Fwd: [S-A] Inexpensive AMAS Test for Detection/Monitoring of Cancer

[Guest guest]

" Misty L. Trepke "

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:13:11 -0000

[s-A] Inexpensive AMAS Test for Detection/Monitoring of Cancer

 

Has anyone heard about this?

Be Well,

Misty L. Trepke

http://www..com

 

The AMAS Test For Early Detection and Monitoring of Cancer

 

Following is a must read for anyone contemplating Cancer testing.

 

This is a follow up on my earlier posts

<http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2003/06/10/the_depths_of_decei

t_mammography.htm>

 

The Depths of Deceit Mammography

 

Even though this cheap and safe " test is a standardized, validated

assay, developed over 15 years ago " ...

 

.... " Conventional cancer treatment authorities are committed to a

host of expensive but highly profitable diagnostic (and treatment)

techniques (mammograms, MRIs, gastrointestinal series, etc.). Were

it not for the intransigence of established authorities, the AMAS

test undoubtedly would be much more widely used. " ...

 

Another test that is also overlooked which was discussed in

<http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2003/06/17/politics_in_healing

_the_suppression_manipulation_of_american_medicine.htm>Politics

in Healing : The Suppression & Manipulation of American Medicine is

yet again another safe alternative to all the expensive and/or

injurious/invasive tests is as follows:

 

" All trophoblast cells produce a unique hormone called the chorionic

gonadotrophic (CGH) which is easily detected in urine. Thus if a

person is either pregnant or has cancer, a simple CGH pregnancy test

should confirm either or both. It does, with an accuracy of better

than 92% in all cases. If the urine sample shows positive it means

either normal pregnancy or abnormal malignant cancer. Griffin

notes: " If the patient is a woman, she either is pregnant or has

cancer. If he is a man, cancer can be the only cause. " So why all of

the expensive, dangerous biopsies carried to 'detect' cancerous

growths? One can only assume that Medicare pays doctors a larger

fee for biopsies than pregnancy tests. "

 

Chris Gupta

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2003/09/27/the_amas_test_for_ea

rly_detection_and_monitoring_of_cancer.htm

---

---

----------------

The <http://www.amascancertest.com>AMAS Test For Early Detection and

Monitoring of Cancer by Ron Schmid, N.D.

 

Most people are unaware that there is a reliable, scientifically

proven laboratory blood test for detecting over 99% of all

cancers. " Why haven't the doctors I see ordered this test? " people

often ask me. Good question. I can only answer that this is yet

another example of the resistance to innovative change that the

medical establishment constantly demonstrates. Most doctors are

simply unaware of the AMAS test because the powers that be

ignore the test, and it remains largely unknown.

 

AMAS stands for " anti-malignin antibody in serum. " The test is

extremely sensitive; blood levels of this antibody rise early in the

course of the vast majority of cancers of all types, regardless of

location in the body. The test is especially useful when cancer is

suspected but has not been confirmed by a biopsy.

 

One study involving the test was published in the journal Cancer

Detection and Prevention in 1994. In 125 patients and controls, 118

were subsequently diagnosed by the time the article was published.

In 21 individuals who were subsequently proven to have cancer, the

AMAS test was elevated. The test was normal in 94, none of whom were

shown to have cancer. In three other subjects who did not have

cancer, the test was elevated when first done but a second test was

normal. The other seven subjects had positive AMAS tests but

remained undiagnosed at the time of the article, but all showed

symptoms of cancer that likely indicated its presence.

 

The study was consistent with other published tests that indicate

that the AMAS test is over 95% reliable on the first test, and over

99% reliable when a repeat test is performed. The test is a

standardized, validated assay, developed over 15 years ago by Peter

Bogovich, M.D., Ph.D. Dr. Bogovich has conducted scores of studies

and published widely on the test.

 

Another study published in the Journal of Cellular Biochemistry in

1994 stated that levels typically rise with age and are higher in

individuals at high risk for cancer because of family history, but

stay within normal levels even when benign growths occur. " We

demonstrated that the concentration is most markedly increased

within weeks of the occurrence of malignant transformation to

clinical breast cancer, " these researchers wrote. This study

involved breast cancer, but the test is valid for all cancer types.

Other researchers have written that the test is an excellent

screening method.

 

The AMAS test also is useful in monitoring the treatment of

malignancies. Levels typically return to normal within two to three

months of successful treatment. Other biological markers in the

blood are much less specific and are usually not elevated early in

the course of disease or recurrence. Thus the AMAS test is an

excellent way to screen for and detect cancer or recurrences, and to

track treatment progress during treatment. Conventional cancer

treatment authorities are committed to a host of expensive but

highly profitable diagnostic (and treatment) techniques (mammograms,

MRIs, gastrointestinal series, etc.). Were it not for the

intransigence of established authorities, the AMAS test undoubtedly

would be much more widely used.

 

<http://www.drrons.com/amas_test.html>http://www.drrons.com/amas_test

..html

 

 

 

 

 

NEW WEB MESSAGE BOARDS - JOIN HERE.

Alternative Medicine Message Boards.Info

http://alternative-medicine-message-boards.info

 

 

 

The New with improved product search