Introduction to Alternative Cancer Treatments - Part 1 The Medicine

[Guest guest]

From my good online friend Webster Kehr, "The Cancer Tutor" (who by the way, likes the oleader treatment a lot and would give it his highest Stage IV rating if it had patient support - as it is, he rates it a "Strong Stage III treatment")Introduction to Alternative Cancer Treatments

by R. Webster Kehr,Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.

 

Part 1 - The Medicine

 

Introduction

 

Most people could not name five of the more than 300 alternative cancer

treatments. Fewer still could name the five most potent alternative

cancer treatments for advanced cancer patients.

Some people wonder why the scores of billions of dollars spent

on the "War on Cancer," that President Nixon started in 1971/72, has

not produced a cure for cancer. Have researchers been looking for more

profitable treatments for cancer or have they been looking for cures for cancer?

 

In fact, the average person knows almost nothing about either orthodox

cancer treatments or alternative cancer treatments, outside of what

they have heard on television or read in the media.

If a survey were taken, the average person would probably think

that the true cure rate of orthodox cancer treatments was 40% or more

and the true cure rate for alternative cancer treatments was close to

zero percent. This is total nonsense, but more will be said about that

later in this article.

Is what you know about cancer treatments based on who has the

most truth, or is it based on who has the most money? Is what you know

about cancer treatments carefully designed to deceive you? Are you

being sold a "bill of goods?"

 

This website is just as important for people who don't have cancer as it is for people who do

have cancer. Why would someone who doesn't have cancer be concerned

about the truth? The reason is that if they are diagnosed with cancer,

their doctor will immediately put intense pressure on them to commit to

chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. Unless you know whether

alternative cancer treatments or orthodox cancer treatments are

superior, BEFORE YOU ARE DIAGNOSED, there is a 100% chance you will make the wrong decision.

 

If you read all three parts of this article, you are assured of hearing

many things that have never entered your mind before. You will read

things that you will never, never hear on television or read in print.

 

You will learn a lot about the techniques of deception that you are

exposed to every day. You will learn things that the people of orthodox

medicine don't want you to know. And all this information is free.

Nothing is sold from this website.

To visualize what is going on in the "cancer industry" today,

and to see behind their massive facade, here is a short story that will

describe how orthodox medicine currently treats cancer patients.

 

A Story

Suppose you own a nice, comfortable, $300,000 house in the country,

near a small city. While you have gone to the store your house catches

on fire. As you return home you see that two rooms of your house are in

flames and the fire is spreading. You immediately call the fire

department.

 

Twenty minutes later three fire trucks show up.

The men and women in the first fire truck pull out heavy suits

and axes and run to the house and start cutting down parts of the house

that have already burned, but are still smoldering. They furiously cut

and cut and when they have cut out about 10% of the parts of the house

that have already burned, they quit and go back to their fire truck.

You note that they did absolutely nothing to stop the spreading

of the fire. What they cut out wasn't even burning and it certainly had

nothing to do with stopping the raging fire.

You watch the men and women in the second fire truck pull out a

fire hose and start spraying a powder on the fire. The amount of powder

they were spraying did not seem to you to be enough to put out the

fire. But you notice that while the powder is slowing down the

spreading of the fire, it is also severely damaging the parts of the

house that are not on fire.

Puzzled, you ask the fireman what the powder is. They say it is

a very toxic acid that is capable of putting the fire out, but they

can't spray very much of it on the fire because if they did, the entire

house would be reduced to a pile of rubble by the acid. Thus, all they

can do is slow down the spreading of the fire, but they can't stop the

spreading of the fire.

 

Even more puzzled, you ask them why they did not bring water

in their fire truck. They said that in firefighter school they were

taught that water was useless in putting out house fires. They said

that using water on a house fire is an old "wives tale" and water is

not effective. They also said that the state firefighter's union would

fire any firefighter that used water on a house fire.

By sheer coincidence you are also aware that the federal

regulatory agency, the Fire Development Administration (FDA), has

researched water and has declared that water is an "unproven" method to

put out house fires. The FDA says there is "insufficient evidence" as

to water's effectiveness and safety. You silently mumble to yourself

that there must be a huge connection between the FDA, the firefighter's

union, the firefighter schools and the chemical companies.

While you have been talking to the men and women in the second

truck, five men have jumped out of the third fire truck. They ask you

where the couch is in the living room. You point in the general

direction of the couch in the living room, which you assume by now is

on fire.

Each of them immediately pulls out a 30-06 caliber rifle and

starts shooting at the couch from where they are standing next to their

fire truck. You scream at them and ask them what they are doing. They

respond that they have been taught in firefighter's school that couches

are very bad to have in a house during a fire, so they are trying to

shoot the couch to pieces. They comment: "We think we are doing some

good."

You say that even if the couch is helping spread the fire, that

they are blowing holes in the front and back of the house trying to

shoot the couch to pieces from outside the house. Furthermore, very

impatiently, you say the fire has already spread far beyond where the

couch is located.

While the spreading of the house fire did slow down because of

the toxic acids, within two hours you no longer have a house. The fire

men and women were quite proud that they slowed down the fire. They

tell you that your house lasted an extra hour because of their work.

You doubt the accuracy of that number. They give each other "high

fives," get in their fire trucks, and head back to the fire station.

Between the fire, the acid and the bullets, your house has been

reduced to rubble. The cutting out of the wood that had already burned,

by the first fire truck, had absolutely no affect on stopping the fire.

In fact, nothing any of them did stopped the spreading of the fire, it

only slowed it down.

 

You are astonished at what you have seen.

You ponder why the "investigative journalists" have not jumped

on this situation. Then you realize how much money the chemical

companies spend on television advertisements and you realize why the

"investigative journalists" have kept their mouths shut.

 

A week later, as you drive by the fire department, you notice that all of the cars in the parking lot are very expensive cars.

A month later you know why they are driving very expensive cars.

They have sent you a bill for their services: $100,000. But they note

in the bill that the house insurance company will pay most of the bill.

