Guest guest Posted April 10, 2004 Report Share Posted April 10, 2004 Fluoride's Effects on Bone- Dr. John Lee M.D. JoAnn Guest Apr 10, 2004 17:48 PDT Fluoride's Effects on Bone- Dr. John Lee http://www.johnleemd.net/breaking_news/fluoridation_02.html - Fluoride's Effect on BONE - and some related considerations T.C. Schmidt – 12 March 2000 Foreword. Except for the introductory sentence (from a textbook); one CDC document; two FDA documents; and the NIOSH RTECS (as referenced in the text per se.) the technical basis for this review has been LIMITED on purpose ONLY to those citations which are retrievable on- line from the National Library of Medicine (PubMed MEDLINE and/or Internet Grateful Med TOXLINE). Introduction Bone tissue has long been recognized as a key accumulation site for some toxic substances – " bones also serve a detoxicating function, elements such as lead, radium, fluorine and arsenic being removed from circulation and deposited into bones and teeth " (The Physiological Basis of Medical Practice, 1961). That is, fluoride accumulates in skeletal tissue, concentrating in the surface layers of the lacunae and canaliculae -- thus helping to clarify the pathogenesis of the osseous lesions seen in skeletal fluorosis (Smith, 1985a). Bone samples from cadavers show that fluoride content of trabecular bone correlates with that of the drinking water -- with histomorphic bone changes becoming markedly increased when water fluoride content exceeds 1.5-ppm (Alrnala, et al. 1985). Thus, daily intake of fluoride that is deemed beneficial to developing teeth, if ingested throughout adult life, may lead to skeletal fluorosis of varying degrees, plus certain disorders that are now becoming common in both the middle-aged and elderly (Smith, 1985b). This was more recently substantiated in a review (Diesendorf, et al. 1997) -- showing " a consistent pattern of evidence " . Osteoporosis in the long bones may provide the earliest radiographic indicator of fluorosis (Lian and Wu, 1986); with clinical radiological aspects including calcification and/or ossification of the attachments of the soft- tissue structures to bone, osteosclerosis, osteopenia, growth lines, and metaphyseal osteomalactic zones (Wang, et al. 1994). More subtle changes as stained section and microradiograph include interstitial mineralization defects and mottled eperiosteocytic lacunae (Boivin, et al. 1989) and CT/MR imaging are very helpful in early diagnosis (Reddy, et al. 1993). Lessons-Learned from Therapy Epidemiology Fluoride is a cumulative toxin, adversely affecting the homeostasis of bone mineral metabolism. Total ingested fluoride is the most important factor determining the clinical course of osteo-fluorosis, which is on the increase world-wide (Krishnamachari, 1986). A level of 4-10 ppm in drinking water causes progressive ankylosis of various joints and crippling deformities irrespective of other variables – as evidenced by skeletal radiology and scintigraphy, cross-correlated with urinary and serum fluoride levels (Gupta, et al. 1993). At greater than 4-ppm for longer than 10-years (Haimanot, 1990) there is generalized osteophytosis and sclerosis with reduction in diameter of nter-vertebral foramina and spinal clonal. Animal studies (Turner, et al. 1996) showed fluoridated water equivalent to only 3-ppm in humans results in reduced bone strength after 6-months -- when accompanied by renal deficiency. Similarly, comparison of a control community having a fluoride content of 1-ppm and that of another with a 4-ppm level (Sowers, et al. 1991) showed a 95% confidence-interval (CI) for the 5-year relative risk (RR) for women of any fracture of 1.0-4.4 -- and for wrist, spine or hip it was 1.1-4.7. That such increase in risk correlates with fluoride accumulation was corroborated based on a study of toenail fluoride concentration in more than 64,000 women (Feskanich, et al. 1998) -- comparing the highest quartile against the lowest quartile provided a 95% CI 0.2- 4.0 for hip fracture RR, and 0.8-3.1 for forearm fracture. That detrimental accumulation occurs due to water fluoridation at the " public health goal " was shown by comparing fluoridated and non- fluoridated areas (Alhava, et al. 1980) with the highest accumulations being in women with severe osteoporosis. That reduction in bone strength presents clinically at the " public health goal " -- the 95% CI RR for hip fracture of fluoridated vs non-fluoridated (Jacobsen, et al. 1992) was 1.06-1.10 for women and 1.13-1.22 for men. Similarly, for femoral neck fracture the 95% CI of RR was 1.08- 1.46 for women and 1.00-1.81 for men (Danielson, et al. 1992) -- and a study (Kurttio, et. al. 1999) showed a 95% CI for hip fracture among younger women of 1.16-3.76. Related Considerations During treatment with fluoride for spinal osteoporosis, some patients suffered spontaneous bilateral hip fractures (Gerster, et al. 1983) with histological examination