Imagine There's No HIV, It's Easy If You Question AIDS

[Guest guest]

 <MedicalConspiracies (AT) googl (DOT) com>

 

 

 

HIV DENIAL OR INFORMED AIDS DISSENT?

 

Think only a few scientists, doctors, academics and journalists doubt the

'HIV' theory of immuno-deficiency? THINK AGAIN.

 

http://www.aras.ab.ca/thelist.htm

 

http://www.aras.ab.ca/aidsquotes.htm

 

 

DID YOU KNOW hundreds of dissenting or dissident scientists, including Nobel

Laureates and members of the National Academy of Sciences, confirming

alternative medicine's long questioning of the virus/germ mode or 'one-cause,

one-course' drug-based model, are calling into question the dominant,

conventional

pharmaceutically-based scientific and medical hypothesis for the alleged viral

pathogenesis and progression of 'HIV=AIDS?'

 

Dissidents dissent from a legitimate scientific and medical bases as to the

causatives and curatives for 30-something previously known and unrelated 'AIDS'

clinically redefined illnesses, all of which occur in those diagnosed 'HIV'

non-specific antibody negative. So, besides the definition and diagnosis of

what is called 'AIDS' Dissidents are also challenging the accuracy and specifity

of the 'HIV' non-specific antibody tests to measure infection with any virus

since there are over 60+ known cross-reactors from pregnancy to the flu to

immunizations to hepatitis to transfusions and on and on. It is a clinical

conundrum or circular construct. TB + HIV = AIDS, whereas TB - HIV = TB and so

on and

so forth on down the list of 30-something previously known and unrelated

illnesses. No one has ever had 'AIDS' or become ill or died of 'AIDS' though

persons [mis]diagnosed as such have become ill and/or died. It is not simply a

matter of semantics, that we are playing a name game. Most of those

[mis]diagnosed

with 'AIDS' have no clinical symptoms, except a non-specific clinical marker

of under 200 T-Cells and there is insufficient evidence 'HIV' positivity is

always or usually a wake-up call rather than a crank call for a stressed immune

system. We recommend all persons address their health irrespective of 'HIV' or

'AIDS' labels.

 

We endorse a multi-factorial approach to immune suficiency and sustainability

in addressing the oxidative stressors including physical[malnutrition],

chemical[toxicologic], biological[dis-ease], psychological[chronic stress], and

spiritual[religious reconciling]-- of which 'HIV' non-specific, non-confirmatory

marker positivity is no reliable indicator of worthiness or wellness.

 

We are disbelievers in a '[sAME]SEXUAL=SIN=SICKNESS' mindset having lead for

many to the unquestioned acceptance of the 'HIV=AIDS=DEATH' paradigm. We

endorse proportionate access to alternative health care for the 50%-2/3 of those

'HIV/AIDS' diagnosed which the HHS says are not in 'HIV' Specialist Care and who

may not choose to access due to their health care philosophy and practise. We

also endorse a model of competition within our health care system to break up

the current model of monopoly of conventional, pharmaceutically-based

medicine. We oppose the enforcement of medical correctness and scientific

censorship

within governmental and private non-profit insititutions such as that enforced

by the AIDS Industry and many organizations within the LGBT community.

 

FIRST, HERE'S A LITTLE MORE ABOUT ME:

 

 