You are amazed when you look at your house insurance policy and realize

the insurance company will not pay the bill if the fire department uses

water.

You ponder to yourself: "What is the connection between the

fire department, the firefighter's union, the firefighter's school, the

FDA, the insurance companies, the television stations and the chemical

companies?"

One thing is clear to you, you now know why all of your friends

think the firefighters are heroes, the television stations constantly

portray them as heros in their shows.

As you research all of the connections between these

organizations it quickly becomes clear to you that all of them are

owned or controlled by very wealthy people who are very, very good

friends with each other. You have a brand new comprehension of what quid pro quo means - you scratch my back and I'll scratch your back. You conclude that a quid pro quo of this magnitude is another term for "conspiracy."

 

End of Story

 

The Explanation

 

What has just been described is how "modern medicine" treats cancer

that has already metastasized. Cancer can be compared to a fire. It is

a fire that will spread until it kills you. But "modern medicine" does

nothing that will put out the fire.

 

The first fire truck represents surgery to cut out tumors or parts of the body where there are concentrations of cancer cells, after the cancer has already started to spread throughout the body!

 

The third fire truck represents radiation, which is used to shrink tumors, after the cancer has already started to spread throughout the body!

While the second fire truck represents chemotherapy, the

"progress" chemotherapy is making is frequently judged by its ability

to shrink tumors. Oncologists love to tell the cancer patient that

their tumors are shrinking.

But even if chemotherapy does slow down the progress of the

cancer, and even if it puts cancer patients into remission, it is

almost always a temporary Pyrrhic victory because the cancer almost

always returns.

 

The Food and Drug Administration (the real FDA) has approved scores of chemotherapy drugs, but none of them can stop the spread of cancer because chemotherapy drugs do not target cancer cells.

 

There are scores of natural substances that do target

cancer cells and can stop the spread of cancer. But the FDA has never

approved a single one of these natural substances (natural substances

cannot be patented by the pharmaceutical companies).

 

Insurance companies will not pay for natural cancer treatments (i.e. alternative cancer treatments). The media never

says anything good about alternative cancer treatments, but constantly

glorifies the medical profession. Medical schools have not taught a

single truthful thing about alternative cancer treatments in over 90

years.

 

The Importance of the Spreading of Cancer

 

To understand how all of this relates to the spreading of cancer, consider this quote by an M.D., the late Dr. Philip Binzel:

 

"When a patient is found to have a tumor, the only thing

the doctor discusses with that patient is what he intends to do about

the tumor. If a patient with a tumor is receiving radiation or

chemotherapy, the only question that is asked is, "How is the tumor

doing?" No one ever asks how the patient is doing. In my medical

training, I remember well seeing patients who were getting radiation

and/or chemotherapy. The tumor would get smaller and smaller, but the

patient would be getting sicker and sicker. At

autopsy we would hear, "Isn't that marvelous! The tumor is gone!" Yes,

it was, but so was the patient. How many millions of times are we going

to have to repeat these scenarios before we realize that we are

treating the wrong thing?

 

In primary cancer, with only a few exceptions, the tumor is neither health-endangering nor life-threatening.

I am going to repeat that statement. In primary cancer, with few

exceptions, the tumor is neither health-endangering nor

life-threatening. What is health-endangering and life-threatening is the spread of that disease through the rest of the body.

 

There is nothing in surgery that will prevent the spread of

cancer. There is nothing in radiation that will prevent the spread of

the disease. There is nothing in chemotherapy that will prevent the

spread of the disease. How do we know? Just look at the statistics!

There is a statistic known as "survival time." Survival time is defined

as that interval of time between when the diagnosis of cancer is first

made in a given patient and when that patient dies from his disease.

 

In the past fifty years, tremendous progress has been made in the

early diagnosis of cancer. In that period of time, tremendous progress

had been made in the surgical ability to remove tumors. Tremendous

progress has been made in the use of radiation and chemotherapy in

their ability to shrink or destroy tumors. But, the survival time of

the cancer patient today is no greater than it was fifty years ago.

What does this mean? It obviously means that we are treating the wrong

thing!"

Philip Binzel, M.D., Alive and Well, Chapter 14

 

In other words, if the cancer has not spread from the tumor, the tumor

presents no danger to the patient (with rare exceptions, such as when a

tumor blocks the fluid in the common bile duct).

 

It is important to understand that the vast majority of cells in a tumor are healthy cells. Cancer cells CANNOT

form tissue. Thus, if the cancer were contained within the tumor, there

would not be enough cancer cells in the person's body to endanger their

life. Likewise, if a man had prostate cancer, and the cancer was

contained inside the prostate gland, there could not be enough cancer

cells inside the prostate gland to endanger the patient's life.

Even if the cancer cells in a tumor were killed, or the tumor

was cut out, it would not solve the problem of the spreading of the

cancer if the cancer has already spread. There would be no benefit to

the patient because it is the spreading of the cancer that kills cancer

patients, not the cancer inside the tumor.

 

Yet the focus of orthodox medicine is on shrinking the tumors.

Chemotherapy (i.e. the second fire truck in the example) is so

toxic to cancer patients that if they gave enough of it to a cancer

patient to kill all of the cancer cells, the patient would die from the

side-effects of the chemotherapy immediately.

So doctors give chemotherapy in very low doses (though they

seem like very high doses), not enough to actually cure you. In the

mean time the cancer continues to spread.

Chemotherapy may put a patient "in remission," but virtually

every cancer patient who goes into remission eventually comes out of

remission and later dies.

Incredibly, doctors use radiation, the third fire truck, even

after the cancer has started to spread. They are interested in

shrinking a tumor. As mentioned above, the tumor is not the problem, it

is the spreading of the cancer that is the problem.

While orthodox medicine continues to use worthless treatments,

that only temporarily slow down the spreading of the cancer, many

cancer patients who use alternative cancer treatments fare no better.

Many alternative medicine practitioners do not use the best cancer

treatments. Either they have been trained to use the most profitable

treatments, or they are simply interested in making as much money as

possible as fast as possible.

