Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: No Bacteria Left Behind

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:18:02 -0500

HSI - Jenny Thompson

No Bacteria Left Behind

 

No Bacteria Left Behind

 

Health Sciences Institute e-Alert

 

March 30, 2004

 

**************************************************************

 

Dear Reader,

 

Every day, school is in session inside our bodies. And the

students and teachers are one and the same: bacteria.

 

Bacteria are highly adaptive because they actually " teach "

one another to resist antibiotics. When one bacterium

develops resistance to an antibiotic, it can share that

resistance with similar and even unrelated strains. They do

this by passing DNA-containing organisms called plasmids,

from one to another. The result: Due to the excessive use of

antibiotics, virtually all of the bacterial infections known

to scientists are becoming resistant to even the most

powerful antibiotics.

 

Fortunately, awareness of this overuse has led to a general

rethinking about how best to utilize antibiotics. Now a new

test has been developed that may provide doctors with the

information they need to avoid prescribing antibiotics

unnecessarily.

 

-----------------------------

Sorting the Bs from the Vs

-----------------------------

 

Antibiotics can only control bacteria - not viruses. But

because many viral and bacterial infections have similar

symptoms, doctors often prescribe antibiotics to treat

viruses on the chance that they might be bacteria. So it's

no mystery why many unneeded prescriptions are filled for

respiratory infections and colds that are viral infections.

 

Currently there are tests that can determine the exact

nature of an infection, but they tend to either take too

long to show results or are too expensive to be practical.

But a new test may change all that. This test quickly

measures levels of procalcitonin, a blood protein that rises

sharply in the presence of a bacterial infection.

Procalcitonin levels rise only slightly in response to viral

infections.

 

As reported in The Lancet medical journal last month,

researchers at the University Hospital in Basel,

Switzerland, devised a trial to examine the procalcitonin

test. More than 240 subjects who were admitted to the

hospital with lower respiratory tract infections were

assigned either standard care, or care based on the results

of a procalcitonin test.

 

In the procalcitonin group, 43 percent showed levels high

enough to prescribe antibiotics. In the standard care group,

patients were diagnosed using x-rays and other tests to

determine infection type. In this group, 83 percent received

antibiotics.

 

Favorable outcomes for patients in both groups were about

equal, and none of the patients in the procalcitonin group

experienced any adverse effects due to a lack of

antibiotics. Follow-up tests to verify infection types

confirmed that approximately 20 percent of the patients in

both groups had bacterial infections.

 

One of the authors of the study observed that while

antibiotics were over-prescribed in the procalcitonin

group, " The test halves antibiotic use, without altering the

clinical outcome. "

 

-----------------------------

No dipstick just yet

-----------------------------

 

What the immediate future holds in store for the

procalcitonin test remains to be seen. More research and

development is required in order to transform it into what

one antibiotic resistance expert calls a " quick and easy

dipstick test " that could reveal bacterial infection right

away.

 

So it may be awhile yet before your doctor has a

procalcitonin test ready to use in his office. In the

meantime, doctors and patients alike need to be more careful

about resorting to antibiotics to treat every sniffle,

earache and cough. And the growing crisis of antibiotic

resistance is only part of the reason to be wary.

 

Just last month, in the e-Alert " Protection Jumps The Rails "

(2/19/04), I told you about a large University of Washington

study that revealed how excessive antibiotic use may be

associated with an elevated risk of breast cancer. In that

study, the women who had the highest rates of cumulative

days of antibiotic use over 17 years had a sharply increased

risk of death due to breast cancer.

 

And in a recent " Baseline of Health " newsletter, HSI

Panelist Jon Barron shared details about a 2003 study of the

effects of antibiotic use in young children. The Henry Ford

Hospital (Detroit) researchers followed 448 children from

birth to seven years. Nearly half of the children received

antibiotic treatments (mostly penicillin) within the first

six months of life, and among these children the risk of

developing asthma was two and a half times greater than the

risk to children who received no antibiotics within the

first six months. Risk of developing allergies was also

significantly increased in the antibiotic group.

