AIDS 'Made In America' - Journal of Degenerative Diseases

[Guest guest]

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/09/24/aids_made_in_america_journal_of_\

degenerative_diseases.htm

 

 

 

AIDS 'Made In America' - Journal of Degenerative Diseases

 

 

AIDS is a US government operation directed towards population control,

which springs from secret research into disease causing agents

conducted in government biowar laboratories. That is the view of

Donald W. Scott, M.A., M.Sc. of the Common Cause Medical Research

Foundation, a group in Canada which publishes the Journal of

Degenerative Diseases. In a special edition made available for

download here by Progressive Convergence,

http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/Aids-made-in-America-Jourv5n3.pdf

the 36-page journal attempts to make a murky chapter in recent medical history

more clearly understandable - up to a point. Scott has delved deeply into the

paper trail left by what seems to be a government funded effort to develop

disabling diseases and to find ways to transmit these to a target

population, time coincident with the appearance of " AIDS " on the world

scene.

 

We learn about Thomas Merigan, who wrote in 1971 about " Viral

infections in man associated with acquired immunological deficiency

states " , about Robert Huebner's research for the US Navy into

spontaneously degenerating adenoid tissue aggravating respiratory

disease in submarine crew, as well as Bjorn Sigurdsson's Rockefeller

sponsored research into brucella bacteria causing visna (danish for

wasting) sheep disease. Hilary Koprowski developed and tested a polio

vaccine and " lost his records " . Belgian and Portuguese research that

completed what US scientists were finding and a small pox eradication

campaign that may have been the vehicle for a disease causing agent to

get to Africa. Henry Kissinger figures prominently and Robert Gallo is

of course a king pin, linking the Nixon " war on cancer " research

program with the eventual appearance of AIDS.

 

I cannot possibly do the work of Scott justice just naming a few of

the highlights. His account makes very interesting reading and it

appears that a book is in preparation that will lay our the story in

all its gory detail.

 

That there was indeed a US Special Virus program is confirmed by Boyd

Graves, who has been researching the matter independently. His

timeline of the development of a disabling disease agent that he says

became AIDS is available here,

http://www.boydgraves.com/timeline/

while his flow chart

http://www.boydgraves.com/flowchart/download.html

and other publications can be had for a fee.

 

- - -

 

What really causes Aids?

 

Whether AIDS is indeed caused by a virus coming out of a government

program, that is, whether the program was successful and is now in

full swing, or whether it is - as Jonathan Campbell says - the result

of an accidentally " escaped " bioweaponized swine fever virus is

immaterial for now. It might be neither of these two. I still have

some doubts, not about the existence of the program, but about the

mechanism that makes people ill. I have challenged Graves saying that

yes, there may have been a government effort to develop such a virus,

but what about the abundant data that shows

 

- HIV was never properly isolated

 

- HIV is not present in sufficient numbers in the blood of

'infected' victims to explain the damage done

 

- there is no proper test to unequivocally prove infection with HIV

 

- AZT and other anti-retroviral drugs are highly toxic killing the

patient rather than the virus

 

- those of the 'infected' that keep away from drugs and strengthen

their own immune system by proper nutrition and other natural

intervention seem to survive and indeed rarely if ever progress to

those 'opportunistic' diseases that make up AIDS.

 

All those things would seem to indicate that quite possibly, HIV may

have nothing to do with what's called the clinical picture of AIDS and

that most of the damage could actually be done by the cure that is so

ardently advocated by one and all - that cure which is not a cure at

all, but it is the only accepted way of medical intervention. Peter

Barry Chowka put this quite succinctly in a recent article, when he said:

http://members.aol.com/pbchowka/live8hiv-aids070105.html

 

" Incredibly, the conventional war on AIDS, like no other issue in

history, has succeeded in uniting left and right, liberals and

conservatives, and evangelicals and nonbelievers in a lock-step march

toward institutionalizing the pharmaceutical drug treatment paradigm

worldwide right down to every last person on earth. If this sounds

like an exaggeration, consider the fact that the expressed objective

of policymaking HIV/AIDS control proponents is to test everyone on the

planet for HIV and treat everyone who tests HIV positive with

antiretroviral drugs, even infants who test HIV negative if their

mothers test positive. It is an absolute act of modern heresy and

guaranteed career suicide for anyone in any position of power and

authority to challenge the dominant HIV/AIDS mega-spin including the

belief in the monolithic HIV/AIDS-test-and-treat-with-drug strategy

that is now completely operant at every level of public policy around

the world. "

 

Genocide or accident?

