The SARS Epidemic: Are Viruses Taking the Rap For Industrial Poisons.

[Guest guest]

http://www.westonaprice.org/envtoxins/sarsepidemic.html

 

 

On March 15, 2003 the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a global alert

warning of a new virus spreading through Asia and causing Severe Acute

Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), a potentially fatal disease, similar to pneumonia.

Photos from China depicting ballet dancers and bridal parties wearing white

masks appeared in western newspapers while health departments across the country

issued notices to hospitals detailing the symptoms of the new virus and asking

for immediate notification of suspect cases. Until the global alert, reports

referred to an " unknown virus " first striking in Guangdong Province, China,

although some reports place the origin in the Philippines. With the March 15 WHO

report, the SARS virus became official and reports of new cases came flooding

in.

 

By late May, officials had reported over 8,000 cases worldwide, with almost 700

deaths.1 Of the 65 suspected SARS victims in the US, all but a few had traveled

by airplane to areas where the outbreak has been most severe, including mainland

China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Hanoi and Toronto. The Chinese economy has taken a

hit and some Chinese airline routes were virtually empty due to SARS fear.2

Serious Drama

The SARS outbreak has revived discussion of forced quarantine. According to a

study by the American Public Health Laboratory Association and quoted by Senator

Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, few cities have enough hospital

space to quarantine patients in the event of a large-scale outbreak of an

infectious disease like SARS. According to Lawrence O. Gostin, director of the

Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown University's Law Center,

public health laws date back to the 19th century and are " wholly inadequate to

deal with an emergency. "

 

" The need for public health law reform is urgent, " said Mr. Gostin. " It should

have provisions for surveillance, vaccination, treatment, isolation and

quarantine in a way that gives decisive powers to health authorities while

respecting the Constitution. " So far, all but one of the SARS victims has

submitted to voluntary isolation. The one exception, a New York man, was

involuntarily contained until his symptoms passed. Federal quarantine law now

includes SARS among its disease guidelines.

 

Mr. Gostin was the author of the draconian Emergency State Health Powers Act,

which has been adopted (fortunately in softened form) by 22 states. According to

Gostin, " The need for effective state compulsory power is beyond doubt. But

that's not a given in our country, which is now so tied to the rhetoric of

individual rights. It seems we've lost the tradition of the common good. " 3

Kill The Carrier

In China, a country where the " rhetoric of individual rights " is lacking, the

government has announced it would kill SARS carriers who refused quarantine.4

Malaysian officials threatened imprisonment.5 In Hong Kong, officials motivated

by the " tradition of common good " have suggested that " families of SARS patients

be rounded up, and sent to quarantine camps. " 6 In Nanjing, China, 10,000 have

been quarantined, and in Beijing 16,000 as of May 6, 2003.7

Official Disease Definition

SARS means " Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. " This wide-open definition

encompasses many diseases common in the affected regions. Symptoms range from

flu-like to pneumonia.8 Dr. Frank Plummer, director of the National Microbiology

Laboratory in Canada stated, " Of course, the case definition of SARS is a little

loose. " 9

 

The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined SARS in the following way: a) a

person presenting after 1 November 2002 with history of high fever (greater than

100.4° F) and cough or breathing difficulty; or b) a person who was not

autopsied but with acute respiratory disease and who has been in close contact

within 10 days of someone who had SARS.10

 

This definition alone should give thoughtful readers cause to question the SARS

phenomenon. Firstly, is a temperature of 1.8 degrees F over normal really a

" high fever " ? The CDC used " mild fever " in their case definition. Secondly,

should WHO install a historical bias before the history of SARS is even written?

WHO has made it impossible to place the discovery of SARS before November 2002,

or even think of it as preceding that date, thus guaranteeing its status as an

" emerging epidemic. "

 

In the US, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) defines SARS differently: a)

Illness of unknown aetiology [cause not already ascertained] and onset after

February 1, 2003, AND, b) Temperature over 100.5 degrees F, AND, c) respiratory

illness, AND, d) Recent contact with a SARS patient or travel to epidemic

region.

 

This defines the new epidemic as an arrival from southeast Asia, China or

Toronto. This definition obviates any need to test for the SARS virus in

patients who contracted pneumonia before February 2003, AND, who had not

traveled to the Orient or met such a traveler. With this definition, the

diagnosis of any SARS-like case, determined previously to be of non-viral

origin, would be secured from contradictions. The usual one-disease, one-cause

theme for epidemics is thereby maintained.

SARS Virology

Due to the wide-ranging definition, the only unique quality of SARS is the

associated virus. But association is not enough and a single association is not

a rigorous, convincing proof.

 

On April 16, 2003, WHO announced that SARS virus, a member of the coronavirus

family, was definitely causative for the disease. The report referred to a study

carried out by a team led by Dr. Albert Osterhaus, the director of virology at

Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam. Media reports used the terms " unequivocal, "

" definite, " and " beyond a doubt " to describe the work at Erasmus.