 

-----------------------------

Good alternatives

-----------------------------

 

Without question, antibiotics are important, life-saving

tools. But the overuse of these drugs has to be curtailed or

the antibiotic resistance crisis will turn into a disaster.

So the next time your doctor suggests writing an antibiotic

prescription, ask specific questions about why it's

necessary and what other options might be workable.

 

For instance, in many cases a natural antibiotic could be

just as effective as a pharmaceutical variety. In the e-

Alert I mentioned above I reviewed four natural antibiotics

recommended by HSI Panelist Allan Spreen, M.D.: vitamin C,

grapefruit seed extract, olive leaf extract and colloidal

silver. (You can find that e-Alert on our web site at

www.hsibaltimore.com with a search of the e-Alert archives.)

 

And I've made a special note to follow the progress of the

procalcitonin test, which could emerge as the most important

means of cutting back antibiotic use. As that develops I'll

keep you posted.

 

**************************************************************

To start receiving your own copy of the HSI e-Alert, visit:

http://www.hsibaltimore.com/freecopy.html

Or forward this e-mail to a friend so they can sign-up to

receive their own copy of the HSI e-Alert.

 

**************************************************************

 

... and another thing

 

Crunching numbers can be frustrating when the numbers can't

be entirely trusted.

 

In the e-Alert " Postcard From Buenos Aires " (3/16/04), I

told you how the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test may be

a useful tool for predicting the potential for prostate

cancer, but only when combined with other types of screening

for the disease.

 

In response, an HSI member named Peg wrote with this

question: " On the subject of PSA, what are the levels? What

is a low number and high number to really be concerned with?

I hear the numbers and I really don't know what they mean. "

 

This is a good question, because any man who has a PSA test

will be able to discuss the results better with his doctor

if he knows the simple parameters.

 

Here are the PSA ranges, as listed by the National Cancer

Institute (NCI):

 

* Normal - 0 to 4 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml)

* Slightly Elevated - 4 to 10 ng/ml

* Moderately Elevated - 10 to 20 ng/ml

* Highly Elevated - more than 20 ng/ml

 

According to NCI guidelines, PSA false positive results

occur mostly in men who are 50 or older. In this age group,

about 15 of every 100 men tested will have PSA levels in the

slightly elevated range or higher. Of those 15, only three

will actually have cancer.

 

Once again, it can't be stressed strongly enough that a

single elevated PSA reading should not prompt a biopsy

without confirmation of cancer possibility from other

screening methods.

 

To Your Good Health,

 

Jenny Thompson

Health Sciences Institute

 

**************************************************************

 

Sources:

" Effect of Procalcitonin-Guided Treatment on Antibiotic Use

and Outcome in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Cluster-

Randomised, Single-Blinded Intervention Trial " The Lancet,

Vol. 363, 2004, thelancet.com

" Test May Lower Antibiotic Use " Helen R. Pilcher, Nature

Science Update, 2/20/04, nature.com

" New Test May Determine Antibiotic Need " Associated Press,

2/18/04, msnbc.com

" Antibiotic Use in Relation to the Risk of Breast Cancer "

Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 291, 2004,

ama-assn.org

" Asthma and Antibiotics " Jon Barron, Baseline of Health,

10/13/04, jonbarron.org

" Questions and Answers About the Prostate-Specific Antigen

(PSA) Test " National Cancer Institute, cis.nci.nih.gov

 

Copyright ©1997-2004 by www.hsibaltimore.com, L.L.C.

The e-Alert may not be posted on commercial sites without

written permission.

 

**************************************************************

Before you hit reply to send us a question or request,

please visit here:

http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ealert/questions.html

 

**************************************************************

If you'd like to participate in the HSI Forum, search past

e-Alerts and products or you're an HSI member and would

like to search past articles, visit http://www.hsibaltimore.com

 

**************************************************************

 

 

 

 

 

Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...