Guest guest Posted November 19, 2003 Report Share Posted November 19, 2003 http://www.redflagsweekly.com/editorial/2003_nov19.html MAINSTREAM MEDICINE IS GETTING VERY WEIRD. THE LATEST “POLYPILL” EPISODE IS WAY OVER THE TOP – SIMPLY WACKO By RFD Editor, Nicholas Regush I blame it all on the British Medical Journal. It referred to a proposed treatment known as the “polypill” as “a step of genius.” No, it isn't. What is the “polypill?” It’s a pill that “could prevent 80% of heart attacks to all over-55s.” That’s what the headline stated today in the Independent, a U.K. newspaper. It’s the brainchild of two researchers who think that a combination of six meds taken once a day would greatly reduce heart disease and strokes. This is madness, of course. One wonders how anyone who has given the complexity and potential dangers (think of side-effects) of polypharmacy any degree of thought would come up with something so inane as a one-pill-cure-all. Forget for the moment any discussion of all the controversies surrounding the various risk factors associated with heart disease. Let’s just stick to the idea of having all these pills working together in some synergistic way to wipe out disease. Is there any real evidence gathered that this would work? Absolutely not. It is something that a person doing morning ablutions might think up out of boredom. The BMJ should have held its histrionics at least until the toilet paper flushed. The first phase of this campaign (which is a big kick in the eye for medicine) was to get a journal (the BMJ) to actually publish the idea. Bravo BMJ. This immediately raised the question of whether the editor of the journal, the extremely enthusiastic Richard Smith, should remain in charge. He thought the idea was “perhaps the most important” the journal had published in 50 years. Dear me. Now, it seems the two researchers, Nick Wald and Malcolm Law, have taken their case to the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Products Agency in the U.K. to look into possible licensing dynamics. This is obviously still at the talking stage. Some of the simplistic maunderings about the polypill no doubt will need to be spelled out more cleanly. We learn from The Independent that it appears that the regulators might insist on a large trial. This presumably would compare the polypill (a thiazide diuretic, beta blocker, Ace inhibitor, aspirin, statin and folic acid all wrapped into one) with its individual constituents. I personally would love to see the proposed methodology for this enterprise. But then again, these days what passes for medical science truly amazes. Just read the medical journals, including the BMJ. Wald says he’s talking to commercial groups about making this devastating concoction. How very appropriate. *** You might wish to read a COMMENTARY by Dr. Peter H. Langsjoen on the polypill. He wrote this for RFD soon after the grand idea of the polypill was unhatched. Here is the article in THE INDEPENDENT. The Original POLYPILL PROPOSAL BMJ Editor, Richard Smith’s COMMENTARY ON THE POLYPILL NEW WEB MESSAGE BOARDS - JOIN HERE. Alternative Medicine Message Boards.Info http://alternative-medicine-message-boards.info Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.