Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Ilana- vit k part 2 (long)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

VITAMIN K: CONTROVERSY? WHAT CONTROVERSY?

 

By Karin Rothville DipCBEd.

 

For the last 40 or 50 years, it has become a generally accepted fact

that

vitamin K prevents haemorrhagic disease of the newborn, and routine

administration of vitamin K to all newborns has been recommended.3,

6, 21, 34,

72 This recommendation has been questioned because results released

in 1990

from a study by Golding and colleagues26 in the UK showed a two to

three times

increased risk of childhood cancers, especially leukaemia, in

children given

prophylactic drugs (usually intramuscular vitamin K) in their first

week. A

further study in 1992 seemed to confirm this risk.25

 

There was widespread anxiety among parents when these findings were

published.

Parents were, understandably, reluctant to have their baby receive a

substance

that could predispose it to cancer in childhood, and many health

workers were

also reluctant to give, without prescription, a possibly cancer-

causing

substance to prevent a disease that few, if any, of them had ever

seen. These

concerns are not the first time that vitamin K safety has been

questioned. So,

what is the controversy about vitamin K? And does it predispose

babies to

childhood cancer?

 

WHAT IS VITAMIN K AND WHAT DOES IT DO?

 

Vitamin K is a fat-soluble substance which triggers off the blood-

clotting

process. Blood clotting is a complex process and can be described as

a sequence

of three stages, requiring up to 12 different coagulation factors.72

The liver

needs vitamin K to synthesise four of these factors. Vitamin K is

also needed

for the formation of other proteins found in plasma, bone and

kidney.33, 58

 

As with other fat-soluble vitamins, a normal flow of bile and

pancreatic juice

is necessary for digestion, and the presence of dietary fat,

especially

short-chain fatty acids, enhances absorption. Absorbed vitamin K is

transported

via the lymph into the systemic circulation.58

 

Normally, a significant portion (up to 55%) of absorbed vitamin K is

excreted

so the amount in the body is small and its turnover is rapid (about 30

hours).58 Vitamin K is stored and re-utilised in the body for 3-4

weeks.33

 

Vitamin K is found in many foods. Leafy, dark green and deep yellow

vegetables

are the best sources.58 Alfalfa18 is a good source; and milk and dairy

products, eggs, cereals, fruits and other vegetables also provide

small but

significant amounts. As the liver of adults contains about equal

amounts of

plant and animal forms of Vitamin K, it is assumed that vitamin K is

produced

in the intestinal tract by bacterial flora. One of the reasons given

for the

low levels of vitamin K in newborn babies is because their gut has

not yet been

colonised by the required bacteria.

 

Recommended daily dietary intakes of vitamin K58

 

Category

Age

Amount (m g)

 

Infants

0 - 1

10

 

Children

1 - 3

15

 

 

4 - 6

20

 

 

7 - 10

25

 

Adolescents

11 - 14

30

 

 

15 - 18

35

 

Adult Male

19 - 70+

45

 

Adult Female

19 - 70+

35

 

Pregnancy

 

+ 10

 

Lactating

 

+ 20

 

 

The dietary requirements for vitamin K in infants and children are

estimates

and are based on weight and growth rates as compared to adults. Many

unsupplemented breasfed infants do not show clinical signs of vitamin

K

deficiency on intakes of less than 3 m g daily and the mean

requirement for

infants is estimated to be 5 m g daily based on weight. The higher

amount of

10m g is recommended for prevention of Haemorrhagic Disease of the

Newborn.58

 

WHAT IS HAEMORRHAGIC DISEASE OF THE NEWBORN?

 

Haemorrhagic Disease of the Newborn (HDN) is a bleeding disorder

associated

with low levels of vitamin K in newborn babies. It was first defined

in 1894 by

Townsend69 as spontaneous external or internal bleeding occurring in

newborn

infants not due to trauma, accident or inherited bleeding disorders

such as

haemophilia. Previously, there were no generally agreed upon criteria

to

determine causes of haemorrhaging, so any diagnosis was based solely

on the

opinion of the attendant medical personnel.

 

Infants are born with low levels of vitamin K23 compared to adults

and this is

termed 'vitamin K deficiency'. Up to 50% of babies develop

this 'vitamin K

deficiency', but bleeding occurs in only a fraction of these cases.37

In most

it starts after birth, becomes

 

Page 2

 

progressively more severe over 48-60 hours, then spontaneously

corrects itself

by 72-120 hours.9

 

HDN has always been rare - in Britain where maternity units practised

a

selective policy of vitamin K administration, the incidence was no

more than 1

in 20,000 in the years 1972-80. Estimates for late onset HDN are 4-8

per

100,000.45 Incidence also seems to vary from country to country.

 

HDN is divided into three categories:

 

1.. Early onset HDN occurs in the first 24 hours. It is very rare and

mainly associated with mothers who have taken anticonvulsant,

antibiotic,

antituberculous or anticoagulant drugs during pregnancy.

2.. Classic HDN occurs in the first week after birth. It is

manifested by

the oozing of blood from the intestines, the nose, the cord site and

broken

skin sites. Bruising at sites where there has been no trauma can also

appear.

3.. Late onset HDN occurs after the first week, with a peak incidence

between the second and sixth weeks, and about half the cases present

with

intracranial bleeding (bleeding into the brain).

WHAT ARE THE RISK FACTORS FOR HDN?

