Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Toxin Found In Brains Of Dead Alzheimer's Victims

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

--- The 5 kingdoms were Monera, Protista, Plants, Animals and Fungi.

The kingdoms fundamentally split the prokaryotes from the eukaryotes

by placing the prokaryotes on their own as Kingdom Monera. It is

still considered to be the most natural and unambiguous kingdom

within this system, its boundary set by distinct prokaryotic

organisation of the nucleus. The prokaryotes are bacteria, which

include the Cyanophyta, the blue-green algae. Despite the

prokaryotic organisation of the Cyanophyta, they possess unique

photosynthetic pigments not present in the rest of the group, and

they release free oxygen as a by-product of photosynthesis.

Organisms of the other four kingdoms all consist of cells organised

on the eukaryotic plan

 

 

In , " madcowcoverup " <k_t723>

wrote:

> --- hi Carol,

> I'd like to see those that sell the product eat it straight out of

> the lake, just so the could back up what they say, but I doubt

very

> seriously they would be happy with the results tho

> and the actual intention of the ? was what critters eat algae in

> nature ? (scum-suckers come to mind) and just because you and all

> your customers( and their pets) eat it does not mean they we

> intended to eat it after all people/ animals(via their masters)

eat

> all kinds of things they should not

> and the word is an Indian word used to identify REPTILIANS cause

> they lack the necessary vocals to pronounce it(hehehe!)

> karl

>

>

> In , " Carol Minnick "

> <carolminnick@a...> wrote:

> > Karl,

> >

> > I guess it could be food for any kind of critter. I eat it, and

> so does my

> > dog, and 3 cats, and 21 goldfish. And so does the neighbor's

> horse. And so

> > do 18 tigers, 17 bears, 16 mountain lions, 9 African Lions, 2

> Leopards, 2

> > Servals, 1 Jaguar, 1 Bobcat, and 1 Coati-Mundi - all who live at

> the Rocky

> > Mountain Wildlife Conservation Center.

> >

> > I don't think you would have to process it if you didn't want

to -

> you could

> > eat it out of the lake if you so desire. But most people would

> rather not

> > eat it that way - just like pretty much anything else they eat -

> everything

> > gets cooked or processed before people find it appealing. Not

too

> many

> > people eat totally raw food.

> >

> > I don't know what you mean by the word kininigan. It's not in my

> > dictionary. Sorry, I have no idea what it is, so no, I can't

> pronounce it.

> > So I'm not human?

> >

> > Carol

> >

> >

> > " madcowcoverup " <\

> > ---Hi Carol

> > food for what kind of a critter????? a reptilian???an

amphibian??

> a

> > fish?? if it has to be processed was it meant to be eaten by

> humans?

> > it does not matter that the manfacturers do not make medicine

they

> > make the same claims( healthy and non-toxic) and just because

> they've

> > been in business 22 years is not a valid argument, there are

> plenty of

> > companies that have been poisoning the public for much longer

than

> 22

> > years and they are still in business and a lot of people still

> > mistakenly think those same companies provide good products

> > just out of curiosity can you pronounce the word kininigan?

> > if not I seriously doubt you be human

> > karl

> >

> > \

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

---let me rephrase the question for you in nature what organisms

naturally eat bacteria?? since blue/green algae is in reality

bacteria, if you eat it from the water will it result in a bacterial

infection??

and is there another agenda to removing oxygen producing organisms

from the environment? hmmm

 

 

 

In , " madcowcoverup " <k_t723>

wrote:

> --- The 5 kingdoms were Monera, Protista, Plants, Animals and

Fungi.

> The kingdoms fundamentally split the prokaryotes from the

eukaryotes

> by placing the prokaryotes on their own as Kingdom Monera. It is

> still considered to be the most natural and unambiguous kingdom

> within this system, its boundary set by distinct prokaryotic

> organisation of the nucleus. The prokaryotes are bacteria, which

> include the Cyanophyta, the blue-green algae. Despite the

> prokaryotic organisation of the Cyanophyta, they possess unique

> photosynthetic pigments not present in the rest of the group, and

> they release free oxygen as a by-product of photosynthesis.

