Guest guest Posted December 1, 2004 Report Share Posted December 1, 2004 > Feature story from the Chicago Tribune > > TV ads key front in drug price war > Health insurers strike back against marketers of expensive remedies > > http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0411270321nov28,1,5244884.story > > By Bruce Japsen > Tribune staff reporter > Published November 28, 2004 > > Not even NFL Hall of Fame quarterback John Elway can win against the > powers of managed care. > > Known for his clock-chasing touchdown drives to win football games, > Elway this year became a television pitchman for the heartburn pill of a > Lake Forest drugmaker trying to gain more ground in the market. > > Yet despite a $100 million-plus TV ad campaign with a spot featuring the > former Denver Broncos great, TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc.'s > prescription Prevacid is rapidly losing sales to an over-the-counter > competitor. > > Prevacid's slip is a rare victory for cost-conscious health insurance > companies and employers fighting the pervasive and persuasive television > advertising that has flourished since late 1997, when the U.S. Food and > Drug Administration eased restrictions on TV ads for prescription drugs. > > Overall, the drug industry spends more than $3 billion a year--triple > what it did just seven years ago--encouraging consumers to seek certain > companies' remedies if they are feeling tired, anxious, gassy, in need > of more " confidence " or maybe just a purple pill. > > Health plans say the TV spots are a key driver in the dramatic increase > in prescription drug costs because they prompt more people to demand the > latest, and often most expensive, brand-name prescriptions. > > Health plan and employer spending on prescription drugs has risen at an > annual rate of 15 percent each of the last four years, far exceeding > inflation. > > Experts attribute much of the rise to TV and other direct-to-consumer > advertising that end-runs doctor advice. > > Still, sales of Prevacid, and others in its class of drugs known as > proton pump inhibitors, are either flat or falling, in contrast to > double-digit growth of other top-selling prescription drugs promoted on > TV in the United States. > > Because Prevacid is therapeutically equivalent to other proton pump > inhibitors, the company's own studies show, health insurance plans are > removing it from preferred positions on their drug lists. Health plans > are encouraging the use of over-the-counter Prilosec, which sells for > less than 80 cents a pill, instead of prescription competitors Prevacid > or AstraZeneca PLC's Nexium, which sell for about $4 a pill. > > " Managed care has had an impact when we have had extraordinarily similar > drugs, " said Dr. Allan Korn, chief medical officer for the Chicago-based > Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, a trade group representing some > of the nation's largest health plans. " Managed-care plans have a tiered > structure to get people to think about this. People then sort of just > move on. " > > Through use of up to four tiers, health insurers work with employers to > place more expensive drugs in a more expensive tier so health plan > enrollees think twice before paying a higher co-payment, especially when > a cheaper option is available. > > HMO giant Humana Inc., for example, worked with interested employers to > raise health plan enrollees' monthly co-payments on Prevacid, Nexium and > other brand-name proton pump inhibitors to between $40 and $50 after > Prilosec became available over-the-counter last fall. > > Humana and other health plans have also bombarded enrollees with > marketing blitzes, using direct mail and automated phone calls that > describe cost and price differences between over-the-counter Prilosec, > which is not covered, and the brand names. > > Since last fall Humana has twice sent coupons for a free two-week supply > of over-the-counter Prilosec to its members who take prescription > heartburn drugs. And members appear to be using them. Humana said the > coupons, which may be sent again early next year, have had a 19-percent > redemption rate--sharply higher than those in the grocery store industry. > > William Fleming, vice president of pharmacy benefit management for > Humana, said Humana is not reluctant to engage in direct-to-consumer > advertising of its own. > > " We believe the consumer needs to be engaged in knowing what things cost > as well as what are the needs to the diseases they have, " Fleming said. > > The strategy is working and saving health plans and employers tens of > millions of dollars. > > Although Humana will not disclose specific savings, the Louisville-based > health plan has seen a 3.4 percent decline in prescriptions filled for > proton pump inhibitors from January through September of this year--in > sharp contrast to the 35 percent increase the year before. > > For TAP and other makers of widely advertised brand-name heartburn > drugs, even additional spending on TV advertising cannot counter such > moves by health plans. TAP's Prevacid sales were down nearly 8 percent, > to $711 million, in the third quarter--a surprise to the company that > said in July 2002 that it did not " anticipate a significant impact on > Prevacid with the introduction of generic or over-the-counter Prilosec. " > > TAP would not comment on its TV strategy for Prevacid, which is