Guest guest Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 Our health and Drug corp profits are poles apart There are many different views on what works and what does not I profess no medical expertise (glad I did not sell my soul to pharma Corp) but how long will we all suffer before we turn back to nature. Most of our present day problems are (IMO) CAUSED BY LACK OF NATURAL substances and TOO MUCH processed chemicals sold as food, water or drugs. Colloidal Gold in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Peter B. Himmel, Jorge D. Flechas, Guy E. Abraham Gold salts (aurothiolates) once the primary therapy for active RA has in recent years declined in its use because of apparent lack of long term efficacy, toxic side effects, and delayed onset of action. One of us (GEA) postulated that the active ingredient in aurothiolates is colloidal gold generated by in vivo disproportionation with subsequent clustering of monoatomic gold, and that the side effects were due to the aurothiolates themselves and the trivalent cationic gold generated from the disproportionation. If this postulate is valid one would expect colloidal gold to have therapeutic effects in RA and devoid of side effects. Methods: 10 patients (6 female, 4 male; average age 50 +/- 3.16 (SE) with long standing erosive RA ( 9 of 10 seropositive) were given an oral dose of 30 to 60 mg a day of colloidal gold (Aurasol-tm) for a period of 1 month. Clinical exams were performed weekly and laboratory studies done on weeks 1, 2, 4. Gold toxicity was evaluated by questioning the patient as to pruritus, rashes, oral ulcers, metallic taste, GI disturbance. The blood was checked for a drop in WBC, Hb, platelet count, BUN, creatinine or eosinophil elevation; and urine for proteinuria. Efficacy was evaluated by an 86 Joint Count Index scoring for joint tenderness and swelling: AM stiffness; the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQII) by T. Pincus and an ESR. Results: Statistically significant improvement were found on each weekly exam for joint tenderness and swelling beginning with the first week 58.8 to 18.2 (p<0.01) for tenderness; 42.5 to 15.9 (p<0.01) for swelling. Joint swelling reduced further to a value of 13.0 (p<0.001) by week 4. Patients fatigue decreased from 5.32 to 3.35 (p<0.05) over the month and a feeling of satisfaction in ones ability to do activities was apparent after 1 week, 3.1 to 2.5 (p<0.01) and persisted. No laboratory tests indicative of gold toxicity were noted. One patient reported 2 chancre sores which cleared while on therapy, 8 of 10 patients responded to colloidal gold. Conclusion: In this pilot study colloidal gold was found to be rapid acting (within one week) by reducing joint tenderness and swelling, without side effects, improved ones feeling of satisfaction in the ability to perform activities and reduce fatigue in 8 out of 10 patients with long standing erosive RA. The study will continue for one year. More definitive controlled trials should now be undertaken with colloidal gold. Note: The study has now completed its eighth month with all ten of the original patients still enrolled. The patients continue to do well with no significant side effects noted. This data is being compiled to be submitted for publication. Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Rationale for the Use of Colloidal Metallic Gold Guy E. Abraham MD FACN1 and Peter B. Himmel MD2 1Optimox Corporation, Torrance, CA, USA and 2 Himmel Health, Wakefield, RI, USA In Press - J. Nutr. Med., Vol. 7 - Dec. 1997 Abstract To test this postulate, 10 RA patients with long standing erosive bone disease not responding to previous treatment, were recruited from a private practice. Clinical and laboratory evaluation were performed prior to oral administration of 30 mg of colloidal metallic gold daily, and thereafter weekly for 4 weeks and monthly for an additional 5 months. There was no clinical or laboratory evidence of toxicity in any of the patients. The effects of the colloidal gold on tenderness and swelling of joints were rapid and dramatic, with a significant decrease in both parameters after the first week, which persisted during the study period. The mean scores for tenderness and swelling were respectively for the pre-and post- 1 week = 58.8 and 18.2 (p<0.01); and 42.5 and 15.9 (p<0.01). By 24 weeks of gold administration, the mean scores were 10 times lower than pre-treatment levels being respectively 5.4 and 3.3 for tenderness and swelling. As a group, there were significant improvement of functional status after 24 weeks of gold therapy: 3 patients were in clinical remission and one patients status improved from totally disabled to full-time work. Evaluated individually, 9 of 10 patients improved markedly after 24 weeks of colloidal gold at 30 mg/day. Cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Tumor necrosis factor (TNFa) were significantly suppressed by the colloidal gold with pre- and post-24 week mean values of 270 and 104 (p<0.05) for IL-6; and 207 and 74 (p<0.05) for TNFa. The results of this open trial in 10 patients with long standing erosive RA not responding to previous treatment support the postulate that colloidal gold is indeed the active ingredient in aurothiolate therapy, and that the side effects are mainly due to the trivalent gold (AU III) generated by oxydation of AU I. Colloidal metallic gold could become an effective and safte alternative to the aurothiolates in the management of RA patients. Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, colloidal metallic gold. Introduction Aurothiolates have been used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) since their introduction by Forestier in 1929 (1). In a follow-up publication, Forestier reported that the only forms of gold effective in the management of RA were organic compounds containing monovalent cathionic gold (AU I) covently bound to a sulfur moiety (aurothiolates), and given by weekly intramuscular injection to achieve a total cummulative dose of 2.5 to 3 gm (2). He stated that colloidal gold was ineffective, but did not mention the dosage, the form of colloidal gold, whether metallic or cathionic, neither the method of administration. Several subsequent reports by various investigators have confirmed the short term efficacy of the parenteral forms of aurothiolates in RA (3), but in more recently published clinical studies with the parenteral aurothiolates, several side effects were reported: Pulmonary damage (4-7), myelotoxicity, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia (8-12). In a recent longitudinal study of 822 RA patients receiving parenteral aurothiolate therapy over a 5 year period (13), no statistical improvement was observed in two outcome variables evaluated: functional assessment and number of painful joints. In an attempt to minimize the side effects of injectable gold complexes, an oral preparation was introduced in 1976 (14). However, this preparation caused diarrhea/loose stools in 50% of the patients, was less effective than the parenteral forms of aurothiolates and produce the same side effects as the injectable forms of gold salts although to a lesser extent. If this postulate is valid, one would expect colloidal metallic gold to have therapeutic effects in RA and devoid of side effects. Metallic gold is non-toxic, used extensively in dentistry and is widely available in colloidal form as a nutritional supplement for human consumption. The above postulate was tested in 10 patients with long standing erosive RA with minimal to no response to previous treatment. The results obtained support the postulate that colloidal metallic gold is indeed the active ingredient in aurothiolate therapy and offer a more effective and safer alternative to aurothiolate therapy in R.A. patients. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.