Guest guest Posted November 22, 2003 Report Share Posted November 22, 2003 Fat, Not Calcium, Is Heart Attack Culprit JoAnn Guest Aug 17, 2003 15:27 PDT Monday February 26 5:44 PM ET By Suzanne Rostler NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Patients whose arteries are clogged with fatty plaque may be more susceptible to heart attack than those whose arteries are coated with calcium-containing plaque, researchers report. The findings indicate that diets aimed at reducing the build-up of cholesterol in the arteries may be more useful than drugs that seek to reduce amounts of plaque that contain calcium deposits (channel blockers). The study also " highlights the importance of developing new methods for identifying the most unstable lesions in patients before they rupture, " such as technologies that can detect the fat content, Dr. Richard T. Lee from Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, and the study's lead author said in an interview. " Currently, this isn't easy to do, but several methods like magnetic resonance imaging or catheter-based techniques are promising, " he said. Fatty plaque can be more dangerous than calcium-containing plaque because it is more likely to *rupture* and cause the formation of blood clots (thrombosis), which can cause heart attack and stroke, the researchers explain. Lee likened the production of artery-clogging lesions to a bench with supports at each end and in the middle. " If you replaced the support in the middle with another hard support like calcium, the bench will still be stable. But if you replaced it with a soft material like lipid (fat), it would be much less likely to support a heavy person, " he said. While " calcification " (from anti-acid supplements and excessive calcium supplementation, i.e. Tums etc.) may suggest a more extensive form of heart disease, it appears to be less likely to lead to heart attack, according to the report published in the February 27th issue of Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association. The researchers examined the composition of artery plaque in 20 cadavers. Half of lesions were ruptured at the time of death. *Fatty* plaque appeared to cause more " stress " on artery lesions and was up to 25% less " stable " than *calcified* plaque, the report indicates. " Our results demonstrate that within a typical lesion, the presence of lesion lipid (fat) is much more important...than calcium, " the study authors conclude. http://www.vitamins-etc.com/study_description.asp? khw6c=m00d1a828ou & x=33 & y=13 JoAnn Guest mrsjoguest DietaryTipsForHBP http://www.geocities.com/mrsjoguest/Melanoma.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.