 

There has been some debate over the years as to whether or not HDN is

actually

caused by vitamin K deficiency. Certainly, giving vitamin K does

arrest

bleeding in the majority of cases, but this does not mean that

vitamin K

deficiency causes HDN. One may as well say that an antibiotic

deficiency causes

bacterial infection. There is also no consensus as to what level of

vitamin K

in plasma protects against HDN. Some researchers have found no

evidence of

vitamin K deficiency in babies in their studies43, 49 and other

factors have

also been suggested.52, 73, 74

 

Most, if no all, of the reported cases of late onset HDN have

presented with

problems which affect the baby's ability to absorb or utilise vitamin

K.45, 56

These include: hepatitis, cystic fibrosis, chronic diarrhoea, bile

duct

atresia, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, coeliac disease of

insufficient plasma

transport capacity. Subclinical cytomegalovirus has also been

implicated.

Vitamin K-responsive bleeding syndrome has been well documented after

antibiotic therapy, especially with cyclosporins.33

 

There are other factors which place the newborn at higher risk. These

include

pre-term birth (as the liver is very immature), low birth weight,

instrumental

or traumatic delivery, bruised or bleeding in the first few days

after birth,

requiring surgery or circumcision, taking inadequate feeds and

breastfeeding.33

 

BREASTFEEDING - WHY IS IT A RISK?

 

Several authors have noted the higher incidence of HDN in solely

breastfed

babies.9, 30 The incidence has been quoted as 1 in 1200.30 Studies

comparing

breastmilk with formula and cow's milk have shown that breastmilk is

lower in

vitamin K.22, 28, 32 Breastmilk substitutes are heavily supplemented

with

vitamin K, however, it is possible that, like iron, vitamin K is

biologically

more available to the baby from breastmilk, and so such high

 

levels are not necessary.

 

Measured levels of vitamin K in breastmilk seemed to vary depending

on the type

of measurement used; however, they all come out lower than cow's milk.

Fournier22 and Greer28 found levels of around 8-9m g/l, which would

mean that

if a baby was taking in about 500ml per day, it would be getting the

recommended 3-5m g daily.

 

Vitamin K content and availability are greater in the hind milk

because of its

higher fat content and vitamin K levels are also higher in

colostrum.32 As an

extra plus, breastmilk contains thromboplastin, one of the factors in

blood

clotting.18

 

Vitamin K levels in the breastmilk rise markedly in response to the

mother

eating vitamin K rich foods or taking vitamin K supplements.29, 54

Nishiguchi

found no cases of low vitamin K levels in breastfed infants whose

mothers had

been given supplements, as opposed to infants who had only been given

1 or 2

doses of oral vitamin K.54

 

Unrestricted access to the breast in the early days after birth is

important,

due to the higher levels of vitamin K in colostrum. The importance of

early

feeding has been recognised since the 1940's. Babies who have been

fed within

their first 24 hours have significantly better coagulation times than

babies

not fed until after 24 hours.24

 

It is essential that, to receive the full complement of vitamin K in

breastmilk, the baby completely finishes one breast before being

offered the

other. Any practice that involves restricting either the baby's time

at the

breast or the number of feeds will not allow the baby to receive

optimum

amounts of vitamin K and will also prolong the time it takes for the

baby's

intestine to be colonised by friendly, vitamin K manufacturing

bacteria.

 

THE HISTORY OF VITAMIN K USE TO PREVENT HDN.

 

The search for the cause of HDN began in 1913 when Whipple82

postulated that a

lack of prothrombin activity could be a cause of HDN. In 1929, Henrik

Dam14

noticed that chicks fed a fat-free diet suffered subcutaneous and

intramuscular

haemorrhages, which could be prevented if the chicks were fed seeds,

cereals

and green, leafy plants. Dam described the condition as a vitamin

deficiency

and named the deficient vitamin 'vitamin K', from the Danish

word 'koagulation'.

 

Research in 19378 found that prothrombin times in normal neonates

were between

30-60% adult levels, falling to 15-30% on day two, and then gradually

rising

again until about day 10. This research led to the continuing belief

that these

low levels in the newborn are a deficiency and need to be corrected.

 

In 1939, vitamin K1 was isolated from alfalfa by Dam, for which he

later

received the Nobel Prize, along with Edward Doisy, who isolated

vitamin K2.45

Further research in 1939 by Waddell and Guerry81 found that low plasma

prothrombin levels could be elevated by the administration of oral

vitamin K.

 

Armed with this 'proof' that vitamin K deficiency caused HDN, vitamin

K was

synthesised and various trials were commenced

 

Page 3

 

to ascertain which was the most effective amount and route to use in

prophylaxis.

 

It is difficult for us to assess these trials nowadays as they were

mostly

neither double blind nor well controlled. The dosage of vitamin K

given, the

route of administration and the time of administration all varied. In

many

cases, the conclusions did not seem to match the results.72

 

Some of the studies assessed the effect on neonatal vitamin K levels

if the

mother was given vitamin K during labour.72 Results varied, with the

effectiveness of the vitamin K given depending on how soon the woman

gave birth

and the dosage given. More recent studies have shown increases in

cord blood

levels where mothers were supplemented antenatally with vitamin K.1,

66 Two

showed a significant difference between the supplemented and

unsupplemented

groups and found that the effect of prenatal vitamin K persisted

until the

fifth day after birth.1

 

Because of the variations in results from these early studies,

further research

focussed on treating the baby after birth. One particular study done

in 194231

was intended to determine the minimal effective oral dose of

Synkavite (K3), a

water-soluble synthetic form of vitamin K. The results showed that

very small

daily doses were effective and that a dose of 5m g daily would

probably prevent

the development of HDN, except in early onset cases. The study also

found that

1.25mg was effective in lowering an excessively high prothrombin time

to

normal. However, the author admitted that several workers found

prothrombin

deficiencies in babies with no abnormal bleeding.