> Organisms of the other four kingdoms all consist of cells

organised

> on the eukaryotic plan

>

>

> In , " madcowcoverup "

<k_t723>

> wrote:

> > --- hi Carol,

> > I'd like to see those that sell the product eat it straight out

of

> > the lake, just so the could back up what they say, but I doubt

> very

> > seriously they would be happy with the results tho

> > and the actual intention of the ? was what critters eat algae in

> > nature ? (scum-suckers come to mind) and just because you and

all

> > your customers( and their pets) eat it does not mean they we

> > intended to eat it after all people/ animals(via their masters)

> eat

> > all kinds of things they should not

> > and the word is an Indian word used to identify REPTILIANS

cause

> > they lack the necessary vocals to pronounce it(hehehe!)

> > karl

> >

> >

> > In , " Carol Minnick "

> > <carolminnick@a...> wrote:

> > > Karl,

> > >

> > > I guess it could be food for any kind of critter. I eat it,

and

> > so does my

> > > dog, and 3 cats, and 21 goldfish. And so does the neighbor's

> > horse. And so

> > > do 18 tigers, 17 bears, 16 mountain lions, 9 African Lions, 2

> > Leopards, 2

> > > Servals, 1 Jaguar, 1 Bobcat, and 1 Coati-Mundi - all who live

at

> > the Rocky

> > > Mountain Wildlife Conservation Center.

> > >

> > > I don't think you would have to process it if you didn't want

> to -

> > you could

> > > eat it out of the lake if you so desire. But most people

would

> > rather not

> > > eat it that way - just like pretty much anything else they

eat -

> > everything

> > > gets cooked or processed before people find it appealing. Not

> too

> > many

> > > people eat totally raw food.

> > >

> > > I don't know what you mean by the word kininigan. It's not in

my

> > > dictionary. Sorry, I have no idea what it is, so no, I can't

> > pronounce it.

> > > So I'm not human?

> > >

> > > Carol

> > >

> > >

> > > " madcowcoverup " <\

> > > ---Hi Carol

> > > food for what kind of a critter????? a reptilian???an

> amphibian??

> > a

> > > fish?? if it has to be processed was it meant to be eaten by

> > humans?

> > > it does not matter that the manfacturers do not make medicine

> they

> > > make the same claims( healthy and non-toxic) and just because

> > they've

> > > been in business 22 years is not a valid argument, there are

> > plenty of

> > > companies that have been poisoning the public for much longer

> than

> > 22

> > > years and they are still in business and a lot of people still

> > > mistakenly think those same companies provide good products

> > > just out of curiosity can you pronounce the word kininigan?

> > > if not I seriously doubt you be human

> > > karl

> > >

> > > \

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

---Everything in the " United States " is For Sale: roads, bridges,

schools, hospitals, water, prisons ,the people etc.

(Executive Order 12803)

I wonder who bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time to check?

 

 

 

 

In , " madcowcoverup "

<k_t723> wrote:

> ---let me rephrase the question for you in nature what organisms

> naturally eat bacteria?? since blue/green algae is in reality

> bacteria, if you eat it from the water will it result in a

bacterial

> infection??

> and is there another agenda to removing oxygen producing organisms

> from the environment? hmmm

>

>

>

> In , " madcowcoverup "

<k_t723>

> wrote:

> > --- The 5 kingdoms were Monera, Protista, Plants, Animals and

> Fungi.

> > The kingdoms fundamentally split the prokaryotes from the

> eukaryotes

> > by placing the prokaryotes on their own as Kingdom Monera. It is

> > still considered to be the most natural and unambiguous kingdom

> > within this system, its boundary set by distinct prokaryotic

> > organisation of the nucleus. The prokaryotes are bacteria, which

> > include the Cyanophyta, the blue-green algae. Despite the

> > prokaryotic organisation of the Cyanophyta, they possess unique

> > photosynthetic pigments not present in the rest of the group,

and

> > they release free oxygen as a by-product of photosynthesis.

