ramazzini study was peer reviewed by 7 world experts.

So FDA's Consumer Online Magazine, February 2006 assures us: " [Aspartame]

has come under fire in recent years from individuals who have used the

Internet in an attempt to link the sweetener to brain tumors and other

serious disorders. But FDA stands behind its original approval of aspartame,

and subsequent evaluations have shown that the product is safe. A tiny

segment of the population is sensitive to one of the sweetener's byproducts

and should restrict intake. However, the agency continually monitors safety

information on food ingredients such as aspartame and may take action to

protect public health if it receives credible scientific evidence indicating

a safety problem "

" A tiny segment? " How about everyone who uses it? In 1995 FDA listed 92

symptoms from 10,000 volunteered consumer complaints including 4 types of

seizures, sexual dysfunction, dozens of neurological problems, comas and

death. So you stopped publishing the list and now deny it existed. I've sent

another 10,000. Renowned doctors have written you. An avalanche of case

histories has swept over you from afflicted victims and survivors

nationwide. I have copies of them. You want credible scientific evidence?

Consider this:

For 16 years FDA rejected aspartame because of brain tumors. Then Don

Rumsfeld, CEO of G. D. Searle Co, went to Washington with Reagan and the

next day his buddy Arthur Hayes was appointed FDA Commissioner. To avoid any

action against aspartame by the outgoing Commissioner an executive freeze

order was ordered by Ronald Reagan treacherously making him powerless till

Hayes got to town. Reagan was a tragic Alzheimer's victim, a dread

affliction aspartame invokes. It is rumored he was addicted to Equal, this

brain eradicating neurotoxin, and memory loss is number 9 on your list of 92

symptoms, right under seizures, number 8.

Now Hayes approved aspartame over the objections of his own scientific Board

of Inquiry. Searle was in money trouble until Hayes, Rumsfeld's stooge,

opened the golden door. Hayes soon was under investigation for

conflict-of-interest, so he escaped with a 10-year consulting contract from

Searle's PR firm for a reported $1,000/day. Consultants don't need to show

up for work; just answer questions on the phone, you know: How's the

fishing, Artie? "

Aspartame interacts with all drugs and vaccines:

http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_interacts.htm

Aspartame-using athletes can drop dead:

http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_msg_scd.htm

Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, 1,038 page medical text

http://www.sunsentpress.com

Excitotoxins, The Taste that Kills http://www.russellblaylockmd.com

Greek studies on aspartame, Jan, 2006

http://www.wnho.net/newgreekaspartame studies.html

Aspartame makers also manufacture deceit http://www.wnho.net/whopper.htm

http://www.wnho.net/recipefordeath.htm

Doctor Ralph Walton's investigation of funding & study-results revealed 92%

of independent studies show aspartame is a toxin. To show aspartame is safe

the producers have to buy & control the study, as they did the Arizona

legislature.

http://www.dorway.com/peerrev.html

Roger Williams, Member of Parliament, has called for a British ban. England

wouldn't have approved aspartame had FDA's intended indictment been known.

Searle sneaked it thru by dealing with Paul Turner of Food Standards, who

approved it without publicity. A Guardian article detailed the collusion.

FDA asked the Justice Department to prosecute G. D. Searle Co. for fraud,

but the producers hired the prosecutors and the case expired with the

statute of limitations. Neat trick! As an encore a parade of FDA officials

including 3 Commissioners have been welcomed into the aspartame business.

Telling FDA of aspartame toxicity is complaining to the Mafia about murder.

In the CDC documentary: SWEET MISERY: A POISONED WORLD [amazon.com & Barnes

& Noble] see Atty. James Turner, former Nader Raider, explain how Don

Rumsfeld called in his markers to get it approved. FDA had revoked approval

because of the brain tumor issue, and because it was not proven safe,

leaving this question: For 16 years until Hayes overruled your Board of

Inquiry the FDA denied approval and tried to indict Searle for fraud: So why

lie about it now? Is there another answer than political corruption?

Meanwhile you attempt a rule change to prevent states from writing food

safety laws. Do you intend to now go against the Bill of Rights, 9 and 10th

amendment which forbids removing the rights of the people and the states?

In the Falklands Robin Goodwin has called for a ban. In New Mexico Stephen

Fox has petitioned the Environmental Improvement Board and the Board of

Pharmacy to ban aspartame in New Mexico based on the fact that aspartame is

adulterated and against the law. Governor Bill Richardson III has been asked

by 10 New Mexico State Senators to declare a state of public health

emergency, in accordance with NMSA 12-10A-5. The emergency derives from

consumers in New Mexico consuming methanol and formaldehyde, derivative

aspartame metabolites.

