Fwd: RE: Contact Information to US Lawyer

[Guest guest]

Kim Marie <bannon wrote: " Kim Marie "

" Reappraising Aids "

RE: Contact Information to US Lawyer

Fri, 26 Sep 2003 21:06:14 -0500

 

I'm not sure what the last message I posted is about, but I think it might be a

good idea if we ALL called this attorney on Monday. Getting a lot of interest

and support could make the difference in whether he decides to take the case or

not. I will do some research to see what I can find out about him and try to

let you know something before Monday.

 

I'm also sending a package to Trial Lawyers for Public Justice (TLPJ) in DC for

consideration of a case along similar lines. I will forward a copy of this

email to them as well. Maybe we can get a team together that can actually

confront and handle the mega bucks, etc. that are against us. You can check out

TLPJ at www.tlpj.org. Click on the button that says " how to request legal

representation " . This looks like exactly the type of case they take. Heck,

maybe we should all call TLPJ on Monday as well. Their phone number is

202-797-8600. Below I'm copying in a rough draft of the cover letter I'm

sending to TLPJ.

 

Kim

 

PS: The video referred to in the letter is " The Other Side of AIDS " by Robin

Scovill which will be premiered at the Tallgrass Film Fest in Wichita, KS, on

Oct. 3. It will be available at www.aliveandwell.org shortly. It is an

excellent documentary which includes interviews with Peter Duesberg, Kary

Mullis, Robert Da Prato, Rodney Richards, Charles Geshekter, Paul Philpott, and

David Rasnick. I highly recommend that everyone needs this video to show your

friends and family.

 

***********

 

 

September 29, 2003

 

Trial Lawyers for Public Justice ATTN: Case

Intake

 

National Headquarters

 

1717 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Suite 800

 

Washington, DC 20036

 

Dear TLPJ Representative:

 

In May of 1992 I was diagnosed as having HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. I was

given five to seven years to live. Ten years later in April of 2002, I began

discovering that many scientists and doctors do not to the

HIV=AIDS=Death paradigm. Since that time I have done a tremendous amount of

research into this subject, first for the purposes of my own health, then in

outrage, and finally in an effort to help as many people as I can who find

themselves in a similar situation as myself. Now, 11 years and 5 months after

my diagnosis, I remain healthy and do not take any AIDS medications.

 

I wish to file a lawsuit on the issue of whether the HIV or AIDS tests are

really showing us what they purport to show, e.g., that a person is infected

with HIV, which is still considered the probable cause of AIDS. You will find,

however, from the enclosed materials that this is not undisputed in the

scientific and medical community.

 

AIDS is a government-identified and defined disease. Twenty-three years ago the

Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported that a growing number of male

homosexuals and intravenous (IV) drug users were experiencing a mysterious

epidemic of diseases, which included several odd types of pneumonia, a rare

malignant tumor called Kaposi’s sarcoma, lymphoma, dementia, tuberculosis,

weight loss (anorexia), fever, diarrhea, etc. Officials at the CDC called the

epidemic “AIDS” (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome), which this agency now

defines as comprising 26 different diseases. From 1981-2001 AIDS has afflicted

800,000 people in the US, 250,000 in Europe, and 1,000,000 (?) in Africa. In

this country, it strikes young male homosexuals (66% of all AIDS cases), male

and

 

female IV drug users (32% of all AIDS cases, 75% of them male), hemophiliacs and

other transfusion recipients (1%), and children born to drug-addicted mothers

(1%).

 

In 1984, government researchers and most notably Robert Gallo proposed that a

sexually transmittable virus (“AIDS-virus”), now called HIV (human

immunodeficiency virus), is the cause of AIDS. In the US and Europe, a person

must have a positive HIV test (antibodies to the virus) to be diagnosed as

having AIDS, along with one of the AIDS-defining diseases, or, since 1993, a low

T cell count (T cells are one of the types of cells that make up our immune

system) in an otherwise healthy person with no diseases. But people in Africa

can be diagnosed as having AIDS without needing to have an HIV test, based on a

ruling by the World Health Organization (WHO). Anyone in Africa who gets

pneumonia, for example, is classified as having “AIDS”. Interpretations of HIV

tests when given also vary from country to country and even from lab to lab.