 

Are we looking at viral genocide? a viral accident? pharmaceutical

genocide? medical incompetence? population reduction in action? We

just can't know with certainty with the data available to us so far.

So by all means therefore, let researchers dig into the murky history

of what seems to have been a government program with destructive intent.

 

One useful thing to do would be to find out whether there is any truth

to the viral causation of Aids and what particle may be the culprit.

Is it the mycoplasma, the visna virus, is it the Gallo/Montagnier HIV,

or a combination? More importantly, what is the mechanism by which

that viral agent or that particular combination causes the

destruction. In that sense, it would be immensely useful to know what

went on behind closed doors in the US biolabs for at least a decade

and a half before the sudden emergence of AIDS.

 

But in the meantime, are we to let thousands upon thousands die from

no treatment or wrong treatment? I don't think so. We should

concentrate on cures that work without causing further degradation of

the patient's immune system. Whether it be selenium and other

nutrients as advocated by Harold Foster,

http://www.hdfoster.com/

a silver colloid patented in

the US as a possible cure for AIDS and advocated by Graves, a

multivitamin,

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/07/01/harvard_research_in_tanzania_con\

firms_multivitamin_slows_aids_progression.htm

or simply bettering the standard of living and the diet

of people in Africa and indeed around the world, it does not matter.

Let's just get going with something we know works, and let's not

poison the patient in the meantime, please.

 

But resolve it we must, the riddle of AIDS, if only to prevent the

next hyped up epidemic.

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/03/02/bird_flu_sars_biowarfare_or_a_pa\

ndemic_of_propaganda.htm

 

Here again the link to the special issue:

http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/Aids-made-in-America-Jourv5n3.pdf

AIDS Made in America - Journal of Degenerative Diseases

 

The recent release by Progressive Convergence:

 

http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/press-AIDS-made-in-America.htm

Progressive Convergence release - Whistleblowing: AIDS, Made in America

 

and Harold Foster's book suggesting a nutritional protocol for AIDS

patients:

 

What really causes AIDS - Harold Foster

http://www.hdfoster.com/index.html#Publications

 

As I mentioned Jonathan Campbell's hypothesis of AIDS causation, here

a discussion of it from a recent email:

 

Accidental release of swine fever virus? - Jonathan Campbell

 

I came at the AIDS puzzle from a completely different angle. When I

first started doing research on AIDS, I was fascinated and horrified

with the fact that it seemed to appear first on Haiti and then spread

to San Francisco and New York. A doctor treating two of the first AIDS

patients - two Haitian immigrants in Boston - Dr. Joseph Viera,

suggested that the disease had been carried to SF and NYC by gay men

traveling to Haiti, since it was a popular vacation spot. He had no

idea why it was in Haiti in the first place. Then when I was in NYC

for a protest demonstration in the early 80s I found a flyer that

claimed that African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) had been cultured in

Haiti in the late 60s and early 70s for use in biological war against

Cuba. ASFV kills pigs by wrecking their immune systems. This was

substantiated by an article several years later, citing that the US

had sent the National Guard to Haiti to exterminate the native wild

pig population of Haiti because it was infested with ASFV. There were

other articles as well: research by Drs. Jane Teas and John Beldekas

that they had discovered ASFV infection in men who had AIDS, clusters

of AIDS and ASFV in Belle Glade, Florida where Haitian immigrants had

smuggled pigs from the island, and prevalence of ASFV in Zaire among

pigs where the epidemic of AIDS seemed to be centered at the time in

Africa.

