Guest guest Posted December 20, 2007 Report Share Posted December 20, 2007 Another piece of bad news for the environment...See AOL's top rated recipes and easy ways to stay in shape for winter. Dear Cynthia, EPA's decision to deny California's waiver request is an outrage. Send an email today. I have just received some outrageous news. Moments ago, the Environmental Protection Agency denied California's waiver request to cut global warming pollution from automobiles. Seventeen other states plan to implement similar programs. EPA's action today is nothing more than a heavy handed stroke to limit the authority of states to fight global warming and protect our environment. Send an email to EPA administrator Stephen Johnson right now and join me in condemning this decision. This is the first time EPA has ever denied a waiver request under the Clean Air Act. It is a major blow to our efforts to cut global warming pollution from cars. The administration is putting the brakes on state action to address the global warming crisis. Doing nothing about global warming is bad enough -- but going out of your way to block the leaders who are trying to solve this is an outrage. Send an email today. Three landmark court rulings earlier this year offered a clear legal path for EPA to grant the waiver. In April, the Supreme Court ruled that carbon dioxide is a pollutant covered under the Clean Air Act and that the EPA has the clear obligation to protect Americans from global warming. More recently, in separate cases, a federal judge in Vermont and another in California rejected efforts by automakers to repeal the state emissions laws. In these decisions, the judges made clear that states can pass laws under the Clean Air Act to limit pollution from tailpipes, but left it to EPA to grant a waiver allowing states to proceed. The federal courts also dismissed automakers' claims that they did not have the technology to meet such standards. In his December ruling, California Judge Anthony Ishii wrote: Given the level of impairment of human health and welfare that current climate science indicates may occur if human-generated greenhouse gas emissions continue unabated, it would be the very definition of folly if EPA were precluded from action. We have been waiting two years for EPA to decide on this waiver request. Until today, EPA had granted all 50 previous waiver requests over the last 40 years. I will be working with my Environmental Defense colleagues and with the rest of the environmental community to explore all legal avenues to fight this decision. We will make sure to update you on those developments. In the meantime, please send an email today to EPA administrator Johnson expressing your outrage over today's decision. Thank you for all that you do,Fred KruppPresident, Environmental Defense You can update your email address, set your message frequency, and from messages by adjusting your subscription options. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2007 Report Share Posted December 20, 2007 That's sad but as long as Bush and his cronies will be at the top, we can not expect anything better. These people don't care about environment California and other states have to wait for a change in the White House. Barbara Another piece of bad news for the environment... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.