Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/154558_prion30.html Tuesday, December 30, 2003 Scientists disagree on cause of infection By TOM PAULSON SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER Drowned out by calls for more testing and regulation to protect against mad cow disease are major disagreements over what causes the illness, how it is transmitted and even what parts of a contaminated cow may be unsafe to eat. Resolving these differences between the U.S. Department of Agriculture and other scientists may be critical to determining how the nation should respond to its first known case of BSE, bovine spongiform encephalopathy. " There are many different ways you can get the disease, " said Dr. Giuseppe Legname, a neuroscientist who works at the University of California-San Francisco lab of the researcher credited with discovering what many believe is the cause of mad cow disease. Mad cow disease, like the similar Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans, is strongly linked to the presence in brain tissue of an abnormal protein called a " prion. " Whether the prion is the root cause of the disease, however, is still hotly debated. The scientist who characterized and named the prion (to mean " infectious protein " ), Dr. Stanley Prusiner, won the 1997 Nobel Prize in medicine for discovering " an entirely new genre of disease-causing agents. " Prusiner and Legname are among those calling for testing all, or nearly all, cattle for mad cow disease. They contend the current U.S. Department of Agriculture method of testing only the brains of select cattle using stained antibodies that react to specific prions does not detect lower levels of infection, or all the varying " strains " of prions. The California researchers also believe the infection may be occurring " spontaneously " -- as Creutzfeldt-Jakob does in humans -- and not necessarily coming only from feed made of contaminated animal products, as most scientists believe. " The USDA is saying the beef muscle is safe, but we don't really know that, " Legname said. The UCSF team last year found prions in mice muscle tissue and claim to have developed a much more sensitive, rapid test that they have made commercially available. Prions, unlike viruses or bacteria, are believed to somehow replicate without having to inject genes into the cells they infect. Prusiner won the Nobel for showing that these abnormal proteins bind to normal proteins and pass on their defect, doing most of their damage in the brain where holes appear to create a spongelike appearance. While Prusiner and like-minded colleagues believe prions are the primary cause of these spongiform diseases -- mad cow, Creutzfeldt-Jakob or scrapie in sheep -- not everyone is convinced. " I don't think we know yet, " said Dr. Bruce Chesebro, an expert on this class of diseases at the National Institutes of Health's Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Hamilton, Mont. " The nature of the infectious agent is still not completely clear. " Chesebro said it would be premature to rule out the possibility that prions are, in fact, symptoms or co-conspirators in a yet-to-be-discovered viral infection. " I think it could very well be a virus, " he said. Those who claim that a virus cannot withstand the heat of cooking the meat, Chesebro said, haven't taken a close look at some of the microbiological residents found in the geothermal pools at Yellowstone National Park. Chesebro said there are a number of findings involving " prion diseases " that don't strongly support this infectious protein as a primary cause. The evidence, Chesebro said, also does not support Legname and Prusiner's claim that BSE may be occurring spontaneously in addition to being spread through contaminated feed. For one thing, he said, the number of Britain's human cases linked to BSE declined after the ban on using brain-tainted feed for cattle. Australia and New Zealand's success in eliminating scrapie -- the sheep equivalent for BSE -- followed by many years with no new cases indicates the infection can be totally eliminated, he said. Chesebro said he believes sample testing of animals remains a good way to monitor for the disease even if prions are not the primary cause of the infection. But he said the scientific community needs to continue to explore the mysteries associated with these diseases. Dr. William Hueston, director of the University of Minnesota's center for animal health and food safety, agrees with Legname that standard tests likely miss some infections. But he doesn't think more testing with better methods will do much to reduce the risk. " Testing more animals won't improve food safety, " said Hueston. " That just gives a false sense of security. " Japan's total testing scheme for cattle, Hueston said, is largely a public relations effort launched in 2001 after that country's first case of BSE. " The most likely source for this infection is contaminated feed, and blocking this source will be the only effective means of blocking this infection, " he said. While there may be no direct evidence showing that BSE-tainted feed is the only way to spread mad cow disease -- or to refute Prusiner's hypothesis of " sporadic " BSE -- Hueston said the epidemiological evidence is overwhelming. " The key to this is to get all brain and spinal cord out of the food supply, " he said. There's no good scientific reason, Hueston said, to allow human consumption of adult cow brain by humans (or other animals) if it is considered a disease carrier. DIFFERING VIEWS OF MAD COW DISEASE USDA: Mad cow disease results from cattle eating feed contaminated with infected cow brain or spinal cord -- a practice banned in 1997. Only limited testing (of brain matter only, in the United States) is needed because the feed ban is the main barrier to protect against spread of the disease. Muscle tissue, such as steaks, is considered safe. PRION PIONEER: Prions are abnormal proteins believed to spread disease like viruses or bacteria but through a unique method of infection. Dr. Stanley Prusiner, who won the Nobel Prize for discovering them, believes prions are likely to be in the muscle tissue of infected cattle even if not detected in standard tests. Prusiner says mad cow disease may occur " spontaneously " just as Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease does in humans, not necessarily from contaminated feed. He believes nearly all cattle should be tested using more sensitive methods. SKEPTICS: Mad cow, Creutzfeldt-Jacob, scrapie and similar diseases involve prions, but they may not be the fundamental cause. The actual cause is unknown. Some experts believe a viral cause is a possibility. Testing can indicate presence of the infection and protect against spreading the disease, but the tests likely do not identify the primary cause. P-I reporter Tom Paulson can be reached at 206-448-8318 or tompaulson Find out what made the Top Searches of 2003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.