SPLENDA SWEETNER = LYING AND DECEIT

[Guest guest]

http://www.wnho.net/splenda.htm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPLENDA IS NOT SPLENDID!

By James Bowen, M.D.

© 2003

Web Site: http://www.bowendrjim.com

E-Mail: jim

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MENU

Home

WNHO

Memberships

Text Links

Banner Links

Announcements

Natural Health News

Aspartame

Chemtrails

Environment

Fluoride

GM Foods

Health

Freedom

Monosodium Glutamate

(MSG)

Vaccinations

Articles Index

WNHO Professional

Resource Directory

Programs and

Services

WNHO

Certifications

WNHO

Endorsements

WNHO Awards

WNHO Recommended

Reading

World Council of

Postsecondary & Religious Education

WCPRE Accredited

Schools

Ministerial

Credentials

History of the

WNHO

About Dr. Dussault

Our Legal

Documents

Governing Boards

Link To Us

Awards This Site Has

Won

Web Rings

Contact Information

Guestbook

 

 

 

 

 

In a simple word you would just as soon have DDT in your food as

Splenda, because sucralose is a chlorocarbon. The chlorocarbons have

long been famous for causing organ, genetic, and reproductive damage.

It should be no surprise, therefore, that the testing of sucralose,

even at less than the level demanded by FDA rules, reveals that it has

been shown to cause up to 40%shrinkage of the thymus: A gland that is

the very foundation of our immune system. It also causes swelling of

the liver and kidneys, and CALCIFICATION of the kidney.

Lying and deceit on the artificial sweetener issue has been

the FDA's

Modus Operandi ever since Donald Rummsfeld broke everything decent in

the US government to put Aspartame on the market as a "contract on

humanity". It has no commercial purpose other than a contract on

humanity. Either they have done but little testing of sucralose, or

they are so afraid of what the public would think of sucralose, and the

government if the public but knew what was going on, that they will not

tell us! BECAUSE: we have been told nothing about the extensive studies

which would have to have been done if very reasonable, and

scientifically sound FDA rules had been followed.

Such study results as have been made known, catches the

company in

great big whopper lies! When questioned about the Thymus shrinkage

which would disqualify sucralose forever, by the FDA's own rules, the

company merely said. "Well the rats wouldn't eat the food with

sucralose in it, so the thymus lost weight from starvation." The FDA

allowed that explanation even though it was an admission that the rats

hadn't ingested the required amount of sucralose, but had demonstrated

immense damage anyway! In fact, if research animals won't voluntarily

eat the required dose of experimental substance it can be given by

gastric gavage, which is a common and well-known research method.

Moreover, the rats so fed were only 7-20% underweight Vs the average

for the control group. Rats who are severely starved to create a 30%

weight loss, only shrink their thymus by an average of 7%. The net

conclusion from all this is, that both the thymus shrinkage and the

growth retardation caused by sucralose were enough to in each case

disqualify sucralose from the marketplace.

All of these KNOWN findings only pointed out that the testing

was so

flawed that it could never be used as a basis for approval on one hand,

and that the effects which were detected anyway were so severe that

sucralose should never be allowed into the human body. It should be

classified right along with DDT, and dioxin as illegal to even release

into the environment much less put into your body!

The company blandly and heinously denied that sucralose is a

chlorocarbon. They stated that it was merely a salt, like sodium

chloride! That whopper wouldn't even get past a sophomore chemistry

student. Facts, and concern for human welfare are obviously irrelevant

in our Bush dominated government, and the Rummsfeld dominated media.

What their incredulously lying statements about what sucralose is, did

bring to mind though, is that it flies in the face of what its known

breakdown product , 1, 6, dichloro, fructose, is: Another highly toxic

chlorocarbon. They admittedly did not do toxicity studies on it, as FDA

rules require, or perhaps the findings were so dangerous that they felt

it better to confess to the "minor omission", of not even complying

with the law and doing the required studies! They further tried to side

step the toxicity issue by saying "Sucralose is not even absorbed from

the digestive tract anyway, because it is after all, a chlorocarbon.":

Another bold faced lie. Chlorocarbons are significantly absorbed from

the digestive tract and sucralose is no exception! It is significantly

absorbed from the GI tract. Of course, at that point their lies had

compounded and contradicted themselves.

What you need to know about sucralose is that it is of a class

of

compounds which places it amongst some of the most dangerous chemicals

on earth. The known studies, and science verify this fact. Lies and

dissimulations, which have been totally, and inexcusably left unchecked

by the FDA, point to gross governmental/corporate corruption, and

massive cover up and peril. They say "Oh, It's just made from sugar,

what could be more natural and harmless."

Sincerely,

Dr. Jim Bowen