I formerly served on AIDS Project Los Angeles Spiritual Advisory Committee

and as the Director of the InterFaith Project for Gay/Lesbian Concerns at

USC, organizing " Coming Out To God " tabling during National Coming Out Week

three years in a row representing many reconciling organizations and affirming

congregations, also a peer mentoring and drop-out prevention program for gay

and lesbian youth in five area high schools in connection with Project Ten. I

am also the first open AIDS Dissident appointed to the Federation of Gay

Games, Sydney 2002, " AIDS, Breast Cancer and Wellness Subcommittee " and have

spoken to groups as diverse as Log Cabin Republicans. I have been heavily

involved

in the presence of AIDS Dissidence on the net; negotiating links to AIDS

Dissident organizations on websites such as AEGiS and Frontiers and have helped

to found a number of very active AIDS Dissident forums, websites with

thousands of members. I have also organized many on-line and on-land actions,

participated in some forums, conferences. In 2003, I was contacted by the

Secret

Service and asked about my involvement in the AIDS Dissident movement since, I

assume, 'AIDS' is catagorized as a national security issue and AIDS

Dissidents are challenging the dominant scientific and conventional medical

model,

questioning the whole paradigm and protocol.

 

Although I work with many persons of any or no faith, I am also the founder

of DISSIDENT and SAINT, a faith-based social action which has engaged in

direct non-violent action at the 2002 and 2003 Utah Pride Festivals, last year

being denied our booth application after having paid our fee and standing in

the 'HIV' testing line under threat of arrest, respectfully providing AIDS

alternative resources and information, resulting in a number of persons getting

out of the line. Our members include the former 'HIV' Prevention Specialist at

the Utah AIDS Foundation, Rob Jones and founder of gayRMs, a social

fellowship for gay Returned Missionaries.

 

 

 

READ MORE OF KELLY JON LANDIS INVOLVEMENT IN THE DISSENTING SCIENTIFIC AND

ALTERNATIVE HEALTH CARE FREEDOM MOVEMENT:

 

....including testifying before a joint legislative hearing in Sacramento, CA

representing the Group for the Scientific Reappriasal of the HIV/AIDS

Hypothesis and providing testimony to the White House Commission on CAM and many

other

organizations and individuals.

 

'NATURAL' ALLIES to AIDS DISSIDENCE

http://groups.msn.com/AIDSMythExposed/general.msnw?action=get_message & mview=0 &

ID_Message=1582 & LastModified=4675445024672392681

 

 

 

 

Healthfully and Hopefully,

 

Kelly Jon Landis

1317 Euclid St., #9

Santa Monica, CA 90404

kjlandis

310-663-3895 [cell]

 

 

LINKS TO DISCUSSION THREADS...

 

BUGGERY, BUG-CHASING, BAREBACKING

http://forums.delphiforums.com/innocuous/messages?msg=619.1

 

'HIV' Super Strain: Another False Alarm

http://forums.delphiforums.com/innocuous/messages?msg=992.1

 

Logical Fallacies Used Against HIV/AIDS Rethinkers or Dissidents

http://forums.delphiforums.com/innocuous/messages?msg=269.1

 

Why People Diagnosed with 'AIDS' Are Living Longer Now

http://forums.delphiforums.com/innocuous/messages?msg=490.1

 

Who Counts as Socalled " Long-Term Non-Progressors? "

http://forums.delphiforums.com/innocuous/messages?msg=180.1

 

 

 

 

BEYOND FLAT EARTH MEDICINE

 

How popular consensus and the medical establishment have often stubbornly

clung to the wrong ideas, unable to think outside the box. When medically

'correct' wasn't always.

 

 

 

A Brief History of Mismanaged Epidemics

[Disease]---[Popular Consensus]---[Actual Cause]

 

Scurvy------Contagious---Malnutrition: Vitamin C deficiency

 

Beri-beri---Contagious---Malnutrition: Thiamin deficiency

 

Maternal Fever---Non-contagious---Contagious: Unsanitary doctor practices

 

Influenza---Bacteria---Virus

 

Pellagra----Contagious---Malnutrition: Niacin deficiency

 

SMON(1950s-70s, Japan)---New Virus---Iatrogenic: Pharmaceutically induced

 

 

In science as in the law, the affirmative statement or theory bares the

burden of proof for establishing itself. Those who critique it's establishment

in

fact, are not required to reprove or replace another theory of it's aetiology,

especially when immune dysfunction has a multi-factorially influenced set of

unrelated conditions, or according to Alternative Medicine, all

illness/wellness is on a continuum and the result of immune sufficiency or

deficiency.