Hence, you could change your HIV status simply by moving to another location.

 

Over the last 20 years the US Government has carried out a program to eradicate

the HIV virus that has engaged the efforts of more than 100,000

government-funded doctors and scientists and has cost the US taxpayers to date

more than $100 billion. They have found no cure, and they have yet to save one

life. And there is strong evidence that the premise upon which this program is

founded is wrong.

 

Although everyone is paying the price, it is the presumption that HIV causes

AIDS that is so injurious to those so diagnosed, many of whom are perfectly

healthy people. Those in non-risk groups do not progress to AIDS unless they

take the AIDS medicines prescribed by the orthodoxy, which are all known to

cause extreme side effects and death. Many people have lost their insurance,

their jobs, their homes and families. Some commit suicide. Pregnant women are

forced to take AZT and are not allowed to breast feed. Babies are taken from

their homes and given drugs, even experimental drugs and vaccines, and sometimes

this happens even when the babies test HIV negative. HIV positives have been

prosecuted for having sex. The psychological effect alone of being given an HIV

death sentence is enough to kill you, one way or another.

 

Yet my research has shown that the HIV tests all contain some sort of disclaimer

that they must be confirmed and validated by another test, which test invariably

has the same disclaimer, and that no test is approved by the FDA to be used for

diagnosis. There are also some 70 known conditions which will cross-react and

give a false positive result on the HIV tests. These conditions range from TB

to pregnancy to chicken pox antibodies to flu shots to warts. This hardly seems

a basis upon which to be issuing a diagnosis of anything.

 

Robert Gallo filed for a patent on the first HIV test on the same day he

announced he had found the probable cause of AIDS, a patent for a test from

which he has made an enormous amount of money. His proclamation was made

despite the fact that his research was previously unpublished - which I have

found would be the scientific standard - in order that it could be verified by

other scientists. Gallo has still not been corroborated. Gallo also was found

to have stolen the virus he claimed to be HIV from a French scientist, Luc

Montagnier; and the dispute was thoroughly investigated and finally settled with

the involvement of US President Reagan and French Premier Chirac. I have found

very unsettling evidence against Gallo and his lawyers which can all be

provided.

 

When I finally recently asked for copies of my own medical records, I found that

the “confirmation” Western Blot test that I was given when I was diagnosed

contains the following language which no one bothered to tell me previously:

 

“Indicates possible infection by virus. Viremia may be present. Positive

results are not diagnostic of AIDS. Biologic false positives still possible in

some select cases… Follow up testing may be advised if clinical findings are

discordant with test results.”

 

Some scientists question that HIV causes AIDS, and some even question whether

HIV exists at all. They claim that what is called HIV is really only cellular

debris. There are doctors treating AIDS with detoxification techniques and

nutrition, and their patients are getting well. All of these dissenting

scientists and doctors are being squelched by the medical and scientific

orthodoxy. They are denied research grants and are not allowed to publish in

scientific journals.

 

I have uncovered a lot of disturbing information in the last year, and here is

another example: Based on information provided by the WHO, even if we assume

that all AIDS cases were fatal in the year 2000, the resulting global mortality

rate of HIV positives (mostly untreated) would only be 1.4%, which is 4 to 6

times lower than the 6.7 to 8.8% mortality rate of HIV positives treated with

anti-HIV drugs in the US and Canada. When you combine this with the fact that

heterosexual, white females who don’t use IV drugs do not get AIDS unless they

take AIDS meds, it does ease my mind that I will never get AIDS since I don’t

take AIDS drugs. Virtually no one in my demographic gets AIDS. However, the

psychological effects of being so misled are even greater at this point. What

would my life have been like for the past 11 years and what would it be like

into the future if I could only live it without the stigma of an HIV positive

diagnosis? And the burden of somehow reaching the general

public with this information that is so vital weighs heavily on my mind and

soul.