> > Organisms of the other four kingdoms all consist of cells

> organised

> > on the eukaryotic plan

> >

> >

> > In , " madcowcoverup "

> <k_t723>

> > wrote:

> > > --- hi Carol,

> > > I'd like to see those that sell the product eat it straight

out

> of

> > > the lake, just so the could back up what they say, but I doubt

> > very

> > > seriously they would be happy with the results tho

> > > and the actual intention of the ? was what critters eat algae

in

> > > nature ? (scum-suckers come to mind) and just because you and

> all

> > > your customers( and their pets) eat it does not mean they we

> > > intended to eat it after all people/ animals(via their

masters)

> > eat

> > > all kinds of things they should not

> > > and the word is an Indian word used to identify REPTILIANS

> cause

> > > they lack the necessary vocals to pronounce it(hehehe!)

> > > karl

> > >

> > >

> > > In , " Carol Minnick "

> > > <carolminnick@a...> wrote:

> > > > Karl,

> > > >

> > > > I guess it could be food for any kind of critter. I eat it,

> and

> > > so does my

> > > > dog, and 3 cats, and 21 goldfish. And so does the

neighbor's

> > > horse. And so

> > > > do 18 tigers, 17 bears, 16 mountain lions, 9 African Lions,

2

> > > Leopards, 2

> > > > Servals, 1 Jaguar, 1 Bobcat, and 1 Coati-Mundi - all who

live

> at

> > > the Rocky

> > > > Mountain Wildlife Conservation Center.

> > > >

> > > > I don't think you would have to process it if you didn't

want

> > to -

> > > you could

> > > > eat it out of the lake if you so desire. But most people

> would

> > > rather not

> > > > eat it that way - just like pretty much anything else they

> eat -

> > > everything

> > > > gets cooked or processed before people find it appealing.

Not

> > too

> > > many

> > > > people eat totally raw food.

> > > >

> > > > I don't know what you mean by the word kininigan. It's not

in

> my

> > > > dictionary. Sorry, I have no idea what it is, so no, I

can't

> > > pronounce it.

> > > > So I'm not human?

> > > >

> > > > Carol

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > " madcowcoverup " <\

> > > > ---Hi Carol

> > > > food for what kind of a critter????? a reptilian???an

> > amphibian??

> > > a

> > > > fish?? if it has to be processed was it meant to be eaten

by

> > > humans?

> > > > it does not matter that the manfacturers do not make

medicine

> > they

> > > > make the same claims( healthy and non-toxic) and just

because

> > > they've

> > > > been in business 22 years is not a valid argument, there are

> > > plenty of

> > > > companies that have been poisoning the public for much

longer

> > than

> > > 22

> > > > years and they are still in business and a lot of people

still

> > > > mistakenly think those same companies provide good products

> > > > just out of curiosity can you pronounce the word kininigan?

> > > > if not I seriously doubt you be human

> > > > karl

> > > >

> > > > \

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Since it is a body of water it is probably owned by the United States

of America, Inc.

 

ed

 

On May 1, 2005, at 11:01 PM, madcowcoverup wrote:

 

> ---Everything in the " United States " is For Sale: roads, bridges,

> schools, hospitals, water, prisons ,the people etc.

> (Executive Order 12803)

> I wonder who bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time to check?

>

>

>

>

> In , " madcowcoverup "

> <k_t723> wrote:

> > ---let me rephrase the question for you in nature what organisms

> > naturally eat  bacteria?? since blue/green algae is in reality

> > bacteria, if you eat it from the water will it result in a

> bacterial

> > infection??

> > and is there another agenda to removing oxygen producing organisms

> > from the environment? hmmm

> >

> >

> >

> > In , " madcowcoverup "

> <k_t723>

> > wrote:

> > > --- The 5 kingdoms were Monera, Protista, Plants, Animals and

> > Fungi.

> > > The kingdoms fundamentally split the prokaryotes from the

> > eukaryotes

> > > by placing the prokaryotes on their own as Kingdom Monera. It is

> > > still considered to be the most natural and unambiguous kingdom

> > > within this system, its boundary set by distinct prokaryotic

> > > organisation of the nucleus. The prokaryotes are bacteria, which

> > > include the Cyanophyta, the blue-green algae. Despite the

> > > prokaryotic organisation of the Cyanophyta, they possess unique

> > > photosynthetic pigments not present in the rest of the group,

> and

> > > they release free oxygen as a by-product of photosynthesis.