Alternative Medicine has long questioned the virus/germ mode or 'one-cause,

one-course' drug-based model or theory of illness which is confirmed by the work

of

hundreds of AIDS Dissident Scientists, including Nobel Laureates, Members of the

National Academy of Sciences and pioneers in their fields. Many often

disconnect the alternative theories of diagnosis[PHILOSOPHY] from the

alternative

therapies of treatment [PRACTISE]-- in how Alternative Medicine differentially

diagnoses the individual and treats using a holistic, multi-factorial or

'many-causes, many-courses' approache to illness. They treat the underlying

causes of

symptoms, not diagnosing/treating diseases and certainly not

diagnosing/treating syndromes, which are a 'catch-all' of redefined

classifications or

catagories of conditions. And therefore, Alternative Medicine does not generally

recognize conventional disease classifications.

 

" For disease, all experience shows, are adjectives, not noun substantives. "

" There are no specific diseases: there are [only] specific disease conditions

[or states of dis-ease]. "

 

Florence Nightingale (Nursing Pioneer, Disease Dissident)

 

 

Interesting that AIDS Apologists, or those who defend or defer to the

affirmative

statement or new theory, in this case the 'HIV=AIDS' hypothesis, often

compare AIDS

Dissidents with Flat Earthers, but Galileo was a Dissident, the Flat Earthers

were the

mainstream scientific establishment.

 

There is a famous story about Galileo, that is relevant here, I think.

Galileo was in

trouble with the Church authorities, for his observation of Jupiter's moons,

through his

telescope. (The four moons that he saw are traditionally called the

" Galilean " moons,

after their discoverer.) Anyway, he offered to let an influential member of

the Clergy

look through the telescope at these moons, so that said clergyman would see

what

Galileo had seen. This pious man refused, saying that as long as he did not

look, his

religious faith could remain intact.

 

Sadly, we are dealing with a kind of medical " church " , regarding the HIV

theory; its

members do not want their faith shaken (or stirred! :-) )

 

Scurvy was thought to be transmitted by a microbe for 200 years even while

Dissident

Scientists were arguing it was a Vitamin C deficiency. The implication was

that Seamen

or Sailors engaged in 'buggary' were sexually transmissing a 'bug.'

Homosexuality was

deemed a psychiatric disorder by the medical and scientific establishment

until 1973, a

decade later the medical diagnosis of GRID-- Gay Related Immune Dysfunction

was

described in the literature.

 

 

 

PEER REVIEW REVIEWED

See especially: Little Evidence for Effectiveness of Scientific Peer

Review, British Medical Journal 326:241, February 1, 2003; Study

Faults Industry Clinical Trials: Company-backed Tests Rarely Follow

Guidelines, Report Finds; Associated Press, October 23, 2002, Trials

Funded by for Profit Organizations Favor the Intervention: The

British Medical Journal, August 3, 2002; 325:249; Scientists for

Sale, Health Editor The Guardian, Thursday February 7, 2002; Medical

Journal Eases Conflict Rules The Associated Press; Conflicts of

Interest in Medical Journals, AMA Journal Critiques Report Data,

Associated Press. Hidden Risks, Lethal Truths, Sunday Reporter, Los

Angeles Times June 30, 2002; Something Rotten at the Core of Science?

Trends in Pharmacological Sciences Vol. 22, No. 2, February 2001;

Definning Disease A review by Marilyn Werber Serafini, from National

Journal June 8, 2002: Pharmacracy.

 

INDEX OF ARTICLES IN MAINSTREAM PRESS INCLUDING THOSE LISTED:

http://www.questionaids.com/index.php?page=PeerReview

 

 

 

 

 

New quotes examining the supposed transmission of HIV/AIDS via sex, blood

products etc.

Top 100 Inconsistencies in AIDS Science.

New quotes on the relationship between ‘recreational’ drug use and HIV/AIDS.

