I would never do chemo under any circumstance. Period!

[Guest guest]

What this person would do, and what I recommend, is my anti-cancer

protocol as thoroughly and completely as possible. The only reason I

would go back to the doctor and continue going back was to get the

baseline figures and continuing figures to monitor my progress.

 

Someone would normally have to overpower and sedate me to drag me to

any surgery or chemo. In fact, I cannot imagine doing chemo under any

circumstances. I am equally fond of radiation. Surgery . . . maybe

to remove a life threatening obstruction.

 

 

oleander soup , robyn howell <robynehowell

wrote:

>

>

> Hi, I have breast cancer and I am pretty sure it has

> spread to my lungs. There is also a lump in my foot

> which I am sure is a tumor, and showed up about 1 week

> after very rought mamograms. I am doing budwig for 3

> weeks. If this crap wasnt spreading I wouldnt be so

> worried, but I dont know if budwig will kick in soon

> enough as most people say it takes at least 2 to 3

> months to effect tumors. I havent been back to the

> doctor in 6 weeks since diagnosis. I'm wondering what

> you people would do about going back, having surgery,

> and chemo, etc.

> Thanks, Robyn

>

[Guest guest]

Yes....but most are not approved by the FDA in America.

 

Theromography is safer than mammography, but the FDA is all over thermography clinics making sure they don't try to tell you that they can replace mammography (did you know that the NCI was taken over by radiologists in the eighties?).

 

Ukrain is an interesting cancer therapy because it hunts out cancer and since it's a self-florescent alkaloid, under an ultraviolet light your tumors light up.

 

Here's an article I'm working on for my next newsletter:

 

 

Two New Tests That Could Make Mammograms Obsolete

But first the bad news: neither of these tests has been approved by our FDA.

For women who want to avoid having their breasts flattened, which, by the way, can tear open tissues and if you do have a tumor, it can burst that too causing it to spread, we have two new tests on the horizon for breast cancer.

Did you know that in medical school they actually teach doctors to handle breast lumps gingerly to avoid spreading any possible cancers, while in radiology school they seem to teach the exact opposite?

So, a new test that avoids the possible tearing of tissues is something you’d think would be received very well by both medicine and by women, and you’d be right. The mammogram industry, however, because our medicine is profit driven, is not going down without a fight.

The first test involves saliva. According to Dr Charles Streckfus at the University of Texas (Dental Branch at Houston), “Breast cancer triggers a change in the type and amount of proteins in the secretions from the salivary glands.†Thus scientists have now identified 49 different proteins in saliva that can separate healthy women from those with benign breast tumors and from those with malignant breast tumors.

We are told it could take at least five years for the FDA to approve this test, or perhaps even longer depending on how well the radiology industry lobbies the FDA to drag its feet.

The next test we’ve found comes from Norway. It’s a blood test from a company called DiaGenic. Again we’re dealing with specific proteins in the blood that this test uncovers. You see, the presence of cancer turns on certain genes, which in turn signal cells to create a specific set of proteins. A test that finds these proteins is far superior to one that looks for genetic mutations.

Again, however, DiaGenic is seeking FDA approval and you know how long that could take. If you happen to live in the United Kingdom, you’re a bit luckier because it is now available there, through Opaldia, the largest cancer center in the UK.

 

 

In a message dated 5/23/2008 7:22:07 P.M. Central Daylight Time, robynehowell writes:

Are there tests they can do that are not radiation?Thanks, RobynGet trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.

[Guest guest]

Are there tests they can do that are not radiation?

Thanks, Robyn

--- Tony wrote:

 

> What this person would do, and what I recommend, is

> my anti-cancer

> protocol as thoroughly and completely as possible.

> The only reason I

> would go back to the doctor and continue going back

> was to get the

> baseline figures and continuing figures to monitor

> my progress.

>

> Someone would normally have to overpower and sedate

> me to drag me to

> any surgery or chemo. In fact, I cannot imagine

> doing chemo under any

> circumstances. I am equally fond of radiation.

> Surgery . . . maybe

> to remove a life threatening obstruction.

>

> >

> oleander soup , robyn howell

> <robynehowell

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Hi, I have breast cancer and I am pretty sure it

> has

> > spread to my lungs. There is also a lump in my

> foot

> > which I am sure is a tumor, and showed up about 1

> week

> > after very rought mamograms. I am doing budwig for

> 3

> > weeks. If this crap wasnt spreading I wouldnt be

> so

> > worried, but I dont know if budwig will kick in

> soon

> > enough as most people say it takes at least 2 to 3

> > months to effect tumors. I havent been back to the

> > doctor in 6 weeks since diagnosis. I'm wondering

> what

> > you people would do about going back, having

> surgery,

> > and chemo, etc.

> > Thanks, Robyn

> >

>

>

>