Guest guest Posted December 21, 2004 Report Share Posted December 21, 2004 Dear Mr. Crow, Thank you for your responsive dissenting opinion. This is what our constitutional right to free speech is all about. I appreciate that you are a long term member of the group and have developed a reputation and I CERTAINLY agree with you regarding JAMA admitting in the 4/98 issue that medical care is the 4th leading cause of death and disability in America especially after personally witnessing the [premeditated iatrogenic Medicare funded genocide committed against my Mother. If the group doesn't object to the solicitation for distribution of products that have not been tested or been on the market very long, it's no big deal to me. As far as my posting my initial opinion of your post, if you are going to be a distributor, you might want to consider my impression when planning your marketing strategy . Regarding the analogy of comparing alternative therapies with the farcisal charade of the FDA's alleged testing of drugs for safety before distributing them into the food chain: their failure to do so is no excuse to pattern ourselves after them. If you have verifiable studies to support the efficacy of the product you promote with the claim you profess of the benefit of consuming them, please fax them to 404 231 2223. As objectionable as the " testing " might be, what I usually do is ask salespersons to forward to me a sample for muscle testing based on the different organs for my " scientific study " . It is one that the FDA would never approve and I myself am still quite skeptical of after using it for over 20 years, but the results seem to be repeatable and it's better than the guessing and prescribing and then changing after watching the side effects that is practiced in medicine. Thank you for this " debate " . While I certainly agree with you that pharmaceutical companies' " scientific " methods are not to be admired, this is also the argument not to emulate them for although their wares may or may not be benificial and are often lifethreatening, at least they are covered by insurance and are not expected to be covered with a 100% " copayment " as are alternative health care opinions such as you have proposed. Here is my address if you wish to send a sample: Thank you, Dr. Sandra Lance, D.C. Lenox Chiropractic Clinic 9B Lenox Pointe Atlanta, Ga. 30324 ***************************** > Dear Mr. Duncan Crow, > I appose your soliciting on this as this is not a > commercial supported group. Otherwise, I solicit the members of the to > encourage the Moderator to be more selective in allowing virtual > reality internet salesmen from using thsi group to market their > experimental wares. Yes it is true that we seek alternative care > because we have become disillusioned with allopathic medicine, but > let's gullible to spending our resources on products that the salesman > admits have not been marketed long enough to prove the claims he > espouses. Thank you, Dr. Sandra Lance, D.C. 404 233 4433 I appreciate your candor Sandra. I think we can agree that, according to a recent peer-reviewed journal about 85% of medicine has never been passed by the standards you hold out, and probably wouldn't, and epidemiological studies show that properly prescribed medication is the third leading killer of Americans. However, equating those miserable failures with potential safety or efficacy issues of a product you know nothing about at this point is most unwise, and I think you'll agree with that too on re-reading your post. All will be revealed in due course, and by the way the formula has been used for years, just not marketed. You may not realize it yet, but as a contributing member of the group ( hopefully a respected one I have the right to mention my belief that the formulation is on to something good based on my own due diligence. You can agree I'm sure that everyone is able to do likewise, using their own frames of reference and cautions. Although I am not a distributor for this product, I intnd to be, and I think we can explore this together. Although you've shown only a healthy skepticism, and that's fine, other M.D.s and chiropractors who ar equally important have expressed curiosity. That's preferable in my view, because even healthy skepticism based on no facts isn't all that useful. In other words there was no need to write that, was there? regards, Duncan Crow (copyright waived) http://profiles./duncancrow/ --- live and help live... --- - " Duncan Crow " <duncancrow Sunday, December 19, 2004 10:57 PM Re: Motion for Moderator to Ban Solicitations for Profit on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2004 Report Share Posted December 21, 2004 > As objectionable as the " testing " might be, what I > usually do is ask salespersons to forward to me a sample for muscle > testing based on the different organs for my " scientific study " . Sorry Sandra, I don't send samples to US clients and this particular corporation doesn't give away samples at all. Besides the logistics of getting it to the mail and the cost involved I just won't go through the hassle of mailing them from Canada; too much FDA paperwork. However the product is cheap enough that anyone can afford to buy a quart and there's a fulfillment center in Virginia. I'll release my newspaper column on the energy nutrient on Wednesday, and put the commercial link in the group's link area. Then I'll post an advertisement to the list at the end of the month. There are free samples available for other products though, that get sent from the USA. I'll post those links as well. regards, Duncan Crow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.