 

Osterhaus reported that his team infected one group of monkeys with SARS virus,

a second group with the metapneumonvirus (also found in some SARS patients), and

a third group with SARS virus and then the metapneumovirus. The monkeys infected

with the metapneumonvirus alone developed mild symptoms, compared to the

" full-blown disease " seen in the first group. The third group " did not develop a

more serious version of SARS. " From this Osterhaus concluded, " the coronavirus

alone is capable of causing the typical symptoms… " 11

Virology In Doubt

Press releases about the " definitive " Erasmus study, distributed by AP, WHO,

Nature Magazine and others, cannot be taken seriously without further details.

Here are a few unanswered questions:

 

a) Since laboratory virus stocks are poisoned with antibiotics, or are derived

by a process that utilizes poisons, then which poisons were present in Erasmus

University virus stocks?

 

b) Were the toxicities of virus stocks included in the assessment of the study

results?

 

c) How was the virus stock obtained?

 

d) Was a comprehensive test for other viruses performed on the experimental

stock?

 

e) Are the laboratory-produced viruses chimeric viruses, that is, synthetic

viruses?

 

f) What quantity of virus medium was applied to each monkey; that is, what

multiple of real-world conditions?

 

g) What concentration of viruses were applied; that is, what multiple of

real-world conditions?

 

h) How was the medium applied; would the application method be possible in

real-world conditions?

 

i) Which chemicals were added to the medium in addition to antibiotics? Do these

interact or promote the toxicity of other chemicals in the virus stock?

 

j) How many monkeys were in each group? Were there enough for a valid

assessment?

 

k) What was the condition of each monkey prior, during and at the conclusion of

the experiment? Monkeys have been regarded as poor experimental subjects because

of their intelligent sensitivity, and maltreatment received from handlers and

distributors. Stress alone, incurred by the monkeys due to cruelty, cage

conditions and poor nutrition, can cause illness or susceptibility.

 

l) Was the virus used in the experiment actually " isolated " ? The word, when used

by virologists, means something entirely different from the meaning assumed by

non-virologists (including doctors), and this word serves as the basis for

misinformation regarding virus proof. The details of " isolation of the virus "

need to be explained.

 

m) Were any of the experimental animals, or tests, rerun after unexpected

results occurred? What were the circumstances?

 

At this writing, one further detail of the Erasmus study has been obtained,

" Osterhaus and colleagues completed the final ones [Koch Postulates] when they

infected two macaque monkeys with the virus from a SARS patient and isolated it

from the animals. " 12

 

So, the " definite " proof is based on two monkeys injected with the supposed SARS

virus. What happened to independent confirmation, randomized controls, and

probability analysis that determine the possibility that a test on two monkeys

is valid? The hyped language, the major institutions and funding sources

involved, juxtaposed against the meager number of monkeys in the experiment,

point to extreme bias in the search for a microbial demon. I look forward to

more details of the Erasmus study.

 

As of late May, tests for the virus in Toronto " failed to spot a targeted virus

in 30% to 50% of infected patients. " 13 This was attributed to inaccurate testing

methods, not the absence of the virus. Nevertheless, no matter how often SARS

virus is found, the virus is present only in trace amounts and not in quantities

large enough to cause disease, leaving infection and pathology in doubt.14

Convenient Scapegoats

In spite of the nagging inconsistencies in the viral theory for SARS, scientists

and the press have gone one step further with reports that SARS originated in a

live meat market in China's Guangdong province in November, 2002. Researchers in

Hong Kong and Shenzhen, China found a virus that is " almost identical " to the

human SARS coronavirus in six masked palm civets (cat-sized animals) and a

raccoon dog sold in these open air markets,15 a convenient discovery that will

bring official pressure on China's traditional farmers and food-sellers, now in

competition with new, " sanitary " western-style supermarkets.

 

Viral demons are fair game for the media. Dramatic realities merge with scenes

from class B sci-fi movies, as doctors and nurses scream through hospital wards,

airports are closed and police round up infected carriers. In China, such

dreadful acts are all too real. In addition to the proposed human executions,

millions of cats, dogs, farm animals and wildlife may be slaughtered to stop the

deadly viral plague. Precedent is found in Britain's Mad Cow and Hoof and Mouth

epidemics, and supposed viral epidemics in Malaysia and Taiwan during 1997-1998.

In this scenario, medical workers come to the rescue like soldiers, heroically

primed to save lives with deadly force.

 

The pharmaceutical companies, of course, are playing a leading role. Roche, " the

global leader in the $22-billion-a-year clinical-diagnostics market " is

developing a test that should be able to " flag SARS in the first days of an

infection, possibly even when the virus isn't causing symptoms. " This will allow

officials " to identify superspreaders (patients whose SARS infections are highly

transmissible) before they become superspreaders, " says a Roche executive.16 As

all diagnostic tests generate false positives, anyone suffering from a fever and

a cough risks being branded as a modern Typhoid Mary should he or she submit to

such a procedure.

SARS Critics

In spite of the fearful headlines, the SARS paradigm has met widespread

criticism.

