Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Women warned - babies best before 30

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=2 & objectid=10345997

Women warned - babies best before 30

 

17.09.05

 

Women who wait until their 30s to start a family are defying nature and risking heartbreak, say doctors in a stark warning about the dangers of older motherhood. Three obstetricians from Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals in London have catalogued the problems - including high blood pressure, diabetes and fetal abnormality - that can befall older women who become pregnant. Men are also affected because sperm counts decline with age and their children have an increased risk of schizophrenia and genetic disorders. Many couples wrongly believe they can fall back on IVF if all else fails. But doctors say this "expensive, invasive" treatment has a high failure rate. Seven out of 10 women who have IVF do not achieve a live birth, rising to nine out of 10 over the age of 40. The obstetricians say in the British Medical Journal: "Women want to have it all, but biology is unchanged ... If women want room for manoeuvre they are unwise to wait till their 30s." The biologically optimal time for childbearing is 20 to 35, but the age of first motherhood has been rising since the mid-1970s, with the sharpest increases in births to women in their late 30s and early 40s. And the rate of complications and abnormalities is increasing. Susan Bewley, consultant obstetrician at Guy's and lead author of the study, says: "If you want a family - and most people want a couple of children - and you are going to complete your childbearing by 35 and leave time for recovery in between, you would be wise to start before 30. "People are aware ageing is a bad thing but the bio-panic women used to have on their 30th birthday has moved up to the 40th birthday. "In surveys of older mothers, 50 per cent said they delayed because they had not met a suitable partner. "Maybe instead of waiting for Mr Right they ought to wait for Mr Good-Enough, if they want children." Social and psychological benefits of older motherhood were found to be slight compared with the physical risks. - INDEPENDENT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't noticed any difference in the level of personal satisfaction, health and happiness, between women that have had, and women that do not have children. I'm sure things would be better for those women that choose not to have children, if it weren't for the way our culture constantly bombards women with the notion that having children is some kind of obligation, or the only "real" way for women to achieve satisfaction or fulfillment in their lives. The fact that the age at which women are having children continues to be put off, continues to advance to later years, reveals to me, that this "obligation" is not being felt as much or as easily by women.

JP

 

-

Misty

Health and Healing ; Armageddon or New Age

Monday, September 19, 2005 4:06 AM

Women warned - babies best before 30

 

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=2 & objectid=10345997

Women warned - babies best before 30

 

17.09.05

 

Women who wait until their 30s to start a family are defying nature and risking heartbreak, say doctors in a stark warning about the dangers of older motherhood. Three obstetricians from Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals in London have catalogued the problems - including high blood pressure, diabetes and fetal abnormality - that can befall older women who become pregnant. Men are also affected because sperm counts decline with age and their children have an increased risk of schizophrenia and genetic disorders. Many couples wrongly believe they can fall back on IVF if all else fails. But doctors say this "expensive, invasive" treatment has a high failure rate. Seven out of 10 women who have IVF do not achieve a live birth, rising to nine out of 10 over the age of 40. The obstetricians say in the British Medical Journal: "Women want to have it all, but biology is unchanged ... If women want room for manoeuvre they are unwise to wait till their 30s." The biologically optimal time for childbearing is 20 to 35, but the age of first motherhood has been rising since the mid-1970s, with the sharpest increases in births to women in their late 30s and early 40s. And the rate of complications and abnormalities is increasing. Susan Bewley, consultant obstetrician at Guy's and lead author of the study, says: "If you want a family - and most people want a couple of children - and you are going to complete your childbearing by 35 and leave time for recovery in between, you would be wise to start before 30. "People are aware ageing is a bad thing but the bio-panic women used to have on their 30th birthday has moved up to the 40th birthday. "In surveys of older mothers, 50 per cent said they delayed because they had not met a suitable partner. "Maybe instead of waiting for Mr Right they ought to wait for Mr Good-Enough, if they want children." Social and psychological benefits of older motherhood were found to be slight compared with the physical risks. - INDEPENDENT

 

 

Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/107 - Release 9/20/2005

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...