Guest guest Posted January 26, 2004 Report Share Posted January 26, 2004 Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:38:48 -0800 Cancer Decisions THE MOSS REPORTS Newsletter (01/25/04) ---------------------- Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D. Weekly CancerDecisions.com Newsletter #117 01/25/04 ---------------------- THE MOSS REPORTS Research in the cancer field moves fast. We are continually updating the 200-plus Moss Reports on different kinds of cancer, incorporating information about the latest developments as well as new information gleaned from my investigative travels abroad. I also continue to offer one-on-one phone consultations to people who are struggling with difficult cancer treatment decisions. Many people find that the reports and/or the phone consultations are a good way to clarify the issues that are confronting them and to learn about new treatment possibilities that might otherwise be hard to find. Because of my busy writing and research schedule, I do a maximum of one phone consultation per day, and so appointment spaces are limited. If you are interested in either a Report or a Phone Consultation, you should call Anne or Diane at 800-980-1234 (call 814-238-3367 from abroad). TWO CHEERS FOR QUACKERY! The eighteenth century savant, Dr. Samuel Johnson, defined a quack as " a boastful pretender to arts which he does not understand, a vain boastful pretender…who proclaims his own Medical ability in public places. " Such medical impostors still exist. But times - and quackery itself - have changed. The Online Cancer Dictionary defines quackery as the deliberate misrepresentation of the ability of a substance (or device) to prevent or treat disease. Quacks are not only unqualified and incompetent, but also appeal to our desire to believe that every disease is curable or at least treatable. The subject of quackery has been much on my mind since I read two wonderful, thought-provoking books on the topic. The first is Professor Roy Porter's " Quacks: Fakers & Charlatans in English Medicine. " Porter was a medical and social historian who wrote or edited over 100 books, including the best-selling " The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity. " He was professor of history and acting head of the academic unit of the Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London. Prof. Porter's untimely death at the age of 55 (he had a heart attack while bicycling home from his office) was a grievous loss to the field of medical history. The second book is an outstanding Italian contribution to the same field. It is Dr. Piero Gambaccini's " Mountebanks and Medicasters, " which was published in English last month. ( " Medicaster, " by the way, is an archaic term for a quack.) It is written by a professor of radiology who lives in Florence. In earlier times, many of the most famous charlatans and mountebanks were of Italian origin, and this book is a history of quackery in Italy from the Middle Ages to the modern period. Both books are as fair-minded as they are fascinating, and are highly recommended to anyone who is interested in the phenomenon of quackery, the age-old business of relieving sick people of their money on false pretenses. But it turns out that the battle between quacks and " quackbusters " has never been as clear-cut as one might imagine. The seventeenth century British playwright Ben Jonson may have excoriated quacks as " turdy-facy, nasty-paty, lusty, fartical rouges. " But, as Prof. Porter demonstrates, the boundaries between quackery and official medical practices have always been uncertain. " Altruistic doctors did not confront thievish quacks like white meeting black, " he says. Paradoxically, quacks sometimes did a modest amount of good; orthodox doctors, on the other hand, often inadvertently caused their patients harm and sometimes even killed them. It takes serious study and discernment to differentiate between good and bad in medicine. Overrun With Quacks Throughout its history, and especially during the 18th and 19th centuries, Europe was overrun with itinerant " healers. " These were men (and occasionally women) who sold medical wares in markets and on street corners. They would usually hawk their remedies from a raised platform in the marketplace (hence the term " mountebank, " meaning " to climb up on a bench. " ) Sometimes they appeared draped in serpents, those ancient symbols of the god of healing, and a perennial source of fascination to any crowd. Quacks were past masters of fast-talking repartee - one suggested origin of the word 'charalatan " ' is from the Italian 'cialare', which means 'to prattle' - and they were often accompanied by a clown or " zany, " who would soften up the audience for the sales pitch. Italy was the home territory of many of Europe's quacks and eventually most European charlatans copied the Italian model. According to Prof. Porter: " The traditional quack in renaissance Europe, modelling himself on the Italian ciarlatani, prefaced his act by defining a public space, a theatre where his word was king. The mountebank performed from a