> > > Organisms of the other four kingdoms all consist of cells

> > organised

> > > on the eukaryotic plan

> > >

> > >

> > > In , " madcowcoverup "

> > <k_t723>

> > > wrote:

> > > > --- hi Carol,

> > > > I'd like to see those that sell the product eat it straight

> out

> > of

> > > > the lake, just so the could back up what they say, but I doubt

> > > very

> > > > seriously they would be happy with the results tho

> > > > and the actual intention of the ? was what critters eat algae

> in

> > > > nature ? (scum-suckers come to mind) and just because you and

> > all

> > > > your customers( and their pets) eat it does not mean they we

> > > > intended to eat it after all people/ animals(via their

> masters)

> > > eat

> > > > all kinds of things they should not

> > > >  and the word is an Indian word used to identify REPTILIANS

> > cause

> > > > they lack the necessary vocals to pronounce it(hehehe!)

> > > > karl

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In , " Carol Minnick "

> > > > <carolminnick@a...> wrote:

> > > > > Karl,

> > > > > 

> > > > > I guess it could be food for any kind of critter.  I eat it,

> > and

> > > > so does my

> > > > > dog, and 3 cats, and 21 goldfish.  And so does the

> neighbor's

> > > > horse.  And so

> > > > > do 18 tigers, 17 bears, 16 mountain lions, 9 African Lions,

> 2

> > > > Leopards, 2

> > > > > Servals, 1 Jaguar, 1 Bobcat, and 1 Coati-Mundi - all who

> live

> > at

> > > > the Rocky

> > > > > Mountain Wildlife Conservation Center. 

> > > > > 

> > > > > I don't think you would have to process it if you didn't

> want

> > > to -

> > > > you could

> > > > > eat it out of the lake if you so desire.  But most people

> > would

> > > > rather not

> > > > > eat it that way - just like pretty much anything else they

> > eat -

> > > > everything

> > > > > gets cooked or processed before people find it appealing. 

> Not

> > > too

> > > > many

> > > > > people eat totally raw food. 

> > > > > 

> > > > > I don't know what you mean by the word kininigan.  It's not

> in

> > my

> > > > > dictionary.  Sorry, I have no idea what it is, so no, I

> can't

> > > > pronounce it.

> > > > > So I'm not human?

> > > > > 

> > > > > Carol

> > > > > 

> > > > > 

> > > > >                " madcowcoverup " <\

> > > > > ---Hi Carol

> > > > > food for what kind of a critter????? a reptilian???an

> > > amphibian??

> > > > a

> > > > > fish??  if it has  to be processed was it meant to be eaten

> by

> > > > humans?

> > > > > it does not matter that the manfacturers do not make

> medicine

> > > they

> > > > > make the same claims( healthy and non-toxic) and just

> because

> > > > they've

> > > > > been in business 22 years is not a valid argument, there are

> > > > plenty of

> > > > > companies that have been poisoning the public for much

> longer

> > > than

> > > > 22

> > > > > years and they are still in business and a lot of people

> still

> > > > > mistakenly think those same companies provide good products

> > > > >  just out of curiosity can you pronounce the word kininigan?

> > > > > if not I seriously doubt you be human

> > > > > karl

> > > > > 

> > > > > \

>

>

>

>

>

> «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«

> ¤»¥«¤»

>

> § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §

>

> Subscribe:......... -

> To :.... -

>

> Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be

> news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult

> with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of

> treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.

> **COPYRIGHT NOTICE**

> In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,

> any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use

> without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest

> in receiving the included information for non-profit research and

> educational purposes only.    

> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

---Good try ED neeeext!

anymore guess'

 

In , Ed Siceloff <siceloff@e...>

wrote:

> Since it is a body of water it is probably owned by the United

States

> of America, Inc.

>

> ed

>

> On May 1, 2005, at 11:01 PM, madcowcoverup wrote:

>

> > ---Everything in the " United States " is For Sale: roads, bridges,

> > schools, hospitals, water, prisons ,the people etc.