 

An insider, Dr. Frank Plummer, spilled the beans: " The director… told The

Scientist yesterday (April 10) that the new coronavirus implicated as the cause

of the disease is certainly around in the environment but is unlikely to be the

causative agent. Frank Plummer is director of Canada's National Microbiology

Laboratory in Winnipeg. " 17

 

Plummer stated, " we are finding some of the best-characterized [sARS disease]

cases are negative [for the SARS virus]. So it's puzzling. As is the fact the

amounts of virus we are finding, when we find it, are very small—only detectable

by very sensitive PCR.

 

" That's what the majority of labs [nasopharyngeal swabs] around the world are

testing, it's where you find most respiratory viruses. It's strange [that

there's so little virus there] because it seems to be transmitted by close

contact. "

 

After the announcement of the Erasmus study, Plummer stated, " Once you conclude

that this coronavirus is the sole cause of SARS then you move into a different

phase and you move to test only for it. . . to the exclusion of other things.

And I think. . . at least based on what we're seeing in Canada. . . it's a

little early to do that. We are in many ways behaving as if this is the

cause. " 18

 

According to a CBC news report, " No classic respiratory or bacterial respiratory

pathogen was consistently identified. Scientists have not definitively shown the

new coronavirus causes SARS. To do that, they need to see the virus in infected

lung samples from all patients and show the virus causes SARS in an animal

model. " 19 Implicit in this statement is the fact that SARS symptoms are not

unique to the disease, or that tests were finding other (non-SARS) pathogens in

the victims, or tests were not consistently performed for other pathogens.

 

Jon Rappoport, an independent journalist who has written for CBS Healthwatch,

writes, " This [sARS] insanity is multiplied beyond all sense when you consider

that, in Canada, they are now finding the [sARS] coronavirus in ZERO PERCENT of

diagnosed SARS cases. " 20

 

Nicholas Regush, veteran journalist of ABC News, admits no contact with

Rappoport, yet writes, " We're in very deep trouble… the COMING OF SARS. Having

been a member of the reporting classes for many years, I can't say that I'm

surprised. More like disappointed. Disgusted. Outraged. " 21

 

Fintan Dunne, who edits a website entitled www.SickOfDoctors.com, is also

critical: " More of the hype machine and further global economic damage, over a

spurious syndrome which is a drop in the disease ocean. " 22

 

Dr. Donald Low, one of Canada's leading infectious disease experts and a key

member of the SARS containment team, described WHO's policies for Toronto as " a

bunch of bullshit " and " inappropriate. " 23

 

According to Peter Duesberg, the well-known microbiologist at the University of

California at Berkeley, the list of badly diagnosed, yet strongly hyped

epidemics is lengthy: Ebola, Hepatitis C, AIDS, SMON, and others.24 According

to the German virologist Stefan Lanka, the list of pseudo-epidemics is nearly

endless.25

Toxicology

The orthodox SARS paradigm completely omits and avoids toxicology for good

reason: SARS disease symptoms are identical to pesticide and air pollution

disease symptoms. And these poisons correlate in time and place with SARS

epidemics.

 

Only virology holds SARS together, and by including toxicology, the virus theory

of SARS can be entirely rebutted.

Airline Pesticides

As the SARS syndrome " appears to be spreading via air travel, the CDC advised

travelers to postpone any non-essential travel to affected areas, which include

China, Hong Kong, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam, according

to WHO. " 26

 

What most travelers don't realize is that airlines routinely apply pesticides to

airplanes, especially those on Asian routes. Airlines call their pesticide

application " disinsection. " A US Department of Transportation memo describes two

methods of application: " Either spray the aircraft cabin, with an aerosolized

insecticide, while passengers are on board or treat the aircraft's interior

surfaces with a residual insecticide. " 27

 

On August 2, 2001, CNN reported on a lawsuit filed by United Airlines

stewardesses for damages caused by pesticides sprayed in United Airlines planes

on Australian and New Zealand routes.28 No further mention of the lawsuit has

appeared in the press.

 

However, on March 17, 2003, Pesticide Action Network Updates Service (PANUPS)

announced: " An airline flight to the tropics may involve greater health risks. .

.. pesticides are routinely sprayed in aircraft cabins by US airlines, sometimes

over the heads of passengers during flight. " 29

 

Details on airline pesticide protocols for southeast Asian airline flights

emerge from the US Department of Transportation memo: " Guam requires

disinsection, but permits the residual method, of all flights from the

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Thailand, Philippines, Korea,

Indonesia, Malaysia, the Federated States of Micronesia, Papua New Guinea,

Solomon Islands, and the Republic of the Marshall Islands and, during certain

months, of flights from Taiwan, Korea and Japan. " 30

 

The pesticides used in airlines are synthetic pyrethrin pesticides

(pyrethroids), which in some countries have been banned from agricultural use.31

SARS symptoms are nearly identical to those of pyrethrin pesticides, as shown in

the table on Page 19.

