Guest guest Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 Pardon me if this is a stupid question, but why not just get apricot kernals from apricots and eat them? ~inga > > FOOTNOTES: For anyone unable to access synthesized Laetrile in Mexico, the > most obvious source of oral vitamin B17 is apricot kernels. Unfortunately the > Australian Government has made access to this natural product extremely > difficult. Courtesy of the pharmaceutical lobbies, it is now a federal > " crime " for health food shops and others to sell apricot kernels to the > public. There is an easier way of obtaining B17 not shown in the text, and > that is from crushed linseed. The primary source of B17 in linseed is > Linimarin rather than Nitriloside found in apricot kernels and Cassava, but > the effect is the same if enough is eaten. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 not only that but I remember in the 70's when there was all kinds of talk anout laetrile until it was proven to be completely ineffective against cancer C Ingrid Mager-Renault <wolfiebear wrote: Pardon me if this is a stupid question, but why not just get apricot kernalsfrom apricots and eat them?~inga>"Life is not holding a good hand; Life is playing a poor hand well." Danish proverb Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 > not only that but I remember in the 70's when there was all kinds of > talk anout laetrile until it was proven to be completely ineffective > against cancer > > C Christina; Laetrile wasn't proven to not work, although indeed that's what the public relations department had originally said. Ralph Moss, who was working in public relations for the Sloan- Kettering Memorial Cancer Clinic at the time the laetrile studies were done at that center had access to and revealed the actual results in the news and was fired for it. Laetrile had unexpectedly worked, and Sloan-Kettering had subsequently falsified a news release in order to not lose further cancer research funding. Follow the money. regards, Duncan Crow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 2 people in my family went on it and both died rather quickly CDuncan Crow <duncancrow wrote: > not only that but I remember in the 70's when there was all kinds of> talk anout laetrile until it was proven to be completely ineffective> against cancer> > CChristina; Laetrile wasn't proven to not work, although indeed that's what the public relations department had originally said.Ralph Moss, who was working in public relations for the Sloan-Kettering Memorial Cancer Clinic at the time the laetrile studies were done at that center had access to and revealed the actual results in the news and was fired for it. Laetrile had unexpectedly worked, and Sloan-Kettering had subsequently falsified a news release in order to not lose further cancer research funding.Follow the money.regards,Duncan Crow«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 There are many people who have taken the laetrile (b17) route, and died. There are far more people, even percentage wise, who have died and not taken it. The laetrile is one of substances that destroys cancer cells, but through the body's own methods. The research had shown that the cyanide complex resident within it destroys cancer cells, because the cancer cells lack an enzyme to neutralize it, while the normal body cells have protection against it. But, it certainly isn't a magic bullet. If one has had cancer therapy via radiation, or chemotherapy, often by the time people get on the therapies that will help, their body's organs, and systems are so far damaged that they are going to die. But, even those who have had those therapies have more successful percentages when they have changed their diets, and resorted to natural methods, like the laetrile, graviola, enzyme therapy, and other things. There are many natural foods and their supplements that destroy cancer cells and metabolize them out of the body. Ed Christina [cbmd3] Sunday, January 02, 2005 3:53 PM Subject: Re: Re: *IS CANCER MERELY A VITAMIN DEFICIENCY DISEASE? 2 people in my family went on it and both died rather quickly CDuncan Crow <duncancrow wrote: > not only that but I remember in the 70's when there was all kinds of> talk anout laetrile until it was proven to be completely ineffective> against cancer> > CChristina; Laetrile wasn't proven to not work, although indeed that's what the public relations department had originally said.Ralph Moss, who was working in public relations for the Sloan-Kettering Memorial Cancer Clinic at the time the laetrile studies were done at that center had access to and revealed the actual results in the news and was fired for it. Laetrile had unexpectedly worked, and Sloan-Kettering had subsequently falsified a news release in order to not lose further cancer research funding.Follow the money.regards,Duncan Crow+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;' - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! 'Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 , Christina <cbmd3> wrote: > 2 people in my family went on it and both died rather quickly Sorry about your family members. Just a question though. Had these family members gone the chemo/radiation or surgery route before taking the B17? I had read that once the immune system has been killed by the chemo/radiation