 

By 1950, most maternity units had a policy of giving infants oral

vitamin K

(usually Synkavite) immediately after birth.70 This prevented the

fall in

prothrombin levels that occurred in the first few days and,

presumably, the

risk of excessive bleeding. This risk was higher in male babies

because of

routine circumcision, and, indeed, vitamin K proved to be of great

clinical

value in preventing post-circumcision bleeding.75

 

Then, in the mid-1950's, reports of increased jaundice and

kernicterus (brain

damage caused by high bilirubin levels) associated with vitamin K

prophylaxis

began circulating. Reviews of maternity units found that some were

giving

Synkavite in doses exceeding 50mg.70 It was established that high

doses of

Synkavite caused haemolysis (destruction of red blood cells) and high

serum

bilirubin levels.48

 

Researchers and medical professionals queried the safety

 

aspects of vitamin K, and there were many conflicting reports on the

appropriate dosages. Some researchers queried the need for vitamin K

at all,

quoting results from studies that showed no difference in prothrombin

times or

vitamin K plasma levels between babies that bled and babies that

didn't.72

 

Eventually, a newer preparation, intramuscular vitamin K1

(phytomenadione), was

developed and approved for use, solely on the grounds that it

appeared to cause

less haemolysis. Phytomenadione (trade names Konakion (Roche) or

Aquamephyton

(Merck, Sharpe & Dohme)) is a synthetic petrochemical derived from 2-

methyl

1,4-naptha-quinone in a polyethoxylated castor oil base.18 In the US,

polysorbate-80 is used as a base instead of polyethoxylated castor

oil.15

 

In spite there being no long term trials of these preparations, the

American

Academy of Pediatrics recommended that phytomenadione be administered

prophylactically to all newborn babies.72 The use of oral vitamin K

preparations fell out of favour in the USA and the 'safer'

intramuscular route

became the route of choice.

 

In Britain, after the jaundice scare of the1950's, many maternity

units began

to practice a selective policy, giving vitamin K only to babies at

risk of

haemorrhaging. McNinch reported in 1980 that less than half the

maternity units

in the UK gave vitamin K to all newborns.47 Some of these babies were

given

oral prophylaxis and some were given intramuscular prophylaxis.

 

In Germany, almost all newborn infants who required medical care and

instrumental deliveries were given intramuscular vitamin K, and some

healthy

newborns also received it.76 Records have not always been kept in New

Zealand

hospitals, so it is impossible to say whether or not vitamin K was

given

routinely and by which route.17

 

Although vitamin K use seemed to prevent most cases of HDN, there was

still

controversy. Not everyone believed vitamin K deficiency was the cause

of HDN.

In 1977, van Doorm et al 52, 73, 74 suggested that HDN could be

caused by a

heparin-like inhibitor in the newborn and he concluded that babies

given their

first feed soon after birth do not have a vitamin K deficiency. Other

researchers agreed with van Doorn.49 In 1980, Malia et al43 could

find no

evidence of vitamin K deficiency in babies in their study and

concluded that

low levels of vitamin K dependent clotting factors were due to the

immature

liver. The authors of these studies questioned whether vitamin K

prophylaxis

was really necessary for healthy newborns.

 

Then, starting in November 1980, there was a cluster of six cases of

HDN in

Britain, all within 17 months.46 Half of these cases were classic

HDN, the

other half were a new manifestation of HDN - late onset.

 

LATE ONSET HDN

 

Late onset HDN was first reported in 1977.5 It mainly occurs in

breastfed

infants and ¯ to ¾ of cases have an underlying liver disorder or

malabsorption

syndrome,15 rather than insufficient dietary intake of vitamin K.

This means

the liver cannot adequately synthesise blood clotting factors or

store adequate

amounts of vitamin K. Liver function cannot be easily diagnosed at

birth

without a range of invasive tests and thus there exists an unknown

risk of

haemorrhaging.

 

Many factors contribute to poor liver function, including hepatitis,

cystic

fibrosis, antibiotic therapy, biliary atresia, alpha-1-antitrypsin

deficiency,

a-beta-lipoproteinaemia, coeliac disease, chronic diarrhoea and

exposure to

pharmacologic agents such as anticonvulsants, rifampin, isoniazid

cephalosporins and coumarin compounds33 When tested, most of the

reported cases

of late onset HDN had hepatitis, liver malfunction or enzyme

 

Page 4

 

deficiencies.6, 35, 51, 80

 

Birkbeck6 believes there are two processes at work - low levels of

prothrombin

and vitamin K-dependent clotting factors VII, IX and X at birth, and

a further

fall in these in the neonatal period. In his view the initial low

levels are

not due to vitamin K deficiency as levels of 2 other non-vitamin K-

dependent

factors, XI and XII are also often reduced. Thus, the situation at

birth may be

simply due to hepatic immaturity.

 

Birkbeck6 also reports that HDN is almost unknown in central Africa

and he

suggests an environmental mechanism as the cause. Associated with

this, a

discussion paper from the University of Amsterdam42 raises the idea

that

by-products of our industrial society such as PCBs, PCDDs and PCDFs

are the

cause of late onset HDN. These chemicals can induce enzymes in the

liver which

cause liver damage and prolong prothrombin time. Although overseas

studies have

reported contamination of breastmilk by these pollutants, a NZ

Department of

Health study on breastmilk reported that levels of these contaminants

were at

the lower end of the scale.7 The Health Department is currently

conducting

another study to see if levels have changed over the past few years.

 

There seems to be a seasonal variance, with most cases of late onset

HDN

occurring in the warmer months.6 It has been suggested that the

mother could

have contracted a viral infection during pregnancy in the colder

months and

this has crossed the placenta. Since viruses have an affinity for the

liver and

mucous membranes, they can affect intestinal absorption and liver

function.67

 

Another suggested cause of late onset HDN includes use of the food

antioxidant

BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene), which has produced vitamin K

deficiency.68 BHT

is present in many processed foods, including margarine. Our Western

diets

consist of a lot of processed food, and to reduce fat intakes,

margarine is

recommended rather than butter. The polyunsaturated fat in margarine

is an

inhibitor of vitamin K absorption.68 Both of these factors could have

an effect

on the amount of vitamin K available to pass through to the baby. A

high level

of vitamin K in the mother's blood is necessary to ensure adequate

transplacental transfer of vitamin K.9, 33 It is important for the

baby to have

adequate stores of vitamin K in its liver at birth to prevent

bleeding until

its feeding and gut flora are established.