To make matters worse, vendors of natural supplements generally

only sell their products, thus if they have a very weak product line,

the patient probably isn't going to survive.

When a person gets cancer, their chances of survival are

virtually nil. If they go with orthodox medicine they are assured they

will get the treatments discussed above.

 

But even if they go with alternative medicine they are likely to get treatments that simply don't work.

This leaves the cancer patient in a quandary. No matter which

way they turn the only thing that is thriving is their cancer and their

practitioners.

 

But believe it or not, there is good news! While the

pharmaceutical industry is in it for the money, Mother Nature isn't in

it for money. And Mother Nature is a lot smarter than the chemists in

the pharmaceutical industry.

 

And there are some people in alternative medicine who are not getting rich treating cancer patients and they know how to cure the vast majority of cancer cases.

 

And there are even a few vendors who have products that are strong enough for almost all cancer cases!

This very long article, which is practically a small book in

three parts, will walk the cancer patient, or their caregiver, through

the mazes of deception that they have been exposed to all their life.

This article is definitely NOT a treatment article. Absolutely

do not use this article to put together a cancer treatment program. There are dozens of articles on this website that deal with treating cancer.

But this article isn't one of them. When you are finished with this

article, go to the home page of this website and the home page will

walk you through the articles on treating cancer.

 

But for now, let us discuss why so many cancer patients die.

 

Introduction To The Key Issue - Integrity

The issue of treating cancer has far more to do with integrity than

it does with science. In fact, after several years of researching this

very issue, it is clear to this author that treating cancer today has

absolutely nothing to do with science. Nothing at all.

Had scientists embraced the Brandt Grape Cure of the 1920s, and

refined it as future discoveries in natural medicine were made, cancer

would have been a footnote in the history books written in the 1940s.

 

It is a fact that if every person who has lived on the Earth lived the Golden Rule, as it should be lived, cancer, and hundreds of other diseases, would currently be a footnote in history books.

 

Here is a quote from the late Dr. Bob Beck, a PhD in physics, who spent 40 years of his life working in electromedicine:

 

"When I looked into Dr. Kaali's work [Patent #5188738

describes a cure for AIDS/HIV found at the Albert Einstein College of

Medicine in 1990], I decided to go ahead and fund it. We found that it

worked all of the time [at curing AIDS/HIV]. For two and a half years,

we gave full credit for this invention to Dr. Kaali, whose name is on

the patent. Then I discovered that there was a long history of this

technology. We followed a trail of these patents back 107 years! We

found a patent, #4665898, that cured all cancer, dated May 19, 1987.

Why has this been suppressed? Why hasn't your doctor told you about an

absolutely proven, established cure for cancer? The answer is that

doctors get $375,000 per patient for surgery, chemotherapy, x-ray,

hospital stays, doctors and anesthesiologists. This is the official

statistic from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Unfortunately, the medical patient cured is a customer lost.

 

A lot of people say, "Aren't you infringing on others' patents?" In

the beginning, I was nervous, but when I found this technology had been

discovered and rediscovered for 107 years, I changed my mind. Now I am

broadcasting it from the rooftops. Still, it is very touchy. It's

rocking the pharmaceutical, surgical and diagnostic industries. But I

really feel that I have been called to do this. I have had people come

to my door with guns. I have been threatened and chased. But I think

God wants this information out. I feel it is my mission to give people

back to themselves, to deliver them from these vested interests, these

[medical] priesthoods that are taking everyone's money. I am not

charging a nickel."

Bob Beck, PhD, Interviewed by Kenneth and Dee Burke

 

As another example, in 1976, two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling,

PhD, and an associate, Ewan Cameron, M.D., did a published scientific

study in Scotland that resulted in proving that Vitamin C, given by

I.V., of 10 grams a day, could extend the average length of time a

terminal cancer patient lives by six times or more.

Had the medical community had any integrity, they would have

quickly replicated his study, come to the same conclusion (because they

did exactly what he did), and would have quickly started giving every

cancer patient, terminal or otherwise, 10 grams of Vitamin C by I.V.

every day.

 

But that is not what happened.

What really happened is that 3 studies were done at the Mayo

Clinic, all of which were directly a result of the Pauling/Cameron

study. However, these studies were not designed to replicate the Pauling/Cameron research. Instead they were designed to AVOID replicating the Pauling/Cameron protocol, AVOID their patient mix, and AVOID their statistical methods. Obviously, if you don't follow the same protocol, you won't get the same results. And they didn't.

 

Here is what the American Cancer Society (ACS) says about this issue:

 

"The Pauling study has been criticized by the NCI

[National Cancer Institute, a division of the NIH or National

Institutes of Health, a U.S. government agency] for being poorly

designed, and subsequent studies done at the Mayo Clinic found that

advanced cancer patients given the same dosage of vitamin C did not

survive any longer than those not given the supplement. However, the

Mayo Clinic trials have also been criticized for not fully addressing

all the issues related to the effects of vitamin C, which still left

questions about its effectiveness in the treatment of cancer."

http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ETO/content/ETO_5_3x_Vitamin_C.asp

 

The ACS would have been insane to challenge the integrity of Linus

Pauling (one of his Nobel Prizes was the Nobel Peace Prize, the other

was in chemistry). So they quote the totally corrupt NIH (Note: 500 NIH

employees were recently caught taking bribes from the pharmaceutical

industry, which they called "outside consulting fees") and state that a

world famous chemist, and two-time Nobel Prize winner, doesn't know how

to design a scientific study!!

 

But they also admit that the Mayo clinic did not use

the same protocol as Pauling and Cameron. So if there are "still left

questions," why hasn't the ACS used their annual scores of millions of

dollars of income, and their political clout, to set the record

straight and replicate the study as originally done? It has been more

30 years since the original study, yet no one in orthodox medicine,

with their billions of dollars in research money, not even the ACS or

NIH, has replicated the Pauling/Cameron study.

 

It appears that extending the life expectancy of terminal cancer patients six-fold, using natural substances, is not important to orthodox medicine.