 

Similar quotes regarding other AIDS drugs (collectively known as HAART).

Scientific quotes indicating that not just injected street drugs are

associated with HIV and AIDS.

HIV tests and measurements are not as accurate as many claim.

Is HIV/AIDS really transmitted between people, or is this just an illusion?

Myths & Mysteries of HIV and AIDS (html or pdf formats).

 

ARE THE NEWER CLASS OF AIDS DRUGS RESPONSIBLE FOR DECLINES IN 'AIDS'

ATTRIBUTED DEATHS? 

 

YOU GOTTA HAVE HAART [or Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy]? 

 

INDEX OF ARTICLES, PAPERS ON THE NEW CLASS OF AIDS DRUG COCKTAILS

http://healtoronto.com/ptease.html

 

 

CDC data on number of AIDS cases and AIDS deaths. AIDS cases and deaths

CLEARLY begin to decline *PRIOR* to the release of new " miracle " drugs! (Taken

from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats/hivsur92.pdf). However, only 19% of so-called

" HIV-positive " people were on the new drugs by the end of June *1996* (see:

http://www.retroconference.org/2001/abstracts/abstracts/abstracts/494.htm ).

Also, the dosage of the TOXIC AZT has been lowered SUBSTANTIALLY (by at least

50%)

since its release in 1987. See THIS GRAPHIC for related information.

 

 

AIDS DISSIDENT SCIENTIFIC SUMMARY ANALYSIS 

 

 

 

what is hiv? 

 

No laboratory has ever obtained an undisputed sample of human

immunodeficiency virus (HIV), despite countless attempts. Most laboratories,

clinics and

medical corporations have come to accept indirect signs, or 'markers', such as

antibody reactions, proteins, genetic fragments, 'virus-like' particles, enzymes

- that could suggest a virus but also other things - as proving the presence

and existence of an 'HIV'. 

 

If such a virus were ever isolated by standards applicable until the late

1970s, the expectations are that it would be a retrovirus - a concept of viruses

adopted in the early 1970s. The genetic code of a retrovirus would work

'backwards' - 'retro' - transforming RNA to DNA. Most retroviruses are known as

harmless passenger viruses a part of all of endogenous or naturally occuring

genetic make-up. 'HIV' has never been found in suficient quantities to kill

T-Cells

and in fact there is no concensus even after 20+ years as to 'HIV's cytotoxic

or cell killing mechanism. For a decade, researchers thought cancer was

caused by a retrovirus. Professor Peter Duesberg, UC Berkeley, isolated the

first

retrovirus and is a Father of Retrovirology says 'HIV' is a harmless passenger

virus that does not cause the syndrome known as 'AIDS.' 

 

In 1984 some signs suggesting a possible new virus were detected in cell

cultures by the scientific teams of Frenchman Luc Montagnier in Paris, and

American Robert Gallo in Washington, who were trying to explain a single cause

for

'AIDS'. The French called their findings Lymphadenopathy Associated Virus (LAV),

the Americans called theirs Human T-cell Lymphotrophic Virus III (HTLV-III).

The US Government announced at a press conference in 1984 that a new virus was

" the probable cause of AIDS, " yet before any scientific papers inviting peer

scrutiny were published. When such papers appeared in Science some weeks

later, a dispute erupted between Montagnier and Gallo. Gallo was found guilty of

scientific misconduct by a Senate Ethics Committee, for misappropriating

material and photographs of 'virus- like' particles from the French. Because of

the

financial stakes - Gallo and the US government applied for a patent for tests

for 'HIV' the day of the press conference - the matter was eventually solved

only by a closed meeting between the scientists which produced an official

history of events, and a meeting between the US and French Presidents. 

