If DDT were sweet, would you put it in your tea?

[Guest guest]

If DDT were sweet, would you put it in your tea?

http://proliberty.com/observer/20050520.htm

 

Government-approved sucralose is the chemical cousin of some extremely toxic

substances

 

by The Idaho Observer

 

Sucralose, under the trade name " Splenda " , is expected to replace aspartame as

industry’s choice to artificially sweeten foods and beverages for public

consumption. Industry is being forced to phase out the use of aspartame due to

public awareness that the artificial sweetener, which is 10 percent free

methanol (a deadly neurotoxin), is an underlying cause of chronic illness in

America and around the world.

 

Researcher and biochemist James Bowen, MD, has released a report categorizing

sucralose within a class of chemicals that include known toxins. " Sucralose,

under the trade name ‘Splenda’, is a chlorocarbon—a chlorinated synthetic sugar

molecule. Chlorocarbons are highly toxic to many species. Common chlorocarbons

include carbon tetrachloride, trichlorethelene and methylene chloride—all of

which are deadly in varying degrees, " Dr. Bowen explained.

 

Dr. Bowen described chlorine as " nature’s Doberman attack dog—a highly

excitable, ferocious atomic element employed as a biocide in bleach,

disinfectants, insecticides, WWI poison gas and hydrochloric acid. "

 

Sucralose is a molecule of sugar that has been chemically manipulated to

surrender three hydroxyl groups (hydrogen + oxygen) which are then replaced with

three chlorine atoms. " Natural sugar is a hydrocarbon built around 12 carbon

atoms. When turned

 

into Splenda, it becomes a chlorocarbon, in the family of Chlorodane, Lindane

and DDT, " says Dr. Bowen.

 

It is logical for the layman to ask, " why is sodium chloride, or common table

salt, considered safe while sucralose is considered toxic? "

 

When molecular chemistry binds sodium to chlorine to make table salt, a

chlorocarbon is not the result. So sucralose and table salt are as different

chemically as oil and water.

 

" Unlike sodium chloride, chlorocarbons are never nutritionally compatible with

human metabolic processes and are wholly incompatible with normal human

metabolic functioning. " When chlorine is chemically reacted into

carbon-structured organic compounds to form chlorocarbons, the carbon and

chloride atoms bind to each other by mutually sharing electrons in their outer

shells. This arrangement adversely affects human metabolism because our

mitochondrial and cellular enzyme systems are designed to completely utilize

organic molecules containing carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and other

electrostatically compatible nutritional elements, " Dr. Bowen explained.

 

More simply stated, chlorocarbons such as sucralose deliver chlorine directly

into our cells because the body is programmed to metabolize carbons. Dr. Bowen

added, " This characteristic makes chlorocarbons effective insecticides and

preservatives. Preservatives, by nature, must kill everything which has life or

metabolism in it to prevent bacterial decomposition. "

 

Dr. Bowen believes that the damage done by ingested chlorocarbons continues with

the formation of other chlorinated poisons. " Any chlorocarbons not directly

excreted from the body intact can cause immense damage to the processes of human

metabolism and, eventually, internal organs, " said Dr. Bowen.

 

The liver is a detoxification organ, which has to deal with ingested poisons.

Much of this chlorocarbon poisoning affects and damages the hepatocytes, the

liver’s metabolic cells, damaging them. The brain and nervous system are highly

subject to metabolic toxicities and solvency damages by chlorocarbon poisoning.

The high solvency of chlorocarbons damages the human nervous system and many

other body systems including genetics and the immune function. Thus,

chlorocarbon poisoning can cause cancer, birth defects, and immune system

destruction.

 

Dioxin and PCBs are other well-known examples of chlorocarbons.

 

Just like aspartame, which achieved marketplace approval by the U.S. Food and

Drug Administration (FDA) after animal studies had demonstrated toxicity,

sucralose has also failed to demonstrate safety in clinical trials with animals.

Where aspartame was found to cause brain tumors in rats and mice, sucralose was

found to cause the shrinkage of thymus glands (the biological seat of immunity)

and liver inflammation in rats and mice.

 

In the coming months we can expect to see a lot of media hype expounding upon

the virtues of Splenda—the trade name for sucralose. We should not be fooled

once again into accepting the safety of an artificial sweetener on the advice of

the FDA or the food and beverage industries. In terms of potential long-term

human toxicity, we should regard sucralose alongside its chemical cousin DDT,

the insecticide now outlawed because of its horrendous long term toxicities at

even minute trace levels in human, avian, and mammalian tissues.

 

James Bowen, M.D. has spent 20 years researching artificial sweeteners after his

use of aspartame resulted in being diagnosed with Lou Gehrig’s disease. Dr.

Bowen’s mission is to warn the world of the toxicity of tabletop poisons like

aspartame, Splenda and Neotame.

 

 

 

Home - Current Edition

Advertising Rate Sheet

About the Idaho Observer

Some recent articles

Some older articles

Why we're here

Subscribe

Our Writers

Corrections and Clarifications

 

Hari Heath

 

Vaccination Liberation - vaclib.org

 

 

 

Stop Using Government Money. Click here for Real Money Backed by Gold and

Silver.

 

Make money, help your country and support The Idaho Observer at the same time by

signing up as a NORFED Redemption Center.

 

 

 

The Idaho Observer

P.O. Box 457

Spirit Lake, Idaho 83869

Phone: 208-255-2307

Email: observer

Web:

http://idaho-observer.com

http://proliberty.com/observer/

[Guest guest]

> Government-approved sucralose is the chemical cousin of some extremely

> toxic substances

 

Such a scary statement about government-approved table salt would be

similarly accurate.

 

Duncan Crow