In fact, two other studies did replicate the Pauling/Cameron

study far more closely than did the Mayo Clinic. Both of these studies verified the Pauling/Cameron results. For more information, see:

Article from eBook: "Case Study of Scientific Corruption"

 

But this is just one of many, many instances where highly effective cancer treatments have been persecuted and/or ignored.

 

There is, in fact, a pattern. A very clear pattern. The pattern is that

if natural substances are involved, such as vitamin C, the study and

evidence is persecuted and/or ignored. When natural substances are

involved it is called "alternative medicine." It should be called

"persecuted and/or ignored medicine."

There are more than 300 alternative cancer treatments that use

natural substances, such as Vitamin C. Every one of them is more

effective than the Pauling/Cameron protocol. Every one of them is far

more effective than chemotherapy and/or radiation. Every one of them is

ignored and many of them have been persecuted.

But there is a clear reason why natural substances are ignored.

It has nothing to do with their effectiveness. The pharmaceutical

industry cannot patent and control, and thus cannot profit from,

natural substances. They can only charge their monopolistic prices on

synthetic molecules, many of which are nothing but mutations of natural

molecules.

 

What is Going On In The Cancer Industry?

The February 22, 2006 USA Today mentioned that by the year 2015, 20%

of the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) could be for health spending.

Now let's be logical. Suppose a cure for cancer was found; and

suppose a treatment to avoid 90% of all heart disease problems was

found; and suppose a cure for type 2 diabetes was found; and suppose a

cure for AIDS/HIV was found. (In fact, all of these have been found.)

Would health spending ever hit 20% of GDP? Of course not. All of these

are highly profitable diseases for both the pharmaceutical industry and

the medical industry (and the politicians who claim to represent their

constituents).

All the money being rasied for treating AIDS patients in Africa

are benefiting no one but the pharmaceutical industry stockholders

because a cure for AIDS/HIV has been around since 1990.

So in essence, the article in U.S. Today was predicting that no

cures for the highly profitable diseases would be found by the year

2015. That is a safe prediction!!

Another safe prediction would be to predict that every new treatment

for the profitable diseases will be more expensive and more profitable

than existing treatments!! Here is another safe prediction, the 20%

figure will be hit before 2015.

Here is yet another safe prediction: the media will continue to

suppress alternative treatments for cancer, heart disease, dementia,

diabetes, etc. See this web site, you will be amazed at what

alternative medicine can already prevent and cure (and this website is

just the tip of the iceberg):

Dementia, Heart Disease, Diabetes, etc. Website

 

Ask yourself this questions: "When was the last time orthodox medicine

used their massive profits to find a cure for any disease?" When was

the last time a cure for disease was found that used prescription

drugs? If you said polio, you would be wrong. Polio was cured by a

medical doctor in the 1940s, but the cure was suppressed because he

used a form of Vitamin C, which drug companies could not patent and

control.

Have you ever wondered what would happen if someone found a

cure for cancer? You probably think that the person finding the cure

would be featured on every television show in America and would win a

Nobel Prize in medicine. Kaali and Lyman, mentioned above, found a cure

for AIDS / HIV, and more than 200 other diseases, and they didn't win a

Nobel Prize. Have you ever heard of them before?

It is difficult, if not impossible, to convince the average

American that orthodox medicine today is not only corrupt, it is more

corrupt than it has ever been in the history of medicine. That is

saying a lot because orthodox medicine was persecuting cures for

disease in the 1700s.

 

With Big Money comes Big Corruption. The bigger the money the more the corruption.

Unfortunately, there are some in alternative medicine who are

also more interested in profits than their patients. The main

difference between orthodox medicine and alternative medicine is

freedom. The people with integrity in alternative medicine are allowed

a great deal of freedom to help others. However, the Food and Drug

Administration is always looking for excuses to crush the people who

know how to cure diseases which are highly profitable to Big Pharma and

Big Medicine (and thus Big Government).

Nevertheless, in spite of some persecution, there are over 300

alternative cancer treatments that currently exist. Every one of them

can cure some cases of cancer, if the person starts using that treatment immediately after being diagnosed. However, there is a very wide range in effectiveness between these treatments, especially when used on advanced cancer patients.

 

The problem with alternative medicine is that patients are frequently

on their own to find out which treatments work for their situation -

and which don't work. Unlike orthodox medicine, which is very uniform

across the country, alternative medicine is neither organized, nor

uniform. The quest for truth is always a winding and rocky road,

especially when money is involved.

Some people erroneously think that medical doctors do not use

the best alternative cancer treatments because the doctors do not know

which treatments are really effective. While medical schools turn

doctors into nothing but drug salesmen, that is not why medical doctors

do not use natural substances in the treatment of disease. Medical

doctors know how to read. But they also know that if

they used a single one of these alternative cancer treatments on a

single cancer patient, they would risk losing their license and could

go to jail!!

 

While it is this attitude that creates uniformity in orthodox medicine,

it is also this attitude that crushes progress. Orthodox medicine is a

highly controlled monopoly, totally controlled by the combination of

Big Pharma and the American Medical Association.

The suppression of truth by Big Medicine is why this website,

and many other websites, exist. The major purpose of this website is to

make information about alternative cancer treatments free and available to the public so that more and more people know which alternative cancer treatments are the strongest.

 

Why Some Alternative Cancer Treatments Are Far Superiorto Orthodox Cancer Treatments

 

All of your life you have probably been taught that natural substances

from Mother Nature cannot possibly be as effective against cancer as

the highly condensed, highly potent synthetic molecules made by the

drug companies. In other words, you have been taught that chemotherapy

drugs kill cancer cells far better than anything Mother Nature can put

together.

 

That is definitely not a true statement, but even if it were true it would be an irrelevant issue!

 

The key issue is whether patented drugs or Mother Nature's minerals and nutrients target cancer cells better.

 

The fact of the matter is that chemotherapy does not target cancer cells. In fact, chemotherapy kills far, far more healthy cells than it does cancer cells.