You say you " may " take action to protect public health if you receive

credible scientific evidence indicating a safety problem? A mountain of

absolute evidence is in your possession! The impeccable Italian study proves

aspartame is " a multipotential carcinogen " . The bottom line of the new Greek

study is Alzheimers. The world's population are guinea pigs, daily proving

aspartame destroys the brain, central nervous system, immune system and

retina, causes cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, precipitates diabetes,

interacts with all drugs and vaccines, triggers obesity and is an endocrine

disrupting drug, an abortifacient, adjuvant and teratogen that brings birth

defects and retardation. University of Texas epidemiological study on 8

years data linked diet drinks with obesity just a few months ago.

Obviously your allegiance is to Big Pharma & their lobbyists, who are the

Washington infestation destroying America with chemical weapons of mass

destruction, while you pretend to be saviors and seek to outlaw vitamins and

herbs.

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/spingola/060207

You once attempted to indict G. D. Searle at a time when you had some

conscience under Title 18, Section 1001.

This US Criminal Code declares: " Whoever, in an matter within the

jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial matter branch of the

Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully

* (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a

material fact;

* (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or

representation;

* (3) or make or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to

contain any materially false,

fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined under the title

or imprisoned.

Today FDA, you are now guilty of the same crime as you deceive the public by

telling them aspartame is safe when you have full knowledge it is not only

not safe, but that you wanted the manufacturer indicted for fraud. Your own

toxicologists, Dr. Adrian Gross and Dr. Jacqueline Verrett observed Searle

researchers' manipulation attempting to make a poison show safety. They just

couldn't do it as Jerome Bressler explained in the FDA audit. They were

caught.

Four years ago I filed a Citizens Petition for ban:

http://www.wnho.net/citizens_aspartame_petition.htm The law requires an

answer in 180 days, which law you broke, and brazenly wrote me that you have

matters of higher priority. Saving consumer lives is low priority? Or was it

impossible to answer my petition that proved from government records that

you lie to America?

James Bowen, M.D. with Lou Gehrigs disease from aspartame, wrote FDA: " The

only responsible action would be to immediately take aspartame off the

market, fully disclose its toxicities, offer full compensation to the

injured, public and criminally prosecute anyone who participated in the

fraudulent placement of aspartame on the marketplace. That includes those

who work so diligently to keep it on the market as well. "

In secret trade information Searle said: " With the spoon-for-spoon, we have

no way of estimating maximum likely abuse and hence need to utilize data

based on almost complete conversion to DKP. If we include this use in the

original FAP, we stand a good chance of ending up with nothing in the short

run and nothing in the long run where as the other approach would give us

something in the short run and, quite likely as much as we would ever get in

the long run. " DKP is the brain tumor agent. They knew aspartame would cause

these tumors worldwide. Premeditated mass murder!

www.dorway.com

Heroic New Mexico Senator Gerald Ortiz y Pino who just sponsored the bill to

ban aspartame said

" Nothing surprises me anymore when it comes to the corrosive influence of

money on our public policy... the final reckoning can only be postponed, not

avoided "

http://www.rense.com/general69/nmm2.htm

I demand that you invoke the Delaney Amendment! James Turner, who with Dr.

John Olney worked to prevent aspartame approval, declares the Delaney

Amendment remains as written, although many have attempted to try and repeal

it and Michael Taylor wrote a clause attempting to minimize it. Yet they did

not succeed he says and it is as valid today as the day it became the law.

The Ramazzini study confirms aspartame is a virulent carcinogen. This

requires FDA to invoke the Delaney Amendment which is emphatic ­ if a

product causes cancer in animals it CANNOT BE PUT IN FOOD.

This should have been done a quarter of a century ago as your scientists

advocated. Refusal will confirm once more that FDA is run by political

lapdogs dedicated to their personal aggrandizement, treacherously condemning

multitudes to disability and death. Mission Possible is a global volunteer

force warning consumers about aspartame because FDA refuses to fulfill its

commission to enforce laws that protect us.

We're taking aspartame brain tumor cases in NY and NJ for litigation, and

this is just the beginning. This is written as an open letter so all reading

it will send it to their congressman, explaining how FDA has sanctioned mass

poisoning by bureaucratic fiat.

Be warned: A higher judge untouched by bribes has pronounced the inevitable

consequence of such duplicity: " Woe to you who are despoiling and who are

dealing treacherously As soon as you have finished as a despoiler, you will

be despoiled. As soon as you have done with dealing treacherously, they will

deal treacherously with you. " Isaiah 33:1 NWT

Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder

Mission Possible International

9270 River Club Parkway

Duluth, Georgia 30097

770 242-2599

http://www.wnho.net/

http://www.dorway.com/

www.holisticmed.com/aspartame -

Aspartame Toxicity Center

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...