revealing severe osteo-fluorosis -- attributed to excessive retention of fluoride due to renal insufficiency. Fluoride is nephrotoxic, causing lesions of kidney tubule (Kassabi, et al. 1981). Acute renal failure results from accidental industrial exposure to fluoride (Usada, et al. 1998); with the nephrotoxic effects related to serum fluoride level. Not only does this result in aluminum deposition into bone (Ittel, et al. 1992); as fluoride elimination is via the kidney (Kono, 1994) and decreased kidney function results in increasing serum fluoride, a vicious cycle is not unlikely (Marumo and Li; 1996). Elevated PTH is not uncommon in fluorosis (Srivastava, et al. 1989) and is a uremic toxin playing a major role in nervous system dysfunction (Smogorzewski and Massry, 1995) and development of hypertension (Uchimoto, et al. 1995). Also, there is evidence that detrimental effects on kidney function may occur at fluoride levels associated with the " misuse " of fluoridated dentifrice by children (Borke and Whitford; 1999). Finally, while CDC calls for a normal control range for school fluoridation systems of up to 6.5-ppm (Water Fluoridation: A manual for water plant operators; 1994) the following relate the deleterious renal and other effects caused by a bottled mineral water at 8.5-ppm (Alexandra, et al. 1984; Arlaud, et al. 1984; Noel, et al. 1985; Camous, et al. 1986; Boivin, et al. 1986; Lantz, et al. 1987; Welsch, et al. 1990; Haettich, et al. 1991; Nicolay, et al. 1997 and 1999). Some epidemiological studies indicate that men may have a greater susceptibility to the detrimental effects of fluoride on bone strength (Karagas, et al. 1996; inter-alia); a comparison of fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas revealed a significant increase in osteosarcoma among males under 30-years of age (Mahoney, et al. 1991); the animal model also produces male osteosarcomas (Bucher, et al. 1991); and a gender-specific physiologically based pharmokinetic model has been developed to describe the absorption, distribution and elimination of fluoride (Rao, et al. 1995). Testosterone deficiency is a major risk factor for male osteoporosis (Katznelson, 1998); and fluoride correlates with decreased testosterone levels (Susheela and Jethanandani, 1996), as well as reduced sperm count and motility (Narayana and Chinoy, 1994). In most likelihood, this is the causative factor for reduced fertility rate in areas of the U.S. having fluoride levels of at least 3-ppm (Freni, 1994). That is, based on the deleterious testicular effects in three different animal models (Chinoy and Sequeira, 1989; Sushella and Kumar, 1991; Krasowski and Wlostowski, 1992; Kumar and Sushella, 1994 and 1995) this decrease in the total fertility rate due to ingested fluoride is paternal in nature. As CDC now " celebrates " the fifty-years of water fluoridation as being one of the greatest public health advances of the century, the following have documented very significant (approximately 50%) decrease in human semen quality (both seminal volume and mean sperm density) concomitant with a very significant (300-400%) increase in testicular cancer over the past fifty-years – (Carlsen, et al. 1992; Giwercman, et al. 1993; Carlsen, et al. 1995; Skakkebaek, et al. 1998; Medras and Jankowska, 1999; Sinclair, 2000). While those references assert that this must be due to some (albeit undetermined) environmental pollutant, the previous mentioned study showing decreased total fertility rate in the areas of the U.S. with water fluoride levels of at least 3-ppm (ibid, 1994) has a consensus p-value of 0.0002 - 0.0004. In addition to being a " reproductive effector " (due to both paternal and maternal effects) the compound descriptors for sodium-fluoride in the NIOSH Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS) also include " tumorigen " and " mutagen " . The latter is based on more than 40 positive results including the following -- unscheduled DNA synthesis and DNA inhibition of human fibroblast; cytogenic analysis of human fibroblast, human lymphocyte, and other human cells; mutation in human lymphocyte; and DNA inhibition in human lung. Similarly, another review of genetic toxicity (Zeiger, et al. 1993) states that gene mutations in human cells were produced in the majority of cases, and " the weight of the evidence leads to the conclusion that fluoride does result in increased chromosome aberrations " . The " painful lower extremity syndrome " from fluoride treatment has been attributed (O'Duffy, et al. 1986) to stress fractures. An associated fibromyalgia however, should not be dismissed out of hand. It is associated with " chronic fatigue syndrome " , and there is a relationship between chronic fatigue and pineal gland calcification (Sandyk and Awerbuch, 1994) with the latter consisting of apatite crystals similar in size and structure to dentin and bone (Nakamura, et al. 1995). Thus, fluorides potential