[PHQandA] Re:problems with scanning

[Guest guest]

Dear Nolan,

 

Namaste.

 

Thank you for your email.

 

On the physical level, the difference is similar to

using a digital scanner to reproduce an image.

 

The clarity and fidelity of the scanned image to the

original that is being scanned depends on several

factors: a.) the ability and experience of the user to

technically follow the user instructions, b.) the

sophistication of the software c.) the sophistication

of the hardware, d.) cleanliness of the surface of the

glass or lens, e.) sophistication and quality of the

printer, f.) color and qaulity of the paper where

reproduced inage is printed, etc.

 

On the gross visible physical level you simply see,

weigh and measure only one level.

 

In the case of elementals, the level of " seing " is on

a more subtle energy level. There are many levels

and sub levels of subtle energy. The first person

could be seeing in one level of energy while another

is looking at two levels while still another is

functioning on several levels all at the same time.

 

In the case of pranic energy congestion, take into

account that the scanner has to be specific. It is

possible to scan any of the various energy levels and

sub levels. All the levels of energy including the

many sublevels exist and interpenetrate.

 

When in doubt, it is good to validate the scanning

results through experiments and second or more

verification from reliable proficient scanners.

 

Scanning is a skill therefore it is developed through

constant practice and experience. Any amount of

mental exercise is insuficient for developing scanning

skills and comprehension.

 

Love,

 

Marilette

 

 

=====================================================

 

--- blueone5000 <blueone5000 wrote:

> Dear Micheal and Marilette,

>

> Namaste.

>

> Thank you on your reply.

>

> After I have read your replies, I am still confused,

>

> maybe even more.

> And not just me, and some people from the group I am

>

> coming from. I will reply in this mail both to

> Micheal and Marilette because your answers are

> similar.

> I will use one metaphor to better show

> what I don't understand and what is confusing to me

> and my others friends. If we want to measure how

> much weight has some object we will use weight

> measurement tool which can do that. And if that

> object has 5 pounds, no matter on which measurement

> tool we do a measuring it will show 5 pounds

> (of course, in case that all measurement tools are

> functioning correctly). But maybe some measurement

> tools are more advanced, and can except weight,

> measure also volume, density, smell,shape…

> But no matter of that, all of that weight

> measurement

> tools have to show 5 pounds. Very similar I am

> looking

> on scanning. Basic course practitioner and

> GrandMaster

> will have to measure for example 5 inch of

> congestion.

> But that is all what can measure one basic course

> practitioner. On the other side GrandMaster will

> measure

> density, quality, source, color of congestion. And

> will

> also see how it is related to other congestion in

> the

> energy body, and what is the best way to resolve it.

>

> So, my conclusion is : I can understand that someone

>

> is more proficient in something than others. There

> are

> many factors that are influencing this. I can accept

>

> that GrandMaster will receive more useful

> information

> about some problem than somebody other will.

> But, 5 inch is 5 inch. It is very exact. No matter

> what is my personality, 5 pounds is 5 pounds.

> So, if I have 1 elemental on my hand, answer on

> question : " How much elementals are on my hand? " is

> 1.

> Not 2, not 5, not 0. If somebody's personality is

> influencing that scanning and he receives that

> answer

> is 5, that is wrong answer.

> OK, I can accept that both people can scan that

> there

> is just 1 elemental, but they have different

> perception

> of quality of that elemental, but for me only

> correct

> answer is : there is just 1. By reading your

> replies,

> it seems that except " 1 " , also 0,3,5… etc. are

> correct answers. And this is confusing me a big

> time.

> Even though I have finished all available courses to

>

> me of PH (even preparatory Arhatic held by MasterFe)

>

> I have very little practice in real life, and I

> consider myself beginner, due to my lack of

> experience.

> And I see you as an authorities, but I can't

> understand

> how can 0,3,5 …etc. also be correct answers. And

> that

> is how I had understood your answers.

>

> >I think maybe a more appropriate question to ask,

> >is are each of you

> >scanning consistently against

> >your own previous scan, before doing

> >any healing, prayer or meditative work?

>

> How can I compare it when I don't have objective

> reference point?

> If I have GMCKS near me, and he is monitoring

> my scanning than I can say. Otherwise, how can I?

>

> > Comparing ourselves is never the best way to

> > advance ourselves, because it leaves someone

> > feeling superior and another inferior.

> > Use yourself, to measure your own

> >progress and accuracy.

>

> I don't have problem if somebody is more proficient

> in something than me. On the contrary, I will learn

> as much I can from that person. In this case my

> problem is if I don't have reference point, and as I

>

> have understand from your answers I can't have it,

> because there are more correct answers on question:

> " How much elementals are on my hand? " . If I had

> understood your answers wrong, please correct me.

>

> >If both persons have the same degree of accuracy of

> >perception and same degree of correct expression,

> >then yes, they would have the same scanning

> results.

> >Otherwise, there would be some variations in the

> >details.

>

> Well, I can understand that can be variations in the

>

> details, but if I have 1 elemental on my hand

> any answers except 1 elemental for me is wrong

> answer.

> GrandMaster will maybe have differences in seeing a

> color of that element, shape,density than Master Fe

> but there is just 1 elemental for them both. I

> can't understand how can somebody measure 10

> elemental,

> and somebody just 1, and to claim that both of them

> are correct. This is bothering me a lot.

>

> I can understand why can somebody see more details

> (like color,shape, density), but I can't understand

> how can be that answers " 0 " and " 1 " and " 5

> elementals

> on my hand " are correct answers in the same time.

> Maybe I have wrongly understood you about this.

> Please

> correct me, because this is big problem for me.

>

> Thank you one more time on your time and energy

> spent

> for explaining this. Correct answer is maybe obvious

>

> for you, but for me at this level isn't. And it

> isn't

> also for some of my friends.

> Nolan

>

>

>

>

 

 

=====

Pranic Healing is not intended to replace orthodox medicine, but rather to

complement it. If symptoms persist or the ailment is severe, please consult

immediately a medical doctor and a Certified Pranic Healer . ~ Master Choa Kok

Sui

 

Miracles do not happen in contradiction to nature, but only to that which is

known to us in nature. ~ St. Augustine

 

Ask or read the uptodate pranic healing protocols by joining the group through

http://health./

 

For the latest International Information regarding GMCKS Pranic Healing, visit

http://www.pranichealing.org.

 

 

 

New Photos - easier uploading and sharing.