 

There are other chemical risks found in aircraft. Diane Fairchild, who worked

decades for the airline industry and spent years litigating against that

industry over issues related to pesticide protocols, describes the liabilities

of airline travel on her website.46

Airport Pollution

Airports are notoriously air polluted. A single airliner at take-off emits

tremendous volumes of pollutants.47 JFK airport in New York City, has its own

oil refinery on the airport grounds, nearly two football fields in area. How

common is that practice? Oil refinery emissions correlate exceedingly well with

recent so-called viral disease epidemics. The West Nile virus epidemic was first

noticed in the neighborhoods beneath one of the busiest take-off lanes in the

US, La Guardia Airport, New York City.48

Industrial Emissions

The greatest SARS epidemic region in the world is the Guangdong province of

China. That heavily populated province also vies for position as the most highly

polluted region on earth, due to the presence of oil refineries, metal smelters

and other chemical industries in a country with lower environmental standards.

 

Writing for The Atlantic Monthly, Mark Hertsgaard describes Guangdong province

as " A fiendish laboratory experiment that was mushrooming beyond control. . . .

Shanxi, a day's journey west of Beijing. . . the land. . . scalped, the water

poisoned, the air made toxic and dark. . . . At least five of the cities with

the worst air pollution in the world are in China. Sixty to 90 percent of the

rainfall in Guangdong. . . is acid rain. . . people's lungs and nervous systems

are bombarded by an extraordinary volume and variety of deadly poisons. One of

every four deaths in China is caused by lung disease. " 49 Hertsgaard found that

total suspended particulates (an air pollution index) can be, in some cities in

China, 12 times higher than in New York City. Obviously, non-viral forms of SARS

exist in Guangdong. SARS is far from atypical.

 

Deforestation by fire can also cause the respiratory problems associated with

SARS. Huge fires are set or occur accidentally in Singapore, Malaysia and China.

Major fires ravaged southeast Asia in September 2002, just two months before

officials announced the SARS epidemic.50

 

Tan Ee Lyn (Reuters) describes the air environment in Hong Kong and southern

China, the major SARS epicenters: " [Title:] CHINA: September 9, 2002, Thick smog

shrouds Hong Kong, health warning issued. [Text:]Hong Kong—Thick smog blanketed

Hong Kong last week, a clear sign that the territory and southern China are

still a long way from cleaning up their bad air. The government urged people

with respiratory problems to avoid heavily congested traffic areas and cut back

on outdoor physical activity. "

Toxicology = Virology

Even if a perfect (according to the rules of virology) laboratory proof for

virus causation existed, such proofs still involve high use of artifice, far

from the reality of everyday life. Even if SARS virology could have isolated and

properly identified a real virus, questions still remain. A SARS virus may be a

natural endogenous virus (from within) serving a normal adaptive function. It

might not be the infectious, exogenous virus (from without) as described by

media hype.

 

Not well known, but well established, is the fact that virus-like genetic

material (RNA) is often expressed from poisoned cellular tissue as an adaptive

and defensive response to poisoning.51 Expressing virus-like genes is part of

the cellular " SOS response " of cells engaged in accelerated genetic

recombination.52 The so-called SARS virus can be interpreted as such a genetic

expression occurring in humans, as well as the exotic animals, palm civet cats

and raccoon dogs sold in Guangdong live animal markets and recently found

positive for SARS.

Virus Is Us

The cutting-edge biochemist, Howard Urnovitz, views SARS virus as human genes

rearranged by pollution stress: " I do not see a virus. I see a unique and

complete rearrangement of genomic elements. For example, when I look at what is

believed to be the gene sequence coding for the spike protein of this

coronavirus, I see a complicated gene rearrangement of a region of human

chromosome. As I did in our studies of Gulf War Syndrome, when I see gene

rearrangements like this, I immediately search for an associated catastrophic

environmental event that could have caused such genomic rearrangement. " 53

(Emphasis added.)

 

SARS epidemics correspond strongly with such " catastrophic environmental

events. "

SARS Redefined

SARS is not a unique disease, since its symptoms coincide with pyrethrin

poisoning and air pollution diseases.

 

Orthodox science damns itself by beginning with a virus hypothesis when

toxicological evidence is plentiful. Orthodox journalism promotes the discovery

of the " SARS virus " with little criticism of the virology and a deafening

silence regarding toxicology.

 

Apparently the virus paradigm is a necessary cover for industrial pollution.

WHO's promotion of the virus disease paradigm is a tremendous boon for industry,

which requires free disposal of industrial wastes into the lungs. . .

correction. . . the atmosphere.

 

The preponderance of evidence indicates that SARS is the direct result of

regional industrial pollution, airport pollution, with an optional coup de grace

from pyrethroid pesticides applied directly upon the passengers or as a residue

vapor. Essentially, airlines are enclosed, fabric-filled containers where air is

circulated several times before it is vented to the outside. They are not the

kind of chamber that environmentalists would prefer to enter following

" disinsection. " SARS, like St. Louis virus (SLE), West Nile Virus (WNV) and

non-toxicological asthma definitions guarantee spin control for emerging

epidemics.