to acerbate soft-tissue pathologies in general, deserves further consideration. Similarly, the cognitive difficulties that result from exposure to fluoride (Spittle, 1994) are accompanied by general malaise and fatigue; intolerance to low levels of environmental chemicals is a polysymptomatic sequela of chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, etc. resulting from an immunological and/or a neurogenic triggering of somatic symptoms and inflammation (Bell, et al. 1998); and the earliest subjective symptoms of osteo-fluorosis are arthritic in nature. Side-effects of fluoride treatment also include gastro-intestinal problems simply referred to as -- " symptoms " (Riggs, et al. 1990); " intolerance " (Dequeker and Declerick, 1993); and " complaints " (Lips, 1998). In two separate studies, the comparative results between patients receiving fluoride treatment for 3-12 months (Das, et al. 1994) and those having documented osteo-fluorosis (Dasarathy, et al. 1996) were identical - 70% endoscopic abnormalities, 70-90% histologic chronic atrophic gastritis; and 100% microscopic abnormalities such as loss of microvilli. Moreover, these affects were also qualitatively similar to a study (Gupta, et al. 1992) that correlated non-ulcer dyspepsia with ingested fluoride level. As expected, symptoms occurring at the (RTECS) human acute TDLo dosage of only 214 ug/kg are gastrointestinal. Similar to curing osteoporosis, fluoride has been proposed as a preventive measure (sic) against Alzheimer's Disease (AD) based on the presumption that by direct competition in the gut, fluoride would decrease aluminum uptake (Kraus and Forbes, 1992). Rather, such antagonism (Li, et al. 1990) is due to the formation of aluminum- fluoride complex (Li, et al. 1991). That fluoride potentiates neuro- toxicity of aluminum has been substantiated (van der Voet, et.al. 1999) -- consisting of interference with neuronal cytoskeleton metabolism. Aluminum accumulations have been found in nuclei of the paired-helical filament (PHF) containing neurons in the brains of both AD patients and elderly normal controls (Shore and Wyatt, 1983) but as no elevations of aluminum were found in serum or cerebrospinal fluid of AD patients, aluminum alone is not the cause – rather, aluminum in PHF bearing neurons is simply a " marker " . Fluoride had been deemed to be a potent stimulator of bone formation (Farley, et al. 1983), but most recent work indicates that the mitogenic effect on osteoblasts is due to fluoro-aluminate (Caverzasio, et al. 1997; Susa, et al. 1997) -- while another model claims the mitogenic action is non-specific (Lau and Baylink,1998). In the animal model, 0.5-ppm aluminum-fluoride for one-year resulted in decreased neuronal density and " necrotic-like " brain-cells (Varner, et al. 1998). Also, fluoride decreases protein content of brain tissue (Shashi, et al. 1994) with 7-months of 30-ppm fluoride resulting in a 10% decrease in total brain phospholipid content (Guan, et.al. 1998) – as well as (biphasic) changes in brain levels of coenzyme-Q (Wang, et al. 1997). Osteo-fluorosis is endemic in certain regions of China (Dasheng and Cutress, 1996) with detrimental effects of fluoride on the IQ of children now being documented (Yang, et al. 1994; Li, et al. 1995). Just as ingested fluoride has a deleterious effect on bone, the same is true for developing teeth. Peer Review Journal References Cited in the Text – with more than 80% of them being published within the past ten-years Akapa, et al. (1997). Dental fluorosis in 12-15-year-ol rural children exposed to fluorides from well drinking water in the Hail region of Saudi Arabia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 25(4): 324- 327. Alexandre, et al. (1984). Fluoride poisoning caused by Vichy Saint- Yorre water. [title only; article in French]. Presse Med; 13(16); 1009. Alhava, et al. (1980). The effect of drinking water fluoridation on the fluoride content, strength and mineral density of human bone. Acta Orthop Scand; 51(3): 413-420. Angelillo, et al. (1999). Caries and fluorosis prevalence in communities with different concentrations of fluoride in the water. Caries Res; 33(2):114-122. _________________ JoAnn Guest mrsjo- DietaryTi- http://www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest The complete " Whole Body " Health line consists of the " AIM GARDEN TRIO " Ask About Health Professional Support Series: AIM Barleygreen " Wisdom of the Past, Food of the Future " http://www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/AIM.html PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER We have made every effort to ensure that the information included in these pages is accurate. However, we make no guarantees nor can we assume any responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product, or process discussed. Tax Center - File online by April 15th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.