Guest guest Posted October 11, 2003 Report Share Posted October 11, 2003 I will continue to eat wild Salmon, until I get clear evidence that the level of pollution is a higher cost than the immense health-benefits. The problem with the Mercola message, is that it's an advertisment for a source of Salmon. " All " food on the planet is polluted, it's a matter of degree. Mercola's alarm doesn't make a judgment about the degree of contamination versus the extent of health benefits. Just saying a food is contaminated isn't enough. Even if wild Salmon is " as " contaminated as farmed Salmon, it's vastly better nutritionally. I rarely eat more than 1 serving a week, and sometimes eat Halibut or other fish. I still think the gain outweighs the loss. I'm also looking for supplements that will help remove Mercury and other pollutants from the body, rather than denying myself an occasional wild Salmon meal. JP - <ConBenesch Saturday, October 11, 2003 11:59 AM [alternative] Both Wild & Farmed Salmon POLLUTED > Bummer. Read these articles about how polluted salmon is. > > What do we eat if we can't eat wild salmon? > > I found this article on the Mercola site, which referred to two articles > about polluted salmon. > > I bought the salmon that Mercola sells on this site -- to be honest, it > doesn't taste very god. Does anyone know where to purchase salmon or other fish > that isn't polluted? > > http://mercola.com/2003/oct/11/polluted_salmon.htm > > > http://www.nature.com/nsu/030915/030915-7.html > Salmon packed with pollutants > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/09/030923064756.htm > > Connie Benesch > Discover the Joy of Living Sugarfree! - www.SugarShock.com > KickSugar Founder/Moderator > Subscribe: kicksugar- > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2003 Report Share Posted October 11, 2003 Dr. Mercola is really afraid of fish: He said take the oil capsules as they are detoxified of mercury---Then He started selling Alaska Salmon. Keta Salmon at $50 for four pounds. Then Kroger's got some Keta Salmon in fresh at $0.99 a lb. I put 40 pounds in the freezer. thawed one out last week and somehow it sat in the Fridge for a week before We ate it; But it still tasted great. Keta Salmon is cheap as the farmed Salmon has ruined the wild Salmon market--it is not quite that simple but some 98 percent of Salmon in my area markets is farmed. Sometimes Wal-Mart has frozen Alaska Salmon at close to $1 a lb. I do not say that Mercola's Salmon is overpriced as they have to store it and ship it to just a few purchasers. However If you watch carefully during the summer you may get fresh Alaska Salmon or frozen Alaska Salmon at a bargain price. And you can always fall back on canned Alaska Salmon. The frozen Salmon or canned Salmon from Alaska is from the cleanest part of the ocean. Also the small, 5 lb, wild Salmon are only two or three years old and have fed on the smallest plankton, shrimp and Sardines so they have the least opportunity to accumulate Mercury. On the other hand Tuna or Swordfish, etc. live many years and feed on older sardines. The ground fish pellets fed to farmed Salmon are made from older fish that may have more mercury; also antibiotics and color chemicals fed to farmed salmon that leaves a lot to be desired. If you go fishing, Kokanee is a lake Salmon that feeds on plankton and could be mercury free in some lakes. Good Luck, Lorenzo John Polifronio [counterpnt] Saturday, October 11, 2003 3:47 PM Re: [alternative] Both Wild & Farmed Salmon POLLUTED I will continue to eat wild Salmon, until I get clear evidence that the level of pollution is a higher cost than the immense health-benefits. The problem with the Mercola message, is that it's an advertisment for a source of Salmon. " All " food on the planet is polluted, it's a matter of degree. Mercola's alarm doesn't make a judgment about the degree of contamination versus the extent of health benefits. Just saying a food is contaminated isn't enough. Even if wild Salmon is " as " contaminated as farmed Salmon, it's vastly better nutritionally. I rarely eat more than 1 serving a week, and sometimes eat Halibut or other fish. I still think the gain outweighs the loss. I'm also looking for supplements that will help remove Mercury and other pollutants from the body, rather than denying myself an occasional wild Salmon meal. JP - <ConBenesch Saturday, October 11, 2003 11:59 AM [alternative] Both Wild & Farmed Salmon POLLUTED > Bummer. Read these articles about how polluted salmon is. > > What do we eat if we can't eat wild salmon? > > I found this article on the Mercola site, which referred to two articles > about polluted salmon. > > I bought the salmon that Mercola sells on this site -- to be honest, it > doesn't taste very god. Does anyone know where to purchase salmon or other fish > that isn't polluted? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.