 

There was a missing link, however. Where on earth did Gallo's new

retrovirus, HIV, come from, and why did it seem to be prevalent among

men who had AIDS? It seemed to be similar to a retrovirus prevalent in

green monkeys. Then I read that there had been a big controversy about

the use of chimpanzees in research, as they were an endangered

species. Green monkeys, which were plentiful and not facing

extinction, became the choice for animal experiments and, as it turned

out, green monkey kidney became the popular growth medium for virus

research. BINGO. The green monkey retrovirus was obviously used as the

culture medium for the CIA's ASFV biowarfare agent, adding green

monkey retrovirus into the mix. This mixture was undoubtedly tried out

on wild Haitian pigs to see if it worked, and one or more of them

probably escaped. Or the CIA released them purposely to see what would

happen, since Haiti was considered expendable.

 

The rest is history. Either through ingestion or blood ritual, Haitian

people became the first victims (in the Western Hemisphere, that is).

I stated above many of the other connections as well, supporting this

historical origin. Gallo's new virus, HIV, possibly a mutant of the

green monkey retrovirus, was found to be prevalent in AIDS patients

and declared to be the cause of AIDS, but prevalence does not mean

virulence or causation. The emerging AIDS establishment at the CDC,

led by Gallo, had to come up with weird explanations of how a weak,

lame retrovirus could possible cause disease years later. In 1986,

faced with the possibility that researchers were going to develop an

alternative origin model, Gallo and his following met at Cold Spring

Harbor and *declared* that no funding was to be given to anyone

working on a non-HIV causation of AIDS, and these alternative

researchers were essentially drummed out. AZT, a failed cancer drug,

was tested in a fraudulent manner in Boston, and wild claims of its

efficacy provided the backdrop for the declaration that it was the

first-line defense against HIV, now very firmly entrenched as the

" cause " of AIDS.

 

If what I have stated above is true, what we have is the

possibility that AIDS is the unintended result of biological warfare.

The vast majority of alternative AIDS researchers such as Duesberg -

those who understand that HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS - believe

that AIDS does not have a special viral cause at all. Their claim -

and they have lots of good evidence - is that in the US it is caused

by toxic trauma and/or malnutrition, and that in developing countries

it is just a convenient label given to people who are dying of mundane

causes - malnutrition, typhoid, TB, - all of the ordinary, known

diseases of poverty.

[Guest guest]

Either all, or nearly all of the AIDS virus, on this planet,

can be traced back to the Unitied Nations administered Small Pox

vaccine.

If you make a graph of the number of cases of aids per year,

that graph regress back gradually to one case.

It regresses to thousands of infections,

starting at the time of the Unitied Nations administered Small Pox

vaccine,

in Africa.

 

It is also significant that The United Nations had published a plan

to reduce the world's population.

 

The origin of The AIDS virus, also appears to be a Unitied Nations

supervised facility, at the army's biowarfare lab at Fort Detrick,

Maryland.

 

AIDS was not originally transferred to man via a monkey in Africa

That was the original theory, which has been discredited.

 

The DNA CODON SEQUENCE of the " AIDS like " virus in the green monkey

is not similar to The DNA CODON SEQUENCE of " AIDS " virus in humans.

 

The DNA CODON SEQUENCE " AIDS " virus in humans is 50% similar to

sheep Visna, and 50% similar to Bovine Leukemia.

This indicates that the most probable origin of AIDS was a

recombinant synthesis between to sheep Visna nd Bovine Leukemia.

This part could have been done by accident. It would only involve

mixing sheep Visna infected plasma with Bovine Leukemia infected

plasma. Of course this is ALSO an interspecies cross up.

 

HERE IS THE PROBLEM;

Recombinant synthesis usually produces nothing else

except " incompetants "

(Virus that cannot live, cannot reproduce, or cannot live anywhere

ELSE except where they were formed)

 

The next step could not have been an accident.