 

However, neither Gallo nor Montagnier ever managed to purify samples of the

virus they claimed to have detected. Many scientists believe that without

fulfiling this traditional primary requirement of virus isolation, multiple

confusions at the molecular biological level are inevitable over what or whether

anything has actually been found. To this day, primary purification of 'HIV' has

never been achieved. The last attempts, published in 1997 in Virology, revealed

proteins and genetic fragments from microvesicles - sub-cell particles - but

no virus. 

 

hiv antibody tests 

 

INDEX OF ARTICLES, PAPERS

http://www.healtoronto.com/hivtest.html

 

 

 

Over the years of the HIV/AIDS theory, different types of test have been used

to try to detect such a virus in patients. These have included (1) antibody

tests, which look for a reaction in a person's blood between their natural

antibodies and synthetic proteins said to belong to HIV, and (2) Polymerase

Chain

Reaction - PCR - or 'viral load' genetic tests, which purport to use part of

the virus' genetic code to detect its presence. 

 

All these tests are indirect, or surrogate. They do not claim to detect any

whole virus. Rather, they use markers to infer whether a virus might be

present. Unfortunately for the accuracy of these tests, these same markers can

be

found in a variety of non-HIV situations. No HIV test of any kind has ever been

validated against the one measure that is not indirect - the gold standard:

physical virus isolation. This is because isolation of HIV by the previously

conventional standards of viral isolation has never been achieved, despite

numerous attempts. 

 

Of the antibody tests for HIV, there are two main types - called ELISA, and

Western Blot. Neither was designed especially for HIV, but are examples of

laboratory methodologies used in many investigations. Around the world many

companies market their versions of the ELISA and Western Blot antibody tests for

HIV. 

 

However, the uncertain, unvalidated nature of these tests is reflected in the

product literature supplied by their manufacturers. 

 

A typical example for the ELISA reads: 

 

" At present there is no recognised standard for establishing the presence or

absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood. " - Axsym System,

Abbott Laboratories 

 

A typical example for the Western Blot reads: 

 

" Do not use this kit as the sole basis of diagnosis of HIV-1 infection. " -

Epitope, Organon Teknika 

 

 

 

 

Neither Isolation Nor Validation

 

Any scientist who declares that a genetic sequence, moreover a genetic

sequence arrived at by human concensus, represents a naturally occuring virus,

has

compromised their scientific integrity. To further suggest that this genetic

sequence represents a unique, exogenous, sexually transmitted and indeed

pathogenic retrovirus is to enter the realms of pseudo-science. Without HIV

isolation

all is mere speculation. Even if HIV were isolated and the proteins tested

for by the ELISA antibody test were actually proteins specific to HIV, an

antibody test would still not be accurate enough for determining actual viral

infection. Everyone tests HIV positive on ELISA if their serum is not diluted by

a

factor of 400 because of non-specific antibodies which bind to any proteins.

 

 

" Of course we looked for it [HIV]... We saw some particles but they did not

have the morphology [shape] typical of retroviruses. ... I repeat we did not

purify. "  

~ Dr. Luc Montagnier, the " discoverer of HIV "  

   (see French transcript of quote from the interview

http://healtoronto.com/lmfrench.html, Did Luc Montagnier Discover HIV?

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/data/dtinterviewlm.htm or video) 

 

 

 

" No one believed we really had that many isolates... No one believed we

really meant that... "  

  ~ Dr. Robert Gallo, also discovered " HIV "  

   (see Gallo Investigated http://healtoronto.com/galloindex.html) 

 

 

 

'viral load' / PCR test 

 

Polymerase Chain Reaction - PCR - or the 'viral load' test, purports to

detect, and quantify, blood-borne HIV in patients. However, the genetic

fragments

it amplifies have never been proved to originate in HIV, or in any virus. The

accuracy of PCR viral load is estimated by leading doctors at plus or minus

300% - i.e. a reading of 90,000 could be 30,000 or 270,000! 

