What if Everything You Thought You Knew About Aids Was Wrong?

[Guest guest]

WHAT IF EVERYTHING YOU THOUGHT

YOU KNEW ABOUT AIDS WAS WRONG?

By Christine Maggiore

 

 

 

 

On April 23, 1984 Dr. Robert Gallo of

the National Institutes of Health announced that he had discovered "the

probable cause of AIDS", a new retrovirus later named HIV.

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Gallo's statement was made at

an international press conference, circumventing essential rules of the

scientific process: No research study providing evidence for his claim

about HIV had been published for review in any scientific or medical

journal. By the following day, the New York Times had turned Gallo's

unsubstantiated statement into a certainty with front page reports on

"the AIDS virus", bringing all funding and research for non-viral

causes of AIDS to an abrupt halt.

 

 

 

 

(2) When the evidence Gallo

offered for his statement was published several weeks later, this paper

revealed that he was unable to find the HIV virus in more than half of

the AIDS patients he had studied.

 

 

 

 

(3) While he was able to detect

antibodies in most, antibodies do not cause or predict disease and are

an indication of immunity. A congressional investigation later

determined that Gallo had not discovered HIV. The virus he claimed to

have found had actually been taken from a sample sent to him by a

French virologist, Luc Montagnier.

 

 

 

 

(4) At the 1993 International

AIDS Conference, Dr. Montagnier stated that "HIV may be benign."

 

 

 

 

(5) The high correlation that

appears to exist between HIV and AIDS is not proof of causation, but

rather an artifact of the AIDS definition. AIDS is defined as any one

of 29 old diseases

 

(such as pneumonia, yeast infection, TB, cancer, diarrhea, and

salmonella) that occur in a person who has also registered positive on

an HIV antibody test. These diseases are called AIDS only when they

occur in people who test HIV antibody positive. All these diseases can

be found in people who test HIV negative. There are no diseases

exclusive to AIDS, and AIDS itself is not a disease.

 

 

 

 

(6) The Formula for AIDS:

 

Pneumonia + HIV Antibodies = AIDS

Pneumonia + HIV Antibodies = Pneumonia

Diarrhea + HIV Antibodies = AIDS

Diarrhea + HIV Antibodies = Diarrhea

 

Like most of our present AIDS

experts, Gallo came from a group of government cancer virologists who

had spent almost two decades and over $20 billion seeking proof for the

theory that cancer is caused by a contagious, sexually transmitted

virus. Since retroviruses do not kill cells and cancer is a condition

marked by rapid cell growth, this type of virus seemed a likely

candidate for a cancer virus. But 20 years of research devoted to

retroviruses failed to produce proof for the concept of contagious,

sexually transmitted cancer.

 

 

 

 

(7) Since 1984, most of these

cancer experts and all $48 billion of AIDS research has focused

exclusively on the hypothesis that the retrovirus HIV causes AIDS.

Although Gallo claimed that HIV caused AIDS by destroying the T Cells

of the immune system, 20 years of cancer research proved that

retroviruses do not destroy cells. There is still no evidence in the

scientific literature demonstrating that HIV destroys T Cells. Despite

the fact that more money has been spent on HIV that the combined total

for all other viruses in history, there is no proof for the hypothesis

that HIV is the cause of AIDS.

 

 

 

 

(8) Although a hypothesis is "an

unproved assumption tentatively accepted to provide a basis for further

investigation and debate", no critical discussion of the HIV hypothesis

has been allowed in scientific and medical forums. A good hypothesis is

defined by its ability to solve problems and mysteries, make accurate

predictions and produce results. The HIV/AIDS hypothesis, after more

than 15 years, fails to meet these criteria. As noted by Dr. Kary

Mullis, 1993 Noble Laureate for inventing the PCR technique used in HIV

testing "It's not even probable, let alone scientifically proven that

HIV causes AIDS. If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there

should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively

demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There are no

such documents."

 

 

 

 

(9) In fact, there are no cases

of AIDS in the medical literature in which HIV has proved to be the

only health risk factor.

 

 

 

 

(10) As there is no naturally

occurring antibody that is specific to any one disease, the HIV

antibody test is non-specific.

(Human beings produce polyclonal antibodies that do not have

"monogamous relationships" with the microbes that elicit them).

 

 

 

 

(11) In fact, there are more than

60 conditions, many found in the blood of normal, healthy people that

have been documented to cross-react on HIV tests and cause false

positive results. These conditions include antibodies produced in

response to a cold, the flu, flu vaccinations, hepatitis, herpes,

immunizations, rheumatoid arthritis, pregnancy and prior pregnancy.

 

 

 

 

(12) The HIV test is also

non-standardized, which means there is no single accepted definition

for what constitutes a positive result. For example, a person testing

HIV positive by Canadian standards could be considered HIV negative in

France or Africa. Standards may even vary between laboratories in the

same city.

 

 

 

 

(13) Accuracy for the HIV test

has never been established by virus isolation, the only means by which

such a test can be "calibrated". Claims of accuracy are based on

reproducibility.

(getting the same result from the same sample).

 

 

 

(14) Newer "viral load" tests do not isolate or measure actual virus.

 

What if Everything You Thought You Knew About

Aids Was Wrong?

 

http://davidicke.com/