It is called REPLICATE PASSAGE.

This involves gradually changing the medium of an " incompetant " ;

which cannot live anywhere ELSE except where they were formed.

In this way the virus in adapted to live in a new species.

Thus an incompetant virus that originated from interspecies cross up

involving sheep and cows,

can be made capable of living in Humans.

 

http://www.konformist.com/1999/aids/manmade.txt

 

<!--StartFragment-->

William Campbell Douglas, M.D., National Health Federation's 1985

Doctor of

the Year, published AIDS:The End of Civilization, 1989, detailing the

development of HIV by scientists working at the army's biowarfare

lab at

Fort Detrick, Maryland.

John Seale, M.D. concludes AIDS was man-made in " Origins of the

AIDS

Viruses, HIV-1 and HIV-2: Fact or Fiction? " (The British Journal of

the

Royal Society of Medicine 81:617-619, 1988) .

Lieutenant Colonel Thomas E. Bearden (U.S. Army, retired) published

AIDS

Biological Warfare in 1988 which maintains that HIV was developed in

American biowarfare labs. Bearden holds a Master of Science degree in

nuclear engineering and a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics,

and

heads an aerospace firm in Georgia.

Dr. Leonard Horowitz, DMD, MA, MPH, a Harvard graduate, published

Emerging

Viruses: AIDS & Ebola -- Nature, Accident or Genocide in 1996.

OutpostS

Book Review calls it: " The most massive, well-documented assembly of

evidence ever published in support of the idea that the AIDS virus

could

have been manufactured as a biological weapon... If you scoff at the

notion,

you won't be so cocky once you see how much evidence exists. "

Washington State Supreme Court Justice William Goodloe (retired)

wrote a

letter in 1990 supporting published articles by award-winning

journalist,

Peter MacKenzie: " I have heard and seen reports of the possible

artificial

origin of the AIDS virus, but until this report have not seen such

compelling evidence of its truth. Mr. MacKenzie has assembled a

remarkable

documentation of heretofore unpublished data, and an immediate

governmental

investigation at the highest level should be commenced. "

Samuel Evans, Chairman of the National Council of Public Auditors,

sent the

following letter to every member of Congress in 1989:

" I address this letter to you requesting a Congressional

investigation into

the 'allegations' that our government is financing research and

development

through genetic heredity engineering to multiply certain viruses to

kill

specific racial groups...The multitude of allegations, statements,

news

articles and personal testimony demands prompt clarification. For

instance,

it is alleged:

1. That Col. David L. Huxsoll, commander of the U.S. Army Research

Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Md., has received

$60

million for research in biological ethnic weapons.

2. That it might be possible to wage ethnic warfare by developing

substances that affect one race more than another. According to

Newsweek

magazine, Jan. 16, 1989, an example would include 'Valley fever,

which is

much more likely to kill blacks than whites.' Another substance,

developed

at a southern California university, is believed to kill only people

with

melanin in their skin.

3. That it is a coincidence that Fort Detrick, which is where Col.

Huxsoll's biological research is being conducted, is also the site

of AIDS

research....

These allegations go to the very root of our constitutional form

of

government and basic world human rights, and must be responded to by

elected

governmental officials on all levels. Nothing less than a

Congressional

hearing and investigation that may lead to a full world conference

in the

United Nations is needed to clarify and defuse the alleged mentally

deranged

plan of world depopulation by ethnic weapons. " (Published in the

Executive

Intelligence Review, 3/17/89)

The Report of the President's Chemical Warfare Commission

admits, " The

rapid advances of genetic technology -- in which the US for now is

fortunately the leader -- offer the predictable likelihood of new

agents

being developed for which no vaccines or counteragents are known or

available. " (Govt. Printing Office, 1985)

Erwin Chargaff, Professor Emeritus of Columbia University and

recipient of

the National Medal of Science for his work with DNA, warned of such

research: " I should say that the spreading of experimental cancer

may be

confidently expected. " (New York Times Magazine, 8/22/76)

The Foundation for Economic Trends, in a 1987 lawsuit, forced the

Department of Defense to divulge its operation of 127 chemical and

biological warfare research sites in the U.S., including

universities and

corporations, as reported by Science Magazine (2/27/87).

