Nice and Legal, National Parks Belong to UN (see US Treaty)

[Guest guest]

Our National Parks Now Belong to United Nations:

Across this great land, our national parks, wildlands, forests, and lakes are being turned over to UN control. Joseph Urso, Jr., a friend of the ministry who hails from Knoxville, Tennessee, recently sent me a photograph of the entrance sign of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Notice the telling phrase on the sign: " AN INTERNATIONAL BIOSPHERE RESERVE. " This means that, under the United Nations Biodiversity Treaty, a precious resource-owned by American citizens for over 200 years-has been turned over to the UN's bureaucrats for control. Yes, you and I will continue to pay taxes for the maintenance and upkeep of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. But we no longer own it. Now, the UN has ultimate jurisdiction. This alone is startling evidence that the once independent nation-state known as the United States of America is going out with a whimper and not a bang. Our sovereignty is coming to an end. http://www.texemarrs.com/061997/PARKS.HTM On March 6, 2001, Congressman Don Young introduced H.R. 883, the American Land Sovereignty Act. H.R. 883 requires congressional approval to add any landsowned by the United States to the World Heritage List, a UNESCO-administered list established by the 1972 World Heritage Convention. Two years ago, on May 20, 1999,the House passed (by voice vote) an identical bill also numbered H.R. 883, but the legislation did not pass in the Senate. Sponsors of that bill expressed concern that addinga U.S. site to the U.N. list, which is currently done under executive authority, might not protect the rights of private property owners or the states. The Clinton Administrationand opponents of the bill argued that the designation has no effect on property rights and does not provide the United Nations with any legal authority over U.S. territory. In related legislation, P.L. 106-429, in which H.R. 5526, the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs appropriations act for 2001 was referenced, containedlanguage prohibiting funding from this bill for the United Nations World Heritage Fund. The FY2000 contribution to the Fund was $450,000. The World Heritage Fund provides technical assistance to countries requesting help in protecting World Heritage sites. This paper describes the operation of the UNESCO Convention and will be updated periodically. This legislation would also affect U.S. participation in the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Program, which includes some of the same sites

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:OKLhgRCKz_oJ:hutchison.senate.gov/Environment8.pdf+UN++national+parks+in+US & hl=en Coeur d'Alene- A 24-year old treaty with the United Nations has been dusted off and brought to the forefront of an age-old battle over management of America's natural resources. Through the treaty, known as the World Heritage Convention of 1972, environmental groups and the Clinton administration have brought in an arm of the United Nations to help 'protect' Yellowstone National Park.

The groundwork has been laid to do the same in several other sites across the nation, including Glacier National Park near Kalispell, Montana, and could eventually have a direct effect on North Idaho. While environmentalists and National Park Service (NPS) officials claim the U.N. involvement is merely in an advisory capacity, key congressional members and two western state legislatures say it's an effort to gain control of this country's natural resources. " This is part of a plot for centralization, and, in fact, global-type control, " said Representative Don Young, R-Alaska, chairman of the House Committee on Resources. " There are people who say as population increases, the only way to keep anarchy from occurring is through centralized control by government. In this case, world government. " Young said if the U.N. is allowed to gain control of U.S. natural resources, it can control the nation's economy and, therefore its people.

http://amprom.org/documents_pages/ungoeswest.html I Know there is alot of info here, I Know it might be overwelming. PEOPLE have to know that we ARE being sold out. How long until The UN plops Armed Forces in our LAND. I understand If YOU dont care. Why should I Its not going to effect me? Because it might, if not you, your kids. WAKE UP people.

 

 

 

UN National parks In The USWhen you go to a bank to get a loan, most the time you have to put up something worth about the same. I was up flipping channels last night,for some reason I stopped on a public tv show, that a radio broad caster in texas made, Like I said it was late so I cant rember his name. It was about the US being sold out by the goverment. To the United nations, and China. He want to talk to National parks around the the US, to see if the park rangers knew of the parks being Given to the UN as backing for our money. If we go in to default, the Parks belong to the UN. Including the Grand Cayon, Yellowstone..... He said this is the reason that parts of the parks where closing. It was a pre Bush show. I Did some searching heres what I found on the subject. OUR NATIONAL PARKS NOW BELONG TO UNITED NATIONS Across this great land, our national parks, wildlands, forests, and lakes are being turned over to UN control. Joseph Urso, Jr., a friend of the ministry who hails from Knoxville, Tennessee, recently sent me a photograph of the entrance sign of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Notice the telling phrase on the sign: " AN INTERNATIONAL BIOSPHERE RESERVE. " This means that, under the United Nations Biodiversity Treaty, a precious resource_owned by American citizens for over 200 years_has been turned over to the UN's bureaucrats for control. Yes, you and I will continue to pay taxes for the maintenance and upkeep of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. But we no longer own it. Now, the UN has ultimate jurisdiction. This alone is startling evidence that the once independent nation-state known as the United States of America is going out with a whimper and not a bang. Our sovereignty is coming to an end. As a consequence, across the U.S.A., our parks and wilderness areas are slowly being closed to the public. Roads inside the parks are being grazed over. Mountain passes and hiking paths are being blockaded. " No fishing, " " No hunting, " " No trespassing " signs are being erected everywhere on public lands. Entrance fees are being jacked up 100%, even 500% higher, to keep American families out of their own lands.