 

Neenyah Ostrom discusses the general relationship between pollution in China and

the SARS virus— and the relation between poisoning and cellular RNA: " But

Guangdong and Hong Kong share another distinction: They are in perhaps the most

polluted area on the planet. Should we be asking questions like, what new types

of pollutants have been introduced into this gene-swapping microenvironment? So,

the question becomes: Is pollution a causative agent in SARS? "

 

If SARS disease is another semantic flag for industrial pollution, then SARS

functions by punishing the economy of polluting regions without specifically

placing blame on powerful industries. Military groups have long employed such a

method—where the group is punished to correct individual behavior. Within

industry, SARS will bring about a reassessment of economic priorities

(industrial need versus human worth) without the complications of public blame

games.

 

About the Author

Jim West serves as Chairman of the Science Committee for the NoSpray Coalition

in New York City. For details see http://www.nospray.org.

 

 

 

SIDEBAR ARTICLES

West Nile Virus

West Nile Virus (WNV) arrived in New York City in 1999 and soon grew into an

" epidemic " characterized by a sea of contradictions.54 Medical press agencies

proclaimed the " first arrival of the West Nile virus to the Western

Hemisphere " 55 but a more accurate description of the situation would be the

" first testing of the West Nile virus in the Western Hemisphere. "

 

Mayor Giuliani personally announced the epidemic. He also announced the

immediate commencement of a six-week pesticide spray campaign over the city,

dispensed by helicopters. Meanwhile, the TV and newspaper headlines chanted,

" The Deadly Virus. " The disease was at first attributed to the St. Louis

encephalitis virus (SLE) but a few weeks later blame shifted to West Nile virus.

 

The United States Geological Survey ( " USGS " ) issued a press release one year

later " confirming " the pathological effect of WNV on crows. This was hyped and

widely distributed. Having read many other virological studies, I found the USGS

results incredibly odd. The crows were injected intramuscularly with a virus

extract and a few days later all met death. The filter used to separate the

virus from tissue extract was nearly six times the diameter of the virus.56

Nearly all non-injected crows in the same cage also died. The success of the

experiment was too convincing to be true, especially for a study that did not

employ the common, harsh, intracranial injection method. The study outcome was

also odd because WNV had been considered a mild virus and not especially

dangerous to birds. The USGS laboratory ignored my repeated inquiries for the

published details. After going through another scientist, who contacted the

USGS, I received an emailed response from the USGS indicating low

confidence for their study. The agency indicated their study would not be

published or discussed and they expressed an intention to perform a better

experiment in the future. I doubt they would want to take a chance on another

such experiment.

 

SLE and WNV epidemics occur annually in air-polluted petrochemical regions (such

as eastern New Jersey and St. Louis) during the warm spring and summer months,

with an apex in July and August. The incidence correlates daily with air

pollution brought to ground level by warm air and loss of convection efficiency

for exhaust sources. SLE epidemics have a long history in the US (in

petrochemical regions) and these epidemics don't spread infectiously to other

regions. The two great epicenters for WNV/SLE disease are the two great

petrochemical industrial regions in the US—southern Louisiana and New Jersey.

 

During the summers of 1999 and 2000, air pollution levels reached record levels,

correlating with the incidence of " West Nile virus " cases, both human and avian.

The gasoline additive MTBE represents perhaps the greatest production volume for

any industrial poison in the US, yet it has received little publicity. The

public became aware of its dangers only when the EPA suggested that MTBE be

phased out on July 27,1999. That date also represents the apex of the West Nile

virus avian epidemic for 1999.63

 

Like so many widely dispensed industrial poisons, the physiological effects of

MTBE have only become known through usage on the public. However, Dr. Peter

Joseph correlated MTBE with neurological disease in his 1997 study, " Changes in

Disease Rates Following the Introduction of Oxygenated Fuels. " Neurological

symptoms also characterize West Nile virus disease. Avian mortality further

distinguishes this " viral " disease. Yet, avian mortality is an early warning

system for human air pollution disease, as evidenced by the traditional air

assay test, the " miners' canary. "

 

 

Legionnaires' Disease

Another acute respiratory disease is Legionnaires' disease, also characterized

by sloppy science. The disease was claimed causative for 182 casualties and 29

deaths within a few days in 1976 at the bicentennial celebration of the American

Legion at the Bellevue Stratford Hotel in Philadelphia.

 

After several months of study, CDC scientists announced the discovery of

Legionella bacteriumas as the cause for Legionnaires' disease. Virologists Peter

Duesberg and Brian Ellison relate the story.57 " One month before the CDC

isolated the bacterium, a US House of Representatives Investigative Committee

held hearings excoriating the CDC for not having looked for toxic chemicals as a

possible cause of the 1976 epidemic. Chairman John Murphy of New York sharply

attacked the investigation because 'The CDC, for example, did not have a

toxicologist present in their initial team of investigators sent to deal with

the epidemic. No apparent precautions were taken to deal with the possibility,

however remote at the time, that something else might have been the cause.' "

 

According to Duesberg, " The evidence indicates Legionella is actually quite

harmless. Since 1976, CDC and public health investigators have found the

bacteria all over the country, in water cooling towers, condensers, shower

heads, faucets, humidifiers, whirlpools, swimming pools and even hot-water

tanks, assorted plumbing, mud, and lakes. The bacterium is so universal that

between 20 percent and 30 percent of the American population has already been

infected, yet virtually no one ever develops Legionnaires' disease symptoms. "

Calling the organism Aguanella—indicating it is simply water-borne—wouldn't

serve the CDC's purpose. Quite by chance, the CDC's interpretation happens to

protect the chemical industry, which sells poisonous deodorants, pesticides,

antibiotics, carpets, paints, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and beverages to

hotels—and airlines.