 

http://www.oakvillegreen.com/food_safety.htm

 

Aids and Green Monkeys

 

In his earth-shaking book, " AIDS: The End of Civilization " , Dr.

William Campbell Douglass asked, " Do you really think some green

monkey all of a sudden bit some guy in the ass and presto, AIDS all

over the world? "

 

Dr. Douglass was examining the hype that the Centers for Disease

Control in Atlanta have been peddling to the public about the AIDS

virus, HIV. Douglas's book tells the " whole " story of the

development of HIV at the Ft. Detrick(Maryland) military

installation. His story is well documented and confirms the theme of

the futuristic movie " Outbreak " .

 

The Strecker memorandum - aids is man made

 

----

-------------------------------- In

, " 121 " <121@l...> wrote:

>

>

>

>

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/09/24/aids_made_in_america_j

ournal_of_degenerative_diseases.htm

>

>

>

> AIDS 'Made In America' - Journal of Degenerative Diseases

>

>

> AIDS is a US government operation directed towards population

control,

> which springs from secret research into disease causing agents

> conducted in government biowar laboratories. That is the view of

> Donald W. Scott, M.A., M.Sc. of the Common Cause Medical Research

> Foundation, a group in Canada which publishes the Journal of

> Degenerative Diseases. In a special edition made available for

> download here by Progressive Convergence,

> http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/Aids-made-in-America-

Jourv5n3.pdf

> the 36-page journal attempts to make a murky chapter in recent

medical history more clearly understandable - up to a point. Scott

has delved deeply into the paper trail left by what seems to be a

government funded effort to develop disabling diseases and to find

ways to transmit these to a target

> population, time coincident with the appearance of " AIDS " on the

world

> scene.

>

> We learn about Thomas Merigan, who wrote in 1971 about " Viral

> infections in man associated with acquired immunological deficiency

> states " , about Robert Huebner's research for the US Navy into

> spontaneously degenerating adenoid tissue aggravating respiratory

> disease in submarine crew, as well as Bjorn Sigurdsson's Rockefeller

> sponsored research into brucella bacteria causing visna (danish for

> wasting) sheep disease. Hilary Koprowski developed and tested a

polio

> vaccine and " lost his records " . Belgian and Portuguese research that

> completed what US scientists were finding and a small pox

eradication

> campaign that may have been the vehicle for a disease causing agent

to

> get to Africa. Henry Kissinger figures prominently and Robert Gallo

is

> of course a king pin, linking the Nixon " war on cancer " research

> program with the eventual appearance of AIDS.

>

> I cannot possibly do the work of Scott justice just naming a few of

> the highlights. His account makes very interesting reading and it

> appears that a book is in preparation that will lay our the story in

> all its gory detail.

>

> That there was indeed a US Special Virus program is confirmed by

Boyd

> Graves, who has been researching the matter independently. His

> timeline of the development of a disabling disease agent that he

says

> became AIDS is available here,

> http://www.boydgraves.com/timeline/

> while his flow chart

> http://www.boydgraves.com/flowchart/download.html

> and other publications can be had for a fee.

>

> - - -

>

> What really causes Aids?

>

> Whether AIDS is indeed caused by a virus coming out of a government

> program, that is, whether the program was successful and is now in

> full swing, or whether it is - as Jonathan Campbell says - the

result

> of an accidentally " escaped " bioweaponized swine fever virus is

> immaterial for now. It might be neither of these two. I still have

> some doubts, not about the existence of the program, but about the

> mechanism that makes people ill. I have challenged Graves saying

that

> yes, there may have been a government effort to develop such a

virus,

> but what about the abundant data that shows

>

> - HIV was never properly isolated

>

> - HIV is not present in sufficient numbers in the blood of

> 'infected' victims to explain the damage done

>

> - there is no proper test to unequivocally prove infection with HIV

>

> - AZT and other anti-retroviral drugs are highly toxic killing the

> patient rather than the virus

>

> - those of the 'infected' that keep away from drugs and strengthen

> their own immune system by proper nutrition and other natural

> intervention seem to survive and indeed rarely if ever progress to

> those 'opportunistic' diseases that make up AIDS.