mobile stage or improvised rostrum to give himself the advantage of height-or, like a general, declaimed from horseback, with the additional advantage of a ready get-away. " In a sense, then, they were the primitive forerunners of the entertainment industry, providing a kind of traveling roadshow for an amusement-starved populace. What became of the quacks? There are different opinions on this subject. The " quackbusters " of today will tell you with righteous conviction that yesterday's quacks became the complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners of today. But both of these well-researched and well-written books provide ample evidence that this is not the case. Prof. Porter makes it clear that the quacks were anything but alternative in both their world view and the way they practiced. To the contrary; they aspired to be indistinguishable from regular doctors. Furthermore, as Prof. Gambaccini shows, the medicines sold by the quacks were sometimes more effective than those prescribed by the real physicians. Survival in Adversity Quacks are a fascinating example of survival in the face of adversity. These rag-tag practitioners would say or do almost anything to get their next meal. They usually called themselves " doctor, " or even invented high degrees and honors to buttress shady reputations, whereas in reality most of them had no formal medical education or credentials whatsoever. The remedies they sold were often mysterious. They did everything they could to keep the ingredients secret, despite the best efforts of the medical guilds to wrest these secrets from them. It was typical for a quack to offer either cure-all panaceas or, conversely, " specifics " for a laundry list of ailments, most of which we no longer can even recognize as genuine disease states. One " Infallible Mountbanke, " caricatured in a play, boasted that he could cure: The Cramp, The Stitch The Squirt, the Itch The Gout, the Stone, the Pox The Mulligrubs The Bonny Scrubs And all Pandora's Box. Handbills aimed at women offered to cure " the Glimmering of the Gizzard, the Quavering of the Kidneys, and the Wambling Trot " (Porter, p. 57). So, if you had 'mulligrubs' or 'glimmering gizzards,' a quack was definitely the man to see! Some quack remedies were harmful or poisonous, especially those that contained mercury or other heavy metals. Others were merely sugar water generously laced with alcohol. But a small number contained ingredients derived from folk medicine, an honest branch of therapeutics that was not as commercially driven. For instance, at a time when the British navy refused to acknowledge that lemons or limes could cure scurvy, folk practitioners were already curing it with scurvy grass, or cochlearia. Quacks knew that people could pick this herb for themselves. They therefore offered " improvements " on such readily available remedies, such as a super-refined " elixir of cochlearia. " In any case, the populace ran ahead of the medical profession in its recognition of the cure for this devastating disease. In time, some English quacks attained considerable wealth, social standing and prestige. They were consulted by well-to-do people, even royalty, and sometimes edged out the regular doctors in people's loyalty and affection. This showed that despite the dubious nature of their livelihood they nevertheless performed a useful social role, a topic I shall return to next week, when this three-part story of quackery and quackbusters resumes. (TO BE CONTINUED NEXT WEEK) --Ralph W. Moss, PhD ======================= To purchase a copy of Prof. Roy Porter's excellent book Quackery: Fakers & Charlatans in English Medicine, please click or go to: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0752417762/cancerdecisio-20/103-4018872-4\ 386244 To purchase a copy of Piero Gambaccini's equally fascinating history of Italian charlatanism, click or go to: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0786416068/cancerdecisio-20/104-2981536-4\ 527952 One of my books, " The Cancer Industry, " also discusses in some detail the development of cancer treatment and the role of some so-called " quack " remedies, click or go to: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1881025098/cancerdecisio-20/104-2981536-4\ 527952 --------------- IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER The news and other items in this newsletter are intended for informational purposes only. Nothing in this newsletter is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice. -------------- IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please do not REPLY to this letter. All replies to this email address are automatically deleted by the server and your question or concern will not be seen. If you have questions or concerns, use our form at http://www.cancerdecisions.com/contact.html Thank you. To SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER: Please go to http://www.cancerdecisions.com/subscr.html and follow the instructions to be automatically added to this list. Thank you. ===== SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.