The girl died of.......?

October 2, 2009

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Natalie Morton's death-convenient pre-existing condition or vaccine cover-up

The news is everywhere this morning. Natalie Morton, the 14 year old girl who died tragically such a short time after her Cervarix (HPV) vaccine, has had an incredibly quick autopsy done and the doctors have found a massive tumour on her heart and lungs. It was only a matter of time, really, before this poor child passed away and it was just a total coincidence that it happened immediately after receiving a vaccine. A vaccine that has been involved in other sudden deaths in which the pathology reports have returned no cause of death. The difference is, with the other girls, their deaths did not make front-page news nor were theyused to halt - even temporarily - a nationwide vaccination campaign.It seems that no matter what the evidence is, nothing must ever be allowed to draw into disrepute - even for a very

short time - the safety and effectiveness of vaccinations.Where does the truth lie?Our buddies from the scumbags organisation (well, if Paul Keating can say it, I can too!) have been emailing me all morning to demand that I take down the article I posted a couple of days ago in which I stated that I didn't believe that Natalie's death was coincidental to the Cervarix vaccine.I won't do that. Because I still don't believe in coincidence. Not when it comes to vaccines.Perhaps there are some cardiologists on this list who might want to answer the following question.How likely is it that a 14 year old girl can have a massive heart / lung tumour of the type which the coroners claim she had - and still be totally asymptomatic?This is a girl who was described by her family and by those around her as being perfectly healthy. She certainly looked to be the picture of health.Shouldn't she have had problems

with extreme tiredness? With breathing? Shouldn't she have been pale and wan looking - I mean, a tumour large enough to cause sudden death should have been impeding her blood-flow for quite some time. Even the most aggressive tumours do, when they affect major organs like the heart and lungs, produce some symptoms even though they may not be specific enough to require exploratory surgery.My aunt, Sheila, who smoked for many years though she had stopped some time in her 40s, passed away several years ago in her early 60s. She had developed a tumour in her lungs which had spread to her heart. She had months of feeling a pressure on her chest, being unaccountably tired and progressivley getting worse until she had to see her doctor. And even then, she did not just drop dead on the floor. She died slowly in hospital whilst being given massive doses of chemotherapy.It all seems too convenient to me - this sudden diagnosis of a perfectly

health girl who has died almost immediately after receiving one of the most toxic vaccines we have today.If I were her parents, I would be asking for a second opinion - for an independent pathologist to review the autopsy results or perhaps, if I had a good relationship with my family doctor, I would ask them to actually veiw Natalie's body and see if there truly is a tumour.We will probably never know the truth about the death of this tragic child. But her passing leaves more questions then it does answers. And while deaths from vaccines continue to be minimised as coincidental, blamed on the parents or put down to just plain bad luck, these questions will remain.

Posted by Meryl at 12:57 PM 1 comments

Labels: adverse reaction, Cervarix, HPV, Natalie Morton, vaccination

Western or allopathic medicine is always saying they have to have proof, double-blind studies, and yet, has your pediatrician ever shown you proof that vaccinations work? - Pat Mckay

Now, send attachments up to 25MB with India Mail. Learn how.