>

> All those things would seem to indicate that quite possibly, HIV may

> have nothing to do with what's called the clinical picture of AIDS

and

> that most of the damage could actually be done by the cure that is

so

> ardently advocated by one and all - that cure which is not a cure at

> all, but it is the only accepted way of medical intervention. Peter

> Barry Chowka put this quite succinctly in a recent article, when he

said:

> http://members.aol.com/pbchowka/live8hiv-aids070105.html

>

> " Incredibly, the conventional war on AIDS, like no other issue in

> history, has succeeded in uniting left and right, liberals and

> conservatives, and evangelicals and nonbelievers in a lock-step

march

> toward institutionalizing the pharmaceutical drug treatment paradigm

> worldwide right down to every last person on earth. If this sounds

> like an exaggeration, consider the fact that the expressed objective

> of policymaking HIV/AIDS control proponents is to test everyone on

the

> planet for HIV and treat everyone who tests HIV positive with

> antiretroviral drugs, even infants who test HIV negative if their

> mothers test positive. It is an absolute act of modern heresy and

> guaranteed career suicide for anyone in any position of power and

> authority to challenge the dominant HIV/AIDS mega-spin including the

> belief in the monolithic HIV/AIDS-test-and-treat-with-drug strategy

> that is now completely operant at every level of public policy

around

> the world. "

>

> Genocide or accident?

>

> Are we looking at viral genocide? a viral accident? pharmaceutical

> genocide? medical incompetence? population reduction in action? We

> just can't know with certainty with the data available to us so far.

> So by all means therefore, let researchers dig into the murky

history

> of what seems to have been a government program with destructive

intent.

>

> One useful thing to do would be to find out whether there is any

truth

> to the viral causation of Aids and what particle may be the culprit.

> Is it the mycoplasma, the visna virus, is it the Gallo/Montagnier

HIV,

> or a combination? More importantly, what is the mechanism by which

> that viral agent or that particular combination causes the

> destruction. In that sense, it would be immensely useful to know

what

> went on behind closed doors in the US biolabs for at least a decade

> and a half before the sudden emergence of AIDS.

>

> But in the meantime, are we to let thousands upon thousands die from

> no treatment or wrong treatment? I don't think so. We should

> concentrate on cures that work without causing further degradation

of

> the patient's immune system. Whether it be selenium and other

> nutrients as advocated by Harold Foster,

> http://www.hdfoster.com/

> a silver colloid patented in

> the US as a possible cure for AIDS and advocated by Graves, a

> multivitamin,

>

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/07/01/harvard_research_in_ta

nzania_confirms_multivitamin_slows_aids_progression.htm

> or simply bettering the standard of living and the diet

> of people in Africa and indeed around the world, it does not matter.

> Let's just get going with something we know works, and let's not

> poison the patient in the meantime, please.

>

> But resolve it we must, the riddle of AIDS, if only to prevent the

> next hyped up epidemic.

>

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/03/02/bird_flu_sars_biowarfa

re_or_a_pandemic_of_propaganda.htm

>

> Here again the link to the special issue:

> http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/Aids-made-in-America-

Jourv5n3.pdf

> AIDS Made in America - Journal of Degenerative Diseases

>

> The recent release by Progressive Convergence:

>

> http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/press-AIDS-made-in-America.htm

> Progressive Convergence release - Whistleblowing: AIDS, Made in

America

>

> and Harold Foster's book suggesting a nutritional protocol for AIDS

> patients:

