What does anyone know about thermograms?

[Guest guest]

1. they can find problems before a mammogram

2. they are not as dangerous as a mammogram

3. however, the site has to tell you that your thermogram does NOT take the place of a mammogram.....because they are taking money from the radiologists of the world.

http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/cancer2/mamo.htm

 

David

 

 

In a message dated 4/12/2008 9:27:15 A.M. Central Daylight Time, scupe1 writes:

I made an appointment to have one instead of a mammogram this year. Tony or Louella? Suz StaplerIt's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money Finance.

[Guest guest]

I made an appointment to have one instead of a mammogram this year.

Tony or Louella?

 

Suz Stapler

[Guest guest]

Hi Suz.

 

Yes, much more preferable to a mammogram. I will say though that I am

not completely knowledeable on thermograms, I would have to google

it. However, from what I read, that is the way to go.

 

Thank you Robert for the information you supplied.

 

Hugs,

 

 

It is such a shame how the FDA controls every facet of alternative

health and we all have to watch what we say.

 

oleander soup , " suzannestapler " <scupe1

wrote:

>

> I made an appointment to have one instead of a mammogram this

year.

> Tony or Louella?

>

> Suz Stapler

>

[Guest guest]

Does anyone know how much a thermogram usually costs, since the

insurance most likely won't cover it?

 

Thanks,

 

Tracy

 

 

oleander soup , " May " <luellamay129

wrote:

>

> Hi Suz.

>

> Yes, much more preferable to a mammogram. I will say though that I

am

> not completely knowledeable on thermograms, I would have to google

> it. However, from what I read, that is the way to go.

>

> Thank you Robert for the information you supplied.

>

> Hugs,

>

>

> It is such a shame how the FDA controls every facet of alternative

> health and we all have to watch what we say.

>

> oleander soup , " suzannestapler " <scupe1@>

> wrote:

> >

> > I made an appointment to have one instead of a mammogram this

> year.

> > Tony or Louella?

> >

> > Suz Stapler

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Tracy and others,

 

My thermogram will be $300. I didn't realize that it wouldn't take the place of a mammogram. I read the site that David sent but it didn't answer this question. Please explain. My site is a recommended one but they didn't tell me that it wouldn't take the place of a mammogram.

 

Suz

[Guest guest]

Hi, Im new here.

I would be happy never to have a mammogram. I'm told that the pressure used is 160 psi. What would that do to any tumour in the breast tissue? A dairy farmer I know of, accompanied his wife & after the first one, he was adamant that she would have no more! He said that if he did that to a cow's udder, the SPCA would take him to court for cruelty. Anyway, she resolved the cancer problem without the slash, poison & burn protocols. She didn't require a f/up mammogram to prove it. She had Paget's. That was 10 years ago & she now runs 2 successful businesses.

My aunt had the same, she died 3 years ago after having a double mastectomy - th cancer metastasised to liver & pancreas. She ALWAYS had mammograms done. Her sister went the opposite way & lived another 27 years following melanoma & metastasised lung cancer! She did have surgery only, but recovered very quickly with carrot juice, yoga etc in the 1960's. Their younger sister had died at age 21 of lung cancer - never smoked. Rural community, maybe use of farm chems in the 1950's contributed to their poor health. The 2 siblings who shifted away did not get cancer. One other sibling has always used natural means to heal herself. She did get polio following vax in the 50's.

 

If you put "Dr Mike Godfrey+thermogram" into your search engine, you ahould get very good info back. He runs the Bay of Plenty Environmental Health Clinic in Tauranga, New Zealand. A real gentleman. He has done comparative studies among his patients - vaccinated/never vaccinated.

I think I would make the decision as to whether the thermo would take the the place of the mammogram. Those who say it shouldn't replace the mammogram, usually have a vested interest in mammograms. Maybe the FDA requires thermographers to put such a disclaimer to protect their pharm cronies' interests!

 

If you read up on the origins of the pink ribbon campaigns, I don't think you would trust the companies that sell mammography equipment to give unbiased information. They get money from governments & their front cancer organisations - supposedly charities, & huge profits, then they play on the heart strings of kind-hearted or frightened people, soliciting donations, as though peddling the chems that actually cause cancer isn't enough.

All the best,

Maracuja

 

 

 

--- On Sun, 4/13/08, suz stapler <scupe1 wrote:

suz stapler <scupe1 Re: What does anyone know about thermograms?oleander soup Date: Sunday, April 13, 2008, 3:57 PM

 

 

 

Tracy and others,

 

My thermogram will be $300. I didn't realize that it wouldn't take the place of a mammogram. I read the site that David sent but it didn't answer this question. Please explain. My site is a recommended one but they didn't tell me that it wouldn't take the place of a mammogram.

 

Suz

[Guest guest]

Hi Suz,

 

Don't stress. First of all, call and try to find out the exact

particulars. I will also do a little digging for you and see what I

can come up with.

 

Hugs,

 

 

oleander soup , suz stapler <scupe1 wrote:

>

> Tracy and others,

>

> My thermogram will be $300. I didn't realize that it wouldn't take

the place of a mammogram. I read the site that David sent but it

didn't answer this question. Please explain. My site is a recommended

one but they didn't tell me that it wouldn't take the place of a

mammogram.

>

> Suz

>