Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Chemtrails - A New Look At A Mystery In The Skies

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Rense.com

 

----------

 

 

 

Chemtrails - A New Look At

A Mystery In The Skies

By Colin Bennett

11-14-4

 

 

 

The so-called " chemtrails " that are seen almost everywhere in the skies of

the world are an incredible phenomenon of our time, if only because like UFO

sightings, the broad span of social, political, and intellectual life of

major nations largely ignores such things utterly. Even those with

imagination (artists, playwrights, novelists, poets) ignore such anomalistic

things as UFOs and chemtrails, even though they offer images, symbols,

metaphors, intrigue, mysterious technology, and much more besides! This

changing of the skies of the world full previously of traditional pantomime

clouds to a sky scored by lines of whitish-grey streaks is totally ignored

by major news, media, and communication outlets. This is strange again given

that the effects are quite spectacular and beautiful when lit by the evening

sun. The trails spread out at different rates, they come from different

angles, and the aircraft that create them can be seen streaking across the

sky, often several at once, and at extremely high speeds.

 

The word " chemtrails " is used here for lack of a better word, but it is

unlikely that what we see spreading out across the sky are chemicals of some

sort. Such an amount of chemicals would surely have the most immediate and

obvious effect on both our minds and environment. We would be please to hear

from environmental group who have more specialized knowledge about any kind

of chemical/environmental approach.

 

Over the past year, the Combat Diaries team have conducted a special

investigation of chemtrails over Britain. With the help of specialists (some

ex Royal Air Force), we conducted a 16 hour period of observation by web,

telephone, and amateur radio of the skies over America and Central Europe,

from first light to last light, taking into account time differences. The

results were quite disturbing. It was obvious that simultaneous operation by

large numbers of quite visible aircraft were being mounted over continental

areas on both sides of the Atlantic. Through contacts, we managed also to

get reports on this selected same day from the civilian staff of merchant

and cruise ships crossing the Atlantic. They reported that sky trails were

visible in whilst sailing in mid Atlantic.

 

Thus we concluded that chemtrails represent a continuous operation of

incredible magnitude. The aircraft involved show remarkably similar

characteristic and performance, though their profile we have yet to find in

any book of aircraft recognition. Roughly, they resemble in shape and size

the Boeing 757 (the type that crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11), but

carried no markings. This is remarkable in itself, because technically it is

illegal. Measured by range theodolite and ex-service hand-held rangefinders,

they were doing approximately the same speed at the same height. The speed

was steady, quite precisely maintained, being 1200 ­1400 mph. This is

somewhat high for an outmoded passenger aircraft type, meant for inland

short/medium range commuter flights at a top speed of 450 mph!

 

These things are wonders in themselves, but it is the sheer number of these

pseudo 757-type aircraft that is beyond belief. On this chosen sample day,

our reporters in France, Germany and Holland, Spain, Italy and Israel alone

reported at noon the sky trails of no less that 234 almost identical

aircraft at between 40-50,00 feet Since this hourly rate continued during

the day it represented some 2340 sorties over ten hours. Worldwide,

multiplying the quite reasonable factor of 10, we have 23,400 sorties per

day by planes of a non-military non-supersonic configuration, travelling at

speeds equivalent to the combat speed of F16 or Typhoon Euro-fighter.

 

By comparison, NATO figures for annual full-scale exercises amount to

something like 300 (jet supersonic) combat sorties at full stretch for the

same time period, involving some no more than 150 aircraft. Again, the

absence of reported noise is strange. Even a single Tornado on afterburner

over central London would shake the population up considerably.

 

Since our observers at military and civilian airfields reported no such

activity by any such aircraft, we have here a modern mystery in our skies

visible to all on a clear day. National airspace regulations don't appear to

be a problem at all with any country as far as these infringements are

concerned.

 

This vast number of aircraft appear to have no detectable bases, they have

no apparent air-refuelling needs, they do not carry drop tanks, and the

routes appear to stretch across the sky from all compass points, often

crossing one another on a pretty random basis. They appear also to have no

detectible manufacturers, support base, or refuelling facilities. And they

don't appear to land or take off! Again, since no air force in the world

(not even the United States Air Force) has any supersonic transport

aircraft, the presence of many hundreds of supersonic transport aircraft is

rather strange!

 

The cost such of such visible operations on a worldwide basis by the

approximately the same type of powerful aircraft must be stupendous. The

maintenance, fuelling, and repair facilities of such a great number of

high-performance aircraft can only be imagined. The training schemes and

accommodation of the personnel appear not to exist! Since no such numbers of

this aircraft type are on manufacturer's lists, and the number that have

been manufactured are all busy on conventional routes flying conventional

passengers and cargo, we have here a true mystery of our time.

 

Where are they from, and what are they doing on their seemingly purposeless

routes across the sky?

 

Investigations are continuing. We are trying, by various means to monitor

their VHF, but they do not appear to have any measurable frequency signature

and neither do they appear to make any physical noise. This again is amazing

because the represent a very great number of aircraft that are entering and

leaving (an indeed manoeuvring) inside national airspace at will, with no

recognition signals, and no visible identification. Since they are

supersonic, they are over the visible horizon in seconds (the comparatively

lazy motion of a 400-mph 747 Jumbo may be compared to them). Where these

many aircraft all break into Mach 1 is another mystery.