What this means is that chemotherapy must be given in very, very

low doses, spread out over long periods of time, and the therapy must

include gaps between the treatments. This "pacing" of the drugs is

because too many healthy cells would be killed if too much chemotherapy

were given too fast.

 

The reason orthodox medicine treats cancer like a chronic disease

is because orthodox treatments, in high doses, would kill the patient

long before they would cure the cancer. This failure of orthodox

medicine to safely kill cancer cells (i.e. safely target cancer cells)

is why they talk about a "5 year cure rate" rather than a true cure

rate. If they can keep the patient alive for 5 years they consider the

patient to be "cured," even if they die in the sixth year.

Mother Nature's cancer treatments, called natural cancer

treatments, or more commonly "alternative cancer treatments," generally

do absolutely no harm to healthy cells.

This is because the human body, which was made by Mother Nature, knows

exactly what to do with Mother Nature's minerals and nutrients.

 

Virtually all natural treatments for cancer do not kill healthy cells - not a single one.

 

This is the key - because

alternative cancer treatments do not harm or kill healthy cells, the

items from nature that can kill cancer cells can be given in much

higher doses than chemotherapy - without any gaps in treatment!!

 

Thus, even if the mutations of natural molecules, called drugs, were

more potent at killing cancer cells than the original natural

molecules, because

of the superiority of natural substances at targeting cancer cells or

leaving healthy cells healthy, alternative cancer treatments can be far

more effective than orthodox drugs at treating cancer!

 

Because Mother Nature does not necessarily condense the cancer-killing nutrients found in foods, some

of the most potent of the alternative cancer treatments are liquid

ionic minerals, certain types of ozone treatments, and other natural

treatments that contain molecules that can be condensed, such as

intravenous vitamin C (but not the Pauling/Cameron doses, however).

 

Just how effective are the best treatments from Mother Nature? Several

alternative cancer treatments have achieved a consistent 50% true cure

rate on cancer patients who had been given up on by orthodox medicine

and had been sent home to die!

 

Such results are possible because these key alternative cancer

treatments not only target cancer cells, they can be given in a very

condensed and potent form, they do not need a catalyst, and they can be

given safely in much higher doses than chemotherapy. Ponder that very

carefully!

Also ponder the true cure rate of these same treatments on

cancer patients who use these treatments exclusively, meaning they had

not lost many months of treatment time while being treated with

orthodox treatments!

 

However,

do not assume every alternative cancer treatment is that effective.

Very few of the 300+ alternative cancer treatments can come anywhere

close to a 50% true cure rate on patients given up on by orthodox

medicine.

 

One of the big mistakes people who seek out alternative cancer

treatments make is to assume that if an alternative cancer treatment

will cure one patient, it will cure all cancer patients, no matter what

condition they are in. This is a dangerous assumption because very,

very few of the 300+ alternative cancer treatments are condensed and

potent enough to cure 50% of those sent home to die by orthodox

medicine. Very few.

 

An Example of One of the Potent Alternative Cancer Treatments

There are very few minerals that can get inside of cancer cells. Two

of the minerals that can get inside of cancer cells are cesium and

potassium. Once cesium gets inside of cancer cells it starts to "pull"

potassium from the blood into the cancer cells (potassium

supplementation is required when on this treatment in order to

replenish the potassium in the blood that was pulled into the cancer

cells). When there is enough build-up of cesium and/or potassium inside

the cancer cell, glucose is blocked from getting into the cancer cell.

Since glucose is what feeds the cancer cell, the cancer cell

will eventually die from starvation. Not only that, but cesium and/or

potassium will also block the cancer cells from making lactic acid,

meaning they block the cachexia cycle at the cancer cell. Other items

also help block or overcome the cachexia cycle in different ways (e.g.

hydrazine sulfate blocks the cachexia cycle at the liver).

Dr. A. Keith Brewer, PhD, discovered in the 1980s how cesium

can treat cancer. Aside from treating the cancer, it can treat the pain

of cancer within 12 to 36 hours, depending on what is causing the pain.

The liquid ionic cesium chloride used today is much more potent than

the cesium carbonate of the 1980s. The complete protocol includes

several other items. Here is an article on this treatment:

Article: The Cesium Chloride / DMSO Protocol

 

Like all of the most potent alternative cancer treatments, this

treatment is so potent at killing cancer cells it must be "paced,"

meaning dosages must be set so the body has time to safely remove the debris caused by the dead cancer cells.

 

Did you notice that orthodox cancer treatments must be "paced" because of all the healthy cells that they kill. But alternative cancer treatments must be "paced" because of all the targeted cancer cells they kill.

 

Because of the number of cancer cells killed by the

cesium chloride / DMSO treatment, the cancer patient needs the expert

advice of a vendor who knows how to safely use these products.

Fortunately, such experts exist.

In fact, all of the most potent alternative cancer treatments

require expert advice over the telephone or in a clinic setting. For

example, the ozone RHP and ozone liquid I.V. treatments require expert

advice or a clinic setting.

Also, these most potent treatments generally cannot be combined

with each other (but they can be combined with some other alternative

treatments). The doses for these products are designed to kill cancer

cells at a rate that the body can safely handle the debris. To combine

such treatments may create too high of a die-off rate.

 

[Note: The list of alternative cancer treatments

which can give a cancer patient (given up on by orthodox medicine) hope

for survival can be found in the top section of the home page of this

web site. Several of these treatments have articles written about them

on this website.]

CancerTutor Home Page

 

More on Orthodox Cancer Treatments

 

You probably believe that the true cure rate of orthodox cancer

treatments is around 40% and growing. This belief is the result of a

wide variety of fancy statistical tricks (which will be discussed in

Part 2 of this article). The fact is that if you get cancer, and you

use nothing but orthodox cancer treatments, your chance of surviving

your cancer (and surviving your cancer treatment) is only about 3%.

On top of that, even the 3% who do survive have had their

bodies so severely damaged that they are vulnerable to future bouts

with cancer.

