The ACS is a mainstream tool and is not to be trusted

[Guest guest]

The most interesting part of the information to me is what an

incredible con job the ACS does by appearing to give lip service to

alternative treatments, foods, vitamins, etc - but when you look every

single one says " not proven " , " dangerous " or " needs more study " .

 

The ACS is a evil, industry controlled group that has the dubious

distinction of being the worlds least charitable non profit

organization - meaning that fewer dollars actually get passed on

compared to those that are collected. And the ones that do get passed

on go almost exclusively to mainstream research of the same old cut,

butn and poison methods that have failed for over half a century.

 

The board of the ACS is riddled with members of the cancer industry with

obvious conflicts of interest and the ACS itself, with all of it's

exorbitant salaries and benifits, and lack of charity, depends on

maintaining the status quo. It is the same conflict of interest that

permeates mainstream medicine and the agencies and foundations that are

interconnected to it.

 

I have no respect and no trust for anything the ACS has to say - and

can only imagine what might be if the collosal amount of money they

have collected over the years had been applied to diet, nutrition,

nutrition, lifestyle, poison, prevention and all of the unproven

alternatives to cutting out, burning or poisoning symptoms while

destroying major organs and immune systems under the guise of treatment.

 

For more information about the ACS, see our file section here for the

article about the worlds least charitable organization.

 

 

 

oleander soup , robert-blau wrote:

>

> The American Cancer Society's Guide to Complementary and Alternative

> Cancer Methods

>

> Lots of interesting information, even from the ACS.

>

> ACS :: Complementary and Alternative Therapies

> http://www.cancer.org/docroot/eto/eto_5.asp

>