> > (Executive Order 12803)

> > I wonder who bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time to

check?

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > In , " madcowcoverup "

> > <k_t723> wrote:

> > > ---let me rephrase the question for you in nature what

organisms

> > > naturally eat  bacteria?? since blue/green algae is in reality

> > > bacteria, if you eat it from the water will it result in a

> > bacterial

> > > infection??

> > > and is there another agenda to removing oxygen producing

organisms

> > > from the environment? hmmm

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > In , " madcowcoverup "

> > <k_t723>

> > > wrote:

> > > > --- The 5 kingdoms were Monera, Protista, Plants, Animals

and

> > > Fungi.

> > > > The kingdoms fundamentally split the prokaryotes from the

> > > eukaryotes

> > > > by placing the prokaryotes on their own as Kingdom Monera.

It is

> > > > still considered to be the most natural and unambiguous

kingdom

> > > > within this system, its boundary set by distinct prokaryotic

> > > > organisation of the nucleus. The prokaryotes are bacteria,

which

> > > > include the Cyanophyta, the blue-green algae. Despite the

> > > > prokaryotic organisation of the Cyanophyta, they possess

unique

> > > > photosynthetic pigments not present in the rest of the

group,

> > and

> > > > they release free oxygen as a by-product of photosynthesis.

> > > > Organisms of the other four kingdoms all consist of cells

> > > organised

> > > > on the eukaryotic plan

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In , " madcowcoverup "

> > > <k_t723>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > --- hi Carol,

> > > > > I'd like to see those that sell the product eat it

straight

> > out

> > > of

> > > > > the lake, just so the could back up what they say, but I

doubt

> > > > very

> > > > > seriously they would be happy with the results tho

> > > > > and the actual intention of the ? was what critters eat

algae

> > in

> > > > > nature ? (scum-suckers come to mind) and just because you

and

> > > all

> > > > > your customers( and their pets) eat it does not mean they

we

> > > > > intended to eat it after all people/ animals(via their

> > masters)

> > > > eat

> > > > > all kinds of things they should not

> > > > >  and the word is an Indian word used to identify

REPTILIANS

> > > cause

> > > > > they lack the necessary vocals to pronounce it(hehehe!)

> > > > > karl

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > In , " Carol Minnick "

> > > > > <carolminnick@a...> wrote:

> > > > > > Karl,

> > > > > > 

> > > > > > I guess it could be food for any kind of critter.  I

eat it,

> > > and

> > > > > so does my

> > > > > > dog, and 3 cats, and 21 goldfish.  And so does the

> > neighbor's

> > > > > horse.  And so

> > > > > > do 18 tigers, 17 bears, 16 mountain lions, 9 African

Lions,

> > 2

> > > > > Leopards, 2

> > > > > > Servals, 1 Jaguar, 1 Bobcat, and 1 Coati-Mundi - all who

> > live

> > > at

> > > > > the Rocky

> > > > > > Mountain Wildlife Conservation Center. 

> > > > > > 

> > > > > > I don't think you would have to process it if you didn't

> > want

> > > > to -

> > > > > you could

> > > > > > eat it out of the lake if you so desire.  But most

people

> > > would

> > > > > rather not

> > > > > > eat it that way - just like pretty much anything else

they

> > > eat -

> > > > > everything

> > > > > > gets cooked or processed before people find it

appealing. 

> > Not

> > > > too

> > > > > many

> > > > > > people eat totally raw food. 

> > > > > > 

> > > > > > I don't know what you mean by the word kininigan.  It's

not

> > in

> > > my

> > > > > > dictionary.  Sorry, I have no idea what it is, so no, I

> > can't

> > > > > pronounce it.

> > > > > > So I'm not human?

> > > > > > 

> > > > > > Carol

> > > > > > 

> > > > > > 

> > > > > >                " madcowcoverup " <\

> > > > > > ---Hi Carol

> > > > > > food for what kind of a critter????? a reptilian???an

> > > > amphibian??

> > > > > a

> > > > > > fish??  if it has  to be processed was it meant to be

eaten

> > by

> > > > > humans?