 

Of the six cases of HDN in Britain in 1980-1982, all were breastfed

and none

had received vitamin K at birth.46 Two of the cases were in the high-

risk group

- one was born by caesarean section and had an epileptic mother

treated with

phenytoin, and the other had an alcoholic mother who had taken anti-

depressants

- and obviously should have received vitamin K at birth.

 

These cases prompted a call for the re-introduction of routine

prophylaxis.

Many opposed the idea of unnecessarily injecting otherwise healthy

babies so

studies40, 47, 55, 79 were therefore conducted to determine whether

oral

vitamin K was as effective as intramuscular. It was also proposed

that oral

vitamin K would be more cost-effective and thus better suited for use

in Third

World countries.55 Results of these studies varied. Some showed that

oral

vitamin K was effective in preventing classic haemorrhagic disease

but not as

effective as intramuscular vitamin K in preventing late onset HDN.47,

55, 78

Others found oral as effective, especially a 10 year study conducted

on 38,000

infants in Sweden where no cases of HDN were observed over that

period.40 Tripp

and McNinch reported no cases in 25,000 babies in their maternity

unit where

only those at risk were given intramuscular prophylaxis and the rest

oral

prophylaxis.70

 

In spite of these findings that oral vitamin K prophylaxis was not

effective in

preventing late onset HDN, it continued to be used in British

maternity units,

especially for low risk infants.

 

RISKS OF VITAMIN K PROPHYLAXIS

 

Konakion ampoules contain phenol, propylene glycol38 and

polyethoxylated castor

oil as a non-ionic surfactant. Studies in animals given

polyethoxylated castor

oil have shown a severe anaphylactic reaction associated with

histamine

release. Strong circumstantial evidence implicates polyethoxylated

castor oil

in similar reactions in humans. Polyethoxylated castor oil, when

given to

patients over a period of several days, can also produce abnormal

lipoprotein

electrophoretic patterns, alterations in blood viscosity and

erythrocyte

aggregation (red blood cell clumping). Individuals sensitive to this

base are

contraindicated from using Konakion. New Ethicals Compendium also

warns that

the use of Konakion can cause jaundice and kernicterus in infants.53

Other

listed side effects include flushing, sweating, cyanosis, a sense of

chest

constriction, and peripheral vascular collapse. Local cutaneous and

subcutaneous changes may occur in areas of repeated intramuscular

injections.

 

This synthetic, injectable vitamin K formulation was never subjected

to a

randomised, controlled trial. In new drugs that are to be used for

prophylaxis,

the usual risk/benefit analysis does not apply, since the individual

is not

ill. The ethical principle of non-maleficence (primum non nocere -

first do no

harm) applies and the trials must thus be larger in order to identify

any

previously unrecognised side effects.65 Since this did not happen,

nor was

there any long term follow up, we actually have little idea of the

effects of

this drug on newborn babies.

 

The risks of injecting vitamin K into a newborn baby are nerve or

muscle damage

as the preparation must be injected deeply into the muscle, not

subcutaneously

under the skin. There is also the documented risk of injecting the

baby with

the syntocinon intended for the mother.30, 70 As stated in the product

information,53 infants can suffer from jaundice or kernicterus (brain

damage

from a build-up of bile pigments in the brain) from Konakion. Infants

who have

the enzyme deficiency G6PD (glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase) are at

particular risk from vitamin K.30 The other risk factor is the

possible

increased chance of childhood cancer.

 

THE LINK BETWEEN CHILDHOOD CANCER AND INTRAMUSCULAR VITAMIN K

 

In 1970, a national cohort study of 16,193 infants born in one week

in April

was begun in Britain.26 This study was to test

 

Page 5

 

hypotheses about childhood cancers and their associated factors.

Thirty-three

of the children had developed cancer by age 10 and were compared with

99

control children, matched on maternal age, parity and social class.

One of the

unlooked-for risk factors was the administration of prophylactic

drugssuch as

vitamin K in the first week after birth - a nearly three-fold risk.

This

association fitted no prior hypothesis and the authors recommended

that their

finding be tested in another series of cases.

 

The authors of the study approached Roche, the manufacturers of

Konakion, for

funding for a further trial to examine the findings more closely.

Roche was not

interested until, a few months later, the media reported the results

of the

study and that vitamin K given to babies might cause childhood

cancer. Roche

then decided to fund a new study.27

 

The new study25 was a case-control study of 195 children with cancer

born at

either of two hospitals in Bristol, England, compared with 588

healthy children

also born at these hospitals. One hospital predominantly gave vitamin

K orally

and the other intramuscularly. The authors found a nearly two-fold

risk of

leukaemia in children who had received intramuscular vitamin K.