 

 

Two SARS Disease Paradigms:

Comparison of SymptomsSymptomAs SARS Virus32-35As Airline Pesticide Poisoning

(mostly Pyrethrin formulations)36-45Coughing Yes Yes Malaise Yes Yes Fever Yes

Yes Headaches Yes Yes Nausea Yes Yes Vomiting Yes Yes Rash Yes Yes Respiratory

distress Yes Yes Respiratory failure Yes Yes Neurological dysfunction Yes Yes

Cardiac dysfunction Yes Yes Irritability Yes Yes Diarrhea Yes Yes Pneumonia Yes

Yes Lung damage (as measles symptoms, see below) Yes Yes Dyspnoea (breathing

difficulty related to hypoxemia) Yes Yes Hypoxemia (low oxygen level) Yes Yes

Proteinaceous pulmonary edema Yes Yes Leukocyte inhibition Yes Yes Increases

sodium ion permeability in tissue Not Listed Yes Affects nasal, windpipe and

lung surfaces Yes Yes Shock Not Listed Yes Seizures Not listed Yes Salivation

Yes Yes Neurological damage Yes Yes Muscular stiffness Yes Not listed Like

measles (Syncytial lung) Yes Yes* Like flu Yes Yes Like common cold Yes Yes Like

mumps Yes Yes*

*In terms of listed symptoms

 

 

SARS - Other Theories

Len Horowitz, PhD, author of Emerging Viruses: SARS is simply the flu, which

kills 36,000 people annually in the US. Death comes to those whose immunity has

been compromised by drugs and vaccines.58 The media has created great fear among

the public by grossly overstating mortality rates and exaggerating the danger to

healthy individuals.

 

Mae-Wan Ho, PhD, president of the London-based Institute of Science in Society:

SARS is a highly infectious disease caused by a new bacterium of the Chlamydia

family that was created accidentally through genetic engineering.

Disease-causing viruses and bacteria and their genetic material are the

predominant materials and tools of genetic engineering. The artificial

constructs created by genetic engineering are designed to cross species barriers

and to jump into genomes, creating the possibility of new, highly virulent

micro-organisms.59

 

Marshall Smith, Editor, BroJon Gazette: The SARS virus, like all flu viruses, is

a variant caused by the rural Chinese custom of raising flocks of geese

side-by-side with herds of swine. If a pig is ill with a porcine flu and then

eats droppings from an avian-virus-infected goose, the result is a new

cross-species flu virus with the outer lining of a pig and the inner viral core

of a goose. Whether or not this theory is correct, Smith's advice is sound: Do

not suppress a fever. Fever is the body's way of preventing the invading virus

from reproducing and spreading massively throughout the body. Unfortunately,

most cold and flu medications reduce fever, setting the stage for massive viral

proliferation. Unfortunately, the current definition of SARS may cause many

people to take drugs to suppress fever, in order to avoid quarantine.

 

Linda Saif, professor of food animal health at Ohio State University:

Coronavirus causes cough and pneumonia, so-called shipping fever, in animals

packed together in cattle cars. The stresses of air travel—large numbers of

people together in small spaces, being away from home, being close to other

strangers, moving across time zones, rushing to catch flights—are conditions

that make the coronavirus dangerous to humans as well.60 (Saif does not explain

why airline travel, which has been a fact of life for millions of people for the

last 40 years, has not caused SARS until recently.)

 

Richard Fisher, senior fellow at the Jamestown Foundation, a Washington-based

think tank: " . . . there are compelling reasons. . . to at least ask whether

there might be any linkage between SARS and China's biological-warfare

efforts. " 61

 

Chandra Wickramasinghe, professor of applied mathematics and astronomy at

Cardiff University: The SARS virus comes from outer space, hitched a ride on a

comet and then drifted down to earth.62

 

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Washington Post, May 24, 2003

AP, May 15, 2003. " SARS has caused more damage to the global airline industry

than the Sept. 11 attacks and the war in Iraq combined, the world's airline

association said Thursday. "

NY Times 5/5/03

" China has threatened to execute or jail for life anyone who breaks SARS

quarantine orders and spreads the deadly virus intentionally. " Beijing

(Reuters), May 15, 2003

" Malaysia ordered a quarantine for 203 citizens, mostly low waged earners,

who had visited a SARS-infected produce market in Singapore and warned that it

would imprison those who would break the orders. "

www.rediff.com/news/2003/apr/24sars1.htm

" Devastating Epidemic In Hong Kong " , CBS NEWS, 4/15/03,

www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/04/15/eveningnews/main549528.shtml

