If Santa Claus posted he did something does that make it so??

[Guest guest]

Again, just wanted to clear some of the diffused air

on the airwaves.....Janice

 

The key evidence thus far is as follows.

 

Original Associated Press and Israeli radio reports

stated that Binyamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli

Prime Minister received a warning before the first

explosion that an attack was about to take place.

Scotland Yard passed on a warning to the Israeli

embassy who forwarded it to Netanyahu. Netanyahu was

due to make a speech at a Hotel adjacent to the site

of the first blast. He cancelled the speech and

remained in his hotel room.

 

Arutz Sheva sourced Army Radio with the following.

 

" The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in

advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin

Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make

his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first

explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he

was to address and economic summit. "

 

For an hour after the first blast, the government and

the news media were reporting that the cause was an

electrical power surge. If the government knew bombs

were going to go off before they did, why did they

report for an hour that it was an accident? Were they

trying to bide time so they could get their story

straight?

 

Both Scotland Yard and the Israelis have since denied

that they had any foreknowledge of the attack.

 

Since the original report, major TV news networks have

been completely silent on the Netanyahu story. They

are just repeating claims that there was no prior

knowledge.

 

About an hour after the story broke, Associated Press

started altering their online news stories, stating

that Netanyahu got the warning after the first blast

and not before. It seems as if they are scrambling to

co-ordinate their cover story. Either there were no

warnings or the warning was after the first blast. The

dithering seems to suggest there is some confusion on

how to successfully hide the smoking gun, the fact

that Netanyahu was warned before the first explosion.

 

Why didn't the people on the trains and buses get the

same warning?

 

On June 7th, MI5 downgraded the London terror alert

from its second highest level " severe general " to a

lower category of " substantial " .

 

Why did they do this, was somebody lowering the guard?

 

The timing of the attack is very suspicious, coming on

the heels of the start of the G8 conference. Both Blair and George Bush in their speeches have tried to

paint the attack as an assault on globalization and

the G8 itself. This means that if you're against the

G8 and globalization, then you're with the terrorists!

It's a tried and tested method they've used time and

time before.

 

In any crime you look at history and motive, The

British government has been caught in multiple

examples of carrying out bombings in London which were

then blamed on the IRA. They even had one of their own

MI5 agents wihin the Omagh bomb squad. Click here for

an archive of this evidence.

The British government has also been caught scripting

fake terror alerts for political effect. Days before

the Queen's speech notable November speech in which

she first introduced ID card legislation, ITN news

correspondents and government lobbyists got together

to cook up a fake terror alert involving planes

attacking Canary Wharf. A London Independent article

later exposed this as a crass psy-op campaign to get

the British people behind the ID card.

 

From Putin blowing up his own apartment buildings to

Israel being behind Hamas, the evidence is

consistently clear that large scale terrorism is

always state sponsored.

 

The Madrid train bombing is another example. The

bombers were found to be police informants with close

links to the Spanish security services. They had

access to the most secure areas of the Madrid train

system. The Spanish government initially tried to

blaim the Basque group ETA for the blast in the hope

that the people would rally behind the government and

get them re-elected. After ETA denied involvement and

the people started saying the government was involved,

the Spanish government had to blame Al-Qaeda and kill

some patsies by claiming they blew themselves up

during a raid.