Rexin-G....anyone heard of this?

[Guest guest]

http://enewschannels.com/2006/11/07/enc366_000837.php See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 9/26/2007 4:18:41 P.M. Central Daylight Time, writes:

Much ado about nothing to hype up sales and investors would be myinitial response.

mine too See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.

[Guest guest]

Nope - but it looks like yet another glowing report of a breakthrough,

just like hundreds of others over the past half century.

 

" Median survival after Rexin-G treatment was 10 months in the first

study, and greater than six months in the second study. In the third

study, wherein an innovative mathematically calculated optimal dose of

Rexin-G (designated " Calculus of Parity " ) was given to three patients,

tumor reduction and/or necrosis were achieved in 100% of patients. "

 

Ten months survival and greater than six months is hardly what I would

call encouraging, much less a breakthrough. And the misleading

mainstream term of " response " is used, as is the misleading " tumor

reduction and/or necrosis were achieved in 100% of patients " .

 

That could mean that 99% had a tumor reduction, however small, and 1%

had had tumor necrosis. Almost treatments result in some tumor

reduction initially. The ones that lead to continued reduction and

then complete elimination are what should be measured. And even then,

you still have a mainstream treatment that does nothing to address the

underlying causes.

 

Much ado about nothing to hype up sales and investors would be my

initial response.

 

 

oleander soup , ahzoov wrote:

>

> _http://enewschannels.com/2006/11/07/enc366_000837.php_

> (http://enewschannels.com/2006/11/07/enc366_000837.php)

>

>

>

>

> ************************************** See what's new at

http://www.aol.com

>