Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Enough to make the blood boil

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

http://www.news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1257142003

 

Enough to make the blood boil

 

JAMES REYNOLDS ENVIRONMENT CORRESPONDENT

 

Seriously hazardous chemicals can be found in the tissue of nearly every person

alive. It is a frightening thought, but exposure to such toxic substances has

been linked to a higher incidence in several cancers, reproductive

complications, a continuing decline in fertility rates and birth defects.

 

Like the majority of people, I was unaware of the levels of these chemicals

circulating in my bloodstream, so when the opportunity to find out about them

came along, I seized it.

 

Along with 150 others, from politicians and journalists to leaders of

environmental NGOs and lobby groups, I volunteered to have my blood tested for

three groups of dangerous chemicals, including PCBs, organochlorine pesticides

and PBDEs, or flame-retardants.

 

The biomonitoring survey, which is the largest exercise the UK has seen in

biomonitoring in over two decades, is part of a chemicals and health campaign

set up by the environmental organisation WWF.

 

It seeks to discover the extent of volunteers’ contamination with the sort of

chemicals and toxic substances that, largely without consumers’ knowledge, are

routinely sprayed on crops and food, added to paints and home-decorating

products, and used in everything from furniture and carports to computers and

televisions.

 

In June, at the time the samples were taken, I did not imagine the analysis

would turn up any particular nasties.

 

For the first 18 years of my life, from 1972, I lived in a village on the

fringes of the countryside near the industrial town of Warrington, in Cheshire.

Although in my early years the claimed health benefits of switching to organic

food had yet to made, my parents were aware that agriculture was largely

chemical-dependent, and our supermarket fruit and vegetables were always washed

before being eaten.

 

I have since continued in the same vein of my upbringing, avoiding the expensive

switch to organic, but conscious that supermarket fruit and vegetables may have

residues of agricultural chemicals and should therefore be washed before eating.

 

I am also a carnivore, and although I am not unhappy if I do not get a daily

dose of something’s cooked flesh, I eat a lot of what is likely to be

intensively farmed chicken and, particularly, fish.

 

In short, as far as what I put into my body is concerned, I think I’m pretty

healthy - but not perfect.

 

But external influences, or the impact of a person’s surrounding domestic, work

and leisure environment, can also affect their degree of toxicity. Since leaving

home for university 13 years ago, I have lived in the comparatively polluted

atmospheres of major cities, but I have never worked in any business close to

the chemical industry.

 

My test results came back last week, detailing my exposure to 77 chemicals,

along with the collective minimum, maximum and median of the other volunteers.

 

When the full results are published in full later this month, they will reveal

that not one of the 150 participants had clean blood.

 

One fortunate individual showed detectable levels of only nine of the 77

substances measured. I had 19, and this was below average compared with a

maximum of 49 and a median of 27.

 

All of the results for the chemicals found are given in " ng/g lipid " - which

stands for nanograms of chemical per gram of fat tested. Put simply, this

reveals how many thousand-millionths of a gram of chemical were found for every

gram of my fat tested.

 

It sounds negligible, but there is a catch. Virtually nothing is known about the

long-term effects on human health of these chemicals, in any quantity.

 

Many of them were first made when manufacturers had no legal requirement to

carry out any safety tests, and none has been tested on humans. Add this to the

fact that no-one knows which of these chemicals may react together, and things

start to get scary.

 

In addition, the 77 chemicals tested are merely the tip of the iceberg. There

are 100,000 synthetic, man-made ones in the environment, with 30,000 of those

traded freely in the EU.

 

If a perfect test were available, it would probably prove I am home to hundreds,

possibly thousands, of synthetic and toxic chemical compounds, the majority of

which come under the umbrella of persistent bioaccumulative endocrine

disrupters.

 

This means that they do not break down readily in the environment and therefore

remain at large for many years once released, that they have the property of

building up in living things in progressively greater quantities, and that they

can interfere with the normal functioning of the hormone system of both humans

and wildlife.

 

Icontain 11 of the 42 PCBs tested for in the survey, although all at levels

lower than the median of the volunteers. Considering that I was born after their

manufacture was prohibited in 1970 and because of the very fact that they build

up in the environment, I am rather alarmed by this.

 

However, according to Dr Asma Khan, a London consultant hired by WWF to advise

on test results, I shouldn’t be. Prior to being banned, PCBs were so ubiquitous

you would be hard pushed to find anyone in industrial countries without

detectable levels in their blood.

 

They are highest in animals high up the food chain, with the main dietary

sources being fish (especially those caught in contaminated lakes or rivers),

fish oils, meat and dairy products.

 

I am without doubt still being exposed to WWF’s second target set of substances,

organochlorine pesticides, which includes DDT, DDE, Lindane and HCBs. No matter

how furiously I scrub my vegetables, I will be unable to erase chemical traces

in certain food-stuffs, although I was found to contain only three of the 12

tested for, again all at lower levels than the group median.

 

Developed and in widespread use in the 1960s and used widely to control

agricultural pests, as well as human and farm-animal diseases, many have now

been banned in the UK after they were belatedly found to be highly persistent in

the environment and cause long-term toxic effects in wildlife. Certain

populations of birds of prey were devastated due to DDT causing their egg-shells

to thin and break.

 

DDT from the mother can enter her unborn baby through the placenta. DDT has been

found in amniotic fluid, human placentas, foetuses and umbilical cord blood. DDT

has been measured in human milk, so nursing infants are also exposed to it. In

most cases, however, the benefits of breast-feeding outweigh any risks from

exposure to DDT in the mother’s milk.

 

Most worrying of all the tests was the exposure to flame-retardants, or

polybrominated diphenyl ethers, PBDEs. These are used extensively in textiles

and plastics, and are commonly employed in polyurethane foam for furniture and

upholstery to mitigate domestic fire risk.

 

Having purchased a new sofa a year ago, I was not surprised to learn that this

was the area where I was most contaminated. Although only five of the 23 tested

for were found to be present, every one found was at concentrations

significantly above the average.

 

There is a theory that these chemicals escape from materials and enter our

bodies via our skin or lungs, so just by sitting on my new sofa, I am prolonging

my contamination. Some scientists are also concerned that PBDEs may enter food

from packaging.

 

The list of potential harmful effects is similar to that of PCBs, but less is

known about them. Sadly, save for living in a Luddite world where all

technological advances are outlawed, a PBDE-free existence will forever remain a

fantasy.

 

I am not at all surprised that I am host to chemicals about which little is

known of their consequences to human health. I am, however, angry that I have no

freedom of choice in the matter.

 

 

 

NEW WEB MESSAGE BOARDS - JOIN HERE.

Alternative Medicine Message Boards.Info

http://alternative-medicine-message-boards.info

 

 

 

Protect your identity with Mail AddressGuard

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...