Guest guest Posted October 17, 2004 Report Share Posted October 17, 2004 Poisoning Ourselves Slowly With Common Tap Water A new study on children provides more evidence damning fluoridated drinking water. http://www.americanfreepress.net/Alternative_Health/Poisoning_Ourselves_Slowly/poisoning_ourselves_slowly.html By Tom Valentine More than two years ago, I wrote about George Glasser a citizen researcher who blew the whistle on the use of fluorosilicic acid from rock fertilizer processing as the primary source of community water fluoridation. Up until that time, most of us were under the impression that water fluoridation used sodium fluoride (rat poison) a by-product of aluminum manufacturing. Glasser pointed out that more than 75 percent of water fluoridated in the United States has contained the highly toxic fluorosilicic acid since the late 1970s. Now, a massive study has come out of young children subjected to fluorosilicic acid fluoridation in communities in New York. Glasser was the first to stress the excessive toxicity inherent in using the hydrofluorosilicic acid residue that is removed from the industrial pollution control “scrubbers” in the manufacture of phosphate fertilizers. The chemists refer to this material as silicofluorides and have now conclusively shown that the fluoridation material is linked to other heavy metal toxins that are found in drinking water—lead, arsenic, aluminum and cadmium, for example. In the March 2001 issue of the journal Neuro Toxicology, a team of researchers led by Dr. Roger Masters of Dartmouth College reported evidence that public drinking water fluoridated with fluorosilicic acid is linked to higher uptakes of lead in children. After pointing out that since 1992 only about 10 percent of America’s fluoridated communities use sodium fluoride and 90 percent use fluorosilicic acid, the re searchers stated that about 140 million Americans have this chemical placed in their water. Researchers also pointed out that sodium fluoride was tested on animals and approved for human consumption, but fluorosilicic acid had not been so tested and approved. The silicofluoride material is referred to as SiFs by the researchers. The research team has now studied the blood-lead levels in more than 400,000 children in three different samplings. In each case they found a significant link between fluorosilicic acid-treated water (SiFs) and elevated blood levels of lead. INHIBITS BRAIN ACTIVITY In the latest study, the blood levels of about 150,000 children ranging in ages from infant to 6 were analyzed. The samples were collected by the New York State Department of Children’s Health from 1994 through 1998. The comparisons included non-fluoridated and fluorosilicic acid-treated communities of similar size, socioeconomic conditions and similar demographic risk factors. After adjusting for confounding factors, the researchers concluded that the fluorosilicic acid-treated water was equal to or worse than old house paint as a contributor to elevated blood-lead levels. Dr. Masters said these preliminary findings correlate the fluorosilicic acid water treatment and behavior problems that are due to known effects of lead on brain chemistry. Additionally, a study in Germany showed the SiFs may inhibit the enzyme, cholinesterase, in the brain which plays a key role in regulating neurotransmitters, or the signals that carry messages through the brain. “If SiFs are cholinesterase inhibitors, this means that SiFs have effects like the chemical agents linked to Gulf War Syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome and other puzzling conditions that plague millions of Americans,” Masters said. “We need a better understanding of how SiFs behave chemically and physiologically.” Last March, Dr. Masters testified before New Hampshire legislators in favor of The Fluoride Product Quality Control Act. The bill would put the SiFs to a series of tests, and perhaps further research on neurotoxicity and behavior. “If further research confirms our findings,” Masters said, “this may well be the worst environmental poison since leaded gasoline.” The EPA admits it has no data on the health and behavioral effects of SiFs. “Shouldn’t we stop intentionally exposing 140 million Americans to an untested chemical until the risks are extensively and objectively evaluated by independent researchers?” asked Dr. Masters. And, the final insult: There is no conclusive evidence that fluoridation of drinking water significantly improves the teeth of children at all. ™ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.