Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Circle The Wagons

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Repost.

 

http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ea2004/ea_040108.shtml

 

Circle The Wagons

 

If you've never used a supplement that contains ephedra, you might not be

concerned about the recent announcement that ephedra has been banned by the FDA.

But this drastic measure goes way beyond the outlawing of just one herb. An

Associated Press headline made that clear on the last day of 2003: " Ephedra Ban

Puts Industry On Notice - Move Shows Government Will Crack Down On Supplements. "

 

If you value your freedom to make your own choices about what dietary

supplements you take, brace yourself. We are now officially under fire.

 

----------------

The real deal

----------------

 

Every day people die due to reckless driving. Should we ban the sale of cars?

That would be absurd, of course, but that's exactly what's happening with

ephedra. A handful of people have blatantly misused products that contain a

hyped-up, synthetic version of the active ingredient in ephedra, and now ALL

ephedra products will be banned, even though thousands of people use ephedra

responsibly every day with no problems.

 

So exactly what are we losing?

 

In the e-Alert " Jekyll and Hyde " (1/16/03), HSI Panelist Linda Page, N.D.,

Ph.D., gave us an insider's perspective on the value of ephedra. Dr. Page has

been a Classical Herbalist for almost 30 years and has formulated over 250

effective whole herb combinations, many of them containing ephedra. Dr. Page

writes:

 

" I am continually distressed about ephedra's misuse and abuse, most importantly

the isolated component of ephedra, ephedrine. If herbalists and formulators lose

the ability to use ephedra, we are losing one of the best broncho-dilators from

the plant kingdom that is extremely valuable when used for asthma and allergies.

What then would people have to choose from to alleviate their symptoms? Drugs of

course.

 

" Ephedra also has thermogenic qualities so it is very effective for weight loss.

Weight loss product manufacturers know this, and in most cases, the ephedrine is

isolated and boosted so that the end result is people are taking a dangerously

high amount. Further, when ephedrine is isolated and boosted, it becomes an

herbal 'drug.'

 

So what's the difference between ephedra and ephedrine? Dr. Page explains that

in a whole herb formulation containing ephedra, there may be up to 50 mg of

ephedra, containing only half a milligram of ephedrine. But the products that

isolate ephedrine may deliver up to 20 mg of ephedrine - a full 40 times as much

as ephedra!

 

Is it any wonder that people experience grave side effects when they exceed the

recommended doses of this altered natural drug?

 

----------------

In a Jiffy

----------------

 

" If there ever were an indication that the drug companies control what agents we

can and cannot acquire, the ephedra scandal is it. "

 

That was the opening line of an e-mail I received last week from HSI Panelist

Allan Spreen, M.D., who added: " The simple proof of drug company influence is

that far higher doses of the (concentrated) synthetic analog of ephedra herb are

still available, and in far higher doses per pill than the herbal form. Ever

heard of Sudafed? It stands for 'pseudo-ephedrine,' and is available in any

drugstore, 7/11, or Jiffy Mart you choose to enter, with no limit on the dose

you might want to take. "

 

Dr. Spreen also makes the point (which you've heard here before) that hundreds

of people die every year due to complications associated with aspirin and

acetaminophen. That's more people every year than have died in ephedra-related

deaths total. Yet, last summer, Congress held an emotional, high-profile hearing

about ephedra side effects. Have you ever heard of any such hearings about

aspirin? No. And as long as giant drug companies continue their very aggressive

and well funded lobbying efforts you never will.

 

----------------

Smear job

----------------

 

One of the worst aspects of the campaign to ban ephedra is the way the dietary

supplement industry has been portrayed as reckless. But just the opposite is

true. In fact, supplement manufacturers have provided perfectly adequate

self-regulation of their industry. For instance, without any laws being passed,

and without any FDA directives, guidelines for ephedra dosage and label warnings

were drafted in 1994 by the American Herbal Products Association, in

collaboration with the National Nutritional Food Association. The draft was

revised and adopted in 2000 by the Consumer Health Products Association.

 

What NO ONE can regulate is the way people use supplements. You simply can't

protect customers who ignore warning labels or use products at dosages much

higher than recommended.

 

----------------

T's and i's

----------------

 

The FDA will soon publish a final rule that will ban the sale ofall ephedra

products, making it impossible to attain them even with a prescription. The ban

will take effect 60 days after publication, probably sometime in March. But

supplement manufacturers may challenge the ban, leading to a showdown in court.

When Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson made the announcement

about the FDA decision, he told reporters, " we crossed the t's and dotted the

i's " to make sure the case for banning ephedra will stand up in court.

 

Hopefully the t's and i's of this rule WILL be challenged and severely tested.

Because behind the familiar accusations about this " dangerous " herb is the

lesser-known truth about its altered forms and the way those forms have been

seriously misused.

 

So in spite of the fact that the ban sounds like it's signed, sealed and

delivered, there may still be one more hurdle. If that hurdle is easily jumped,

I think we can fully expect FDA officials to press even harder to increase the

agency's regulatory powers over the supplement industry.

 

And you can be sure that nothing would please the drug companies more.

 

***********************************************

 

 

....and another thing

 

Speaking of consumer responsibility, have you taken steps to remove trans-fatty

acids (TFAs) from your diet?

 

According to a recent analysis of restaurant food commissioned by Canada's Globe

and Mail and Canadian Television (CTV), one good way to avoid TFAs is to not eat

out at all. Every single restaurant product that was tested contained some

amount of TFA.

 

Without naming any specific restaurants or brands, here are some of the items

tested and their TFA totals:

 

* One slice of double-cheese pizza - about half a gram of TFA

* Large order of French fries - 4 to 6 grams

* Chicken pot pie - 5 grams

* One sour cream glazed doughnut - 5 grams

* Five chicken nuggets - almost 4 grams

* Two spring rolls - 2 grams

* " Captain's " platter of fried shrimp, fish, clams, and scallops - 22 grams

 

That last one is not a misprint: 22 grams of TFA!

 

According to at least one research report, a daily intake of only one gram of

TFA may increase the risk of heart disease by as much as 20 percent. And a 2002

report from the National Academy of Sciences concluded that, " the only safe

intake of trans-fat is zero. "

 

Obviously, most of the foods listed above would come under the " junk " category.

Or to be more generous, we'll call it " convenience food. "

 

Convenient or not, it's obvious that you need to be a picky eater when you're

dining out if you want to avoid TFAs.

 

To Your Good Health,

 

Jenny Thompson

Health Sciences Institute

 

***********************************************

Sources:

" FDA Announces Plans to Prohibit Sales of Dietary Supplements Containing

Ephedra " Food and Drug Administration press release, 12/30/03, fda.gov

" Ephedra Ban Puts Industry On Notice - Move Shows Government Will Crack Down On

Supplements " The Associated Press, 12/31/03, msnbc.msn.com

" U.S. Moves to Ban Ephedra Diet Supplement " Reuters, 12/30/03, reuters.com

" Trans Fats Almost Everywhere, Tests Find " Andre Picard, Avis Favaro and Jenny

Wells, The Globe and Mail, 12/8/03, theglobeandmail.com 1997 -

2004 by Institute of Health Sciences, L.L.C.

 

 

 

 

Hotjobs: Enter the " Signing Bonus " Sweepstakes

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...