 

So this is what has led me to TLPJ. I have spoken with private attorneys who

just cannot economically take on such a case. I have narrowed the issue to

whether or not the HIV tests are valid and feel that can considerably reduce the

litigation costs, while at the same time effectively giving people who have

tested positive the right to question their diagnoses, and hopefully halting the

continued use of the flawed tests. I see no present need to litigate the issue

of whether HIV exists or if it causes AIDS, which would be much more expensive

to pursue. I can see the potential for future lawsuits in this area as well as

in the area of the AIDS medications. Essentially, you’ve got to start

somewhere. I see this as the most expeditious way to have a far-reaching result

with the least expense.

 

I have provided a few enclosures for your review in consideration of this case,

including reference letters from Wichita attorneys and a photo. Hopefully I

have done a good job in selecting these items to use to introduce you to the

subject, as I now have so many. I would like to send more documents which raise

many more vital questions and also show that this all could have and should have

been known for at least 20 years and, in fact, has been known in some circles.

 

The video is a good place to start. It is a little over an hour long and will

give you an opportunity to see the main experts on the case being interviewed

and expressing their opinions. You will have a good understanding of the

history of HIV/AIDS, the shortcomings of the orthodox hypothesis and the HIV

tests, as well as a glimpse of the effects this whole scam is having on real

people.

 

Next read “The chemical bases of the various AIDS epidemics: recreational

drugs, anti-viral chemotherapy and malnutrition”. This was just published in

June of 2003 and contains the latest available statistics from the CDC, NIH, FDA

and WHO.

 

Next go for “The Yin and Yang of HIV”. This is the first article I found in

April 2002, and I still consider it a good history even though it was written in

1999.

 

Then to give you an overview of the shortcomings of the various HIV tests, I’ve

included actually six documents. I justify this number by the fact that it is

the information behind the crux of the lawsuit I’m proposing. I put them in

reverse chronological order with an index, so you can peruse them as you wish.

 

Finally enclosed you will find the book What If Everything You Thought You Knew

About AIDS Was Wrong? by Christine Maggiore. Christine is on the video. Her

book is the best condensation of this story I can give you. Although I have

collected lots of examples of distortion of the evidence and statistics that I’m

not sending to you, this book provides a few good examples that are probably not

as obvious in the other materials I’ve included here.

 

I’ve largely kept my HIV status a private matter to this point. The atrocities

that I’ve discovered cause me to reconsider this decision. It would appear that

I could very easily go on with my life as I have for more than 11 years and tell

no one of my “condition” or my more recent research findings. However, this is

impossible for me to do in good conscience. I suppose my background as a

freelance court reporter since 1983 has led me to the avenue of the justice

system to help me in my quest to spread the truth.

 

Please send an acknowledgement via email, telephone or USPS of your receipt of

this information and an indication of your willingness to read it in

consideration of becoming my attorneys. I look forward to your reply.

 

 

-Allen Graves IBWB ( U.S.A. )

" Do not let either the medical authorities or the politicians mislead you. Find

out what the facts are, and make your own decisions about how to live a happy

life and how to work for a better world. " - Linus Pauling

 

Sites that I've found to be helpful/informative ;

 

aidscured A good forum for those who are

seeking a non-pharmaceutical solution to illness(es).

AIDSsoc This forum focuses on the

societal aspects of the " AIDS " myth.

[Guest guest]

Kim Marie <bannon wrote: " Kim Marie "

" Reappraising Aids "

RE: Contact Information to US lawyer

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 11:02:20 -0500

 

Here is the link to Paul Kerson's web site:

 

www.koppellaw.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The New with improved product search