Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: Back to the Island

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:46:41 -0500

HSI - Jenny Thompson

Back to the Island

 

Back to the Island

 

Health Sciences Institute e-Alert

 

December 29, 2003

 

**************************************************************

 

Dear Reader,

 

They did it again. Just when I get to the point where I think

I've seen it all, they raise the bar to a new height of

absurdity.

 

" They " in this case is the mainstream medical establishment in

general, and the drug industry specifically. And this time it's

a doozy. If you think drug company influence has a long reach,

wait till you hear this one.

 

-----------------------------

Can of worms deluxe

-----------------------------

 

When you see the terms " secret consultancy fees " and " drug

companies " mentioned in the same article, you know it's time to

fasten your seat belts. But this time it goes way beyond fees

paid to individual doctors. This time the fee recipients are

highly placed officials with the National Institutes of Health

(NIH).

 

Hats off to David Willman, a two-time Pulitzer Prize winning

reporter for the Los Angeles Times, who recently concluded a

five-year investigation of the inner workings of the NIH. Mr.

Willman's article reveals that hundreds of thousands of dollars

of drug company consulting fees have been paid to top NIH

officials who oversee the clinical trials of drugs.

 

-----------------------------

Wait. It gets worse.

-----------------------------

 

Willman cites a 1998 legal opinion that provides a loophole by

which more than 90 percent of NIH officials are allowed to keep

their consulting income confidential. In addition, many of them

sign confidentiality agreements with the companies from whom

they receive fees and corporate stock options.

 

If there were ever a situation tailor-made for conflict of

interest, this would be it.

 

An LA Times survey of more than 30 other federal agencies

revealed that the NIH had the lowest percentage of employees

filing reports of " consulting " income. In many of those agencies

ALL of the most well paid officials submitted public reports.

Mr. Willman concludes that in the area of financial disclosures,

the NIH is " one of the most secretive agencies in the federal

government. "

 

But wait. It gets even worse.

 

-----------------------------

Consulting we will go

-----------------------------

 

To understand the trust that has been violated by the NIH's

easy-does-it attitude toward consulting fees, Mr. Willman

highlights one case in particular.

 

In an NIH study of a drug to treat kidney inflammation related

to lupus, one of the subjects receiving the drug died of a

complication that was believed to be related to the drug. But

the senior NIH official connected to the study didn't stop the

study, nor did he attempt to warn the medical community of the

potential danger of the drug.

 

That official was a paid consultant for the company that

produced the drug. And in the past 10 years, he received well

over half a million dollars in consulting fees from various drug

companies and biomedical firms.

 

And he wasn't alone. According to the LA Times article, among

his many colleagues who provided consulting services, one of

them has accepted almost $1.5 million in fees.

 

Gee. He must be a REALLY good consultant.

 

-----------------------------

Once upon a time...

-----------------------------

 

During the Reagan era, Margaret Heckler (the secretary of Health

and Human Services, which is the agency that oversees NIH)

called NIH " an island of objective and pristine research,

untainted by the influences of commercialization. "

 

Ah, those were the days!

 

In 2003 the NIH comprises 27 individual institutes, more than

18,000 employees, an annual budget of almost $28 billion this

fiscal year, and a very protective bureaucracy.

 

When Dr. Ruth L. Kirschstein (the NIH deputy director who

approved many of the consulting arrangements) was asked about

the results of the Willman investigation, she told the LA Times

that NIH staff members are " highly ethical " and have " enormous

integrity. " She admitted that systems can be " tightened up, " and

said that, " perhaps, based on this, we will do so. "

 

Wow. Sounds like Dr. Kirschstein is going to go all out!

 

And last month, NIH Director Elias A. Zerhouni announced that he

would study the situation by forming a committee.

 

Well, well, well... a committee! Now that IS impressive! What

next? A memo?

 

**************************************************************

To start receiving your own copy of the HSI e-Alert, visit:

http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ealert/freecopy.html

Or forward this e-mail to a friend so they can sign-up to

receive their own copy of the HSI e-Alert.

 

**************************************************************

 

... and another thing

 

Another grape juice, please. And keep 'em coming!

 

In the e-alert " Cup of Good Cheer " (12/24/03) I told you about

studies that have shown how the resveratrol content of dark

grapes may reduce cardiovascular and cancer risks, and may even

prevent the brain damage triggered by free radicals in the days

following a stroke.

 

Now a new study from the U.S. Department of Agriculture

indicates that a regular intake of concord grape juice may help

the brain forestall the process of brain aging by inhibiting a

specific protein that responds to oxidative stress.

 

As is the case with most of these studies, the subjects used in

this research were laboratory rats. And while the lead author of

the study, James A. Joseph, recognized that his research is

preliminary, he feels the results clearly underline the positive

effects that dietary antioxidants have on mental and physical

declines of aging.

 

So set 'em up, Joe. I've got a good feeling that concord grapes

and grape juice probably won't do me any harm. And it just might

give my brain a little extra edge.

 

I don't know about you, but I can use all the edge I can get in

that department.

 

To Your Good Health,

 

Jenny Thompson

Health Sciences Institute

 

**************************************************************

 

Sources:

" Stealth Merger: Drug Companies and Government Medical Research "

David Willman, the Los Angeles Times, 12/7/03, latimes.com

" Moonlighting Federal Watchdogs " CBS News, 12/8/03, cbsnews.com

" Stealth Merger: Drug Companies and Medical Research at NIH -

LAT " Alliance for Human Research Protection, 12/7/03,

researchprotection.com

" Grape Juice to Regain Youth " NutraIngredients.com, 12/19/03,

nutraingredients.com

 

Copyright ©1997-2003 by www.hsibaltimore.com, L.L.C.

The e-Alert may not be posted on commercial sites without

written permission.

 

**************************************************************

Before you hit reply to send us a question or request, please

visit here http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ealert/questions.html

 

**************************************************************

To manage your e-mail subscription, use our web interface at:

http://www.agoramail.net/Home.cfm?List=hsiweb

Or to end your e-mail subscription, send a blank e-mail to:

hsiweb_unsub

To cancel or for any other subscription issues, write us at:

Order Processing Center

Attn: Customer Service

P.O. Box 925

Frederick, MD 21705

 

 

 

 

Photos - Get your photo on the big screen in Times Square

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...