 

Here is what really happens to the typical cancer patient:

 

Step 1) The patient goes to the doctor and is diagnosed with cancer,

Step 2) The cancer surgeon cuts out the parts of the body with high concentrations of cancer cells,

Step 3) The oncologists give the patient chemotherapy and/or radiation,

Step 4) They send the patient home "in remission,"

Step 5) The cancer soon appears again (because they didn't actually cure the patient),

Step 6) Go back to step 1)

This cycle continues until the patient is sent home to die (of

course, they are sent home to die after one more round of chemotherapy

and radiation). Soon the patient dies. This is the cycle for virtually

all cancer patients. The only difference between one patient and

another is how many times the cycle is repeated.

 

This is medicine?

One hundred years from now the medical doctors of the day will

look at the "medicine" of today in total and absolute disgust. There is

absolutely no excuse for what is going on today in medicine.

Even those who stop this nonsense and go with alternative

medicine have severe problems. Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery

virtually destroy a person's immune system. A well put together natural

treatment, on the other hand, which will actually include several

different products which do different things, will actually build the

person's immune system to make sure the cancer will not return. But

alternative medicine cannot quickly mend an immune system that has been

destroyed. That is why the most potent alternative cancer treatments do

not take the time to fix the patient's immune system. The immune system

is fixed during remission.

 

But it gets worse.

 

First, ninety-five percent of cancer patients who go with

alternative cancer treatments have already been given up for dead by

orthodox medicine. In other words, they first went to orthodox medicine, their body was destroyed by orthodox medicine, THEN they decided to go with alternative cancer treatments.

 

Second, because so few alternative cancer treatments can cure people

sent home to die by orthodox medicine, very few of the cancer patients

sent home to die pick a treatment strong enough to give them a fighting

chance. In other words, very few of these cancer patients pick one of the most potent alternative cancer treatments.

 

These two things create a severe disadvantage for alternative medicine.

Alternative medicine has lost between 1 and 4 years to treat the

patient and build their immune system - because the patient was using

orthodox treatments.

 

In addition to that, after orthodox treatments, the patient is in far worse physical and mental condition than they were when they were first diagnosed. This is why there are so few alternative cancer treatments that can achieve a true cure rate of 50% on these patients.

 

If we put all of this together we come to the following facts:

1) Almost 100% of all newly diagnosed cancer patients go with orthodox medicine first,

2) About 97% of these patients die, or are sent home to die and later die, due to their cancer and/or their cancer treatment,3)

Only a very small percentage of the cancer patients sent home to die

ever go with alternative cancer treatments, they simply go home and die,

4) Of those who do go with alternative cancer treatments, only a very

small percentage of them pick a treatment strong enough to give them a

50% chance of survival.

 

Is it any wonder that deaths from cancer continue to rise in spite of the power of some of the alternative cancer treatments?

So, what is the cure rate of recently diagnosed cancer patients

who go with alternative medicine exclusively? It depends on how

dangerous their cancer is and what treatment they pick. There are more

than 300 alternative cancer treatments.

 

If they pick the best possible treatment for their situation, when they are first diagnosed,

a 90% or higher true cure rate is fairly easy to achieve. Overall,

there are at least two dozen alternative cancer treatments that can

come close to a 90% overall true cure rate across the board for those

who use alternative cancer treatments exclusively.

The amazing thing is that orthodox medicine has had its own

opportunities to have its own 90% cure rate. There are two incredible

substances that allow chemotherapy to safely target cancer cells:

insulin and DMSO.

Insulin allows small amounts of chemotherapy to target cancer

cells because of the way it works with the cell membranes. The

treatment is called Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT).

DMSO actually binds to small amounts of certain chemotherapy

drugs. The DMSO, which has a very high affinity for cancer cells, then

pulls the chemotherapy into the cancer cells with it. On this website,

this treatment is called DMSO Potentiation Therapy (DPT).

DPT and IPT are two treatments that are easy to combine. It is

a very potent treatment. But don't ask your oncologist about it, he or

she has probably never heard of it.

Because these two treatments use very low doses of chemotherapy

(about 1/10th a normal dose), and because the chemotherapy targets the

cancer cells, these two treatments are very potent and have virtually

no side-effects.

 

But orthodox medicine does not use their own discoveries! They would rather have a 3% cure rate than a 90% cure rate!! See this article about these two substances:

Article: DMSO - The Magic Bullet For Cancer

So, if this is true, and it is true, why haven't you heard this

on television a hundred times during your lifetime? Why don't movie

stars, "investigative journalists," etc. constantly tout the vast

superiority of alternative cancer treatments?

 

Why You Haven't Heard These Things Before

 

Everything you hear throughout your life is not based on

who has the most truth, it is based on who has the most money. If you

haven't figured that out by now, you better figure it out real quick.

The average American knows absolutely nothing about alternative

cancer treatments except rumors about people who probably used the

wrong treatment. Let us consider the reasons for this lack of accurate

and useful information about alternative cancer treatments with the

following list of facts:

 

Fact #1) Virtually every American gets the vast majority of

their information directly or indirectly from the media, which includes

television, radio, newspapers, magazines, etc. Only the Internet, books

and emails would not be considered part of the "media."

 

Fact #2) The pharmaceutical industry spends $3 billion a year advertising in the media.

 

Fact #3) In the 1940s, the book: The Drug Story

was published by newspaper owner Morris Bealle. This book exposed the

vast corruption in the media due to advertising dollars. In other

words, it exposed why newspapers (this was before television) refused

to tell the truth about corruption in corporations due to their fear of

losing advertising dollars to these same corrupt corporations.

However, it was well known long before the 1940s that

advertising money bought influence with the media. Actually, this was

known no later than the 1880s. In other words, for more than 100 years

the media has clearly understood that if you say things in the media

that are true, but cut into the profits of your advertisers, you will

quickly lose not only your advertising revenue from that company, but

possibly from many other companies as well (who also fear any type of

honesty).

 

Consider this quote by a famous journalist to a group of other journalists, given in the 1880s:

 

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's

history [1880], in America, as an independent press. You know it and I

know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest

opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never

appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of

the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries

for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write

honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job.