treatment that the laetrile would not be effective except for perhaps extending the life a little longer and perhaps helping to alleviate pain. Cannot remember the source of this info. Surgery more often that not spreads the cancer wildly thoughout the body. Liz S.C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2005 Report Share Posted January 4, 2005 I think we ought to look at cancer truly from a holistic point of view rather than just trying to identify it with lack of vitamins or even link it to diet alone. I have personally gone through cancer twice eventhough I have been on organic food in the last 8 years. Each of us should try to understand our own selves better and try to identify the causes of our own disease. In my case, I have narrowed down the causes to chronic stress which depressed my immune system (bearing in mind that NK cells are highly susceptible to stress), resulting in elevation of Epstein-Barr virus (IgA VCA >100) which eventually resulted in cancer. Research have shown that many cancers are caused by virus (about 21%)notably EBV, HPV, Hepatitis B, etc. My approach to cancer prevention and treatment, in addition to conventional treatments such as RT and CT, is to find ways to support and enhance our own immune system, and to remove the likely causes. In my case, I had EBV for one and a half years before cancer was detected. Subsequent to treatments and resolution of the tumor, EBV remained at >100. My search for treatment of EBV ended with transfer Factor which managed to bring EBV level down to 6.61 after 3 weeks of supplementation. I was also on therapeutic doses of many vitamins and herbal supplements but EBV remained at >100 until Transfer Factor was added. In conclusion, each of us is in a way unique and each cancer is also possibly unique and we have to play an active role in our search for a cure. Regards Yeong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2005 Report Share Posted January 4, 2005 yes, one of them had, but chemo has saved counstless lives you can't say for that leatrile CElizabeth Otto <godshealingchild wrote: , Christina wrote:> 2 people in my family went on it and both died rather quicklySorry about your family members. Just a question though. Had these family members gone the chemo/radiation or surgery route before taking the B17? I had read that once the immune system has been killed by the chemo/radiation treatment that the laetrile would not be effective except for perhaps extending the life a little longer and perhaps helping to alleviate pain. Cannot remember the source of this info. Surgery more often that not spreads the cancer wildly thoughout the body.Liz S.C. «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2005 Report Share Posted January 4, 2005 Hi Christina: There is NO PROOF Chemo cures Cancer! NONE! It does destroy the immune system and weakens the patient! Do a search on it on Google you'll get the real facts. IF had Cancer I would NOT do Chemo or allow it to be cut out. Cancer is curable! Walt - Christina Tuesday, January 04, 2005 12:37 PM Re: Re: *IS CANCER MERELY A VITAMIN DEFICIENCY DISEASE? yes, one of them had, but chemo has saved counstless lives you can't say for that leatrile CElizabeth Otto <godshealingchild wrote: , Christina wrote:> 2 people in my family went on it and both died rather quicklySorry about your family members. Just a question though. Had these family members gone the chemo/radiation or surgery route before taking the B17? I had read that once the immune system has been killed by the chemo/radiation treatment that the laetrile would not be effective except for perhaps extending the life a little longer and perhaps helping to alleviate pain. Cannot remember the source of this info. Surgery more often that not spreads the cancer wildly thoughout the body.Liz S.C. «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2005 Report Share Posted January 5, 2005 I never said it cures cancer, as there is no cure for cancer, it has saved many people though, like myself and many people I know. Lance Armstrong had testicular cancer that spread to his lungs and brain and he is now 8 years cancer free simply through chemo, he did nothing else, how do you explain that? CWalt <kortron wrote: Hi Christina: There is NO PROOF Chemo cures Cancer! NONE! It does destroy the immune system and weakens the patient! Do a search on it on Google you'll get the real facts. IF had Cancer I would NOT do Chemo or allow it to be cut out. Cancer is curable! Walt - Christina Tuesday, January 04, 2005 12:37 PM Re: Re: *IS CANCER MERELY A VITAMIN DEFICIENCY DISEASE? yes, one of them had, but chemo has saved counstless lives you can't say for that leatrile CElizabeth Otto <godshealingchild wrote: , Christina wrote:> 2 people in my family went on it and both died rather quicklySorry about your family members. Just a question though. Had these family members gone the chemo/radiation or surgery route before taking the B17? I had read that once the immune system has been killed by the chemo/radiation treatment that the laetrile would not be effective except for perhaps extending the life a little longer and perhaps helping to alleviate pain. Cannot remember the source of this info. Surgery more often that not spreads the cancer wildly thoughout the body.Liz S.C. «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.