 

These findings were extremely worrying. Golding calculated that the

extra cases

of leukaemia caused by vitamin K injection could be as many as 980 in

the UK

alone.25 These results were supported by reports of the potential

carcinogenicity of vitamin K from Israels et al, who suggested that

low vitamin

K levels in the newborn protect against the risk of mutations during

a period

of rapid cell growth and division.39 Pizer et al did not find any

association

between the route of vitamin K administration and mutations in cells

but

concluded that his study was too small to show any real effect.62

Another study

reported no increase in abnormalities in newborn infants, but, with

only 12

infants, the study was too small to show any real effect.10 It is

worth noting

that after an intramuscular dose of vitamin K, the baby's plasma

levels are

almost 9000 times the normal adult levels.47 It has also been

suggested that

the cancer-causing agent could be a metabolite, N-epoxide, or some

othe!

r component of the solution other than vitamin K itself.15

 

Golding's study was criticised by many. One of the reasons was that

the authors

had to make assumptions for some cases, as the information on vitamin

K

administration was not clearly recorded. In spite of this, expert

epidemiologists considered that the results were plausible and so

could not be

lightly dismissed.15 Further studies were proposed to answer the

question of

cancer and vitamin K.

 

In 1993, results from three retrospective studies on vitamin K and

childhood

cancer were published. The studies were done in the USA, Denmark and

Sweden.41,

57, 19 These studies, although large, did not confirm the association

between

intramuscular vitamin K and childhood cancer. One of the studies not

only

showed no association between IM vitamin K and childhood cancer, it

also showed

no association between maternal smoking and childhood cancer, a

finding totally

at odds with the results from many other studies.19 The other two

studies were

also not comparable to the British study. One because of differences

in type of

vitamin K given41 and the other because of the use of birth cohorts

with

differing regimens of vitamin K usage.57

 

Because of the design flaws in these studies, there was still a need

for

further case-control studies. Results from two were published in

1996.2, 77

They had carefully matched controls and more accurate information on

whether

vitamin K had been given or not, and by which route. One of the

studies2

reported no association between intramuscular vitamin K and childhood

cancer

and the other77 found a risk of leukaemia, but only when cases were

compared

with local controls (i.e. from the same hospital) and not with

controls

randomly selected from the whole area under study. This, although

suggestive,

was not followed up but dismissed as a chance finding related to

multiple

testing.

 

The suggestion was then put forward that, as these studies had failed

to show a

definite association between intramuscular vitamin K and childhood

cancers,

worries about any potential cancer risk should be abandoned.83

 

At that time, four more studies on vitamin K and cancer were in

progress.44,

59, 60, 61 The results from these four studies were published in

1998. Two of

them failed to confirm any increased risk of childhood cancers.44 61

One of the

other studies showed a twofold risk of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

among 1-6

year olds,59 the other showed a significant risk for all cancers.60

 

So, the jury is still out on whether there is an increased risk of

childhood

leukaemia with the intramuscular form of vitamin K. Some recommend

that

intramuscular vitamin K should still be used, as the risk of

leukaemia " seems

more hypothetical than real " .76 Others believe that public confidence

in IM

vitamin K has been severely shaken and will be difficult to restore

fully. They

recommend an oral regimen similar to that used in the Netherlands of

25m g

daily, given by the mother. This would avoid the grossly

unphysiological peaks

of vitamin K from both the IM route and the present oral route.71

 

ORAL VITAMIN K VS INTRAMUSCULAR

 

The two main problems with giving vitamin K orally are that there is

no

licensed oral formulation, meaning that babies receive the

intramuscular form

orally, and that compliance with three oral doses is poor as many

doctors and

midwives are reluctant to give an unlicensed formula.13 The use of

unlicensed

preparations may theoretically expose professionals to litigation in

the event

of prophylactic failure or unforeseen adverse events.2

 

Roche, the manufacturers of Konakion, state that they do not

recommend the

administration of Konakion solution orally.63 Their reasons are:

 

a.. that they have no clinical studies to support oral use,

b.. phenol, which has been reported to be an irritant to newborns

mouths,

is used as a preservative,

c.. the variability in the production of bile salts in newborns may

affect

absorption,

d.. that Konakion given orally has a small association with

anaphylactic

reactions.

Page 6

 

The preparation was also unpleasant to taste and babies were inclined

to spit

it out82 or to vomit it back up. Only about half of an orally

administered dose

is absorbed.47 Even so, the plasma concentrations in babies who were

given oral

vitamin K reached 300 times the adult levels, before dropping off

slightly

after about 24 hours.47

 

After the publication of Golding's studies, further trials were done

on oral

vitamin K prophylaxis and whether it gave longer term protection. In

1992,

Cornelissen11 found plasma vitamin K concentrations were higher in

the group

given IM vitamin K than the oral group, but blood coagulability,

activities of

factors VII, X and PIVKA-II concentrations showed no differences. By

3 months

follow-up, vitamin K levels had dropped in both groups but more in

the oral

group. He suggests that neither give long term protection. One would

assume

that babies should be producing their own vitamin K by 3 months and,

if not,

what other mechanism could be hindering this process.

 

Von Kries et al78 studied repeated oral vitamin K prophylaxis in

Germany, with

3x 1 mg doses and found that it was not as effective as a 1mg

intramuscular

dose at birth. Another study by Cornelissen et al12 reported on the

effectiveness of differing regimens of oral vitamin K in four

different

countries - the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland and Australia (two

differing

regimes). In the Netherlands, babies are given 25 m g daily oral

vitamin K for

3 months with I mg given at birth either orally for healthy newborns

or

intramuscularly for unwell babies. In Germany, the regime is 3 x 1 mg

oral

doses as was also the case in Australia from 1993 to 1994. In

Switzerland 2

oral doses of a new 'mixed-micellar' oral vitamin K is given. The

Netherlands

had the lowest failure rate - 0 per 100,000. In Australia, where the

regime was

changed in 1994 from oral to IM, the failure rate was 1.5 per 100,000

for oral

and 0.9 per 100,000 for IM, showing that 3 oral doses are less

effective at pr!

eventing late onset HDN than one IM dose of vitamin K. Even if Roche

are

persuaded to bring the mixed-micellar preparation into New Zealand,

results

from Switzerland (failure rate of 1.2 per 100,000)12 show that

further study

needs to be done on the most effective timing of the doses.