 

The PCR was not invented for HIV. Its Nobel Prizewinning inventor, Dr Kary

Mullis, calls the use of PCR in AIDS medicine, " a tragedy in the practice of

Western medicine " and a " viral load of crap. "  

 

The uncertain unvalidated nature of the PCR for HIV is reflected in the

product literature supplied by manufacturers. A typical example reads: 

 

" The Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test is not intended to be used as a screening

test for HIV or as a diagnostic test to confirm the presence of HIV infection. "

- Roche, Amplicor 

 

VIRAL LOAD OF WHAT?

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/kmullis.htm

 

 

 

 

 

t-cells 

 

Since the beginning of the HIV/AIDS theory, it has been suggested that a

virus kills a certain type of cell of the immune system - called T-cells, or CD4

cells. 'T' refers to the maturing of these cells in the gland of the Thymus,

after their birth in the bone marrow. CD4 is short for Cluster Differentiation

4, referring to a method by which scientists group subsets of these cells

according to protein markers on their surface. 

 

In fact there has never been any proof that an HIV kills these cells, or

indeed that even when they seem in low numbers in a person's blood, cells have

not

instead migrated out of the blood to bone marrow and elsewhere. Despite commo

n assumptions, even by doctors, CD4/T-cell counting remains a poor predictor

of wellness and illness. Since the Berlin World AIDS Conference of 1992

considerably less scientific importance has been attached to T-cell counting.

T-cell

counts are naturally variable, within an individual over time, between

individuals, and between communities. The technology for counting T-cells is

accurate

only to approximately plus or minus 100 cells. The cells sampled for counting

are taken from a person's peripheral blood, where it is widely accepted, less

than 10% of a healthy person's T-cells will ever be found. 

 

CD-4 T-cells: What Do They Count For? [index of articles/papers]

http://healtoronto.com/cd4counts.html

 

 

 

 

what is aids? 

 

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is a medical diagnosis applied

since 1984 in some branches of medicine and the wider public when a person

perceived as infected with a human immunodeficiency virus ('HIV') experiences

one of

29 conditions. But all of the 29 conditions exist or occur in persons

diagnosed 'HIV' antibody negative and are only redefined as 'AIDS' when someone

tests

antibody positive.

 

'Acquired' specifies that the diagnosis does not apply to people with

inherent immune deficiencies. 'Immune Deficiency' is conventionally taken to be

the

inability of a person's body to protect against illness. Syndrome is a group of

symptoms or conditions which seem to be more or less linked. 

 

The growing list of conditions defined 'in the presence of HIV infection'

since 1984 as AIDS, have already all been known for decades. Thus TB plus 'HIV'

is AIDS, TB without 'HIV' is TB. Cervical cancer plus 'HIV' is AIDS, without is

cervical cancer. Etc. 

 

In the early 1980s the 'AIDS-indicator' conditions numbered two: pneumocystis

carinii pneumonia (thought to be caused by an opportunistic protozöon, now

thought to be fungal), and Kaposi's Sarcoma (a quasi-cancer of the skin and

other membranes, first reported in 1887). These two conditions were found

increasingly frequently in the early 1980s in the USA and Europe in men having

sex

with men, and were hypothesised as resulting from infectious immune deficiency,

inferred from counting people's peripheral T-cells. 

 

The syndrome was for a while classified as Gay Related Immune Deficiency

(GRID). The list of 'defining' conditions has increased substantially since

1984,

though the major risk groups for 'AIDS' in the West have remained men who have

sex with men, people with haemophilia (Haemophilia), and IV drug users

(Drugs). Despite early alarms, HIV/AIDS has never become a heterosexual epidemic

in

the West, which does not mean it's a gay disease, but it has failed to meet

the parameters of the infectious model. 'HIV=AIDS' does not fulfill Koch's

Postulates as none of the apes injected with 'HIV' have developed 'AIDS'

conditions. 

