If I get cancer guess who I won't go to! LOL

[Guest guest]

It was me who started the badmouthing of Clark. While her supporters

are legion, the fact remains that she has had decidedly mixed results

and most of the voices of alternative and natural health that I

respect are no fans of hers.

 

Her liver cleanses are beneficial (even though she erroneously

maintains that a person has to follow her protocol strictly for them

to work0.

 

I cannot disregard her zapper - after all there is precedent with the

Rife and other devices/

 

However, her theory of flukes has been thoroughly discredited and she

was caught using her dubious " syncrometer " to diagnose a health

official of HIV, falsely claim to cure him in only minutes but tell

him to come back for 6 more treatments or it would return - and then

recant her entire diagnosis when she discovered he was an undercover

health inspector.

 

Most damning was the discovery that she has never cured a single case

of medically diagnosed cancer. Only those diagnosed with the

syncrometer have responded to her treatments.

 

I certainly cannot say that she has never helped anyone. I am sure

that her liver cleanse and diet advice alone have helped a number of

people. So no, I would not bet my life that she has never helped

anyone - I am sure she has. But I would make that bet that she has

deliberately conned people too - and I cannot stand idly and silently

by when I see that happen.

 

You see, it is my very considered judgement that she is less than 100%

legtitimate. Since freedom of speech is one of the liberties I

cherish and exercise most, I have every right to voice that judgment.

And since I have worked long and hard to create this group and help

those I can, I also fell that when I make such a judgment I have not

only the right, but the responsibility to warn those who might fall

prey to questionable practices.

 

If that opens me up to questioning or criticism, then so be it. I am

pretty thick skinned and am confident in what I have researched and

judged to be true.

 

I love this group too! It has well over 200 friendly folks in it now,

and a couple of old grouches. Sometimes I am one of them!

 

:- )

 

 

 

oleander soup , Orus Moon <orusmoon11 wrote:

>

> I would think that folk here should think twice about putting other

folk down. Karma? Just being nice? After all many other folk would

think this group crazy and quacks. Getting healed by a mere bush? Oh

come on!

> Regardless of what you think about Clark-she has indeed opened

many peoples eyes to different kinds of toxins and better choices. I

just saw her at a workshop.....me and the doctor I work for and she

had an awesome class. It was packed and I'm willing to bet that she

got some folk online and doing research on some of her ideas. At least

she opened the door. And I've Never heard her trash anyone. Do you

need to do that to feel good?

> I'm 23 years free of cancer and yes, I followed some of her

teachings. I thought people were nice here...........you are coming

across like a bunch of closed minded MD " s. You might not like her

shit......but I can assure you.....that its not your bloody right to

trash another human being. I can also say that many other folk WILL

SAY she healed them. Blessed be. Now be nice.......or face the Karma

of being trashed yourself at some point. Would you bet your life on

the fact that she HAS NEVER HELPED ANYONE? I think not.

> I love this group.........And some call me a quack because I'm a

SHAMANKA.

> Orus

>

> robert-blau wrote:

> Maybe she should have used the " CLAPPER " instead of the

" Zapper " .

>

> Tony wrote:

>

> Yes, the Cure Library is an interesting site, and even has some

> good info. Too bad it buys heavily into the bogus claims and protocol of

> one of alternative medicine's biggest charlatans: Hulda Clark. That rips

> it for me, right there!

> Clarks liver cleanses are good, but that does not excuse her track

> record of rip-offs and chicanery.

>

> According to court records, Clark's books alonehave generated over $7

> million in sales - and that does not include her " treatments " for all

> the patients diagnosed with cancer or HIV or whatever with her

> " synchrometer " .

>

> She screwed the pooch when she used the synchrometer to diagnose an

> undercover investigator for the Indiana Department of Health with HIV,

> then told him that a 3 mintute zapper treatment had cured him, but that

> he would have to come back for 6 more treatments to keep it from

> returning.

>

> When she found out he was an agents, Clark told him that her earlier

> information was a mistake.

> Hulda Clark . . . . synchrometer, universal flukes . . . ROFLMAO!

>

> I could go on and on here about Clark, but I will leave it at this

> unless someone wants to get totally annihilated in a debate on the

> subject of Hulda Clark - it is one I know well!

> >

> oleander soup , robert-blau@ wrote:

>

> Interesting site, big cancer section . . .

>

> The Cure Library » Cures from around the world

> http://www.curelibrary.com/

In my heart, I think a woman has two choices: either she's

a feminist or a masochist. "

> —Gloria Steinem

>

 

> Building a website is a piece of cake.

> Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.

>

[Guest guest]

Don't worry - I won't go to Clark and I won't get cancer - I take OS and have a predominately healthy lifestyle.It isn't whining when I warn about someone who has a proven record of

chicanery, Orus. Nor is it hateful and spiteful to offering a warning

and inform the group about proven facts.

 

I can see how you might like Clark if something in her protocol helped

you. I dislike her because all of the good she has accomplished is

tarnished by the wrong - and we in alternate and natural health do not

need that kind of behavior among our ranks.

 

Thanks for your advice on the head doctor. As a result your posts are now moderated!

 

 

 

Tonyoleander soup , Orus Moon <orusmoon11 wrote:>> Tony, don't go to Clark if you get cancer. NOTHING works if you do not believe in it. . . .