 

If New Zealand parents wish their baby to receive oral vitamin K, the

recommended regimen is for 3 x 1mg doses, 1 at birth, 1 at 5 days and

1 at 6

weeks.6, 20 It is up to parents to ensure that their baby receives

all 3 doses

if they choose this form of prophylaxis.

 

CONCLUSION

 

It would seem an anachronism that babies are born with a deficiency

of such an

essential vitamin and require supplementation. In fact, although

there have

been many studies on differing aspects of vitamin K prophylaxis,

there has only

been one39 on the possible reasons for and the advantages (if any) of

the

physiological levels of vitamin K in newborns.

 

The risks of prophylaxis for the majority of babies who are at low

risk of HDN

are also not understood. As plasma vitamin K levels in newborns reach

300 times

normal adult levels for oral and almost 9000 times for IM vitamin

K47, some

research needs to be done on the effects this may have. Studies have

shown that

physiological levels of vitamin K maintain a careful balance between

coagulation and anti-coagulation and we have no idea what the effects

of

upsetting that delicate balance would be.

 

The number of children currently developing cancer during childhood

is much

higher than the number developing a life threatening or permanently

disabling

problem as a result of late onset HDN. The risk of childhood cancer is

estimated to be 1.4 per 1000, from the 1970 British cohort. If IM

vitamin K

caused cancer, there would be 100 extra cases of cancer per case of

HDN

prevented.16 This could mean that giving IM vitamin K to every baby

would be

doing more harm than good.36

 

The decision rests on parents' shoulders - the link between

intramuscular

vitamin K and childhood cancer has not been definitively proved, nor

has it

been completely disproved. It may be that an oral regimen as

suggested by Tripp

and McNinch71 could be the answer to the dilemma. If this is the

case, then

Roche needs to be lobbied to make the European preparations available

in New

Zealand. In the meantime, the choice is between no vitamin K, with

the mother

being aware of her dietary intake of vitamin K, an oral regimen or the

intramuscular formulation.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

a.. Anai T, Hirota Y, Yoshimatsu J et al. Can prenatal vitamin K1

supplementation replace prophylaxis at birth? Obst Gynec 1993;81:251-

4.

b.. Ansell P, Bull D and Roman E. Childhood leukaemia and

intramuscular

vitamin K: findings from a case-control study. BMJ 1996;313(7051):204-

5.

c.. Barton J, McNinch A. and Tripp J. Oral vitamin K prophylaxis and

frequency of late vitamin K deficiency bleeding (letter). Lancet 1994

343(8906):1168.

d.. Barton J, Tripp J. and McNinch A. Neonatal vitamin K prophylaxis

in the

British Isles: current practice and trends. BMJ 1995; 310(6980):632-3.

e.. Bhanchet P, Tuchinda S, Hathirat P et al. A bleeding syndrome in

infants due to acquired prothrombin complex deficiency. Clin Pediatr

1977;16:992 in, Hathaway W. New insights on vitamin K. Hematol Oncol

Clin North

Am 1987;1(3):367-379.

f.. Birkbeck J. Vitamin K prophylaxis in the newborn: a position

statement

of the Nutrition Committee of the Paediatric Society of New Zealand.

NZMJ

1988;101:421-2.

g.. Birkbeck J. Despite the contamination breastmilk remains the

best. NZ

Doctor July 1990.

h.. Brinkhous K, Smith H and Warner D. Plasma prothrombin level in

normal

infancy and in hemorrhagic disease of the newborn. Am J Med. Sci

1937;193:475-479 in, Ruby C. Vitamin K prophylaxis: a historical

perspective.

MIDIRS;7:3.

i.. Clarkson P and James A. Parenteral vitamin K1: the effective

prophylaxis against haemorrhagic disease for all newborn infants.

NZMJ 14 March

1990.

j.. Cornelissen M, Smeets D, Merkx G et al. Analysis of chromosome

aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in peripheral blood

lymphocytes of

newborns after vitamin K prophylaxis at birth. Pediatr Res

1991;30:550-3.

k.. Cornelissen EAM, Kollée LAA, DeAbreu RA et al. Effects of oral and

intramuscular vitamin K prophylaxis on vitamin K, PIVKA-II, and

clotting

factors in breastfed infants. Arch Dis Child 1992;67:1250-54.

l.. Cornelissen M, von Kries R, Loughnan P et al. Prevention of

vitamin K

deficiency bleeding: efficacy of different multiple oral dose

schedules of

vitamin K. Eur J Ped 1997;156(1):126-30.

m.. Croucher C. and Azzopandi D. Compliance with recommendations for

giving

vitamin K to newborn infants. BMJ 1994;308(6933):894-895.

n.. Dam H, Dyggve H, Larsen H and Plum P. The relationship of vitamin

K

deficiency to hemorrhagic disease of the newborn. Adv Pediatr

1952;5:129-153

(abstract).

o.. Darlow B. Vitamin K deficiency haemorrhage: dilemmas over

prophylaxis

continue. NZ Practice Nurse February 1995:35-37.

p.. Darlow B. and Nobbs P. The neonatal vitamin K debate: IM vs.

oral: two

views. New Ethicals May 1993:11-18.

q.. Dockerty J, Broadbent R and McNoe B. New Zealand hospital records

insufficient for vitamin K study. NZMJ 10 May 1995.

r.. Donley J. Vitamin K in relation to haemorrhagic disease of the

newborn.

NZCOM Journal December 1992.

 

 

Page 7

 

s.. Ekelund H, Finnstrom O, Gunnarskog I. et al. Administration of

vitamin

K to newborn infants and childhood cancer. BMJ 1993;307(6896):89-91.

t.. Fetus and Newborn Committee of the Paediatric Society of New

Zealand.