" 10,000 quarantined in Nanjing, China " , CBC News,

www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/05/06/sars_china030506

Maggie Fox, " Scientists Identify Virus Behind Deadly SARS " , Reuters 4/10/2003

Robert Walgate, " Cause of SARS disputed. Head of Canadian lab not convinced

that coronavirus causes SARS, " www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030411/04

W.H.O. case definitions for SARS: www.who.int/csr/sars/casedefinition/en

" Rotterdam-led scientists confirm virus as cause of SARS " , Bio Aspects

Newsletter, Vol 6, April 24, 2003,

www.geneyous.nl/docs/BioASPects20030424.html#article-marktontwikkeling1

" Tests Confirm Coronavirus Is Sars Source " , Patricia Reaney, May 15, 2003,

NIH/Reuters, MedlinePlus

Fortune Magazine, 5/26/03

www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030411/04

Washington Times, February 24, 2003

Fortune Magazine, May 25, 2003

Walgate 4/11/03, Ibid

" Containment Controversy " , Global Sunday, 4/25/03, an interview by Troy Reeb

with Dr. Frank Plummer, Global Sunday, www.canada.com/national/globalsunday

" Scientists make small steps in identifying cause of SARS " , CBC NEWS, April

10, 2003, www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/04/10/sars_sci030410

Jon Rappoport, " More SARS Madness " , 5/52003, www.nomorefakenews.com

Nicholas Regush, www.redflagsweekly.com

Fintan Dunne, www.sarstravel.com

Helen Branswell, " Irate officials blast SARS warning " , Canadian Press, April

21, 2003 www.thestar.com

Peter Duesberg, and Bryan Ellison, Inventing The AIDS Virus, 1996, p3-129

Stefan Lanka's work may be found on www.virusmyth.com

Neenyah Ostrom, " Why is SARS Such a Mystery? Virus, Bacteria, Fungus,

Parasite – Why Can't Researchers ID the Bug? " , March 20, 2003,

www.chronicillnet.org

Aviation Policy, U.S. Dept. of Trans.,

http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/policy/safety/disin.htm

" United Sued Over Pesticide In Planes " , August 2, 2001, CHICAGO, Illinois

(AP) — Flight attendants are being sickened by exposure to pesticides that are

sprayed on airplanes serving Australia and New Zealand, a lawsuit filed against

United Airlines claims, "

www.cnn.com/2001/TRAVEL/NEWS/08/02/unitedairlines.pesticides.ap/index.html

" Airline Passengers Are Sprayed for Bugs " , March 17, 2003: " An airline flight

to the tropics may involve greater health risks… pesticides are routinely

sprayed in aircraft cabins by U.S. airlines sometimes over the heads of

passengers during flight. " PANNA mentions Asian routes as specifically at risk

for this procedure.

" Aviation Policy " , U.S. Dept. of Trans.,

http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/policy/safety/

Cynthia Olsen, " A Safe Alternative Treatment for Head Lice " , Alive Magazine,

October 2000, " Pyrethrins have been banned from agricultural use as a

pesticide. "

CDC Case Definition for SARS (March 22, 2003): Measured temperature > 100.5F;

cough; hypoxia; shortness of breath; pneumonia; acute respiratory distress.

Gavin Joynt and Charles Gomersall, " Severe acute respiratory syndrome

(SARS) " ,

Tamer Fouad, M.D., SARS Symptoms: " headache, muscular stiffness, loss of

appetite, malaise, confusion, rash, and diarrhea. Early laboratory findings

include low platelet and white blood cell counts. In some cases, those symptoms

are followed by pneumonia in both lungs, sometimes requiring use of a

respirator. " The Doctor's Lounge.NET.

http://thedoctorslounge.net/medlounge/articles/sars

Maggie Fox, April 10, 2003 (Ibid). Early SARS symptoms: like flu, measles,

mumps.

Olsen, 2000, Ibid. Symptoms listed for permethrin (a type of synthetic

pyrethrin used on airlines): " Side effects include vomiting, respiratory

failure, pneumonia and asthma. "

Becky Riley, " Flyers Beware: Pesticide Use on International and U.S. Domestic

Aircraft and Flights " , Northwest Coaltion Against Pesticides (NCAMP), 1998, " …

" in-flight spraying, Airosol Aircraft Insecticide, says that acute health

hazards of exposure to the product include dizziness, skin irritation, and

frostbite, and that overexposure due to inhalation may cause temporary central

nervous system effects: dizziness, headache, confusion, stupor with the

exclusion of oxygen and with grossly excessive overexposure. Additional warnings

state that individuals with preexisting diseases of the cardiovascular system

may have increased susceptibility to the toxicity of excessive exposures, and to

heart irregularities (Airosol Company, 1992). "

Ibid, " Two other U.S.-registered permethrin-containing products with labeled

aircraft uses, but theoretically not for use in passenger cabins (though this is

far from clear from reading the product labels), are Dragnet FT

Termiticide/Insecticide and Flea Insecticide. According to information provided

by the FMC Corporation, manufacturer of the above products, symptoms of

overexposure to both of the products include hypersensitivity to touch and

sound, tremors, and convulsions. Overexposure of animals via inhalation has also

produced symptoms such as squinting eyes, irregular and rattling breathing, and

ataxia (loss of muscular coordination). Inhalation of stoddard solvent vapors

[present in both of the above products] may cause dizziness, disturbances in

vision, drowsiness, respiratory irritation, and eye and skin and mucous membrane

irritation (FMC, 1998; FMC, 1993).

