Guest guest Posted July 22, 2007 Report Share Posted July 22, 2007 I found this in a reader comment at the Mercola Blog. A Four-Step Health-Care Solution by Hans-Hermann Hoppe http://www.mises.org/freemarket_detail.asp?control=279 & sortorder=articledate Step is a tough one - I personally cannot stand the idea of anyone denied health care - but this plan, or something very like it, is an answer to many problems. Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2007 Report Share Posted July 23, 2007 I agree with you. We need most of these points. I don't agree with denying healthcare to anybody. A solution would have to be implementeed for this. May The Best Years in Life (under construction)....... / http://thecorner4women.com "Empowering Women Throughout the World" http://dipetanesoutheast.com Tony oleander soup Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 1:27:10 PM A Four-Step Health-Care Solution I found this in a reader comment at the Mercola Blog.A Four-Step Health-Care Solutionby Hans-Hermann Hoppehttp://www.mises. org/freemarket_ detail.asp? control=279 & sortorder= articledateStep is a tough one - I personally cannot stand the idea of anyonedenied health care - but this plan, or something very like it, is ananswer to many problems.Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2007 Report Share Posted July 23, 2007 It would be a find line balancing compassion with restraint. I cannot see denying desperately needed health care to anyone, but there would have to be a way to encourage healthy lifestyle choices and discourage giving treatment to those who decided to live like ground sloths and ride motorized carts from their car all the way through Wallymart and back out to the cars with a load of fat laden junk foods because they have lived an unhealthy lifestyle and become bloated to the point of being simply too fat and lazy to walk on their own two tree trunks, er, legs. Also, once you begin subsidizing health care to any extent you open up the door to abuses and long term managed illness care like we have now. The idea is to encourage health and to take back control of our bodies from the managed illness industry. oleander soup , May <luellamay129 wrote: > > I agree with you. We need most of these points. I don't agree with denying healthcare to anybody. A solution would have to be implementeed for this. > > May > > The Best Years in Life (under construction)....... > / > http://thecorner4women.com > " Empowering Women Throughout the World " > http://dipetanesoutheast.com > > > > > > Tony > oleander soup > Sunday, July 22, 2007 1:27:10 PM > A Four-Step Health-Care Solution > > I found this in a reader comment at the Mercola Blog. > > A Four-Step Health-Care Solution > by Hans-Hermann Hoppe > > http://www.mises. org/freemarket_ detail.asp? control=279 & sortorder= articledate > > Step is a tough one - I personally cannot stand the idea of anyone > denied health care - but this plan, or something very like it, is an > answer to many problems. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2007 Report Share Posted July 24, 2007 I agree with you. However, what would you do with the ones who are older now and are in the habit of living like ground sloths, riding motorized carts all through Walmart filling it with every kind of junk food imaginable? You can't just educate them overnight. So how would we deal with them? And I do believe you have hit the nail on the head. Government intervention caused this mess. May The Best Years in Life (under construction)....... / http://thecorner4women.com "Empowering Women Throughout the World" http://dipetanesoutheast.com Tony oleander soup Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 9:57:36 AM Re: A Four-Step Health-Care Solution It would be a find line balancing compassion with restraint. I cannotsee denying desperately needed health care to anyone, but there wouldhave to be a way to encourage healthy lifestyle choices and discouragegiving treatment to those who decided to live like ground sloths andride motorized carts from their car all the way through Wallymart andback out to the cars with a load of fat laden junk foods because theyhave lived an unhealthy lifestyle and become bloated to the point ofbeing simply too fat and lazy to walk on their own two tree trunks,er, legs.Also, once you begin subsidizing health care to any extent you open upthe door to abuses and long term managed illness care like we havenow. The idea is to encourage health and to take back control of ourbodies from the managed illness industry.Tony oleander soup@ . com, May <luellamay129@ ...> wrote:>> I agree with you. We need most of these points. I don't agree withdenying healthcare to anybody. A solution would have to beimplementeed for this.> > May> > The Best Years in Life (under construction) .......> http://www.tbyil. com/> http://thecorner4wo men.com> "Empowering Women Throughout the World"> http://dipetanesout heast.com> > > > > > Tony @. ..>> oleander soup> Sunday, July 22, 2007 1:27:10 PM> Subject: A Four-Step Health-Care Solution> > I found this in a reader comment at the Mercola Blog.> > A Four-Step Health-Care Solution> by Hans-Hermann Hoppe> > http://www.mises. org/freemarket_ detail.asp? control=279 & sortorder= articledate> > Step is a tough one - I personally cannot stand the idea of anyone> denied health care - but this plan, or something very like it, is an> answer to many problems.> > Tony> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2007 Report Share Posted July 25, 2007 The issue of univeral health care was debated in a national chiropractic trade journal. There were 2 well-known chiropractors who took different positions and expressed their views. One said he might be in favor of such an idea. His concern was that chiropractic and other healing arts be included and compensated on par with the MD's. The other was definitely against it. I have to side with him, and for the same reasons. If national health care were to be funded by tax dollars, it would just mean more people would be over-medicated. National health care would be a way for Congress to pass a law which guaranteed a mandate for drug company profits. More morbidity. More slow death. More physical and psychological addiction to the sacrament of the temple of infernal medicine. Caveat: more of the same problem which exists. When they talk about national health care they mean nothing other than putting more people on drugs that are killing us, at taxpayer expense to fund the murder. What we need is truth and law which guarantees disclosure of the truth. Right now we have censorship of the truth by the drug companies, FDA, Federal Trade Commision, and various other administrative and statutory laws. We need to kill the monster! Not enact national health care and pay out the kazoo to feed more people to the monster, more quickly. Now beside the laws and bureacracies that protect the drug company profits and censor truth about health and disease, it is being considered that we be taxed to increase drug company profits (and morbidity and mortality) by making drug distribution universal. And our tax money will be feeding all the paper pushers and reviewers, etc. Kill the monster; don't feed it to make it bigger and stronger. Health care needs to be between patient and provider. Not with 20 other people again eating off the health care finance food chain. Dr. Goebel Building a website is a piece of cake. Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.