problems with scanning

[Guest guest]

Hi,

I have a question about scanning. Last night three of us have done

scanning. We were getting different results (not slightly, but huge).

One of us was claiming that is normal, and that is OK. For me it

seems that is wrong. Is this correct? Is it normal that we receive

totally different results for scanning i.e. physical congestion of

mine minor left hand chakra? If it is, why? If it is not, why we

receive different results? What can we do about it?

 

I am hoping that I will receive an answer from somebody who is

proficient and who knows answer for sure. (preferably Marilette).

Thank you in advance,

I can't wait your answer.

Nolan

 

P.S. All three of us have finished basic, advanced, psychotherapy,

crystalotherapy...

[Guest guest]

Dear Marilette,

 

Namaste.

 

Thank you for your reply.

 

>This is a very good question.

>Scanning is a personal perception and interpretation

>of subtle energy. Depending on the individual's

>clarity of mind and emotions, the perception will be

>more accurate and the interpretation will be correct.

 

If I understand it correctly, when 2 person have accurate

perception they will receive the same results. Is that correct?

I would like explicit answer, because that person who claims

opposite is very stubborn in their attitude and it would help a lot

to receive explicit answer from someone who is authorized from GMCKS.

 

So my question is : If GrandMaster and Master Fe do the scanning of

physical congestion of mine minor left hand chakra, they will receive

the same results. Is that true?

 

 

>Before scanning, a.) relax, do not scan when

>emotionally or mentally unsettled, b.) invoke for

>guidance and protection, c.) place yourself in a

>neutral or non-judgemental frame of mind, empty of

>preconceived ideas or expectations. Of course, it is

>strongly advised that the healer regularly practice

>not only scanning but more importantly the Meditation

>on Twin Hearts to cleanse and raise his/her energy

>level.

 

Thank you on your suggestions. Except this for beginning it

is very important to me to have referent point, which means

somebody with whom I can verify my results. This is only

possible if I am sure that both of us have to get same results,

of course if both of us have accurate perception.

 

Thank you once again,

Nolan

 

P.S. It is great to have group like this, where we can get answers

from person authorized by GMCKS, because it helps to

stay on right direction.

[Guest guest]

Dear Micheal and Marilette,

 

Namaste.

 

Thank you on your reply.

 

After I have read your replies, I am still confused,

maybe even more.

And not just me, and some people from the group I am

coming from. I will reply in this mail both to

Micheal and Marilette because your answers are similar.

I will use one metaphor to better show

what I don't understand and what is confusing to me

and my others friends. If we want to measure how

much weight has some object we will use weight

measurement tool which can do that. And if that

object has 5 pounds, no matter on which measurement

tool we do a measuring it will show 5 pounds

(of course, in case that all measurement tools are

functioning correctly). But maybe some measurement

tools are more advanced, and can except weight,

measure also volume, density, smell,shape…

But no matter of that, all of that weight measurement

tools have to show 5 pounds. Very similar I am looking

on scanning. Basic course practitioner and GrandMaster

will have to measure for example 5 inch of congestion.

But that is all what can measure one basic course

practitioner. On the other side GrandMaster will measure

density, quality, source, color of congestion. And will

also see how it is related to other congestion in the

energy body, and what is the best way to resolve it.

So, my conclusion is : I can understand that someone

is more proficient in something than others. There are

many factors that are influencing this. I can accept

that GrandMaster will receive more useful information

about some problem than somebody other will.

But, 5 inch is 5 inch. It is very exact. No matter

what is my personality, 5 pounds is 5 pounds.

So, if I have 1 elemental on my hand, answer on

question : " How much elementals are on my hand? " is 1.

Not 2, not 5, not 0. If somebody's personality is

influencing that scanning and he receives that answer

is 5, that is wrong answer.

OK, I can accept that both people can scan that there

is just 1 elemental, but they have different perception

of quality of that elemental, but for me only correct

answer is : there is just 1. By reading your replies,

it seems that except " 1 " , also 0,3,5… etc. are

correct answers. And this is confusing me a big time.

Even though I have finished all available courses to

me of PH (even preparatory Arhatic held by MasterFe)

I have very little practice in real life, and I

consider myself beginner, due to my lack of experience.

And I see you as an authorities, but I can't understand

how can 0,3,5 …etc. also be correct answers. And that

is how I had understood your answers.

 

>I think maybe a more appropriate question to ask,

>is are each of you

>scanning consistently against

>your own previous scan, before doing

>any healing, prayer or meditative work?

 

How can I compare it when I don't have objective

reference point?

If I have GMCKS near me, and he is monitoring

my scanning than I can say. Otherwise, how can I?

 

> Comparing ourselves is never the best way to

> advance ourselves, because it leaves someone

> feeling superior and another inferior.

> Use yourself, to measure your own

>progress and accuracy.

 

I don't have problem if somebody is more proficient

in something than me. On the contrary, I will learn

as much I can from that person. In this case my

problem is if I don't have reference point, and as I

have understand from your answers I can't have it,

because there are more correct answers on question:

" How much elementals are on my hand? " . If I had

understood your answers wrong, please correct me.

 

>If both persons have the same degree of accuracy of

>perception and same degree of correct expression,

>then yes, they would have the same scanning results.

>Otherwise, there would be some variations in the

>details.

 

Well, I can understand that can be variations in the

details, but if I have 1 elemental on my hand

any answers except 1 elemental for me is wrong answer.

GrandMaster will maybe have differences in seeing a

color of that element, shape,density than Master Fe

but there is just 1 elemental for them both. I

can't understand how can somebody measure 10 elemental,

and somebody just 1, and to claim that both of them

are correct. This is bothering me a lot.

 

I can understand why can somebody see more details

(like color,shape, density), but I can't understand

how can be that answers " 0 " and " 1 " and " 5

elementals

on my hand " are correct answers in the same time.

Maybe I have wrongly understood you about this. Please

correct me, because this is big problem for me.

 

Thank you one more time on your time and energy spent

for explaining this. Correct answer is maybe obvious

for you, but for me at this level isn't. And it isn't

also for some of my friends.

Nolan

[Guest guest]

Namaste,

 

Thank you on your reply.

 

With your and Michele help I think that

now I understand.

Because energy body is very complex and

dynamic system almost nobody can receive

completely accurate results all the time,

but almost everbody can receive to some

degree accurate results for most of the

time.

We all, are getting to some degree correct

results. And because we are getting just one

part of complex energy, even if we receive

different results they are correct to some

degree, but not correct absolutly.

This is what is my conclusion about it.

If it is incorrect conclusion, please correct

me.

 

Thank you again for your effort and time spent

for replies on my questions.

 

With best wishes for Christmas and NewYear,

Nolan:)