> > > > > > it does not matter that the manfacturers do not make

> > medicine

> > > > they

> > > > > > make the same claims( healthy and non-toxic) and just

> > because

> > > > > they've

> > > > > > been in business 22 years is not a valid argument,

there are

> > > > > plenty of

> > > > > > companies that have been poisoning the public for much

> > longer

> > > > than

> > > > > 22

> > > > > > years and they are still in business and a lot of people

> > still

> > > > > > mistakenly think those same companies provide good

products

> > > > > >  just out of curiosity can you pronounce the word

kininigan?

> > > > > > if not I seriously doubt you be human

> > > > > > karl

> > > > > > 

> > > > > > \

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

> «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«

¤»§«

> > ¤»¥«¤»

> >

> > § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §

> >

> > Subscribe:......... -

> > To :.... -

 

> >

> > Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may

be

> > news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always

consult

> > with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any

course of

> > treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.

> > **COPYRIGHT NOTICE**

> > In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,

> > any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair

use

> > without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior

interest

> > in receiving the included information for non-profit research

and

> > educational purposes only.    

> > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

....which means it's owned by Monsanto Corporation... ...and what

are We The People going to do about this kind of thing?! Public

Citizen and MoveOn.org are doing some mighty good work. I get so

extremely depressed about all this stuff, and then I see that I'm NOT

alone, people are speaking up, and I feel so much better. You better

believe it that the corporations or anybody else who stands to gain

money and power will run over us roughshod unless we stand up to them.

 

Joy

 

, Ed Siceloff <siceloff@e...>

wrote:

> Since it is a body of water it is probably owned by the United

States

> of America, Inc.

>

> ed

>

> On May 1, 2005, at 11:01 PM, madcowcoverup wrote:

>

> > ---Everything in the " United States " is For Sale: roads, bridges,

> > schools, hospitals, water, prisons ,the people etc.

> > (Executive Order 12803)

> > I wonder who bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time to

check?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

---Hi Carol, please tell everyone who owns klamath Lake?

surely as a distributor of the lakes bacteria, you know....

 

 

In , " madcowcoverup " <k_t723>

wrote:

> ---Good try ED neeeext!

> anymore guess'

>

> In , Ed Siceloff

<siceloff@e...>

> wrote:

> > Since it is a body of water it is probably owned by the United

> States

> > of America, Inc.

> >

> > ed

> >

> > On May 1, 2005, at 11:01 PM, madcowcoverup wrote:

> >

> > > ---Everything in the " United States " is For Sale: roads,

bridges,

> > > schools, hospitals, water, prisons ,the people etc.

> > > (Executive Order 12803)

> > > I wonder who bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time to

> check?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > In , " madcowcoverup "

> > > <k_t723> wrote:

> > > > ---let me rephrase the question for you in nature what

> organisms

> > > > naturally eat  bacteria?? since blue/green algae is in

reality

> > > > bacteria, if you eat it from the water will it result in a

> > > bacterial

> > > > infection??

> > > > and is there another agenda to removing oxygen producing

> organisms

> > > > from the environment? hmmm

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In , " madcowcoverup "

> > > <k_t723>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > --- The 5 kingdoms were Monera, Protista, Plants, Animals

> and

> > > > Fungi.

> > > > > The kingdoms fundamentally split the prokaryotes from the

> > > > eukaryotes

> > > > > by placing the prokaryotes on their own as Kingdom

Monera.

> It is

> > > > > still considered to be the most natural and unambiguous

> kingdom

> > > > > within this system, its boundary set by distinct

prokaryotic

> > > > > organisation of the nucleus. The prokaryotes are

bacteria,

> which

> > > > > include the Cyanophyta, the blue-green algae. Despite the

> > > > > prokaryotic organisation of the Cyanophyta, they possess

> unique

> > > > > photosynthetic pigments not present in the rest of the

> group,

> > > and

> > > > > they release free oxygen as a by-product of

photosynthesis.