 

We have discovered something else that multiplies these astonishments. Using

(passive) night scope infrared amplifiers, we found that the operations did

not cease after nightfall!

 

This means that roughly speaking we can possibly multiply the scale of

operations by a factor of two, bringing us into absurd realms as regards

cost, maintenance, and purpose.

 

Our collective " not-seeing " is unusual if only because chemtrails are much

more visible and more frequent than UFO visitations. We are forced to

consider the idea that levels of conscious acceptance and recognition within

a culture have often nothing to do with how much " evidence " is available.

All anomalistic structures have this common peculiarity. Somehow, like a

bioelectric switch, as a society we turn most anomalies " off " as far as

social cognition is concerned. This is a most common effect. The phenomenon

may be large or small, fantastic or mundane, it makes no difference. We

cannot see the kitchen matchbox in front of us, say, because we are have

been diverted into thinking about something else. We don't have enough RAM

to hold all our files open at the same time!

 

>From a Fortean point of view, the phenomenon of chemtrails might enable us

to construct a new and healthier definition of what we mean by " skepticism. "

We might see skepticism not a revealing of mundane truth, so much as an

automated control mechanism by means of which maintain a kind of

wonder-management rather than differentiate fact from fiction. This was

Charles Fort's original view of the function of skepticism. It puts " doubt "

in a new dynamic context rather than it being seen as a depressing

semi-automated denial of all that is wondrous and magical in the world.

 

Meantime, we are starting the long, hard road of corresponding with the

appropriate civil and military authorities about chemtrails.

 

We can hear both Franz Kafka and Charles Fort laughing from their graves!

 

Colin Bennett was born in Robin Hood's Sherwood Forest, within arrow-shot of

the Sheriff of Nottingham's castle. He left school after studying science

and mathematics, became a professional musician, then a mercenary soldier

before winning a scholarship to read English at Balliol College, University

of Oxford.

 

After leaving Oxford, he had several plays performed on the professional

stage in London including the Royal Court Theatre before retraining as an

electronics engineer to cure what he calls " a bad dose of left-liberal

decadence. " After his reconstruction, he then ran his own electronics

consultancy and printing firm. He has had two novels published, and now

lives within a spear-throw of Portobello Road, London, and hopes he has done

with reconstructions. He is frequently consulted on security, conspiracies,

and computer hacking. He now heads a team who spend all their time running

the Combat Diaries web site at http://www.combat-diaries.co.uk

 

He is the author of Looking for Orthon (Paraview Press) a biography of Georg

e Adamski. His following book, on the life work, and ideas of Charles Fort,

was Politics of the Imagination (Head Press). This won the Anomalist Award

for Best Biography, 2002.

 

His third biography is due out in March 2005. This is An American Demonology

(Head Press) the story of Captain Edward Ruppelt, who headed Project Blue

Book in the early 1950s. This Project was the official United States Air

Force investigation into the UFO phenomenon. Both the above books are

available on Amazon.

 

http://phenomenamagazine.com/0/editorial.asp?aff_id=0 & this_cat=Area+5

1 & action=page & obj_id=1821 & type_id=3 & cat_id=132 & sub_id=0

 

 

Comment

>From John Albrecht

11-15-4

 

Jeff,

 

I offer a better study concept, and discount the conclusions of the article.

 

A more valid study would be to track a number of commercial airliners from

take-off to landing, using positioned observers along the route, using the

flight-plans, and just WATCH to see if these " in-study " commercial airliners

generate " chemtrails " . There is already enough data to suggest optimum

airports to start the study (history of " chemtrails " reports, satellite

photos, etc). One could study/photograph the individual aircraft pre-flight

(looking for nozzles, intake of unknown supplies, etc), and one could also

put people ON each flight in the study to look for supporting data from

within the plane. One could study airport operations to see if there are

hidden repositories of chemicals, special fuels, and places where the plane

is serviced in an unusual manner. One could study the service records of the

aircraft involved, talk to the people who hands-on service the planes, etc.

 

It is just too easy to discount the conclusions of the referenced article,

if one assumes the base observation of flight altitudes at 50,000 ft is

incorrect. Surveying equipment and hand-held range-finders are NOT designed

to measure such distances. They ARE optimized to measure distances to

relatively near objects. For such distances, a much longer observational

baseline, or radar, is required. One can have incredibly accurate scientific

equipment, but if used outside of its operational parameters..the results

are just as meaningless as if the equipment were junk.

 

Given observational error and possible use of jet-streams (a common airline

industry practice), and if we assume the aircraft are really flying at

roughly 25,000 ft (a more common jet-flight altitude), the resulting

calculated air-speed is well within the reach of all just about all jet

aircraft...commercial, private, and military. Calculate it for yourself

(simple trigonometry, folks).

 

If the " operation " is as large as the article suggests, it would be

impossible to keep its existence a secret. The number of people involved,

aircraft, the fuel requirements, the labor and parts support requirements,

and so on are just too vast to hide away.

 

Regards,

John Albrecht

 

«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»

Paranormal_Research - Scientific Data & Health Conspiracies

Paranormal_Research

Subscribe:... Paranormal_Research-

 

Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related,

purely speculation or someone's opinion, If health related always consult with a

qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment,

especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.

 

**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,

any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without

profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the

included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...