one of > the nation's most expensive pharmaceutical advertising campaigns, > industry analysts say. > > Rival affected > > TAP is not alone. Prevacid's even more frequently promoted rival, > Nexium, saw its U.S. sales plummet 17 percent to $651 million in the > third quarter. > > What's more, Nexium's maker was hit last month with a consumer group's > lawsuit over some of the company's earlier ads promoting Nexium. > > Members of the Prescription Access Litigation Project, a national > coalition of unions and consumer groups, sued AstraZeneca PLC, accusing > the company of a misleading ad campaign that claimed Nexium was > significantly better than Prilosec. > > AstraZeneca makes both drugs, known in the older Prilosec ads and the > newer Nexium ads as the " purple pill. " > > The consumer group says the two drugs are " nearly identical " and that > the drugmaker was trying to reap a higher price for essentially the same > drug. The suit alleges AstraZeneca sought to preserve its market share > and profits as the patent on its blockbuster drug Prilosec was set to > expire in 2002, by " initiating a massive and misleading advertising and > promotional campaign to deceive consumers into purchasing Nexium, a > nearly identical new drug, " the group said in a release. > > For its part, AstraZeneca rejected the claims made in the suit and said > its U.S.-approved information for Nexium shows advantages over Prilosec > in " healing damage to the lining of the esophagus and heartburn control > in a larger percentage of patients, " company spokeswoman Rachel > Bloom-Baglin said. > > AstraZeneca would not comment on its TV ad strategy for Nexium, but the > company stands by the need for direct-to-consumer advertising. > > " It drives patients to go see their doctor for conditions that they > might not otherwise seek treatment for, and that is a good thing, " > Bloom-Baglin added. > > But some doctors and insurers say Nexium is not a significant > improvement over Prilosec. Even AstraZeneca's own head-to-head > comparison shows Nexium is only about 3 percent better at controlling > and healing damage. > > Meanwhile, Abbott Laboratories, which owns half of TAP, touted > head-to-head studies showing " Nexium offers no clinical benefit over > Prevacid. " > > Other insurers have tried to combat sales of brand names advertised on > TV with similar strategies. > > When the popular allergy drug Claritin began selling over-the-counter in > 2002, rival brand-name drugs in the same therapeutic class, such as > Clarinex, Zyrtec and Allegra, became more expensive on insurers' lists > of medications. > > In January 2003, health insurance giant Aetna Inc., for example, began > to require health plan members to " precertify " and obtain the insurer's > approval before members could take the more expensive non-sedating > antihistamines. > > Brand-name sales hurt > > Drugmakers have since bemoaned the deterioration of sales of their more > expensive brand names. > > Schering-Plough Corp. said in its third-quarter earnings report that > U.S. Clarinex sales declined 8 percent to $118 million " due to the > continued contraction in the prescription antihistamine market, stemming > from the late-2002 introduction of over-the-counter Claritin and other . > . . non-sedating antihistamines, coupled with a decline in market share. " > > Drug benefit managers and health plans say their direct-mail marketing > and preferred drug lists can be effective, especially when prescription > drugs come off patent protection and either a generic or an > over-the-counter version becomes available. > > Insurers say they will continue to pursue ways to combat rising costs > when drugmakers market higher-cost products that work only equally as > well as less expensive medicines. > > " We have the unique responsibility of managing the resources of families > and companies who are trying to keep health insurance affordable, " said > Korn, of Blue Cross. > > - - - > > COMPARABLE HEARTBURN DRUGS > > Over-the-counter > > Prilosec > > Below 80 cents per pill > > Total sales (2004): $304.2 million > > Prescription only > > Prevacid > > $4 per pill > > Total sales (2004): $2.19 billion > > Prescription only > > Nexium > > $4 per pill > > Total sales (2004): $2.10 billion > > Note: Total U.S. sales Jan. to July, 2004 > > Chicago Tribune > > - - - > > Spending millions to gain billions > > Drugmakers are spending millions to market their more expensive brands > of prescriptions. > > The leading medicines listed are based on total media advertising for > 2003. > > DRUG COMPANY HEALTH PROBLEM U.S. SALES > ADVERTISING > IN MILLIONS > Nexium AstraZeneca PLC Heartburn $3.1 billion $257.2 > Clarinex Schering-Plough Corp. Allergy $685 million $129.2 > Allegra Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. Allergy $1.6 billion $125.5 > Viagra Pfizer Inc. Impotency $1.1 billion $112.5 > Lipitor Pfizer Inc. Cholesterol $6.8 billion $109.2 > Advair GlaxoSmithKline PLC Asthma $2.3 billion $101.7 > Celebrex Pfizer Inc. Arthritis $2.6 billion $95.9 > Prevacid TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. Heartburn $4.0 billion $95.3 > Zocor Merck & Co. Cholesterol $4.4 billion $95.2 > Zyrtec Pfizer Inc. Allergy $1.2 billion $95.1 > Note: Sales figures are for 2003 > Sources: IMS Health, Nielsen Monitor-Plus > Chicago Tribune > > > 2004, Chicago Tribune > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.