 

http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/new_world_order/Rockefeller_UN_National_Parks.html World Heritage Sites are designated under a treaty to which the United States is a party, entitled the ?Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage,? which was adopted at the General Conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in Paris on November 16, 1972. Although the United States no longer participates in UNESCO(1), the U.S. Department of State in conjunction with the National Park Service and other agencies, administers the program. Sites continue to be added to the 22 already-designated parks, buildings and other sites in the United States. Both ?cultural? and ?natural? Heritage are protected under the treaty. Although national sovereignty is an issue of concern in all designations, the experience of private property owners indicates that it is the resource designations which pose the potentially serious detriment to their private property rights. Under Article 2 of the Convention, ?natural heritage? is defined http://www.prfamerica.org/UN-WHS-NPS-Seeks.html

Here is a list of all Propeties. http://www.prfamerica.org/ExistingTentativeUNWHS.html

UNESCO's WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE ACTIONS: Yellowstone National Park has now been designated as a " World Heritage Site in Danger. " Adul Wichiencharoen of Thailand, head of the World Heritage Committee said, " certainly the forest areas around Yellowstone belong to the same ecosystem. All these lands must have protection so their integrity is not threatened. " Wichiencharoen stressed that he respected U.S. sovereignty, however as a signator to the 1972 World Heritage Convention treaty, the U.S. has a duty to preserve the Yellowstone ecosystem across administrative boundaries. Similarly designated were Glacier National Park and Carlsbad Caverns and its minerals. In a " Bozeman Chronicle " report, Senator Conrad Burns of Montana is reported as stating; " It is astonishing that a group of extreme environmentalists can invite a few folks from the United Nations to circumvent laws that Americans and Montanans have worked hard for and lent their voices to. " Burns expressed fears the committee " would also seek to put a halt to activities in the park such as travel by motor vehicles as well as to create a buffer zone around the park that would run roughshod over private property rights. http://www.iahushua.com/WOI/biosphere.html 1972 Treaty Grants the United Nations Control Over American Historical Landmarks The Founding Fathers would be shocked to learn that some of their successors have given control of key American sovereign territory to other nations. Through an international treaty, the United States is allowing the United Nations and its member countries access to and control of American soil - in particular, our historic buildings and treasured wilderness. http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA341.html LAND GRAB here.

http://www.warroom.com/grab.htm Undeterred by the will of the people, the Clinton administration continues to work closely with the UN to implement its secretive, pantheistic agenda of global governance through a host of additional programs? all designed to strip private property rights from landowners and revert much of the American landscape back to its natural wilderness condition. Only through prayer, factual documentation and direct action by citizens can this agenda be exposed, then stopped. http://www.discerningtoday.org/members/Digest/1999Digest/September/UN%20Taking%20Over.htm

Looks like the UN is a major player. Here is at least one more link. for now. Millions of Americans will flock to the country's national parks this summer. Dazzled by nature and history, will they notice the missing signs, crumbling roads, or disappearance of park rangers? Facing what some people warn is a " crippling " budget shortfall, many national park superintendents are being asked to consider cutting their ranger staffs, services, and visitor center hours? and possibly even closing down completely on certain days. http://100777.com/node/view/709 Keep the Statue of Liberty Free: An Argument for Congressional Oversight of U.N. Land Designations in the U.S. by Amy Ridenour This Independence Day more than most, our Statue of Liberty has special meaning. With its flame of freedom overlooking the site of the World Trade Center complex, the Statue of Liberty eloquently symbolizes the characteristics for which Americans are most known: our love of freedom; our commitment to self-government, our resistance to foreign threats and oppression. Too bad the Statue of Liberty itself is under foreign domination. That's because the Statue of Liberty, like 17 other sites in the United States, has been designated as a U.N. World Heritage Site under the auspices of the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural organization (UNESCO). A U.N. World Heritage Site is a cultural or natural landmark that receives international protection under the terms of the 1972 World Heritage Treaty.1

http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA419.html Last year a United Nations-designated panel, at the behest of the Clinton administration, called for the creation of uninhabited " buffer zones " around several U.S. national parks. Since then roughly two dozen U.S. parks and preserves, covering millions of acres of public land, have been included in the plan. Now, however, new plans to expand these zones are in the works, and the outrage has reached a near fever pitch among experts who say these U.N.-designated sites are merely attempts to " globalize " huge portions of the United States -- with taxpayers picking up the tab.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15179 There is no longer any doubt that the NWO ( and UN and Third Way) are taking over the United States. This is being done slowly and systematically through such coverts actions as destroying our Constitution through manipulation of Congress and taking control of our public lands. The extent is becoming alarming. Just browsing down the Opening Title Page will provide a vivid and alarming scenario. http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/list-nwo.htm