 

If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper,

before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of

the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert,

to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and

his [human] race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and

what folly is this toasting an independent press?

 

We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are

the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our

possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are

intellectual prostitutes."

John Swinton (1829-1901) pre-eminent New York journalist & head of

the editorial staff at the New York Tribune. Quoted one night between

1880-1883.

Quoted by Upton Sinclair in his 1919 book:

The Brass Check: A Study of American Journalism, page 400

Even though Upton Sinclair was famous by 1919, because he was

criticizing corruption in the media, he had to self-publish this book.

 

Absolutely nothing has changed since the 1880s.

 

Fact #4) As a result of the above item, and the $3 billion a

year spent by the pharmaceutical industry in the media, American

journalists are required to publicly be highly, highly loyal to the

pharmaceutical industry. A single verbal slip by a journalist on or off

the air could cost him or her their job. Prior approval by the

advertisers is required to say anything mildly negative about the

pharmaceutical industry.

 

These same rules apply to most major industries, not just the pharmaceutical industry.

 

Fact #5) The orthodox cancer treatments (e.g. surgery,

chemotherapy, radiation and many others) used in "modern" medicine are

equally subservient to the pharmaceutical industry. Actually, "modern"

medicine was corrupt long before the pharmaceutical industry took over

the medical schools many decades ago. Medical doctors, who are

under the control of the American Medical Association, are not allowed

to use any natural substance in the treatment of cancer. Modern "doctors" are taught nothing but medicine using prescription drugs.

 

Medical doctors are only allowed to use natural substances in the treatment of the symptoms of prescription drugs. This is called "complementary alternative medicine" or CAM. CAM is not designed to treat any disease!

 

Because of the money of the pharmaceutical industry: the medical

community, the media and the politicians are all subservient to the

pharmaceutical industry. All are in the same bed together.

 

There are many books that have been written on these subjects.

 

Fact #6) While vitamin companies can advertise in the media, the

substances which are used in the most potent natural or alternative

cancer treatments are never advertised in the media. Thus, the media

receives $0 dollars of advertising related to viable alternative cancer

treatments.

Thus, there is a $3 billion dollar difference between what the

pharmaceutical industry spends on advertising and what is spent for the

main substances used in alternative cancer treatments. There is an

equally proportional difference in the opinions you gather from

watching or reading the media.

 

Fact #7) Taking all of the above items into account, is it any

wonder that the average American hears nothing good about alternative

cancer treatments anywhere in the media, but hears hundreds or

thousands of good things about orthodox medicine in the media every

year (thousands if you include pharmaceutical advertisements).

You might not remember hearing anything good about orthodox

medicine. Every time you watch a role-playing show on television that

glorifies a doctor or hospital you are being indoctrinated. Every time

you hear a news program that implies you should go to your orthodox

doctor for some problem, you are being indoctrinated. Every time you

hear a pharmaceutical ad you are being indoctrinated.

 

But you never hear anything positive about alternative cancer treatments. This is by design.

 

An Even Bigger Reason For The Great Deception

But the problem is much deeper than just advertising money. The

issue of cross-ownership and cross-board of directors control is a far

more significant reason for the great deception.

For example, as this article is being written, General Electric

owns 80% of the NBC network. General Electric also owns 14 major NBC

affiliates. General Electric's partner, Telemundo (which owns the other

20% of NBC), owns 16 major television stations. By the way, GE now owns

Telemundo.

Why is this significant? General Electric has a major division

called: "GE Healthcare." This division includes "GE Medical Systems

Information Technologies,GE Healthcare Cintricity Pharmacy" (which

has sold about 6 billion prescriptions) and other orthodox health

related organizations.

All of these organizations, and many more, are heavily involved

in orthodox medicine. Thus, the same company, General Electric, has

major ownership in both the media and orthodox medicine.

CBS has a longstanding advertising policy that prohibits the

sale of advertising time for the advocacy of viewpoints on

controversial issues of public importance. In other words, they can

censor any advertisement they want. So much for freedom of the press.

The press has the freedom, but not the people.

A local FOX station in Florida fired two of its reporters, Jane

Akre and Steve Wilson, for refusing to back down on an investigative

reporting segment that exposed Monsanto chemical company for adding a

toxic chemical, BGH, which causes cancer, to milk. The national FOX

network has stood solidly behind the Florida station. Are you

surprised?

For decades the 3 major television networks were so liberal

that they were no longer able to control the conservatives. Something

had to be done to manipulate and keep the conservatives from figuring

out what was going on in Washington. In 1985, the Fox Network was

founded with the main purpose of controlling the conservatives by

diverting their attention from the real corruption

in Washington and focusing the attention of the conservatives on

unimportant issues that would not threaten the profits of the main

conspiracy.

All of what has been said is just the tip of the iceberg. There

is the issue of cross-board of directors control, such as between large

cancer research clinics and pharmaceutical companies. There is also the

issue that 42 U.S. Senators (42%) own stock in the pharmaceutical

industry.

Then there is the issue of the revolving door between the FDA

and the pharmaceutical industry. There is the issue discovered by a Los Angeles Times

investigation that found out more than 500 employees of the National

Institutes of Health (NIH) were receiving bribes (i.e. "outside

consulting fees") from the pharmaceutical industry. When the head of

the NIH slapped a one year moratorium on these bribes (because they got

caught, not because of any modicum of integrity), he was jeered by the

crowd of NIH employees.

 

Follow the money trail, it all leads back to the pharmaceutical industry and American Medical Association (AMA).

Now you know why the government and the AMA don't want you to

know the whole truth about your cancer treatment options. Now you know

why medical doctors are not allowed to use natural substances in the

treatment of cancer EVEN AFTER a person is sent home to die. Ponder that one carefully!!

 

If alternative medicine is capable of having a consistent cure rate of 90% or more, on newly diagnosed cancer patients, then clearly orthodox medicine

is also capable of having a 90% true cure rate on newly diagnosed

cancer patients if doctors were allowed to use natural substances in

the treatment of disease. That is exactly why they are not allowed to

use alternative medicine to treat disease.

