Guest guest Posted April 19, 2007 Report Share Posted April 19, 2007 You may be right, David, but I think that there is a pattern of erosion of our access to the treatments and natural alternatives we should be free to choose. The proposed new guidelines are yet another step along that dark path and they are so broad and vague that it gives me pause as to what further harrassment of alternative treatments and natural supplements might follow their adoption. oleander soup , ahzoov wrote: > > > In a message dated 4/19/2007 12:05:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > writes: > > HEALTH FREEDOM OR SLAVERY - YOUR CHOICE! > > > One of the problems with focusing on the issue is that the FDA already has > the right to call anything they want a drug. > > Check out their pages. If " it " ameliorates, cures, fixes, relieves any > disorder, they've always had the right to control it. They come down hard on supp > lement manufacturers all the time for making claims. > > I am beginning to wonder why we are focusing on this issue. Is this a major > distraction while something else is going on? > > David > > > > ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.