Ibid. Airline pesticides: " Organophosphates are efficiently absorbed by

inhalation, ingestion, and skin penetration. Symptoms of acute exposure to

organophosphates include: headache, nausea, dizziness and anxiety, followed by

muscle twitching, weakness, tremor, incoordination, vomiting, abdominal cramps,

diarrhea, tightness in the chest, and coughing. Severe organophosphate

poisonings can lead to incontinence, paralysis, unconsciousness, convulsions,

and life-threatening respiratory failure (US EPA, 1989). "

Ibid. " Bendicarb: Highly toxic carbamate nerve poison (US EPA, 1989). Causes

eye irritation. Exposure (poisoning) symptoms include tightness in chest,

sweating, stomach pains, vomiting, and diarrhea (US EPA, 1979). "

Ibid. Piperonyl butoxide (used on aircraft): " Classified by EPA as a possible

human carcinogen (US EPA, 1998-3). In animal tests, causes liver tumors and lung

damage, hemorrhages, and anemia (Takahashi, 1994). "

" MSDS: Permethrin, " Universal Crop Protection Alliance LLC, " …moderate eye

and skin irritation… Eye: There may be moderate stinging, tearing and redness…

mild skin irritation… Disturbances in vision, drowsiness, respiratory

irritation… High oral doses can result in damage to the liver and kidneys… Long

term feeding studies in animals resulted in increased liver and kidney weights,

induction of the liver microsomal drug metabolizing enzyme system, and

histopathological changes in the lungs and liver. "

Shirley A. Briggs and Rachel Carson Council, Inc., " Excerpts From Basic Guide

To Pesticides " , Pyrethroid symptoms: " tremors; exaggerated startle response;

hyperthermia [fever] "

Lance C. Villers, MA, NREMTP, " Managing organophosphate exposures " , Texas

Dept. of Health, EMS Management, OP Symptoms: " respiratory depression,

bronchospasm, bronchial secretions, pulmonary edema, muscular weakness,

resulting in hypoxemia. " www.tdh.state.tx.us/hcqs/ems/MJCEPesticideExp.htm

INCHEM, " Pyrethrin " , Symptoms: " cough, wheeze, dyspnoea, bronchospasm or

pulmonary oedema. " , Chemical Safety Information From Intergovernmental

Organizations. www.inchem.org

Diane Fairchild, Flyana.com

" Airports create smog; a single 747 arriving and departing... produces as

much smog as a car driven more that 5,600 miles, and as much NOx as a car driven

almost 26,500 miles (source: Natural Resources Defense Council). " Queens College

School of Earth and Environmental Science www.qc.edu/EES/ENSCI111/Air/air.html

Jim West, " The Dangers of MTBE-Gasoline Additive: Its Connection to the West

Nile Virus " , Townsend Letter For Doctors And Patients, July 2002, v228, p64-76.

Mark Hertzgaard, " Our Real China Problem " , The Atlantic Monthly, November

1997.

" South East Asia: Regular Fire and Weather Update " , March 2003.Sources:

NASA/EO and OSEI/NOAA. www.fire.uni-freiburg.de/GFMCnew/2003/0305/

Ralph Scobey, M.D., " Relationship Between Toxicology And Virology " , from

Science (1954) v51, p117. Archived at www.geocities.com/harpub/scobexog.htm

Mark Ptashne, A Genetic Switch (1992), p62. Cell Press and Blackwell

Scientific Publications, 50 Church St., Cambridge, MA 02138

" Dr. Urnovitz rejects the theory of a coronavirus as being the cause of

SARS " , May 14, 2003. www.chronixbiomedical.com/Research/press_release3.html

Jim West, " The Epidemiology Of Air Pollution " , www.geocities.com/noxot

Eric Ammerman , Senior Public Health Sanitarian, Monroe County Department of

Health. " Experts agree that WNV most likely arrived in the Western Hemisphere as

some 'accidental tourist' aboard a ship or in an airplane. "

David Crowe, " West Nile Virus — Does It Exist? " , 2001

www.mercola.com/2001/oct/3west_nile_virus.htm

Peter Duesberg, 1996 ( Ibid), p56

http://www.tetrahedron.org

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/full/BioTerrorismAndSARSFull.php

Reuters, May 20, 2003

Wall Street Journal, May 23, 2003

Ibid.

" A panel appointed by the EPA is set to report on Tuesday that use of the

much-debated ingredient M.T.B.E. . . should be 'reduced substantially'. .. " The

New York Times, July 27, 1999.

 

 

This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts,

the quarterly magazine of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Summer 2003

 

This page was posted on 12/07/03

 

 

 

 

 

Find out what made the Top Searches of 2003