The 3% cure rate treatments are so much more profitable than

the 90% cure rate treatments, that the "leaders" of orthodox medicine

have intentionally chosen to suppress the far superior alternative

cancer treatments.

If medical doctors were allowed to use alternative medicine on

cancer patients they sent home to die, they could cure 50% of them.

That would lead to questions of why the alternative cancer treatment

was not used first! That

is why medical doctors are not allowed to use alternative medicine even

after the pharmaceutical industry and doctors already have their money

and the patient is sent home to die!

 

This point is so important it cannot be made often enough. After

orthodox medicine has all the money they can get from a cancer patient,

the individual medical doctor is still not allowed

to cure the patient with alternative medicine. This is the most telling

fact of all in the battle between orthodox and alternative medicine. It would be too embarrassing to orthodox medicine for their cancer patients to be cured with alternative medicine after the orthodox treatments failed! So to avoid the embarassment, they stand back and watch their patients die a painful death.

 

While individual doctors may or may not know what is going on, and may

or may not be at fault for what is going on, it is clear that the

individual medical doctors can be severely criticized

for not having the guts to clean house within the national and state

AMA boards and stand up for their patient's health. They can also be

severely criticized for not desiring to learn more about alternative

cancer treatments. Most doctors don't want to "rock the boat."

What you hear from the "cancer industry" and the media does not

come from anyone who is concerned about your health (or your life),

what you hear comes from people who care about their personal assets.

What you hear is controlled very carefully by a wide network of

cross-controlled organizations and advertising money.

Indeed, those of us who are interested in telling people about

their cancer treatment options feel as the reformer Upton Sinclair felt

in 1919:

 

"I was determined to get something done about the

Condemned Meat Industry. I was determined to get something done about

the atrocious conditions under which men, women and children were

working the Chicago stockyards. In my efforts to get something done, I

was like an animal in a cage. The bars of this cage were newspapers,

which stood between me and the public; and inside the cage I roamed up

and down, testing one bar after another, and finding them impossible to

break."

Upton Sinclair, The Brass Check: A Study of American Journalism, page 39

Even though Sinclair was famous by 1919, he had to self-publish this book.

 

With the total control of information by the media, and the total

dependence of Americans on this mode of information, is it any wonder

that virtually every newly diagnosed cancer patient chooses to go with

orthodox medicine?

 

A Summary

 

Let us summarize all of the things above:

1) Because of greed and corruption, orthodox medicine uses the

most profitable treatments for cancer, thus their true cure rate is

around 3%.

2) The true cure rate of orthodox medicine could easily be 90%

or higher if they used the most effective orthodox cancer treatments or

the most effective alternative cancer treatments.

3) Because of a wide variety of problems, but mainly because

most cancer patients go with orthodox cancer treatments first, the true

cure rate of alternative medicine is unknown, but it is probably around

10% to 15%.

4) Like orthodox medicine, the true cure rate of alternative

cancer treatments could be 90% or higher if newly diagnosed cancer

patients went with alternative cancer treatments instead of orthodox

cancer treatments and they found and used the most effective of the alternative cancer treatments for their situation.

 

5) Thus, orthodox medicine and alternative medicine have essentially

the same potential, especially if orthodox medicine used the best of

the alternative cancer treatments. But a medical doctor stands at risk

of losing their medical license, and possibly going to jail, should

they use the most effective cancer treatments, either orthodox or

alternative. Thus, going with orthodox cancer treatments is almost

always a mistake, because of the corruption in modern medicine.

6) Thus, for a newly diagnosed cancer patient, because they

have the option to use alternative cancer treatments, and the freedom

to do their homework on the Internet and in the right books, their only

hope of achieving a high chance of survival is to use alternative

cancer treatments.

 

In short, the

war between alternative cancer treatments and orthodox cancer

treatments has nothing to do with science, it is a war of information

and freedom. From a scientific standpoint, if the right treatment is

chosen for a given situation, and the patient avoids orthodox medicine

(except in rare situations), because of the corruption of orthodox

medicine, alternative cancer treatments are far superior. But the side

that wins the most cancer patients is the side with the most money.

 

In other words, because they are corrupt, Big Pharma and Big Medicine

have the most money and the most influence over the media (who are

essentially owned and controlled by the same people who own and control

the pharmaceutical industry), thus almost all newly diagnosed cancer

patients choose the worst possible option because the media has

suppressed the truth, deceived them into thinking current orthodox

medicine is wonderful and brainwashed them into picking their worst

possible option.

Medicine is not a "healing art," it is a business. Their goal

is not to cure people, but to maximize their profits. Cancer is one of

the key diseases that is a "goose that lays golden eggs" for orthodox

medicine. No one wants to kill that goose.

More than one million Americans die every year of cancer, heart

disease, diabetes, etc., when they could have been cured or their

disease could easily have been prevented. Instead of being told the

truth, the truth is suppressed and replaced with false hopes, deceptive

statistics and pressure.

 

God will judge those who are responsible and God cannot be bribed.

Part 2 of this article will go into great detail about the

"Great Deception" and Part 3 of this article will detail the politics

involved in the Great Deception.

 

 

Part 2 - The Great Deception

 

Part 3 - The Politics

 

 

 

Note: A superb new book, released in August, 2006, covers many

of the topics on this website, and many issues not on this website. The

book is called: Cancer - Step Outside the Box, by

researcher Ty Bollinger. It is recommended both for cancer patients and

as a gift to others to help spread the word about the effectiveness of

alternative cancer treatments. The ideal scenario is for someone to

know about alternative cancer treatments before they are

diagnosed with cancer, so they won't be pressured into making the wrong

decision. The book is available on Amazon. See also:

Cancer - Step Outside the Box

 

Copyright © 2003, 2004, 2006 R. Webster Kehr, all rights reserved. This article may be downloaded, stored on the internet, printed, or emailed to others, as long as it is not modified in any way and this copyright notice remains intact.