>

> What really causes AIDS - Harold Foster

> http://www.hdfoster.com/index.html#Publications

>

> As I mentioned Jonathan Campbell's hypothesis of AIDS causation,

here

> a discussion of it from a recent email:

>

> Accidental release of swine fever virus? - Jonathan Campbell

>

> I came at the AIDS puzzle from a completely different angle. When I

> first started doing research on AIDS, I was fascinated and horrified

> with the fact that it seemed to appear first on Haiti and then

spread

> to San Francisco and New York. A doctor treating two of the first

AIDS

> patients - two Haitian immigrants in Boston - Dr. Joseph Viera,

> suggested that the disease had been carried to SF and NYC by gay men

> traveling to Haiti, since it was a popular vacation spot. He had no

> idea why it was in Haiti in the first place. Then when I was in NYC

> for a protest demonstration in the early 80s I found a flyer that

> claimed that African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) had been cultured in

> Haiti in the late 60s and early 70s for use in biological war

against

> Cuba. ASFV kills pigs by wrecking their immune systems. This was

> substantiated by an article several years later, citing that the US

> had sent the National Guard to Haiti to exterminate the native wild

> pig population of Haiti because it was infested with ASFV. There

were

> other articles as well: research by Drs. Jane Teas and John Beldekas

> that they had discovered ASFV infection in men who had AIDS,

clusters

> of AIDS and ASFV in Belle Glade, Florida where Haitian immigrants

had

> smuggled pigs from the island, and prevalence of ASFV in Zaire among

> pigs where the epidemic of AIDS seemed to be centered at the time in

> Africa.

>

> There was a missing link, however. Where on earth did Gallo's new

> retrovirus, HIV, come from, and why did it seem to be prevalent

among

> men who had AIDS? It seemed to be similar to a retrovirus prevalent

in

> green monkeys. Then I read that there had been a big controversy

about

> the use of chimpanzees in research, as they were an endangered

> species. Green monkeys, which were plentiful and not facing

> extinction, became the choice for animal experiments and, as it

turned

> out, green monkey kidney became the popular growth medium for virus

> research. BINGO. The green monkey retrovirus was obviously used as

the

> culture medium for the CIA's ASFV biowarfare agent, adding green

> monkey retrovirus into the mix. This mixture was undoubtedly tried

out

> on wild Haitian pigs to see if it worked, and one or more of them

> probably escaped. Or the CIA released them purposely to see what

would

> happen, since Haiti was considered expendable.

>

> The rest is history. Either through ingestion or blood ritual,

Haitian

> people became the first victims (in the Western Hemisphere, that

is).

> I stated above many of the other connections as well, supporting

this

> historical origin. Gallo's new virus, HIV, possibly a mutant of the

> green monkey retrovirus, was found to be prevalent in AIDS patients

> and declared to be the cause of AIDS, but prevalence does not mean

> virulence or causation. The emerging AIDS establishment at the CDC,

> led by Gallo, had to come up with weird explanations of how a weak,

> lame retrovirus could possible cause disease years later. In 1986,

> faced with the possibility that researchers were going to develop an

> alternative origin model, Gallo and his following met at Cold Spring

> Harbor and *declared* that no funding was to be given to anyone

> working on a non-HIV causation of AIDS, and these alternative

> researchers were essentially drummed out. AZT, a failed cancer drug,

> was tested in a fraudulent manner in Boston, and wild claims of its

> efficacy provided the backdrop for the declaration that it was the

> first-line defense against HIV, now very firmly entrenched as the

> " cause " of AIDS.

>

> If what I have stated above is true, what we have is the

> possibility that AIDS is the unintended result of biological

warfare.

> The vast majority of alternative AIDS researchers such as Duesberg -

> those who understand that HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS - believe

> that AIDS does not have a special viral cause at all. Their claim -

> and they have lots of good evidence - is that in the US it is caused

> by toxic trauma and/or malnutrition, and that in developing

countries

> it is just a convenient label given to people who are dying of

mundane

> causes - malnutrition, typhoid, TB, - all of the ordinary, known

> diseases of poverty.