Senator Frist Frivolously Dismisses Vaccine Damage

[Guest guest]

http://www.vaccinationnews.com//Scandals/2003/Dec_22/Scandal68.htm

 

 

Scandals - 12/22/03

 

Senator Frist Frivolously Dismisses Vaccine Damage

 

by Sandy Mintz

 

In a recent article in the Financial Times, referring to the alleged link

between litigation and an inadequate flu vaccine supply, “Bill Frist, the Senate

majority leader from Tennessee, last week told a television audience that one

cause for shortages was the ‘high cost of litigation - the frivolous lawsuits

that come from these little, tiny vaccines’.”

 

Now, Senator Frist and others may well argue that because some lawsuits are

frivolous that these vaccine lawsuits are all frivolous and deserve to be

stopped. But arguing that won’t make it true or fair.

 

And they may in the end, in spite of the inequity of the argument, get their way

by making it even more difficult than it already is for those harmed by vaccines

and other products to get rightly compensated.

 

But really, now. Did the good Senator honestly mean to suggest that size

matters? Exploding atoms, spores of botulism, tiny, deadly vials of poison like

cyanide – why is he pretending to be unaware that tiny packages can deal a

powerful punch?

 

Might it be due to the fact that the Senator has considerable ties to the drug

industry, including being the third highest drug company contribution recipient

in Congress? Might he be banking on the automatic trust bestowed upon doctors

to once again try and pull the wool over our eyes? Might this trust be

completely undeserved and misplaced given the charges and enormous penalties

lodged against the Frist family medical business, his own sizable fortune

because of this business, as well as the other possible conflicts of interest?

 

Now we all know what love can do to people. But this love affair Senator Frist

is having with the drug and vaccine manufacturers has really caused him to lose

his head this time.

 

For one, he seems to have confused having a hobby with having a lobby.

 

But is it really such a good idea to bet the farm (i.e., re-election) on this

relationship? Is it really all that smart to use the “but, your honor, it was

just a tiny bit of poison” argument in their defense?

 

Sandy Mintz

 

" Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty. " - Wendell Phillips (1811-1884),

paraphrasing John Philpot Curran (1808)

 

Sandy Mintz is the publisher of the website " Vaccination News " , and writer of

the columns " Scandals " and " Out of Control " . To join her political action

egroup or learn more about it, please send an email to sandym,

indicating the purpose of your email in the subject line.

 

 

 

 

 

Photos - Get your photo on the big screen in Times Square