Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

BGH: Monsanto and the Dairy Industry's Dirty Little Secret

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

BGH: Monsanto and the Dairy Industry's Dirty Little Secret

 

Seven years ago, on Feb. 4, 1994,despite nationwide protests by

consumer groups, Monsanto and the FDA forced onto the US market the

world's first GE animal drug, recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone

(rBGH, sometimes known as rBST).

 

BGH is a powerful GE drug produced by Monsanto which, injected into

dairy cows, forces them to produce 15%-25% more milk,

in the process seriously damaging their health and reproductive

capacity.

 

Despite warnings from scientists, such as Dr. Michael Hansen from

the

Consumers Union and Dr. Samuel Epstein from the Cancer Prevention

Coalition, that milk from rBGH injected cows contains substantially

higher amounts of a potent cancer tumor promoter called IGF-1, and

despite evidence that rBGH milk contains higher levels of pus,

bacteria,and antibiotics, the FDA gave the hormone its seal of

approval, with no

real 'pre-market' safety 'testing' required.

 

Moreover, the FDA ruled, in a decision marred by rampant conflict of

interest (several key FDA decision makers, including Michael Taylor,

previously worked for Monsanto),

that rBGH-derived products did not have to be labeled, despite polls

showing that 90% of American consumers wanted labeling -- mainly so

they could avoid buying rBGH-tainted products.

 

All of the major criticisms leveled against rBGH have turned out to

be true. Since 1994, every industrialized country in the world,

except

for the US, has banned the drug.

 

In 1998, Canadian government scientists revealed that Monsanto's own

data on feeding rBGH to rats, carefully concealed by the company and

the FDA,

 

indicated possible cancer dangers to humans.

 

Since rBGH was approved, approximately 40,000 small and medium-sized

US dairy farmers, 1/3 of the total in the country, have gone out of

business, concentrating milk production in the hands of industrial-

sized dairies, most of whom are injecting their cows with this cruel

and dangerous drug.

 

In a 1998 survey by Family Farm Defenders, it was found that

mortality

rates for cows on factory dairy farms in Wisconsin, those injecting

their herds with rBGH, were running at 40% per year.

 

In other words,after two and a half years of rBGH injections

most of these drugged and supercharged cows were *dead*.

 

Typically, dairy cows live for 15-20 years.

 

Alarmed and revolted by rBGH, consumers have turned in droves to

organic milk and dairy products or to brands labeled as rBGH-free.

 

Nonetheless,use of the drug has continued to increase in the US (and

in

nations like Brazil and Mexico) especially in large dairy herds, so

that currently 15% of America's 10 million lactating dairy cows are

being

injected with rBGH.

 

Compounding the problem of rBGH contamination, most of the nation's

1500 dairy companies are allowing the co-mingling of rBGH and non-

rBGH

milk,thereby contaminating 80-90% of the nation's milk and dairy

supply

(including all of the major infant formula brands).

 

For a list oforganic and rBGH-free dairies in the US consult the

Organic Consumers Association (OCA) website.

 

The major reason that rBGH is still on the market is that it is not

labeled.

 

Supermarket dairy managers, following guidelines circulated

by the rBGH and biotech lobby,routinely lie to consumers, telling

them

either that rBGH is not in their products, or that there's no way to

tell, and reassuring them that the FDA has certified that rBGH is

safe.

 

Of course, every survey conducted since 1994 shows that if consumers

were given a choice, they would boycott rBGH-tainted products.

 

Responding to the global controversy surrounding the drug, Monsanto

put BGH for sale in 1998, but there were no takers.

 

Transnational PR firms working with the biotech industry have

categorized Monsanto's handling of the rBGH controversy as a " public

relations disaster. "

 

Starbucks has been a target as 3/4 of the 32 million gallons of milk

it buys every year in the US are coming from dairies that allow cows

to

be injected with rBGH.

 

Once Starbucks' 15 million customers learn that most of the latte or

cappuccino drinks they're paying top dollar for (3/4 of the volume

of

these drinks are milk) contain an extra dose of pus, antibiotics,

and growth hormones and that Fair Trade and organic coffee

constitute less than one percent of company sales, they may decide

to take their business elsewhere.

 

Total annual sales for the company are approximately $2.5 billion.

 

The worst nightmare of Monsanto and the biotech industry is starting

to materialize:

a mass-based consumer and environmental marketplace

pressure campaign in the heartland of GE foods-North America.

 

A number of major US food companies are already responding to public

pressure and starting to sweep GE foods off their products lists and

their grocery shelves:

 

Gerber (baby food), Heinz (baby food), Frito-

Lay(at least for their corn), Whole Foods, Wild Oats, Trader Joe's,

andeven McDonald's (at least for their French fries).

 

OrganicConsumers.org

_________________

 

JoAnn Guest

mrsjoguest

DietaryTipsForHBP

http://www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/AIM.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...