 

The international CDC definition of AIDS is specifically founded on

'infection with HIV', assumed or demonstrated. Thus by definition it is nearly

impossible to have 'AIDS' that is not 'correlative' with 'HIV', though it is

widely

accepted that 'Immune Deficiency' can be 'Acquired' in a many ways. There are

also many well documented causes and treatments for all of the 29 'AIDS'

redefined conditons or for addressing aquired immune deficiency.

 

Between different regions of the globe, the criteria and means for arriving

at an AIDS diagnosis vary. There are at least seven varying official criteria

for diagnosing 'AIDS.' 

 

In Africa, for example, the same official concept of AIDS can be found, but

since a meeting in 1985 in the city of Bangui, Cote d'Ivoire, the World Health

Organisation's Bangui AIDS Definition has allowed for diagnosis of AIDS in

Africa with no test performed for 'HIV', if a person experiences the relatively

common African symptoms of weight loss, cough, fever and diarrhoea for more

than a month. 

 

HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS. Why would a virus infect 1% of the US

population and 30% of some Africa countries? Why would a virus cause different

symptoms depending on your age, gender, and location? Why hasn't 20 years worth

of

research and billions of dollars spent created a vaccine or " cure " ? Why do the

pharmaceutical companies and the government censor the scientists, doctors

and laypeople that ask these questions and provide reasonable answers?

 

The infectious model does not work that way. See how 'HIV=AIDS' unfills

Kochs' Three Postulates of the Infectious Model of Disease. This is why there

will

never be an 'AIDS' vaccine or cure for 'AIDS' or a manner to prevent

transmission of the alleged 'HIV.'

 

 

 

'AIDS' IN AFRICA INDEX OF PAPERS, ARTICLES

http://healtoronto.com/africa.html

 

HIV Epidemiology or Epidemio-illogic: An AIDS Numbers Game

http://forums.delphiforums.com/innocuous/messages?msg=606.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

========================================

RESOURCES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

========================================

 

 

 

The GROUP for the SCIENTIFIC REAPPRAISAL 

of the HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS  [100s of pages of articles, papers]

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/find.htm

 

 

 

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL [bMJ]

MODERATED ONLINE DEBATE ON HIV/AIDS http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/326/7387/495

 

[Especially note referenced contributions of The Perth Group of Austrailian

AIDS Dissident Scientists, lead by biophysicist Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos,

whose other extensive archives are found here http://www.theperthgroup.com

and here: http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/perthgroup/]

 

 

 

Roberto Giraldo, MD

President of The Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS

Hypothesis http://www.robertogiraldo.com/eng/papers/papers.html

 

 

TREATING AND PREVENTING ILLNESS ATTRIBUTED TO OR ASSOCIATED WITH " AIDS "

http://www.robertogiraldo.com/eng/papers/TreatingAndPreventingAIDS.html

 

 

 

REBUTTAL TO NIAID/NIH " Evidence for HIV " DOCUMENT

http://www.healtoronto.com/nih

 

 

 

INTERNATIONAL AIDS PANEL, INTERIM REPORT 

Synthesis of deliberations by the panel of experts invited by the President

of South Africa, Thabo Mbeki and the ten experiments the Panel designed in

attempt to resolve the controversy, endorsed by the African National Congress

[AIDS Dissidents/'Denialists' and AIDS Apologists/Orthodoxy]

http://www.polity.org.za/govdocs/reports/aids/aidspanel.htm

 

 

 

REBUTTAL TO DURBAN DECLARATION http://thedurbandeclaration.org/

 

 

 

HEAL [Health Education AIDS Liason] 

http://www.healtoronto.com

 

 

 

ANOTHER LOOK [breastfeeding and 'HIV/AIDS']

http://www.anotherlook.org

 

 

 

MOMM [Mothers Opposing Mandatory Medicine]

http://www.informedmomm.com

 

 

 

AIDS MYTH EXPOSED

[Largest AIDS forum on MSN] http://www.aidsmythexposed.com

 

 

 

V I R U S M Y T H

[Largest AIDS forum on Delphi] http://forums.delphiforums.com/innocuous

---------------------------