> > > > > Organisms of the other four kingdoms all consist of cells

> > > > organised

> > > > > on the eukaryotic plan

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > In , " madcowcoverup "

> > > > <k_t723>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > --- hi Carol,

> > > > > > I'd like to see those that sell the product eat it

> straight

> > > out

> > > > of

> > > > > > the lake, just so the could back up what they say, but

I

> doubt

> > > > > very

> > > > > > seriously they would be happy with the results tho

> > > > > > and the actual intention of the ? was what critters eat

> algae

> > > in

> > > > > > nature ? (scum-suckers come to mind) and just because

you

> and

> > > > all

> > > > > > your customers( and their pets) eat it does not mean

they

> we

> > > > > > intended to eat it after all people/ animals(via their

> > > masters)

> > > > > eat

> > > > > > all kinds of things they should not

> > > > > >  and the word is an Indian word used to identify

> REPTILIANS

> > > > cause

> > > > > > they lack the necessary vocals to pronounce it(hehehe!)

> > > > > > karl

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In , " Carol Minnick "

> > > > > > <carolminnick@a...> wrote:

> > > > > > > Karl,

> > > > > > > 

> > > > > > > I guess it could be food for any kind of critter.  I

> eat it,

> > > > and

> > > > > > so does my

> > > > > > > dog, and 3 cats, and 21 goldfish.  And so does the

> > > neighbor's

> > > > > > horse.  And so

> > > > > > > do 18 tigers, 17 bears, 16 mountain lions, 9 African

> Lions,

> > > 2

> > > > > > Leopards, 2

> > > > > > > Servals, 1 Jaguar, 1 Bobcat, and 1 Coati-Mundi - all

who

> > > live

> > > > at

> > > > > > the Rocky

> > > > > > > Mountain Wildlife Conservation Center. 

> > > > > > > 

> > > > > > > I don't think you would have to process it if you

didn't

> > > want

> > > > > to -

> > > > > > you could

> > > > > > > eat it out of the lake if you so desire.  But most

> people

> > > > would

> > > > > > rather not

> > > > > > > eat it that way - just like pretty much anything else

> they

> > > > eat -

> > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > gets cooked or processed before people find it

> appealing. 

> > > Not

> > > > > too

> > > > > > many

> > > > > > > people eat totally raw food. 

> > > > > > > 

> > > > > > > I don't know what you mean by the word kininigan. 

It's

> not

> > > in

> > > > my

> > > > > > > dictionary.  Sorry, I have no idea what it is, so no,

I

> > > can't

> > > > > > pronounce it.

> > > > > > > So I'm not human?

> > > > > > > 

> > > > > > > Carol

> > > > > > > 

> > > > > > > 

> > > > > > >                " madcowcoverup " <\

> > > > > > > ---Hi Carol

> > > > > > > food for what kind of a critter????? a reptilian???an

> > > > > amphibian??

> > > > > > a

> > > > > > > fish??  if it has  to be processed was it meant to be

> eaten

> > > by

> > > > > > humans?

> > > > > > > it does not matter that the manfacturers do not make

> > > medicine

> > > > > they

> > > > > > > make the same claims( healthy and non-toxic) and just

> > > because

> > > > > > they've

> > > > > > > been in business 22 years is not a valid argument,

> there are

> > > > > > plenty of

> > > > > > > companies that have been poisoning the public for much

> > > longer

> > > > > than

> > > > > > 22

> > > > > > > years and they are still in business and a lot of

people

> > > still

> > > > > > > mistakenly think those same companies provide good

> products

> > > > > > >  just out of curiosity can you pronounce the word

> kininigan?

> > > > > > > if not I seriously doubt you be human

> > > > > > > karl

> > > > > > > 

> > > > > > > \

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>

> «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«

> ¤»§«

> > > ¤»¥«¤»

> > >

> > > § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §

> > >

> > > Subscribe:......... -

 

> > > To :.... -

>

> > >

> > > Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it

may

> be

> > > news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always

> consult

> > > with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any

> course of

> > > treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening

illnesses.

> > > **COPYRIGHT NOTICE**

> > > In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,

> > > any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under

fair

> use

> > > without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior

> interest

> > > in receiving the included information for non-profit research

> and

> > > educational purposes only.    

> > > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml  

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

---I'm impressed Joy !!!

you are absolutely correct, the distributors of that bacteria in

actuality are working for Monsanto Corp.

