Guest guest Posted November 28, 2003 Report Share Posted November 28, 2003 http://www.redflagsweekly.com/caldecott/2003_nov21.html THE HISTORY OF HERBAL MEDICINE IN NORTH AMERICA (Part Eight) By RFD Columnist, Todd Caldecott of Clinical Herbal Studies Wild Rose College Of Natural Healing Calgary, Alberta Email: phyto Website In this major series, RFD Columnist, Todd Caldecott explores the history of herbal medicine in North America, with the view of fostering a better understanding of the issues that face modern herbalists and a greater appreciation of the evolution of the relationships between alternative, complimentary and conventional medicine. Herbal medicine in North America has a long and venerable tradition, from the First Nations practices that were in existence thousands of years before the first colonists arrived, to the development of four-year clinical programs at the turn of the last century. The practice of physiomedicalism With the scientific discoveries of the 18th and 19th centuries, the medical sciences increasingly adopted a mechanistic conception of the body, and indeed, of all life. These early medical scientists believed that all activities of the body were subject to the same physical and chemical laws that had been recently developed, and that the body was essentially a machine comprised of lifeless constituents. The physiomedicalists however, wholly rejected such a conception of the body, and continued to embrace and build upon Thomson’s conception of the “innate heat,” which became synonymous with the “vital force.” Central to the practice of physiomedicalism was the conception of the healing power of nature, vis medicatrix naturae. Thus all medicaments given by physiomedicalist physicians were intended to restore this vital capacity, not diminish it, as was the end result of mercury administration and blood letting. These remedies were termed sanative or restorative remedies, which not only assisted the activity of the vital force, but helped to sustain it. Rather than imparting any special or intrinsic power to the body, as is the Chinese and Indian conception of restorative remedies like Ginseng (Panax ginseng) or Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera), physiomedicalists believed that sanative remedies simply modified the vital force to promote a favorable change in the body, such as the elimination of “morbid wastes” and the proper digestion and assimilation of nutrients. While the same pharmacies that supplied the Regular physicians also carried a variety of botanic remedies, physiomedicalists preferred to buy their remedies from dealers that specialized in herbal medicine for fear of adulteration. Initially, Samuel Thomson and Sons provided the bulk of the remedies on the market, but this was soon augmented by several herbal companies, including Godfrey Meyer and Ward Sears (Haller 1997, 96-97). The early physiomedicalists took great pride in ensuring that their patients had access to the freshest and best quality herbal remedies around, but following the decline of Thomsonism, fewer and fewer herbal pharmacies remained to service them. By the mid to late 1800’s physiomedicalists increasingly depended upon the Eclectic druggists, most notably the Lloyd Brothers of Cincinnati, but also from firms that are recognizable today, including Parke, Davis and Co., as well as Eli Lilly of Indiana (Haller 1997, 97). Nonetheless, many physiomedicalists were uncomfortable with this trend, especially when the great Eclectic John King initiated a relentless pursuit of “resinoids,” a class of “constituents” first derived from Mandrake (Podophyllum peltatum), which King figured to be the ultimate medicinal substance. As a result, many physiomedicalists lost faith in the pharmaceutical companies, instead collecting and preparing their remedies themselves. Of the more important debates in medicine that occurred during the latter part of the 19th century was the research of Robert Koch, who devised a method of identifying bacteria, and established the bacterial cause of many infectious diseases, including anthrax, tuberculosis, and cholera. Despite some early confusion between the terms “bacteria” and “virus” Regular medicine rapidly embraced his work and applied it to the practice of medicine. Taking the lead from Edward Jenner’s smallpox vaccine, researchers developed bacterial antitoxins, which, while neutralizing the effect of the bacterial toxins, did little to actually treat the infection itself. Based on these middling results, physiomedicalists rejected such theories, especially the elder among them, who referred to Samuel Thomson’s success in the treatment of such “bacterial” disease as cholera. To the physiomedicalists, disease remained a manifestation of some “wrong of life,” not specific etiological agents like little “bugs.” Nonetheless, the burgeoning interest in bacteriology presented an important challenge to the physiomedicalists, especially if they wanted to continue to learn and work in a hospital environment. Eventually, many of the physiomedicalists did come around to accepting the tenets of bacteriology, but rather than a wholesale acceptance of bacteria as a cause, they continued to believe that bacterial infection represented some disturbance of the vital capacity of the body. CONTINUING NEW WEB MESSAGE BOARDS - JOIN HERE. Alternative Medicine Message Boards.Info http://alternative-medicine-message-boards.info Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.