Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Why obvious evidence is ignored?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Why do vaccine officials ignore adverse effects of thimerosal, aluminum, and squalene?http://www.generationrescue.org/binstock/090920-vaccinologists-in-wonderland.htm

 

 

 

Teresa Binstock

Researcher in Developmental & Behavioral Neuroanatomy

September 20, 2009

Peer-reviewed findings announced in 2009 describe an increased rate of

autism-spectrum disorders (triple) among boys who as neonates had

received HepB vaccination, which originally contained thimerosal (1,2).

Similarly and previously, the Stony Brook medical school researchers

had

reported special education rates were nine

times

higher among boys who, early in life, had received HepB vaccinations

containing thimerosal (3).

 

 

These two sets of findings are consistent (i) with outcomes in a number

of

other studies, and (ii) with the CDC's original findings (1999) wherein

early-life vaccinations which included thimerosal were associated with

autism, PDD/NOS, tics, language problems, and sleep disorders (eg,

4-7). In contrast, the 2009 findings

are inconsistent with widely touted epidemiological studies that may

not have

had the power to reveal subgroups with increased susceptibility (8-10).

 

 

Augmenting concern are facts found in CDC documents obtained by FOIA.

For

instance, one CDC-investigator's email about their 1999 findings stated

that making the

autism-thimerosal association "go away" was not easy. Ultimately,

however, the CDC team led by Thomas Verstraeten was able to dilute

their own findings and did so by using large data-sets from HMOs

wherein autism and other developmental disorders were under-reported. A

study based upon the diluted-data findings was published by a

trade-journal called "Pediatrics". This history is delineated in David

Kirby's Evidence of Harm... (2; see also 5).

 

Why some children more than others are susceptible to adverse

effects from vaccinations remains an important issue. Genetic and

non-genetic factors are implicated. In other words, for any given child, increased

susceptibility can be acquired and/or genetic. For instance, having one

or more pro-inflammatory

alleles of an immune-related gene may heighten the infant's or

toddler's immune-system's reaction to vaccine ingredients (reviewed in

11).

Alternatively, some children are known to have weak alleles in genes

related to detoxification (eg, 12). Hypersensitivity to

thimerosal has long been known, and glutathione status and glutathione

pathways are implicated (eg, 13-14).

 

Among the non-genetic reasons for why a child can have increased

susceptibility, the vaccinating of sick or recently sick children

remains problematic because an illness utilizes and may incline towards

depletion of a child's reserves of glutathione (eg, 15-18),

which helps

detoxify mercury and other toxic metals (19). Ironically, giving

Tylenol aka acetaminophen aka paracetemol increases utilization and

potentiates depletion of glutathione (20). http://www.generationrescue.org/binstock/090920-vaccinologists-in-wonderland.htm All it takes is just one vaccine to forever change your life. - Dawn, mother of vaccine damaged child.

From cricket scores to your friends. Try the India Homepage!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...