Hmmm! so how safe does one think it is ? to consume that bacteria

knowing that it is being promoted by Monsanto

how many safe products does Monsanto market? none that I know of

but if I'm wrong I'll be more than happy to admit so

 

In , " joyinthewoods "

<peessnic@a...> wrote:

> ...which means it's owned by Monsanto Corporation... ...and

what

> are We The People going to do about this kind of thing?! Public

> Citizen and MoveOn.org are doing some mighty good work. I get so

> extremely depressed about all this stuff, and then I see that I'm

NOT

> alone, people are speaking up, and I feel so much better. You

better

> believe it that the corporations or anybody else who stands to gain

> money and power will run over us roughshod unless we stand up to

them.

>

> Joy

>

> , Ed Siceloff

<siceloff@e...>

> wrote:

> > Since it is a body of water it is probably owned by the United

> States

> > of America, Inc.

> >

> > ed

> >

> > On May 1, 2005, at 11:01 PM, madcowcoverup wrote:

> >

> > > ---Everything in the " United States " is For Sale: roads,

bridges,

> > > schools, hospitals, water, prisons ,the people etc.

> > > (Executive Order 12803)

> > > I wonder who bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time to

> check?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

--- inoculate:

To communicate a disease to (a living organism) by transferring its

causative agent into the organism.

To implant microorganisms or infectious material into

In , " madcowcoverup " <k_t723>

wrote:

> ---I'm impressed Joy !!!

> you are absolutely correct, the distributors of that bacteria in

> actuality are working for Monsanto Corp.

> Hmmm! so how safe does one think it is ? to consume that bacteria

> knowing that it is being promoted by Monsanto

> how many safe products does Monsanto market? none that I know of

> but if I'm wrong I'll be more than happy to admit so

>

> In , " joyinthewoods "

> <peessnic@a...> wrote:

> > ...which means it's owned by Monsanto Corporation... ...and

> what

> > are We The People going to do about this kind of thing?! Public

> > Citizen and MoveOn.org are doing some mighty good work. I get so

> > extremely depressed about all this stuff, and then I see that

I'm

> NOT

> > alone, people are speaking up, and I feel so much better. You

> better

> > believe it that the corporations or anybody else who stands to

gain

> > money and power will run over us roughshod unless we stand up to

> them.

> >

> > Joy

> >

> > , Ed Siceloff

> <siceloff@e...>

> > wrote:

> > > Since it is a body of water it is probably owned by the United

> > States

> > > of America, Inc.

> > >

> > > ed

> > >

> > > On May 1, 2005, at 11:01 PM, madcowcoverup wrote:

> > >

> > > > ---Everything in the " United States " is For Sale: roads,

> bridges,

> > > > schools, hospitals, water, prisons ,the people etc.

> > > > (Executive Order 12803)

> > > > I wonder who bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time

to

> > check?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Actually, it

cannot be classified as bacteria. It

has a unique blend of plant, animal,

and bacteria. It can be called a

plant because it has chlorophyll and performs photosynthesis; it can be called

an animal because it has a non-cellulous cell wall made of protein; it can be

called bacteria because the cells have no nuclei, no nuclear membrane.

 

" madcowcoverup "

<>

since

blue/green algae is in reality bacteria,

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

--- Really so the scientists at MIT and Harvard which classify life

forms are wrong and the manufacturer is right?

methinks not! sounds more like corporate propaganda inline with the

bunk of the parent corporations of Monsanto - Bechtel - IG FARBEN

that bacteria or whatever you want to call it filters toxins from the

air/water.

so tell the people where are the scientific tests which prove the

toxins were removed in processing??

tell us inquiring minds want to know

 

 

 

 

In , " Carol Minnick "

<carolminnick@a...> wrote:

> Actually, it cannot be classified as bacteria. It has a unique

blend of

> plant, animal, and bacteria. It can be called a plant because it has

> chlorophyll and performs photosynthesis; it can be called an animal

because

> it has a non-cellulous cell wall made of protein; it can be called

bacteria

> because the cells have no nuclei, no nuclear membrane.

>

> " madcowcoverup " <>

> since blue/green algae is in reality bacteria,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...