The FDA has set the United States up to lose in a future WTO Trade dispute on the Codex vitamin issue.

[Guest guest]

The FDA has set the United States up to lose in a future WTO Trade dispute on the Codex vitamin issue. http://alternativecancer.us/doctors.htm After reading this page, consider reading how conventional treatment selection is right for groups but wrong for an individual. Go to Understanding Treatment Selection.Every year in the United States, more people die of the side effects of pharmaceutical drugs than die in car accidents. Clearly this is not good medicine. Despite the yearly claims of great new cancer drugs*, the percentage of Americans who die each year from cancer has remained pretty much the same since 1970. This is not progress. There Is Good MedicineDid you know that astragalus is a powerful broad-spectrum antiviral agent? It is safe and effective. I used astragalus to cure myself of chronic fatigue syndrome, but your doctor will never recommend it. Conventional medicine has nothing to combat the vast majority of viruses (they only suppress symptoms), but still doctors will not recommend astragalus because it is plant based. The non-profit Nutra Sanus** web site has lots of astragalus information. Plant based treatments cannot produce large profits because they cannot be patented. Large profits are needed to pay for the expensive FDA approved clinical trials. So plant based treatments never get FDA approval to treat a disease. Your doctor can only prescribe treatments that are FDA approved. If your doctor prescribes treatments that are not FDA approved, he or she can be sued or lose their license. Table of Contents | Return to the Comparison Table* | Bottom The End of Plant-based MedicineAround the begining of the last centruy, Rockefeller and Carnegie obtained control over medical school education through the use of the Flexner Report which was written by Henry Pritchett, who was in the employ of Rockefeller. This report favored only the medical schools that concentrated on using drug-based treatments. These schools started to receive large amounts of money from Rockefeller and Carnegie. In 1905, 160 medical schools were in operation. By 1927, 17 years after the Flexner Report, the number had dropped to 80. From then on, pharmaceutical company control of medical school curriculums was assured by the large amounts of money they would "give" to the schools for approved research. That research of course was approved or disapproved by the pharmaceutical companies. Only research that would lead to treatments that could be patented received approval. That eliminated any treatments derived from plants. Treatment derived from plants are more often safe than dangerous. Treatments that can be patented are more often dangerous and kill more people each year in the USA than car accidents.Table of Contents | Return to the Comparison Table* | Bottom The Story of the Persecution of Three Alternative DoctorsIn 1994 New York alternative healthcare advocates helped pass the Alternative Medical Practice Act designed to help guarantee that people would have access to alternative medical doctors by barring the State of New York from taking away the licenses of Alternative Medical Doctors just because they practiced alternative or non conventional medicine. Despite the passing of this legislation, the Medical Board bureaucrats found a way to avoid the intent of the law. Alternative medical doctors were once again targeted and eliminated from medicine. Here are three examples.Table of Contents | Return to the Comparison Table* | Bottom Understanding Treatment Selection Everyone’s body chemistry is different. The key to surviving cancer is to find the most effective treatments for you. Finding those treatments may sound difficult, but it can be done in a few minutes using the Test Kit.Conventional Doctors Do Little During the past ten or twenty years there has been a number of “new treatments” for almost every condition. All of those treatments worked pretty well. But, new treatments are usually just a little better than the old. It would make sense for your doctor to test all the old and new treatments on you to see which one would be the most effective (if he knew a quick test method). However, in most cases, you are automatically given the newest treatment. Prescribing older treatments makes doctors appear to be uninformed. Finding Your Best Treatments If a patient believes in a treatment because it worked for a friend, it is reasonable for the patient to take that treatment. Many studies have shown significant, positive effects from believing in a treatment even when the "treatment" was a sugar pill. Taking an additional treatment because the patient’s research showed that it is the best treatment is also reasonable, but neither of these approaches help a patient find the most effective treatment based on his or her body. Only neurofeedback can.How Many Treatments It is reasonable to combine two or three treatments, it increases the odds of survival. However, if you take multiple treatments, check for compatibility using either the Compatibility column on the Comparison Table or the Test Kit. NeurofeedbackFor years medical science has had neurofeedback machines that can produce an effectiveness rating for any treatment. All that is needed is a sample of that treatment. If you use the test kit with these machines, you can determine the most