Guest guest Posted October 8, 2003 Report Share Posted October 8, 2003 http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/08/dining/08BEEF.html?th October 8, 2003Schools Seem in No Hurry to Buy Irradiated BeefBy MARIAN BURROS ARE irradiated hamburgers coming to your child's school cafeteria next year? Last spring the federal Department of Agriculture told schools that starting in January they could buy ground beef that had been irradiated to kill bacteria and prevent contamination outbreaks. But telephone interviews with officials in 56 school districts around the country found few takers so far. Thirty-four of the officials said they had no plans to serve irradiated beef in their school lunch programs, 4 said they would definitely not use it, 13 said they had not yet decided and 5 would not comment. None said they were going to buy it. The government has said that irradiation is a responsible way to prevent contamination by E. coli 0157:H7, listeria and other dangerous bacteria. But critics have said that not enough studies have been done to prove irradiated beef's safety; that in fact some studies have shown that it may promote cancer and that it should not be given to children until the concerns are met. Most school officials interviewed said either that contamination was not enough of a problem for them to consider irradiation or that they needed to know a lot more about irradiated beef before using it. The extra cost — an estimated 13 to 20 cents per pound more than regular beef — was another issue cited. Like many districts, New York City uses precooked hamburgers. Margie Feinberg, a spokeswoman for the city's school food service, said that that avoids the need for irradiation. Many districts around the country are also giving more training to their cafeteria workers in food preparation, storage and sanitation to prevent contamination. New York State will survey school districts next spring and give them the option of ordering irradiated beef. " Everyone is still in a learning curve, " said Jim Walls, director of the division of government-donated foods in the state's office of general services. " We are trying to provide them with information. " Of 17 states surveyed, Alabama, Iowa, Missouri and Nevada said they would not offer irradiated ground beef to school districts. California, Maine, Minnesota and Virginia plan to offer it. The remainder, including New York, Connecticut and New Jersey, said it would be made available if schools asked for it. Kathy F. Kuser, director of the division of food and nutrition for the New Jersey agriculture department, said that very few of the state's school officials have responded to a survey in August about whether they would order irradiated beef and that she knew of none who said they would. " Probably it's such a new concept people want to feel more comfortable and want to know more about it, " Ms. Kuser said. Reflecting the responses from all of the local districts contacted, she added: " We need input from the parents at the local level. " In Connecticut, most officials who were interviewed said they would decide after a food service directors' meeting later this month, at which the topic would be discussed. Cindy Brooks, director of school food services in Seymour, a small town outside New Haven, said that the increased cost would be a factor and that she thought an education campaign was needed. " We've had a few calls from parents who said their kids would brown bag it if we serve irradiated meat, " she said. In Greenwich, where the hamburgers are precooked, John Hopkins, director of school food services, said the schools are not likely to use it because of the controversy. Unlike most school officials, those in Marshall, Mich., have had experience with food contamination. In 1997, well over 300 people in Marshall and elsewhere in Calhoun County were treated for hepatitis A contracted from strawberries served in the schools. It was one of 195 outbreaks of food poisoning at schools in the 1990's, according to a survey by the General Accounting Office. But the experience has not persuaded Marshall's food service director, Kay Davis, to order irradiated beef. " I don't think we should be feeding children something when we don't know the consequences, " Ms. Davis said. Others questioned whether irradiation was even needed. " If the meat gets to the point where it must be irradiated, then I want to be questioning why we're giving the meat to them at all, " said Dr. Robert Ervin, the superintendent of the Bangor, Me., school district. Dr. Norman Thomas, executive director of school services in Atlanta, said irradiated beef had been discussed at PTA meetings, but there were no plans to buy it. " Essentially what we were saying is, if it were not necessary to even deal with it, not to deal with it, " Dr. Thomas said. Julie Korenstein, a member of the Los Angeles school board, introduced a resolution that the board passed last month banning all irradiated foods from schools for five years. " I was not particularly enamored of using 750,000 children as guinea pigs, " she said. " Some studies suggest that irradiation may have a negative impact on vitamins, and there's a question about whether irradiation may create carcinogenic properties. " Aware of the uphill battle for acceptance food irradiation has always faced, the Agriculture Department sent a letter and information brochure to school superintendents in the spring urging them to " engage in an educational effort on food irradiation before ordering irradiated product. " The brochure offered assurance about the safety of irradiation and noted that it had been endorsed by several health organizations, including the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It said irradiation " can increase the safety of the food supply and help protect consumers from food-borne illness, " but it also said that it was not a substitute for good sanitation or safe food handling. It explained that food still had to be cooked and that even when irradiated it could contaminate other food. Another brochure was produced as part of a pilot education program last spring in three Minnesota school districts. That program was not without problems. After reading the educational material created by the Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning in cooperation with the Agriculture Department, one of the districts in the program, Sauk Rapids-Rice, dropped out, saying the material was more promotional than educational. " We felt we would look more like an advocate of irradiation than we felt we should, " said Gary Kawlewski, business manager for Sauk Rapids-Rice, a blue-collar district in central Minnesota. Jim Amundson, chairman of the school board in Spring Lake Park, an upper middle class suburb north of Minneapolis, said he was sorry his district participated because it caused so much controversy. " People accused us of using their children as guinea pigs, " Mr. Amundson said. But Kathy Leedom, superintendent of the Willmar public school district, in a rural working class community, said the information was " very fair and balanced. " While Minnesota is one of the four states that intend to offer irradiated ground beef, none of the districts that participated in the pilot are planning to buy it. Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company NEW WEB MESSAGE BOARDS - JOIN HERE. Alternative Medicine Message Boards.Info http://alternative-medicine-message-boards.info The New with improved product search Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.