1992. Vitamin K administration in the newborn.

u.. Foetus and Newborn Society, Canadian Pediatric Society. The use of

vitamin K in the perinatal period. Canad MAJ 1988;139:127-130.

v.. Fournier B, Sann L, Guillaumont M and Leclerq M. Variations of

phylloquinone concentrations in human milk at various stages of

lactation and

in cow's milk at various seasons. Am J Clin Nutr 187;45:551-8.

w.. Garrow D, Chisholm M. and Radford M. Vitamin K and thrombotest

values

in full term infants. Arch Dis Child 1986;61:349-51.

x.. Göbel U, Sonnenschein-Kosenow S, Petrich C and von Voss H.

(Letter).

Lancet 1977;i:187-8.

y.. Golding J, Greenwood R, Birmingham K. et al. Childhood cancer,

intramuscular vitamin K and pethidine given during labour. BMJ

1992;305

(6849):341-6.

z.. Golding J, Paterson M and Kinlen L. Factors associated with

childhood

cancer in a national cohort study. Brit. J Cancer 1990;62:304-8.

aa.. Greenwood R. Vitamin K and childhood cancer. MIDIRS 1994;4

(3):258-9.

ab.. Greer F, Marshall S, Cherry J and Suttie J. Vitamin K status of

lactating mothers, human milk, and breast-feeding infants. Pediatrics

1991;88(4);751-6.

ac.. Greer F, Marshall S, Foley A et al. Improving the vitamin K

status of

breastfeeding infants with maternal vitamin K supplements. Pediatrics

1997;99(1);88-92.

ad.. Hall M. and Pairaudeau P. The routine use of vitamin K in the

newborn.

Midwifery 1987;3(4):170-7.

ae.. Hardwicke S. et al. Studies on the minimal effective dose of a

water-soluble vitamin K substitute in the prevention of

hypoprothrombinemia in

the newborn infant. J Pediatr 1944;24:259-269 (abstract).

af.. Haroon Y, Shearer M, Rahim S et al. The content of phylloquinone

(vitamin k1) in human milk, cow's milk and infant formula foods

determined by

high performance liquid chromatography. J Nutr 1982;112:1105-17.

ag.. Hathaway W. New insights on Vitamin K. Hematol Oncol Clin North

Am

1987;1(3):367-379.

ah.. Henderson-Smart, D. Giving vitamin K to newborn infants: a

therapeutic

dilemma. MJA 1996;165:414-5.

ai.. Heron P, Cull A., Bourchier D and Lees H. Avoidable hazard to New

Zealand children: case reports of haemorrhagic disease of the

newborn. NZMJ

1988;101:507-8.

aj.. Hey, Edmund. Vitamin K - the debate continues. MIDIRS 1998;8

(2):234-6.

ak.. Hilgartner, M. Vitamin K and the newborn. New Eng J Med

1993;329(13):957-8.

al.. Hull D. Vitamin K and childhood cancer. BMJ 1992;305:326-7.

am.. Israels l, Friesen E., Jansen A. and Israels E. Vitamin K1

increases

sister chromatid exchange in vitro in human leukocytes and in vivo in

fetal

sheep cells: a possible role for 'vitamin K deficiency' in the fetus.

Pediatr

Res 1991;30:550-3.

an.. Jorgensen F, Fielding P, Vinther S et al. Vitamin K to neonates.

Peroral versus intramuscular administration. Acta Pediatr Scand

1991;80(3):304-7.

ao.. Klebanoff M, Read J, Mills J. et al. The risk of childhood cancer

after neonatal exposure to vitamin K. New Eng J Med. 1993;329(13):905-

8.

ap.. Koppe J, Pluim E and Olie K. Breastmilk, PCBs, dioxins and

vitamin K

deficiency: discussion paper. J Royal Soc. Medicine 1989;82:416-419

in, Donley,

Joan. Vitamin K in relation to haemorrhagic disease of the newborn.

NZCOM

Journal Dec 1992.

aq.. Malia R, Preston F and Mitchell V. Evidence against vitamin K

deficiency in normal neonates. Thromb Haemost 1980;44:159.

ar.. McKinney P, Juszczak E, Findlay E, Smith K. Case-control study of

childhood leukaemia and cancer in Scotland: findings for neonatal

intramuscular

vitamin K. BMJ 1998;316:173-7.

as.. McNinch A and Tripp J. Haemorrhagic disease of the newborn in the

British Isles: a two year prospective study. BMJ 1991;303(6810):1105-

1109.

at.. McNinch A, Orme R and Tripp J. Haemorrhagic disease of the

newborn

returns. Lancet 1983;i:1089-90 (abstract).

au.. McNinch A, Upton C, Samuels M et al. Plasma concentrations after

oral

or intramuscular vitamin K1 in neonates. Arch Dis Child 1985;60:814-

818.

av.. Meyer T and Angus J. The effect of large doses of Synkavit in the

newborn. Arch Dis Child 1956;31: 212-5 in, Ruby, C. Vitamin K: a

historical

perspective. MIDIRS 1997;7(3):362-4.

aw.. Mori P, Bisogni C, Odino S et al. (letter). Lancet 1977;ii:188.

ax.. Motohara K, Endo F and Matsuda I. Screening for late neonatal

vitamin

K deficiency by acarboxyprothrombin in dried blood spots. Arch Dis

Child

1987;62:370-375.

ay.. Motz R. Late haemothorax after oral vitamin K. NZMJ 11 November

1992:459.

az.. Muller A., van Doorm J and Hemker H. Heparin-like inhibitor of

blood

coagulation in normal newborn. Nature 1977;267:616-7.

ba.. New Ethicals Compendium; 3c: 303-304.