effective treatments from among the 12 most recognized alternative cancer treatments and any others for which you have samples. Conventional treatment selection cannot do anything like this.To learn more about using neurofeedback, Table of Contents | Return to the Comparison Table* | Bottom ReoccurrenceMost tumors contain a small percentage, approximately 2%, of multiple drug-resistant cells (MDR cells). Chemo is not effective against these cells. After the first round of chemo, if the chemo is effective, all of the cells that are not MDR, are destroyed. Since this accounts for the vast majority of the tumor mass, the tumor will appear to be effectively destroyed. However, the MDR cells remain and start to multiply. Eventually, a new tumor is formed that is entirely MDR. The next time chemo is used, none of the cells will be destroyed because they are all MDR. For a doctor to recommend chemo a second time when it is clear that the tumor is mostly MDR is a tremendous error. Unfortunately, conventional medicine has nothing that works against MDR cells. The alternative cancer treatment, Paw Paw is the only cancer treatment that has shown effectiveness against MDR cells. But, of course conventional doctors cannot recommend it.Table of Contents | Return to the Comparison Table* | Bottom The Current Legislative Situation for AlternativesThere are four areas under discussion:United States California New York State EuropeUnited StatesThe FDA has set the United States up to lose in a future WTO Trade dispute on the Codex vitamin issue. They've done this in conjunction with the pharma dominated National Academy of Science. If they succeed, United States citizens will lose access to high potency vitamins, herbs, and plant based supplements. To counter this threat to our health freedom support the Alliance for Natural Health** (ANH) lawsuit to overturn the EU Food Supplement Directive**. The United States is likely to follow the EU regulations due to how globalization and harmonization have been structured. Make a donation to ANH. Please forward this widely and encourage people to joined the Mailing List of the International Advocates for Health Freedom** (IAHF) website for updates concerning our health-care freedom.Stop the FTAA or Lose Access to Suppliments in 2005 Stop the FTTA** web site and learn all sorts of actions you can take.CaliforniaCurrently, it is a felony for a doctor to recommend any alternative cancer treatment. However, at the time of this writing, April 2004 there is a bill in front of the state legislature to legalize the only form of safe cancer treatment, alternative. It is essential that all aware Californians send a letter stating their support for the bill authored by Assembly Member Ray Haynes making it legal for physicians to practice using alternative treatments of cancer. The letter should be addressed to Assembly Member Ray Haynes, State Capitol and e-mailed, faxed or sent regular mail to our office. We will make copies of the letter to go to members of the committees that will be hearing our bill. When appropriate we will send a copy to your senator and assembly member as the bill moves through different committees. This will give greater support and save staff time for Assemblyman Haynes. California Citizens for Health Freedom 8048 Mamie Ave. - Oroville, California 95966 Fax (530) 534-5854 The letter can be a simple paragraph stating your support for AB 2393 sponsored by Assembly Member Haynes . If you are a professional, represent an organization, or have a business please use your letterhead. New York StateNew York Natural and Complementary Practices Project (NYNCPP) is a coalition of New York State consumers seeking to broaden the public's access to complementary and natural practices in New York. They have the latest information on what is happening and how you can help.EuropeIn August 2005 the EU Food Supplements Directive (FSD) will ban many supplements including natural vitamins such as mixed tocopherols (natural vitamin E), carotenoids and b-12 methylcobalamin, all forms of sulphur, boron, vanadium, silicon and most trace elements, the most readily absorbed and safest forms of calcium, magnesium, zinc, selenium, chromium and molybdenum. The FSD will severely limit the doses of vitamins and will remove all high-dose products from the market. It will include future restrictions on nutrients such as fatty acids, amino acids, enzymes, probiotics, phytonutrients, etc. The directive will dramatically limit future innovation in the supplements industry, and seriously impact retail outlets, complementary practitioners and consumers who choose to take responsibility for their own health and let food be their medicine. This is likely to happen in the United States unless we become more aware of our legislation and the Europeans. This has not been the case historically.Table of Contents | Return to the Comparison Table* After reading this page, consider reading how conventional treatment selection is right for groups but wrong for an individual. Go to Understanding Treatment Selection.Table of Contents There is Good Medicine The End of Plant-based Medicine Alternative Doctors Treatment Selection Reoccurrence LegislationSearchTo search for a phrase, use quotes. Results appear in a Google page. All results, except the first few commercial results, if any,, are from alternativecancer.us. Site Map | Read the Disclaimer | Contact Us .