bb.. Nishiguchi T, Saga K, Sumimoto K. et al. Vitamin K prophylaxis to

prevent neonatal vitamin K deficient intracranial haemorrhage in

Shizuoka

prefecture. Brit J Obstet Gynec 1996;103 (11):1078-84.

bc.. O'Connor M. and Addiego J. Use of oral vitamin K1 to prevent

hemorrhagic disease of the newborn infant. J Pediatr 1986;108:616-9.

bd.. O'Connor M, Livingstone D, Hannah J. and Wilkins D. Vitamin K

deficiency and breastfeeding. Am J Dis Child 1983;137:601-2

be.. Olsen J, Hertz H, Blinkenberg K. et al. Vitamin K regimens and

incidence of childhood cancer in Denmark. BMJ 1994;308(6933):895-6 in,

Greenwood, R. Vitamin K and childhood cancer. MIDIRS 1994;4(3):258-260

bf.. Olson J. Recommended dietary intakes (RDI) of vitamin K in

humans. Am

J Clin Nutr 1987;45:687-92.

bg.. Parker L, Cole M, Craft A, Hey E. Neonatal vitamin K

administration

and childhood cancer in the north of England: retrospective case-

control study.

BMJ 1998;316:189-93.

bh.. Passmore S, Draper G, Brownbill P, Kroll M. Case-control studies

of

relation between childhood cancer and neonatal vitamin K

administration:

retrospective case-control study. BMJ 1998;316:178-84.

bi.. Passmore S, Draper G, Brownbill P, Kroll M. Ecological studies of

relation between hospital policies on neonatal vitamin K

administration and

subsequent occurrence of childhood cancer. BMJ 1998;316:184-9

bj.. Pizer B, Boyse J, Hunt L. and Mott M. Neonatal vitamin K

administration and in vivo somatic mutation. Mutat Res 1995;347:135-9.

bk.. Roche Products Ltd. Position statement re: Konakion injection

given

orally.

bl.. Roche Products Ltd. New oral vitamin K formulation for newborns

(press

release). Welwyn Garden City, 30 Aug 1996.

bm.. Ruby Christine. Vitamin K prophylaxis: a historical perspective.

MIDIRS 1997;7(3):362-4.

bn.. Shearer M. et al. Plasma vitamin K1 in mothers and their newborn

babies. Lancet 1982:460-3 in, Hathaway, W. New insights on vitamin K.

Hematol

Oncol Clin North Am 1987;1(3):367-379.

bo.. Stevenson, J. The vitamin K conundrum. Maternity Alliance Action

Newsletter July/August 1992.

bp.. Suzuki H, Nakao T and Hiraga K. Vitamin K deficiency in male

rats fed

diets containing butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). Toxicol Appl

Pharmacol

1979;50:261-6 in, Birkbeck J. Vitamin K prophylaxis in the newborn: a

position

statement of the Nutrition Committee of the Paediatric Society of New

Zealand.

NZMJ 1988;101:421-2.

bq.. Townsend C. The hemorrhagic disease of the newborn. Arch Pediatr

1894;11:559-562 in, Birkbeck J. Vitamin K prophylaxis in the newborn:

a

position statement of the Nutrition Committee of the Paediatric

Society of New

Zealand. NZMJ 1988;101:421-2.

br.. Tripp J. and McNinch A. Haemorrhagic disease and vitamin K. Arch

Dis

Child 1987;62:436-7.

bs.. Tripp J and McNinch A. The vitamin K debacle: cut the Gordian

knot but

first do no harm. Arch Dis Child 1998;79:295-299.

bt.. Vail, B. Vitamin K prophylaxis and hemorrhagic disease of the

newborn.

ICEA Review 1985;9(3).

bu.. Van Doorm J and Hemker H. Vitamin K deficiency in the newborn

(letter). Lancet 1977;ii:708-9.

bv.. Van Doorm J, Muller A. and Hemker, H. Heparin-like inhibitor, not

vitamin-K deficiency, in the newborn (letter). Lancet 1977;i:852-3.

bw.. Vietti T, Murphy T, James J and Pritchard J. Observations on the

prophylactic use of vitamin K in the newborn. J Pediatr 1960;56

(3);343-6

(abstract).

bx.. Von Kries R. Neonatal vitamin K prophylaxis: the Gordian knot

still

awaits untying. BMJ 1998;316 (7126):161.

by.. Von Kries R, Göbel U, Hachmeister A. et al. Vitamin K and

childhood

cancer: a population based case-control study in Lower Saxony,

Germany. BMJ

1996;313(7051):199-203.

bz.. Von Kries R, Hachmeister A and Göbel U. Repeated oral vitamin K

prophylaxis in West Germany: acceptance and efficacy. BMJ 1995;310

(6987):1097-8.

ca.. Von Kries R, Kreppel S, Becker A, Tangermann R and Göbel U.

Acarboxyprothrombin activity after oral prophylactic vitamin K. Arch

Dis Child

1987;62: 938-40.

cb.. Von Kries R, Shearer M and Göbel U. Vitamin K in infancy. Eur J

Pediatr 1988;147:106-12.

cc.. Waddell W. and Guerry D. The role of vitamin K in the etiology,

prevention and treatment of hemorrhage in the newborn infant. J Ped

1939;15:802

in, Ruby, C. Vitamin K prophylaxis: a historical perspective. MIDIRS

1997;7(3):362-4.

cd.. Whipple G. Hemorrhagic disease; antithrombin and prothrombin

factors.

Arch Intern Med. 1913;12:637-641 in, Birkbeck, J. Vitamin K

prophylaxis in the

newborn: a position statement of the Nutrition Committee of the

Paediatric

Society of New Zealand. NZMJ 1988;101:421-2.

ce.. Zipursky A. Vitamin K at birth. BMJ 1994;313(1051):179-180

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...